Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Diagnosis


Recommended Posts

Guest ZombieDracula

I see a psychiatrist for my mental health and I asked for a summary report after my last appointment and under "Other Medical Conditions (Problem List)" it states F64.9 Gender identity disorder, unspecified. 

I have no idea which doctor of mine gave me this dx nor when it was. My psych has medical records from multiple doctors that I have seen over the years.

I used to think I was FTM (back when non binary wasn't a thing I was aware of and I thought that because I knew I wasn't a woman,I must be a man because I didn't know there was anything in between or outside of the binary). I am now non binary just to be clear (well I guess technically I always was non binary but wasn't aware it was a thing). I'm not exactly sure where I fall (I am not sure of another label besides non binary that fits me).

For the dx I have - Does anyone know what it means exactly? I know what gender identity disorder is, but the unspecified part is what is confusing to me because I am pretty sure it was given before I realized that I'm non binary.

I hope this makes sense, and feel free to ask me to clarify anything if need be!!!

- ZD 

Link to comment

"Gender Identity Disorder" is an outdated diagnosis from DSM4. The term was abandoned, because it's pathologizing, at that time they still believed something was wrong with the identity in itself. In the DSM5 manual, this was changed to "Gender Dysphoria". On wikipedia, it's described as follows:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_dysphoria

Quote

Some transgender people and researchers support declassification of GID because they say the diagnosis pathologizes gender variance, reinforces the binary model of gender, and can result in stigmatization of transgender individuals. The official reclassification as gender dysphoria in the DSM-5 may help resolve some of these issues, because the term gender dysphoria applies only to the discontent experienced by some persons resulting from gender identity issues. The American Psychiatric Association, publisher of the DSM-5, states that "gender nonconformity is not in itself a mental disorder. The critical element of gender dysphoria is the presence of clinically significant distress associated with the condition."

 

Link to comment

Not all medical computers are up to date though. I've got a similar issue, however; mine are through US GOVT systems. I have 1 file that still says transsexualism, and a couple that say GID. All of the doctors are tracking it's just gender dysphoria now, and some are ready for it to change again in the coming DSM's. It just happens to be how it's being updated from computer system to computer system.

Link to comment

Hi all - It's not so much about using "updated computer systems".  It's how things were coded at the time.  Physicians, coders, and other providers use the current/accepted codes that were available to them at the time.  Unfortunately those can follow you in your medical record forever and a day.  Generally, the only way to get them changed is by manual intervention.  Someone has to go into whatever system is used and update or delete the outdated code.  That usually doesn't happen unless you the patient push it.  And many times it still won't because most providers are very hesitant to change or remove what someone else coded.  There's also some rules/regs/laws that have to be followed. 

And in the end, that still doesn't correct all the paper records that still exist. 

Link to comment
Guest ZombieDracula

Huh. Well I wonder if I was given that code 7 years ago when I was in inpatient for like a week because I can't figure out where else I would have been given it. I was on the LGBT unit so that makes the most sense. I have no idea when the DSM-5 came out though.

I do not have gender dysphoria nor do I dislike my body due to my gender. I just don't feel anything in regards to gender (so maybe I'm genderless?). I'm also autistic (undiagnosed currently because I don't have $1500 to see someone right now). 

I see my psych again in July (I see him about every 2 months) and I'm going to ask him what he thinks about the code. My counselor has already suggested that I try to get all my medical (mainly mental health based) records from all the places I've been so I think it would be a good idea to do so even though it'll be tough. 

Thank you everyone for responding to this. It's been helpful and I hope that eventually I'll have an idea of where the dx came from and why they put that specific code down in my medical charts. 

- ZD

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   8 Members, 0 Anonymous, 175 Guests (See full list)

    • VickySGV
    • MaeBe
    • Abigail Genevieve
    • SamC
    • Timi
    • Ivy
    • Lenneth
    • Susie
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,025
    • Most Online
      8,356

    JamesyGreen
    Newest Member
    JamesyGreen
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alscully
      Alscully
      (35 years old)
    2. floruisse
      floruisse
      (40 years old)
    3. Jasmine25
      Jasmine25
      (22 years old)
    4. Trev0rK
      Trev0rK
      (26 years old)
  • Posts

    • VickySGV
      I do still carry a Swiss Army knife along with my car keys.  
    • Timi
      Jeans and a white sweater. And cute white sneakers. Delivering balloons to a bunch of restaurants supporting our LGBT Community Center fundraiser today!
    • April Marie
      Congratulations to you!!!This is so wonderful!!
    • missyjo
      I've no desire to present androgynous..nothing wrong with it but I am a girl n wish to present as a girl. shrugs, if androgynous works fir others good. always happy someone finds a solution or happiness    today black jeans  black wedges..purple camisole under white n black polka dot blouse half open   soft smile to all 
    • MaeBe
      I have read some of it, mostly in areas specifically targeted at the LGBTQ+ peoples.   You also have to take into account what and who is behind the words, not just the words themselves. Together that creates context, right? Let's take some examples, under the Department of Health & Human Services section:   "Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of “gender identity” and bases a person’s worth on his or her race, sex, or other identities. This destructive dogma, under the guise of “equity,” threatens American’s fundamental liberties as well as the health and well-being of children and adults alike."   or   "Families comprised of a married mother, father, and their children are the foundation of a well-ordered nation and healthy society. Unfortunately, family policies and programs under President Biden’s HHS are fraught with agenda items focusing on “LGBTQ+ equity,” subsidizing single-motherhood, disincentivizing work, and penalizing marriage. These policies should be repealed and replaced by policies that support the formation of stable, married, nuclear families."   From a wording perspective, who doesn't want to protect the health and well-being of Americans or think that families aren't good for America? But let's take a look at the author, Roger Severino. He's well-quoted to be against LGBTQ+ anything, has standard christian nationalist views, supports conversion therapy, etc.   So when he uses words like "threatens the health and well-being of children and adults alike" it's not about actual health, it's about enforcing cis-gendered ideology because he (and the rest of the Heritage Foundation) believe LGBTQ+ people and communities are harmful. Or when he invokes the family through the lens of, let's just say dog whistles including the "penalization of marriage" (how and where?!), he idealizes families involving marriage of a "biological male to a biological female" and associates LGBTQ+ family equity as something unhealthy.   Who are the radical actors? Who is telling people to be trans, gay, or queer in general? No one. The idea that there can be any sort of equity between LGBTQ+ people and "normal" cis people is abhorrent to the author, so the loaded language of radical/destructive/guise/threaten are used. Families that he believes are "good" are stable/well-ordered/healthy, specifically married/nuclear ones.   Start looking into intersectionality of oppression of non-privileged groups and how that affects the concept of the family and you will understand that these platitudes are thinly veiled wrappers for christian nationalist ideology.   What's wrong with equity for queer families, to allow them full rights as parents, who are bringing up smart and able children? Or single mothers who are working three jobs to get food on plates?
    • Ashley0616
      Well yesterday didn't work like I wanted to. I met a guy and started talking and he was wanting to be in a relationship. I asked my kids on how they thought of me dating a man and they said gross and said no. I guess it's time to look for women. I think that is going to be harder. Oh well I guess.  
    • Ashley0616
      I don't have anything in my dress pocket
    • Carolyn Marie
      This topic reminds me of the lyrics to the Beatles song, "A Little Help From My Friends."   "What do you see when you turn out the lights?"   "I can't tell you but I know it's mine."   Carolyn Marie
    • Abigail Genevieve
      @Ivy have you read the actual document?   Has anyone else out there read it?
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I am reading the Project 2025 document https://www.project2025.org/policy/   This will take some time.  I read the forward and I want to read it again later.   I read some criticism of it outside here and I will be looking for it in the light of what has been posted here and there.  Some of the criticism is bosh.   @MaeBe have you read the actual document?
    • RaineOnYourParade
      *older, not holder, oops :P
    • Abigail Genevieve
      No problem!
    • RaineOnYourParade
      Old topic, but I gotta say my favorites are: "Stop hitting on minors" (doesn't work if you're holder tho) and "Sure as [squid] not you"
    • Carolyn Marie
      Abigail, I think we will just leave the other posts where they are, and the discussion can start anew here.  It is possible to do what you ask, but would disrupt the flow of the discussion in the other thread, and would require more work than it's worth.   Carolyn Marie
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I am in too good a mood to earn my certificate today. I am sure something will happen that will put me on the path to earning it.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...