Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Kansas State GOP Votes to Oppose Validating TG Identity


Carolyn Marie

Recommended Posts

  • Forum Moderator

The republican party is making stands based on what they believe their base core wants. They hate (Bill) Clinton and Obama, and believe they couldn't defeat them because they were not rightwing enough. But their core base consists largely of aging voters who do not tend to want change. This is giving their party a lot of trouble recruiting new younger members. On average, the younger republicans don't tend to support the hard line attitude of the aging party leadership.

 

The aging republican party leadership feels their old steadfast views fading in the public eye. They are reacting the way most people do when they see the world they thought they had built slipping away from them by fighting to restore it. It's that last ditch effort invariably made when defeat is knocking at the door.

 

Because of the "old fogey" type image they are giving themselves, they are in serious danger of waning into a minority party, and possible eventual dissolution. As their aging base dies off, if they don't or can't attract new younger members in greater numbers than they currently do, their party will diminish and die. 

 

The nation over all is slowly becoming more progressive, and this spells the death knell for the old guard of the republican party.

 

There is a saying, "All good things must come to an end". In this case, it's more like, "All bad things must come to an end". Things will change. It's just a matter of time.

 

Lots of love,

Timber Wolf?

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

I remember that character who was rabidly pro Trump.  Yuck.

I found this sentence disturbing:  

He said he was motivated by love to sponsor the resolution because he believes the GOP needs to be willing to stand up for its Christian principles."  I have grown up with the belief that there is a separation between church and state which not only seems to be eroding but also seems to be openly sponsored by one party.  

That being said i also don't find this a very Christian principle.

 

Hugs,

 

Charlize

 
Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator
5 hours ago, Charlize said:

I have grown up with the belief that there is a separation between church and state

 

This is something that is most disturbing to me that the GOP would contravene this "contract" we have had for over 200 years.  No good will come of this.  

 

Jani

Link to comment
8 hours ago, Timber Wolf said:

Because of the "old fogey" type image they are giving themselves, they are in serious danger of waning into a minority party, and possible eventual dissolution. As their aging base dies off, if they don't or can't attract new younger members in greater numbers than they currently do, their party will diminish and die.

Lots of good points, Timber. I'll add that Democrats and Independents make up the majority in the U.S. and Republicans are acting out of fear. And unfortunately they have buckets of money to push their agendas. I'm hopeful though. The up and coming generations have clear and bold ideas - look at the student's response to the school shooting in Florida - and they will put the pressure on. All we have to do is survive our remaining time with the Great Orange One :)

 

Gwen

Link to comment

"God's design for gender as determined by biological sex and not by self-perception,"

 

I find lines like that to be EXTRAORDINARILY disturbing when in direct relationship with government agendas.  Especially to a non religious person like myself, who though I have no problem with what anyone believes, do not believe in any religions per se.  To me this would be akin to making laws governing other humans lives.....with an acknowledged origin basis in a magical fairyland. That is to say, a self serving moral hierarchy created to subdue anyone who does not follow the same tenets.

 

I would label the overt and unabashed integration of church and state, especially in the midwest/deep south areas as a MAJOR priority needing addressed if this nation is going to move forward to foster a more progressive society.  

 

But on a positive note....thank you League of Women Voters for bankrolling a potentially historic case in Penn. , which if you haven't seen the news, came to fruition yesterday and has led to a completely redrawn map for Penn.  Hopefully it is deemed legal and sets a precedence.....which has the potential to literally turn this country upside down in the best way possible....especially after a few election cycles.

 

Jackie

Link to comment
Guest Rachel Gia

Very hard for me to comment on anything (Canadian) accept the arrogance that someone believes they can speak to Gods Plan and invalidating someone who by there own beliefs is Gods Work.

i have been reading various religious based liturature lately and I get the idea the writers feel that by creating a villian or vilifying a demographic , somehow they will unite the general populous.

Tacky politicians engage in this without shame or conscience.

 

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator
4 hours ago, Jackie said:

I find lines like that to be EXTRAORDINARILY disturbing when in direct relationship with government agendas

What's most disturbing is that it is espoused by the party that wants smaller government, i.e less intrusion in personal lives.  I guess only when it suits their agendas. 

 

Jani

Link to comment
  • Who's Online   6 Members, 0 Anonymous, 170 Guests (See full list)

    • MaeBe
    • Ashley0616
    • Abigail Genevieve
    • missyjo
    • KathyLauren
    • KymmieL
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,024
    • Most Online
      8,356

    JamesyGreen
    Newest Member
    JamesyGreen
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alscully
      Alscully
      (35 years old)
    2. floruisse
      floruisse
      (40 years old)
    3. Jasmine25
      Jasmine25
      (22 years old)
    4. Trev0rK
      Trev0rK
      (26 years old)
  • Posts

    • missyjo
      I've no desire to present androgynous..nothing wrong with it but I am a girl n wish to present as a girl. shrugs, if androgynous works fir others good. always happy someone finds a solution or happiness    today black jeans  black wedges..purple camisole under white n black polka dot blouse half open   soft smile to all 
    • MaeBe
      I have read some of it, mostly in areas specifically targeted at the LGBTQ+ peoples.   You also have to take into account what and who is behind the words, not just the words themselves. Together that creates context, right? Let's take some examples, under the Department of Health & Human Services section:   "Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of “gender identity” and bases a person’s worth on his or her race, sex, or other identities. This destructive dogma, under the guise of “equity,” threatens American’s fundamental liberties as well as the health and well-being of children and adults alike."   or   "Families comprised of a married mother, father, and their children are the foundation of a well-ordered nation and healthy society. Unfortunately, family policies and programs under President Biden’s HHS are fraught with agenda items focusing on “LGBTQ+ equity,” subsidizing single-motherhood, disincentivizing work, and penalizing marriage. These policies should be repealed and replaced by policies that support the formation of stable, married, nuclear families."   From a wording perspective, who doesn't want to protect the health and well-being of Americans or think that families aren't good for America? But let's take a look at the author, Roger Severino. He's well-quoted to be against LGBTQ+ anything, has standard christian nationalist views, supports conversion therapy, etc.   So when he uses words like "threatens the health and well-being of children and adults alike" it's not about actual health, it's about enforcing cis-gendered ideology because he (and the rest of the Heritage Foundation) believe LGBTQ+ people and communities are harmful. Or when he invokes the family through the lens of, let's just say dog whistles including the "penalization of marriage" (how and where?!), he idealizes families involving marriage of a "biological male to a biological female" and associates LGBTQ+ family equity as something unhealthy.   Who are the radical actors? Who is telling people to be trans, gay, or queer in general? No one. The idea that there can be any sort of equity between LGBTQ+ people and "normal" cis people is abhorrent to the author, so the loaded language of radical/destructive/guise/threaten are used. Families that he believes are "good" are stable/well-ordered/healthy, specifically married/nuclear ones.   Start looking into intersectionality of oppression of non-privileged groups and how that affects the concept of the family and you will understand that these platitudes are thinly veiled wrappers for christian nationalist ideology.   What's wrong with equity for queer families, to allow them full rights as parents, who are bringing up smart and able children? Or single mothers who are working three jobs to get food on plates?
    • Ashley0616
      Well yesterday didn't work like I wanted to. I met a guy and started talking and he was wanting to be in a relationship. I asked my kids on how they thought of me dating a man and they said gross and said no. I guess it's time to look for women. I think that is going to be harder. Oh well I guess.  
    • Ashley0616
      I don't have anything in my dress pocket
    • Carolyn Marie
      This topic reminds me of the lyrics to the Beatles song, "A Little Help From My Friends."   "What do you see when you turn out the lights?"   "I can't tell you but I know it's mine."   Carolyn Marie
    • Abigail Genevieve
      @Ivy have you read the actual document?   Has anyone else out there read it?
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I am reading the Project 2025 document https://www.project2025.org/policy/   This will take some time.  I read the forward and I want to read it again later.   I read some criticism of it outside here and I will be looking for it in the light of what has been posted here and there.  Some of the criticism is bosh.   @MaeBe have you read the actual document?
    • RaineOnYourParade
      *older, not holder, oops :P
    • Abigail Genevieve
      No problem!
    • RaineOnYourParade
      Old topic, but I gotta say my favorites are: "Stop hitting on minors" (doesn't work if you're holder tho) and "Sure as [squid] not you"
    • Carolyn Marie
      Abigail, I think we will just leave the other posts where they are, and the discussion can start anew here.  It is possible to do what you ask, but would disrupt the flow of the discussion in the other thread, and would require more work than it's worth.   Carolyn Marie
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I am in too good a mood to earn my certificate today. I am sure something will happen that will put me on the path to earning it.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      It's likely most cis-women consider a fitting unnecessary "because they know what  they wear" and get used to the wrong size.  The instructions for what your size is are simple and why go to any further effort?  You measure your bandsize and you measure your max and subtract the two to get the needed info for the cup size.  Then you buy the same size for years until it hurts or something.
    • KatieSC
      Congratulations Lorelei! Yes, it is a powerful feeling to have the documents that say "you are you".
    • Mmindy
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...