Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Measuring for underwear


Amory

Recommended Posts

So, I'm going to order my first pair of men's underwear. I'm really excited, but I want to get sizing right. My waist is about 30 inches, and my hips are about 36, so I don't know where that puts me for sizes. Thank you so much, really appreciate any help

Link to comment
  • Admin

Men's underwear operates solely on waist size.  With the difference between your waist and hip measurements, I'd recommend starting at a size 32.  You'll find most men's underwear is sold in sizes "32 - 34," as it's marketed to accommodate different body shapes. 

 

At 32, the elasticity should mean you won't have an issue passing the hips, and the fabric itself should be well-fitted all around.  If it doesn't fit quite right, you can use it as a springboard to determine what size to try next. 

 

Keep in mind that women's' waists are measured differently than men's.  From our clothing size guide:

 

Quote


For FtM (male clothing) measurements:

Keeping the measuring tape level with the floor, measure around your midsection immediately below your navel.

 

Link to comment

Remeber that men’s underwear sits at about the same level as a low rise women’s underwear. About 4-5” below the belly button. That’ll be your band size. If you have  wide hips or thighs or bum even, you may wanna try a boxer short for the extra room. Most guys have little to nothing in that area. 

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

I had forgotten about hip measurements after 8 years of wearing mens clothes though I wore women's for 6 decades. Nothing in mens clothes is ever measured by hip size. Just waist and leg for pants and chest and neck for shirts and suit coats or sports jackets, etc.

There is a S,M. L for jackets and such too. It refers only to length of the jacket or shirt and sleeves. Many trans guys need the S for shorter arms and length.

A lot of men's underwear and clothing also just comes small, medium and large. I'm a medium in underwear and wear a 34 in pants.

There can be some variation in sizes and how they fit depending on style. 

I wear bikini jockeys because they work best for me with my STP. I can actually wear a small but the longer I live male the more important comfort becomes. I like things a little loose.

Over time if you are on T your proportions will change. I was always 10 inches bigger in my hips than waist no matter what size I was from puberty on. Now my hips and waist are the same and have been for several years. It still makes me grin sometimes to have to wear as belt to keep my pants up because my hips won't anymore.

I found when I started wearing mens clothes full time that it helped to go to thrift stores where no one cares what you do and try on different sizes and styles so I knew what worked for me and how different brands fit. I had always worn men's jean's and tees but dress pants etc was different. Also if you are on T  ot going to be your size will change as your body changes so if you can find cheaper for awhile it helps because they may not fit right in a few months time.

Johnny

Link to comment
  • 4 weeks later...

My BFF gave me my first bunch of men's briefs about 6 months ago and I only wear the old women's underwear if I've missed doing laundry and run out of briefs-!  LOVE them.  I particularly love the longer legged boxer briefs.  I wear a 2XL for now, but am determined to lose weight.  I hope T will help my size rearrange (I know it won't help LOSE); my hips are my biggest part for now.  

 

I'm disabled, so working out is a difficult venture.  Hoping just walking in small bits will help, at first.  Any suggestions for upper body work where mobility is limited?

Link to comment

I don't know if it would work, but have you ever looked at Ski ERGs? Concept 2 started out making rowing machines, but they also make ski ergs that are supposed to be a great workout and are upper body only. Something to think about anyway

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

I lost 200 lbs when I transitioned and have kept all but 15 lbs off for over 7 years now. I started swimming - a crawl or commando stroke is great to build muscles- especially upper body. Then went to hiking. Gradually (and gradual is important or you will do damage) I added wrist weights and weight to my pack. Then I added workouts with a resistance tube working up to an Ultra- over 100 lb pull. Not for old peopl anymore. Professional body builders use resistance tubes when they travel. They are zero impact and can be customized to target specific areas. I got guns and developed my already broad shoulders at 64! That was just a bonus - I strengthened my core so I was in less pain than I had been in my adult life. (I've cracked 6 vertabrae and herniated 3 discs in different incidents.  plus no cartiledge in my knees) Since I had been bedridden for 3 years before transition and using a Walker or electric cart 10 years before that it was a massive change. I never dreamed it was really possible but just set out to do the best I could. Didn't set an ultimate goal. Just took each day doing my best. Except one day a week when I ate anything and everything I wanted. Helps control cravings and prevent metabolism falling and stalling you out. Still do it because truth is eating changes only work if they are for life.

The most important thing on the weight loss I think was that I kept track religiously 6 days a week. I used My Pate on Livestrong because it was easiest for me and free and the fit thing that came on my phone to log exercise.

You can do more than you dream. Just give it your best and live in the day!

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 85 Guests (See full list)

    • VickySGV
    • KymmieL
    • mattie22
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,024
    • Most Online
      8,356

    JamesyGreen
    Newest Member
    JamesyGreen
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alscully
      Alscully
      (35 years old)
    2. floruisse
      floruisse
      (40 years old)
    3. Jasmine25
      Jasmine25
      (22 years old)
    4. Trev0rK
      Trev0rK
      (26 years old)
  • Posts

    • KymmieL
      Well first day is over and now getting ready for bed soon. Work was OK.   Don't know why but I am feeling down. I am heading to bed. Good Night.   Kymmie
    • Adrianna Danielle
      Boyfriend and I our time at my place.Both admit our sex life is good,got intimate for the 2nd time and he is good at it
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Thanks.  I will look those up in the document, hopefully tomorrow.   I always look at the source on stuff like this, not what someone, particularly those adversarial, have to say. 
    • MaeBe
      LGBTQ rights Project 2025 takes extreme positions against LGBTQ rights, seeking to eliminate federal protections for queer people and pursue research into conversion therapies in order to encourage gender and sexuality conformity. The policy book also lays out plans to criminalize being transgender and prohibit federal programs from supporting queer people through various policies. The project partnered with anti-LGBTQ groups the Family Policy Alliance, the Center for Family and Human Rights, and the Family Research Council. Project 2025 calls for the next secretary of Health and Human Services to “immediately put an end to the department’s foray into woke transgender activism,” which includes removing terms related to gender and sexual identity from “every federal rule, agency regulation, contract, grant, regulation, and piece of legislation that exists.” The Trump administration proposed a similar idea in 2018 that would have resulted in trans people losing protections under anti-discrimination laws. [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; The New Republic, 2/8/24] Similarly, the policy book calls for HHS to stop all research related to gender identity unless the purpose is conformity to one's sex assigned at birth. The New Republic explains: “That is, research on gender-nonconforming children and teenagers should be funded by the government, but only for the purpose of studying what will make them conform, such as denying them gender-affirming care and instead trying to change their identities through ‘counseling,’ which is a form of conversion therapy.” [The New Republic, 2/8/24] The policy book’s foreword by Kevin Roberts describes “the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children” as “pornography” that “should be outlawed,” adding, “The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned.” Roberts also says that “educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Roberts’ foreword states that “allowing parents or physicians to ‘reassign’ the sex of a minor is child abuse and must end.” Echoing ongoing right-wing attacks on trans athletes, Roberts also claims, “Bureaucrats at the Department of Justice force school districts to undermine girls’ sports and parents’ rights to satisfy transgender extremists.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; TIME magazine, 5/16/22] Dame Magazine reports that Project 2025 plans to use the Department of Justice to crack down on states that “do not charge LGBTQ people and their allies with crimes under the pretense that they are breaking federal and state laws against exposing minors to pornography.” [Dame Magazine, 8/14/23] Project 2025 also calls for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to repeat “its 2016 decision that CMS could not issue a National Coverage Determination (NCD) regarding ‘gender reassignment surgery’ for Medicare beneficiaries.” The policy book’s HHS chapter continues: “In doing so, CMS should acknowledge the growing body of evidence that such interventions are dangerous and acknowledge that there is insufficient scientific evidence to support such coverage in state plans.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Going further, Project 2025 also demands that the next GOP administration “reverse policies that allow transgender individuals to serve in the military.” The policy book’s chapter on the Defense Department claims: “Gender dysphoria is incompatible with the demands of military service, and the use of public monies for transgender surgeries … for servicemembers should be ended.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023]   …summaries of what’s within the rest of the document re: LGBTQ+ concerns. A person can believe their gender is fixed but incongruent with their physiology, but the authors and Trump (by his own words) just see the incongruity of an “expressed gender” that conflicts with what was/is in a person’s pants.
    • Mmindy
      Good catch… I took care of it.
    • Sally Stone
      I'm tired of the two-party system.  It has degraded to a system where there are only two diametrically opposed views, neither of which supports me.  I have conservative views regarding big government and government spending but I have very liberal views when it comes to protecting the rights of individuals.  And just elections of the past, I am stuck with two choices, neither of which I support. With only two parties, each with agendas that are off the left and right scales, I am not adequately represented.    Finally, I'm okay with party affiliated politicians running for office using their party views, but once elected to office, they are obligated to support the entire electorate not just the electorate members that voted for them.  Plain and simple, our government system is broken and dysfunctional.  I'll step down from my soapbox now.     
    • Sally Stone
      Thanks Mae.  She was an amazing friend and I grew to love her like a sister.
    • Sally Stone
      I did Ashley.  Non-rev travel was one of the major factors for taking the job.  At the time, US Airways had the best non-rev policy in the industry.  It cost $10 to fly coach and $25 to fly first class.  We flew first class whenever there were seats available.  
    • Abigail Genevieve
      You should have a moderator fix what you meant to write as "birth certificate".  Ooops.   I've gone over that verse and am wholly and completely dissatisfied with the SBC exegesis of it, so much so that it was one of the things that helped me break out of a mindset of guit.  Sometime I may strut by stuff as a Hebraist and show what it really means.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found this   — 450 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Goal #1: Protecting Life, Conscience, and Bodily Integrity. The Secretary should pursue a robust agenda to protect the fundamental right to life, protect con- science rights, and uphold bodily integrity rooted in biological realities, not ideology. From the moment of conception, every human being possesses inherent dignity and worth, and our humanity does not depend on our age, stage of development, race, or abilities. The Secretary must ensure that all HHS programs and activities are rooted in a deep respect for innocent human life from day one until natural death: Abortion and euthanasia are not health care. A robust respect for the sacred rights of conscience, both at HHS and among gov- ernments and institutions funded by it, increases choices for patients and program beneficiaries and furthers pluralism and tolerance. The Secretary must protect Americans’ civil rights by ensuring that HHS programs and activities follow the letter and spirit of religious freedom and conscience-protection laws. Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of “gender identity” and bases a person’s worth on his or her race, sex, or other identities. This destructive dogma, under the guise of “equity,” threatens American’s fundamental liberties as well as the health and well-being of children and adults alike. The next Secretary must ensure that HHS programs protect children’s minds and bodies and that HHS programs respect parents’ basic right to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their children.   https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_CHAPTER-14.pdf   First, that is not much, if that is all that is of concern.  Secondly, I have seen all sorts of anti-Trump slander, including the Steele dossier and the lawfare he is now undergoing, to be cynical of any criticism against him, and indirectly this document.    He deserves some of what he is getting, but not all.  Thirdly, I bolded one statement of concern.   I don't think gender identity is subjective.  "Radical actors" is name calling, and there is a lot of that going around.  Maybe I am not seeing everything of concern or reading this right, but i would discuss with the author of this document concerning this.
    • Willow
      Good evening   well I finally finished reading my textbook.  Yeah.  But I still have a lot more to go for the class.     My endocrinologist always asks me about lactation.  And yes I have had some very small amounts of leakage but not on any regular basis.  I figure I blocked the discharge Duce when I pierced my nipples with scare tissue.  But who knows.  I also get asked about mammograms.  I e had my first or baseline and this fall I will need to schedule my second.   As someone in the midst of studying the Old Testament, I can say that I haven’t found any mention of pending damnation for being transgender or intersex.  The closest it comes is a verse that says men should not wear women’s clothing.  Now I don’t know each and everyone’s particulars, but I know I meet the medical definition of female gender, and even in Ohio, a State that until recently refused to allow birth certificates to be changed, I meet the criteria.  Therefore I can only conclude I am not a man wearing women’s clothing.  But there is a somewhat different scholarly explanation of that law that it should not be taken as literally as the haters want.  Mostly men should not pretend to be women to ex ape from their enemies. Or tried to hide from God.     willow
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Well, the left wing has been doing that.    I read a few things while trying to find out what the problem is and liked what I read.  But I am a conservative.    Is there something specific in there that is of concern?  Does it promise somewhere to erase trans folk? That would be problematic.
    • Ivy
      It's a plan to basically completely take over the government by the right wing.
    • Ivy
      I'm actually in Asheville tonight.  Some of the people in the support group invited me for dinner after the meeting.  We're going to get together again tomorrow again. It's been nice, 4 trans women and 1 trans man, together ar a restaurant.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found https://www.project2025.org/policy/   I will have to read it.  I have not.  What is of concern?   The link provided earlier goes back to this forum.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...