Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

1st laser appointment


BrendaOlivia

Recommended Posts

 Well hello all. Hope everybody’s having a great day. I have had two electrolysis procedures on my face already with many many more to come. Tomorrow I have my first full face and neck laser appointment. Can I get a few pointers of what to expect and if I should prepare for any issues?

Link to comment

The first session will normally start with a test at the lowest setting, gradually taking it up to the level where it becomes painful, so the proper hair removal can be just about below that level. As for preparation, obviously you need to shave at the right time. Hair needs to be growing, so you should shave a day before, but if your beard grows as fast as mine, the hairs would be too long and make themselves notable by a zipping pain and a burnt smell, so it needs to be done later. You will probably get some instructions if you do it wrong. Also very important, make sure your face is properly cleaned from any cosmetics. Makeup contains pigments that might attract the laser and other cosmetics might too.

 

Otherwise if you want to be prepared for any eventualities you might want to buy some aloe vera and put it in the fridge ready for use. I only ever needed it once and got a bit of it from the salon, but it's probably not bad to have it at hand.

 

A lot will depend on the type of laser and cooling system as well as your hair and skin type. I don't have any experience with electrolysis, but from what I've read laser is far less painful then electrolysis. In fact I would describe it as uncomfortable rather than downright painful.

Link to comment

Thank you Terry for all of this information. I read that aloe vera is good to use afterwards. My Electrologist told me that laser is not as bad as Electrology.  I’ve already had two rounds of Electrology on the upper lip. I’ve heard that the upper lip is the most sensitive on the face. So I wanted to start there. I go back Monday to continue on the upper lip.  Great advice. Thank you 

Link to comment

Laser isn’t bad. But like terry said, shave as close to your appointment as you can. If you’re nice and smooth it barely hurts at all. With stubble it’s mildly worse. But still not bad. Plan on no sun afterwards for a few hours. And wear sunscreen for a couple days after just to be safe. 

Laser is cool. It really clears your face quickly.  But it’s not permanent. So keep up the electrolysis. That’s what will make it go away permanently. 

Good luck! 

Link to comment

Laser is not as bad as electrolysis.  Laser is just really hair reduction where electrolysis is permanent hair removal.  But I would say that if you are like me where you have fair skin, your face might turn red from the laser but it only last for a few hours.  But you wont be able to wear makeup for a while or go out in the sun.  Then you will need some aleo Vera which would be nice.  But I will say that laser goes real fast and will be done with the session in like 5 min.

 

For myself, I can tell you that I do alternating every 2 week laser and electrolysis and it helps me out with cutting my electrolysis time in half and has helped me out to get rid of alot of hair and since I have been doing that, I am about 75% hair free.

 

Good luck on your first laser

Link to comment

 Thank you for the good tips! I heard it goes pretty quick. And I shaved yesterday morning but my hair grows slow. Barely any stubble. 

Link to comment

I will tell you “none” and “barely any” is a world of difference. Just the difference between shaving the morning of with a new razor vs a used one is noticeable. If you’re smooth, no pain. Anything but smooth makes for pain. But yes the laser is NOTHING compared to electrolysis. 

Link to comment

Thanks Kirsten. I took your advise and just shaved again. You’re a doll.

Link to comment

I'm just back from a laser appointment myself. It's been the first one after a while. The salon I used to go to closed down and now I've found a small clinic that does only laser treatments. To my surprise it felt quite different, which is apparently because of the different laser. It was less painful, yet I could clearly smell burned hair. Also some hairs popped out right away, a thing that almost never happened during the previous treatments. I was told this is a good thing that you only get with medical-grade lasers.

 

What was also different was that I got a more detailed introduction how it works. We also discussed the close shaving and the laser tech agreed that it's better when there is no stubble.

Link to comment

 I got back from my treatment. It wasn’t bad at all. It was more like a blast of cold at each spot and a little smell of burnt hair when it was done on my upper lip area. Put on some aloe vera and barely any pink. Nothing compared to the electrolysis pain.

Link to comment
Just now, Charley Price said:

It was more like a blast of cold at each spot

 

This makes me wonder if the setting was high enough. Did they try out different levels? "Cold" sounds like what you experienced was just the cooling, not the laser. While there's nothing against a good cooling system, the treatment should be more efficient if it's done using more power.

Link to comment

The laser really really hurts me! each zap is like someone flicking an elastic band on my face only it gets warmer and warmer and stings more and more. Even with the cold air which is a godsend. By the end of an hour I am totally at my limit, but it has worked well enough to see a huge difference. I had laser on Saturday and I hadnt shaved since Tuesday. My first session took a week for my skin to calm back down, now its just a day or two. In comparison because of the numbing cream electrolysis is like a relaxing conversation, I go in an hour before my appointment, get the cream on and then wander out 3 hrs later with normal coloured skin. Slow but absolutely my preferred method, and the difference in time means the sessions cost roughly the same and I go once a month.

Link to comment

I pasted here the type of laser they use. Apparently there are different applications of laser and this they told me is the latest one out.

 

The Cynosure state of the art laser system contains a tissue surface-cooling device, which continuously blows cold air on the skin surface at the site of the coming laser pulse. This reduces the pain of the laser pulse. 

 

Link to comment

Wow DeeDee. I really did not feel much pain at all except near my nose on the upper lip. It’s been four hours now

Link to comment

Oh, that's a coincidence. I've just checked, the place I'm going to now also uses a Cynosure. That said, it did feel warm, sometimes even too hot, which was when I had to ask to lower it a bit. So either in your treatment there was less hair or the setting was quite low in comparison.

Link to comment
Just now, Charley Price said:

Less hair. I reshaped before going

Reshaved 

Link to comment
12 hours ago, Charley Price said:

Less hair. I reshaved before going

 

That's not quite what I meant. Actually I should have written "less hairs", plural, because it's really about hairs per area.The optics always targets the same area, and when there are more hairs in that area your skin heats up more.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 152 Guests (See full list)

    • Breanne_O
    • AllieJ
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,024
    • Most Online
      8,356

    JamesyGreen
    Newest Member
    JamesyGreen
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alscully
      Alscully
      (35 years old)
    2. floruisse
      floruisse
      (40 years old)
    3. Jasmine25
      Jasmine25
      (22 years old)
    4. Trev0rK
      Trev0rK
      (26 years old)
  • Posts

    • EasyE
      Republicans have long committed grave errors by emphasizing their social agenda and moral issues instead of just focusing on the economy, lowering taxes, keeping the public safe, building a strong national defense, promoting business, touting reasonable immigration policies, etc.   The country would thrive economically under Trump's tax and business policies. That's a fact. Another four years of Biden will run this country into the ground financially (including all of our 401Ks and IRAs). But the GOP continues to play right into the Dems' hands by leading with their moral crusades instead of staying the course and trusting their fiscal policies to win the day... 
    • Carolyn Marie
      https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-news/hundreds-athletes-urge-ncaa-not-ban-trans-athletes-womens-sports-rcna149033     Carolyn Marie
    • KymmieL
      Well first day is over and now getting ready for bed soon. Work was OK.   Don't know why but I am feeling down. I am heading to bed. Good Night.   Kymmie
    • Adrianna Danielle
      Boyfriend and I our time at my place.Both admit our sex life is good,got intimate for the 2nd time and he is good at it
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Thanks.  I will look those up in the document, hopefully tomorrow.   I always look at the source on stuff like this, not what someone, particularly those adversarial, have to say. 
    • MaeBe
      LGBTQ rights Project 2025 takes extreme positions against LGBTQ rights, seeking to eliminate federal protections for queer people and pursue research into conversion therapies in order to encourage gender and sexuality conformity. The policy book also lays out plans to criminalize being transgender and prohibit federal programs from supporting queer people through various policies. The project partnered with anti-LGBTQ groups the Family Policy Alliance, the Center for Family and Human Rights, and the Family Research Council. Project 2025 calls for the next secretary of Health and Human Services to “immediately put an end to the department’s foray into woke transgender activism,” which includes removing terms related to gender and sexual identity from “every federal rule, agency regulation, contract, grant, regulation, and piece of legislation that exists.” The Trump administration proposed a similar idea in 2018 that would have resulted in trans people losing protections under anti-discrimination laws. [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; The New Republic, 2/8/24] Similarly, the policy book calls for HHS to stop all research related to gender identity unless the purpose is conformity to one's sex assigned at birth. The New Republic explains: “That is, research on gender-nonconforming children and teenagers should be funded by the government, but only for the purpose of studying what will make them conform, such as denying them gender-affirming care and instead trying to change their identities through ‘counseling,’ which is a form of conversion therapy.” [The New Republic, 2/8/24] The policy book’s foreword by Kevin Roberts describes “the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children” as “pornography” that “should be outlawed,” adding, “The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned.” Roberts also says that “educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Roberts’ foreword states that “allowing parents or physicians to ‘reassign’ the sex of a minor is child abuse and must end.” Echoing ongoing right-wing attacks on trans athletes, Roberts also claims, “Bureaucrats at the Department of Justice force school districts to undermine girls’ sports and parents’ rights to satisfy transgender extremists.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; TIME magazine, 5/16/22] Dame Magazine reports that Project 2025 plans to use the Department of Justice to crack down on states that “do not charge LGBTQ people and their allies with crimes under the pretense that they are breaking federal and state laws against exposing minors to pornography.” [Dame Magazine, 8/14/23] Project 2025 also calls for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to repeat “its 2016 decision that CMS could not issue a National Coverage Determination (NCD) regarding ‘gender reassignment surgery’ for Medicare beneficiaries.” The policy book’s HHS chapter continues: “In doing so, CMS should acknowledge the growing body of evidence that such interventions are dangerous and acknowledge that there is insufficient scientific evidence to support such coverage in state plans.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Going further, Project 2025 also demands that the next GOP administration “reverse policies that allow transgender individuals to serve in the military.” The policy book’s chapter on the Defense Department claims: “Gender dysphoria is incompatible with the demands of military service, and the use of public monies for transgender surgeries … for servicemembers should be ended.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023]   …summaries of what’s within the rest of the document re: LGBTQ+ concerns. A person can believe their gender is fixed but incongruent with their physiology, but the authors and Trump (by his own words) just see the incongruity of an “expressed gender” that conflicts with what was/is in a person’s pants.
    • Mmindy
      Good catch… I took care of it.
    • Sally Stone
      I'm tired of the two-party system.  It has degraded to a system where there are only two diametrically opposed views, neither of which supports me.  I have conservative views regarding big government and government spending but I have very liberal views when it comes to protecting the rights of individuals.  And just elections of the past, I am stuck with two choices, neither of which I support. With only two parties, each with agendas that are off the left and right scales, I am not adequately represented.    Finally, I'm okay with party affiliated politicians running for office using their party views, but once elected to office, they are obligated to support the entire electorate not just the electorate members that voted for them.  Plain and simple, our government system is broken and dysfunctional.  I'll step down from my soapbox now.     
    • Sally Stone
      Thanks Mae.  She was an amazing friend and I grew to love her like a sister.
    • Sally Stone
      I did Ashley.  Non-rev travel was one of the major factors for taking the job.  At the time, US Airways had the best non-rev policy in the industry.  It cost $10 to fly coach and $25 to fly first class.  We flew first class whenever there were seats available.  
    • Abigail Genevieve
      You should have a moderator fix what you meant to write as "birth certificate".  Ooops.   I've gone over that verse and am wholly and completely dissatisfied with the SBC exegesis of it, so much so that it was one of the things that helped me break out of a mindset of guit.  Sometime I may strut by stuff as a Hebraist and show what it really means.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found this   — 450 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Goal #1: Protecting Life, Conscience, and Bodily Integrity. The Secretary should pursue a robust agenda to protect the fundamental right to life, protect con- science rights, and uphold bodily integrity rooted in biological realities, not ideology. From the moment of conception, every human being possesses inherent dignity and worth, and our humanity does not depend on our age, stage of development, race, or abilities. The Secretary must ensure that all HHS programs and activities are rooted in a deep respect for innocent human life from day one until natural death: Abortion and euthanasia are not health care. A robust respect for the sacred rights of conscience, both at HHS and among gov- ernments and institutions funded by it, increases choices for patients and program beneficiaries and furthers pluralism and tolerance. The Secretary must protect Americans’ civil rights by ensuring that HHS programs and activities follow the letter and spirit of religious freedom and conscience-protection laws. Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of “gender identity” and bases a person’s worth on his or her race, sex, or other identities. This destructive dogma, under the guise of “equity,” threatens American’s fundamental liberties as well as the health and well-being of children and adults alike. The next Secretary must ensure that HHS programs protect children’s minds and bodies and that HHS programs respect parents’ basic right to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their children.   https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_CHAPTER-14.pdf   First, that is not much, if that is all that is of concern.  Secondly, I have seen all sorts of anti-Trump slander, including the Steele dossier and the lawfare he is now undergoing, to be cynical of any criticism against him, and indirectly this document.    He deserves some of what he is getting, but not all.  Thirdly, I bolded one statement of concern.   I don't think gender identity is subjective.  "Radical actors" is name calling, and there is a lot of that going around.  Maybe I am not seeing everything of concern or reading this right, but i would discuss with the author of this document concerning this.
    • Willow
      Good evening   well I finally finished reading my textbook.  Yeah.  But I still have a lot more to go for the class.     My endocrinologist always asks me about lactation.  And yes I have had some very small amounts of leakage but not on any regular basis.  I figure I blocked the discharge Duce when I pierced my nipples with scare tissue.  But who knows.  I also get asked about mammograms.  I e had my first or baseline and this fall I will need to schedule my second.   As someone in the midst of studying the Old Testament, I can say that I haven’t found any mention of pending damnation for being transgender or intersex.  The closest it comes is a verse that says men should not wear women’s clothing.  Now I don’t know each and everyone’s particulars, but I know I meet the medical definition of female gender, and even in Ohio, a State that until recently refused to allow birth certificates to be changed, I meet the criteria.  Therefore I can only conclude I am not a man wearing women’s clothing.  But there is a somewhat different scholarly explanation of that law that it should not be taken as literally as the haters want.  Mostly men should not pretend to be women to ex ape from their enemies. Or tried to hide from God.     willow
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Well, the left wing has been doing that.    I read a few things while trying to find out what the problem is and liked what I read.  But I am a conservative.    Is there something specific in there that is of concern?  Does it promise somewhere to erase trans folk? That would be problematic.
    • Ivy
      It's a plan to basically completely take over the government by the right wing.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...