Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Hello


Heather Nicole

Recommended Posts

Hi. First of all, I want to thank the moderators for approving my account. I've been very tentative, and started and stopped, and got registered but then chickened out on posting and forgot my login, and then made a new one...I'm sure I must have raised some red flags, and I certainly understand the importance of basic screening for a board like this...So I just want to thank the admins for giving me a chance...

 

So, I guess I'm pretty well in the "trans questioning" category:

 

Born a male, grew up male, the male puberty fairy hit me HARD, and at the time I was even happy about it - hitting the "growing up" rites of passage. If anything, I felt far more dysphoric about feeling like an adult in a kid's world than anything else. Although, I did have an occasional fascination with what it would be like to be a girl (both anatomically and otherwise).

 

But I don't know, maybe it was just a lack of feeling pressured to conform to male stereotypes: I was aware of various gender associations, but only ever felt tiny little pressure to conform to them. Most notably sports: I know that's something for everyone these days,, but there's a certain "tradition" that dictates "Boys are into sports". I've never been able to give a crap about sports even when I've tried (although I totally would've joined my high school's volleyball team if it hadn't been girls-only - that and golf are at least fun to play), and I've always found sports-fan-related tribalism to be especially intolerable. And as a kid, I remember having a babydoll and some necklaces just as readily available to play with as any "boy" toys - and I played with all of them. So, it wasn't really a "Buys MUST be like XYZ" environment. It was more like, I was aware of the stereotypes, but, at the time, could never really understand why anyone would willfully subject themselves to them.

 

But I'm in my late 30's now and I realize - the older I get, the more I envy girls, the more I dislike "masculinity" in general, and the more I find "being male" to really mean "being limited, restricted and villianized". Heck, I grew up in the 80's - in MY day, when it was summer and the weather was hot, ANYONE could wear "shorts" - regardless of your gender, And they were PROPER 70's/80's-style shorts, just like the ones women have recently started wearing again today, and not those absolutely god-awful super-gigantic, knee-length all-denim and/or (god forbid) "cargo" GARBAGE that us males have been "woman in india"-style EXILED to ever since the worthless  90's and the horrid, god-awful "sagging" fad that just...would...not...die!!! And that's to say nothing of the nice airy skirts, sundresses, halter-tops, croptops, yoga-pants, and strappy-but-nice sandals, and colored nails options girls have. Whereas us guys have a choice between "generic mascu-color T-shirt with either parachute semi-capris or full pants" vs "Suit and Tie" (Ugh!!! Gag me with a spoon!!!) or "Khaki and Polo"  (Just as bad!!!)...or....something more risque but automatically comes with periodic negative social consequences and an air of seeking male companionship (not my personal thing). Same goes for swimsuits, too...I don''t even WANT to show off my bare chest unless it gets people excited, (which it definitely WON'T!!) and male swim trunks are just giant water-logged balls-and-chains. And then there's body hair...ugh...thick rough non-smooth non-soft skin, an expectation of acting allergic to anything cute or  pretty or sparkly, or the MOST AWESOME piercings available unless we want to advertise interest in guys (again, not my thing,...although sometimes I almost with it was...many girls can be quite squirrely about physical intimacy with anyone whose decent and respectable, but us guys are just programmed to biologically require it...just one of nature's sick, twisted jokes)

 

Which lead to another thing: Most the time I look at...umm..."adult content"...I can't help imagining what it would feel like for the girl rather than the guy (even though guys are a turn-off for me), and half the time I can't decide between "I wish I was *with* her" vs "I wish I *was* her". Yea, I'm sure this is probably a very, very "guy" response, but I *long* to be sexually objectified...but only women are...and they hate it...and I'm not one...so naturally I want it...go figure, life, huh?

 

Oooo...kkkk....so that probably hit "TMI" real hard, but a certain bit of, ahem, drink (along with very careful timing), was the only way to get me to reach out in actual words, even though there's a part of me that's been wanting to since a long while now....so, umm, there it is!.....*runs and hides now...*....

 

Edited by Timber Wolf
Removed colorful language.
Link to comment

Hello and welcome! 

 

I don't think you're alone in your questioning. I certainly found a lot of what you said relatable. I'm in my early 30's and started exploring my gender again just last year. As a kid I preferred hanging out with girls and playing with dolls and My Little Ponies, didn't care for romping around in the mud with the boys. I dress out most of the time now (capris or long skirts mostly, so cute and comfortable), and dread having to work men's jeans, t's and steel toe boots (I work for a moving company and I'm not out at work yet). 

 

And I think that a lot about women with meet-I want to be with her, but I also want to be like her! *sigh*

 

And the only sports with a ball I was into were volleyball and golf, too! Not that men have to play sports and women don't, people are breaking a lot of these obsolete stereotypical norms these days. It's a new era from when we grew up in the 80s and 90s. 

 

Don't be shy. Ask and post what you feel compelled to here. Everyone here is pretty helpful and friendly. This forum is great, I love it, I know it helped me a lot. 

 

~Toni

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

Hi Heathick,

Welcome to Transpulse. I'm glad you're here!

 

Lots of love and a big welcome hug,

Timber Wolf ?

Link to comment
6 hours ago, Heathick said:

Which lead to another thing: Most the time I look at...umm..."adult content"...I can't help imagining what it would feel like for the girl rather than the guy (even though guys are a turn-off for me), and half the time I can't decide between "I wish I was *with* her" vs "I wish I *was* her". Yea, I'm sure this is probably a very, very "guy" response, but I *long* to be sexually objectified...but only women are...and they hate it...and I'm not one...so naturally I want it...go figure, life, huh?

I fully relate with this. Pre transition I looked at my fair share of adult content. And like you I found myself wishing to know her side of things. And now i even find myself peacocking for guys. But like you I have no interest in men. Just for the feeling of being that girl. Idk that I am objectified yet, but oddly enough I hope to be someday. 

I will say that the further along I get, this becomes increasingly confusing though. The draw is much stronger. But I can honestly say when it comes to the physical aspect of all that, I still have no interest in men. But the rest is so appealing. The security. The dominance. The social aspect of being the female in the relationship. That’s all almost like a dream to me now. Pretty sure there aren’t guys out there that want a girl like me with no physical at all tho. Lol. Thankfully I’m married and don’t have to worry for now. 

Welcome to our forums! Don’t be shy. We love fresh meat! ?????‍♀️Jk. Lots of great people here always ready to help and support. ?

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

Welcome Heathick. 

Being here helped me find and accept myself.  Hope you find the same.

 

Hugs,

 

Charlize

Link to comment
  • Admin

Welcome to Trans Pulse, Heathick.  Thank you for sharing your thoughts.  It takes a while sometimes to figure out where one falls on the gender spectrum.  So look around the forums, take your time, do some introspection and maybe have a talk with a gender therapist. 

 

HUGS

 

Carolyn Marie

Link to comment
  • Admin

The folks in the XXX adult movies and magazines actually do not feel much except satisfied they have a paycheck coming in.  They are actors even for steamy sex scenes that portray a writer's idea of what sex acts may be like.  I have spoken to many of them over the years and the private person is different from the actor's characters they portray.  I have actually been present during filming of some of those movie scenes and can say it is all business and not what you see on the screen months later.

 

We have got to get it through people's minds that we are not those fantasy movie characters and that we are real people.  If those movies and mags got you thinking about your authentic self and what it really is, then they are redeemed to some extent and made the role of the actor more important for you.  Fantasies that are both guy and girl, yes, girls have them, can give us a window on what our innards are really wanting us to look like and be seen as.  Do not over play the "this is a guy thing" to get yourself into one set mold since you are probably a bigger mix of all genders than you may be comfortable with at first gasp. 

Link to comment

Thank you everyone for the kind words! And the relatable comparisons are especially nice to read!! Always nice to not feel alone!

 

@Carolyn Marie: I'm only assuming I've caught your profile's "Location" reference reference right, but if so: I love that show!!

 

@VickySGV: I sooo completely agree that people are often a far bigger mix of genders than most people realize. That's something that's been bubbling in the back of my mind for a long time, actually...

 

I have a theory (completely unfounded, untested, etc, I realize, and I can only base it on nothing more than my own personal experiences, thoughts and observations, so, it's only just a thought and I have no intention of pushing it to anyone who disagrees - because after all, for all I know, I might not even have a clue what I'm talking about anyway! How would I even know?)

 

Anyway, perhaps, people mostly just are what they are, and "gender identity" is usually (ie, "traditionally") just observation of both our own bodies and which gender "bucket" those around us perceive and treat us as being part of, and then just simply blindly accepting that at face value. Ie, I suspect many cis people would have lead perfectly functional, comfortable lives (well, to the extent that *anyone* actually does!) regardless of what bucket fate/biology/society had happened to assigned them into at birth. Perhaps most people would have blindly accepted it either way, and then willingly conformed to whichever it was...(Or maybe I'm just projecting.)

 

But then, just as is always inevitable when quantifying inherently qualitative data into discrete "buckets", there are inevitably many cases (such as myself and doubtless many others) that are not so simple, or just don't happen to fall neatly within the given lines, but fall more on the borders between. And we may have, or have noticed, more discrepancy or incompatibility between our "bucket" vs our fundamental nature than others might have, or have recognized in themselves. And some of us may be more open to the idea that the person we're treated as being, or even told that we are, may not be completely, entirely, unquestioningly accurate.

 

In any case, just as an aside, sometimes it can be convenient, for the sake of conversation, to refer to one of those "buckets" by name ("guy", "gal", whatever), NOT because the buckets are an accurate reflection of reality (they clearly aren't), but simply because we're all aware of what the buckets are and what their common (though mistaken) associations are.

 

But maybe I got a little off-track philosophical there :)

 

In any case, thanks again for the warm welcome!

 

Link to comment
12 hours ago, VickySGV said:

The folks in the XXX adult movies and magazines actually do not feel much except satisfied they have a paycheck coming in.  They are actors even for steamy sex scenes that portray a writer's idea of what sex acts may be like.  I have spoken to many of them over the years and the private person is different from the actor's characters they portray.  I have actually been present during filming of some of those movie scenes and can say it is all business and not what you see on the screen months later.

 

We have got to get it through people's minds that we are not those fantasy movie characters and that we are real people.

 

True, I realize that, at least to the extent that I'm capable of. But if anything at all, please understand that I come from a VERY different perspective than they do. The fact of the matter is, regardless of how they may feel about what they are doing on-camera, they ARE actually doing it. AND getting paid for it.

 

Me? Shoot, I wasn't even going to go here but...oh heck, in for a penny in for a pound...I was borderline suicidal because I was 34 and nobody in my entire life had ever cared to date me, let along touch me at all. It's all I'd ever truly wanted since puberty hit, to the point I could scarcely even bear it as a 12 year old, let alone twenty years later despite society's lies and false promises of "someday you will meet somebody...".

 

The ONLY reason I'm even still alive today, despite the best efforts of countless professional counselors/psychiatrists/etc over the course of...years? I don't even remember...is because of one genuine angel I just barely managed to figure out how to meet who...let's just say had a non-traditional career, an open mind, and (to my regret) will probably never know how much she truly meant. Ethics, legality, what-have-you aside, that tiny little bit (I couldn't even feel anything because of the mutually-agreed-upon protection), was still enough, just barely enough...Because even though my mind had LONG since filed it away under the "fiction/fantasy/only exists for people who aren't me" category, another human being was actually willing to be unclothed, together with me in the same state...Just of few minutes of that alone was enough to do what years with army of professionals couldn't...It pulled me...just a little bit...back from the edge. I swear to you it's the only reason I'm alive today.

 

And yes, I realize this puts me squarely in the same "damaged" category as millions of generic, fully-deluded others...but at least some of the damaged get to have that placebo they can never fully appreciate. Some of us aren't even THAT lucky...

 

So no matter how jaded some people may become...Never, ever, ever, ever discount the importance of basic human sexuality, no matter how "risque'", "immoral", or by far worst of all..."overrated"...is to the basic human experience.

 

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   8 Members, 0 Anonymous, 162 Guests (See full list)

    • MaeBe
    • Adrianna Danielle
    • RaineOnYourParade
    • Maddee
    • violet r
    • Siobhan F
    • Susie
    • Betty K
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,024
    • Most Online
      8,356

    JamesyGreen
    Newest Member
    JamesyGreen
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alscully
      Alscully
      (35 years old)
    2. floruisse
      floruisse
      (40 years old)
    3. Jasmine25
      Jasmine25
      (22 years old)
    4. Trev0rK
      Trev0rK
      (26 years old)
  • Posts

    • MaeBe
      LGBTQ rights Project 2025 takes extreme positions against LGBTQ rights, seeking to eliminate federal protections for queer people and pursue research into conversion therapies in order to encourage gender and sexuality conformity. The policy book also lays out plans to criminalize being transgender and prohibit federal programs from supporting queer people through various policies. The project partnered with anti-LGBTQ groups the Family Policy Alliance, the Center for Family and Human Rights, and the Family Research Council. Project 2025 calls for the next secretary of Health and Human Services to “immediately put an end to the department’s foray into woke transgender activism,” which includes removing terms related to gender and sexual identity from “every federal rule, agency regulation, contract, grant, regulation, and piece of legislation that exists.” The Trump administration proposed a similar idea in 2018 that would have resulted in trans people losing protections under anti-discrimination laws. [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; The New Republic, 2/8/24] Similarly, the policy book calls for HHS to stop all research related to gender identity unless the purpose is conformity to one's sex assigned at birth. The New Republic explains: “That is, research on gender-nonconforming children and teenagers should be funded by the government, but only for the purpose of studying what will make them conform, such as denying them gender-affirming care and instead trying to change their identities through ‘counseling,’ which is a form of conversion therapy.” [The New Republic, 2/8/24] The policy book’s foreword by Kevin Roberts describes “the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children” as “pornography” that “should be outlawed,” adding, “The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned.” Roberts also says that “educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Roberts’ foreword states that “allowing parents or physicians to ‘reassign’ the sex of a minor is child abuse and must end.” Echoing ongoing right-wing attacks on trans athletes, Roberts also claims, “Bureaucrats at the Department of Justice force school districts to undermine girls’ sports and parents’ rights to satisfy transgender extremists.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; TIME magazine, 5/16/22] Dame Magazine reports that Project 2025 plans to use the Department of Justice to crack down on states that “do not charge LGBTQ people and their allies with crimes under the pretense that they are breaking federal and state laws against exposing minors to pornography.” [Dame Magazine, 8/14/23] Project 2025 also calls for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to repeat “its 2016 decision that CMS could not issue a National Coverage Determination (NCD) regarding ‘gender reassignment surgery’ for Medicare beneficiaries.” The policy book’s HHS chapter continues: “In doing so, CMS should acknowledge the growing body of evidence that such interventions are dangerous and acknowledge that there is insufficient scientific evidence to support such coverage in state plans.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Going further, Project 2025 also demands that the next GOP administration “reverse policies that allow transgender individuals to serve in the military.” The policy book’s chapter on the Defense Department claims: “Gender dysphoria is incompatible with the demands of military service, and the use of public monies for transgender surgeries … for servicemembers should be ended.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023]   …summaries of what’s within the rest of the document re: LGBTQ+ concerns. A person can believe their gender is fixed but incongruent with their physiology, but the authors and Trump (by his own words) just see the incongruity of an “expressed gender” that conflicts with what was/is in a person’s pants.
    • Mmindy
      Good catch… I took care of it.
    • Sally Stone
      I'm tired of the two-party system.  It has degraded to a system where there are only two diametrically opposed views, neither of which supports me.  I have conservative views regarding big government and government spending but I have very liberal views when it comes to protecting the rights of individuals.  And just elections of the past, I am stuck with two choices, neither of which I support. With only two parties, each with agendas that are off the left and right scales, I am not adequately represented.    Finally, I'm okay with party affiliated politicians running for office using their party views, but once elected to office, they are obligated to support the entire electorate not just the electorate members that voted for them.  Plain and simple, our government system is broken and dysfunctional.  I'll step down from my soapbox now.     
    • Sally Stone
      Thanks Mae.  She was an amazing friend and I grew to love her like a sister.
    • Sally Stone
      I did Ashley.  Non-rev travel was one of the major factors for taking the job.  At the time, US Airways had the best non-rev policy in the industry.  It cost $10 to fly coach and $25 to fly first class.  We flew first class whenever there were seats available.  
    • Abigail Genevieve
      You should have a moderator fix what you meant to write as "birth certificate".  Ooops.   I've gone over that verse and am wholly and completely dissatisfied with the SBC exegesis of it, so much so that it was one of the things that helped me break out of a mindset of guit.  Sometime I may strut by stuff as a Hebraist and show what it really means.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found this   — 450 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Goal #1: Protecting Life, Conscience, and Bodily Integrity. The Secretary should pursue a robust agenda to protect the fundamental right to life, protect con- science rights, and uphold bodily integrity rooted in biological realities, not ideology. From the moment of conception, every human being possesses inherent dignity and worth, and our humanity does not depend on our age, stage of development, race, or abilities. The Secretary must ensure that all HHS programs and activities are rooted in a deep respect for innocent human life from day one until natural death: Abortion and euthanasia are not health care. A robust respect for the sacred rights of conscience, both at HHS and among gov- ernments and institutions funded by it, increases choices for patients and program beneficiaries and furthers pluralism and tolerance. The Secretary must protect Americans’ civil rights by ensuring that HHS programs and activities follow the letter and spirit of religious freedom and conscience-protection laws. Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of “gender identity” and bases a person’s worth on his or her race, sex, or other identities. This destructive dogma, under the guise of “equity,” threatens American’s fundamental liberties as well as the health and well-being of children and adults alike. The next Secretary must ensure that HHS programs protect children’s minds and bodies and that HHS programs respect parents’ basic right to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their children.   https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_CHAPTER-14.pdf   First, that is not much, if that is all that is of concern.  Secondly, I have seen all sorts of anti-Trump slander, including the Steele dossier and the lawfare he is now undergoing, to be cynical of any criticism against him, and indirectly this document.    He deserves some of what he is getting, but not all.  Thirdly, I bolded one statement of concern.   I don't think gender identity is subjective.  "Radical actors" is name calling, and there is a lot of that going around.  Maybe I am not seeing everything of concern or reading this right, but i would discuss with the author of this document concerning this.
    • Willow
      Good evening   well I finally finished reading my textbook.  Yeah.  But I still have a lot more to go for the class.     My endocrinologist always asks me about lactation.  And yes I have had some very small amounts of leakage but not on any regular basis.  I figure I blocked the discharge Duce when I pierced my nipples with scare tissue.  But who knows.  I also get asked about mammograms.  I e had my first or baseline and this fall I will need to schedule my second.   As someone in the midst of studying the Old Testament, I can say that I haven’t found any mention of pending damnation for being transgender or intersex.  The closest it comes is a verse that says men should not wear women’s clothing.  Now I don’t know each and everyone’s particulars, but I know I meet the medical definition of female gender, and even in Ohio, a State that until recently refused to allow birth certificates to be changed, I meet the criteria.  Therefore I can only conclude I am not a man wearing women’s clothing.  But there is a somewhat different scholarly explanation of that law that it should not be taken as literally as the haters want.  Mostly men should not pretend to be women to ex ape from their enemies. Or tried to hide from God.     willow
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Well, the left wing has been doing that.    I read a few things while trying to find out what the problem is and liked what I read.  But I am a conservative.    Is there something specific in there that is of concern?  Does it promise somewhere to erase trans folk? That would be problematic.
    • Ivy
      It's a plan to basically completely take over the government by the right wing.
    • Ivy
      I'm actually in Asheville tonight.  Some of the people in the support group invited me for dinner after the meeting.  We're going to get together again tomorrow again. It's been nice, 4 trans women and 1 trans man, together ar a restaurant.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found https://www.project2025.org/policy/   I will have to read it.  I have not.  What is of concern?   The link provided earlier goes back to this forum.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      My parents were life long Democrats. 
    • Ivy
      'Nuff said. Yeah I'm not thrilled with Biden either. There are some conservative ideas I'm good with.  And I do feel that the current Democratic party is too cozy with the bankers and wealthy.  But despite all their talk, when it comes down to it, so are the Republicans.  And it's not the Dems calling for our eradication. Unfortunately, I see this election as existential for trans folks.  
    • Mmindy
      Good evening everyone,   @Birdie your CNA Is ill informed about breast and proper bra fitting.   My wife and I are checking out a campground up in Michigan just a little North of Saginaw, MI. We had a great meal at a local tavern serving delicious perch fillet dinner.   We’re going to check out the Saginaw,MI Bay area for summer time activities for when we come back on occasion. We belong to a camping club call Adventure Outdoors and have free camping at their resorts around Michigan and Ohio.   Hugs,   Mindy🌈🐛🏳️‍⚧️🦋    
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...