Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

RuPaul's Drag Race UK Gets U.S. Release Date


Maid In Bedlam

Recommended Posts

When i see this advertised my first reaction was OHHHHHH NOOOOOO

 

Maybe im wrong? Perhaps im a minority that actually finds this kind of television just tacky and of no value. It just reminds me of pantomine dames.

 

So i have to admit. I have watched about 10 minutes of it once and drew a conclusion from that small window into it.

 

Should i be very afraid or should i give it a chance? Is it just me?

 

 

 

 

Quote

RuPaul, Michelle Visage, Alan Carr, and Graham Norton will judge. Twiggy, Andrew Garfield, Maisie Williams, and Geri Horner are among the celebrity guest judges.

 

 

Link here

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

Well my partner hates this type of thing and with this show I have to agree with her. It is really a fine line, I think, as I used to love 'Little Britain' with it's take on transexuality etc. She also hates pantomine dames, and I do see the connection. I suppose it could be seen as a bit close to home for me it identifies the type of person I hope I would not be seen as.

 

Tracy

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

Ru Paul is a funny gay character.  His productions are in the tradition of drag.  While the performers dress in "female" attire they are way over the top.  Some may think they mock female beauty but at best are not hateful.

Not my taste but i've laughed at times.

 

Hugs,

 

Charlize

Link to comment
6 hours ago, tracy_j said:

Well my partner hates this type of thing and with this show I have to agree with her. It is really a fine line, I think, as I used to love 'Little Britain' with it's take on transexuality etc. She also hates pantomine dames, and I do see the connection. I suppose it could be seen as a bit close to home for me it identifies the type of person I hope I would not be seen as.

 

Tracy

 

I to have a strong dislike for Little brittian. I feel David Walliams made his money on the back of ridicule for at the time an in the shadows minority. Its not like now and im sure it would not be allowed. Matt Lucas, Well he is just as bad but not in the same league as walliams.

 

Even now he still does the gay act for a cheap laugh. But it isnt really funny. Its just quite sad. I will say. From what i read he is a great writer. But he should leave comedy to those that do not base there whole act on a camp gay man or a very sad bearded tranvestite in an old dress Doing lady things. Anyway thats my little brittan rant over.


 

For anyone who does not know Little Brittan. Hers a snippet with Robbie williams for comic relief

 

Panto dames. Im neither here or there just as i am with drag queens. They dont bother me one bit. Dames Its a tradition really going back to the times of shakesphere. Then Women were not allowed to act in theartre therefore men had to play those parts. In fact i went panto with a pal and her little boy a year back. There was dames. I was also shouting back "Hes behind you" and "Ohh no he isnt" Along with everyone else.  It was very amusing. Hense we know what to expect and what is required from a panto dame its many years old

 

I think really it boils down to how comftable you are with yourself.  It was never always the case. But now i do not feel associated to men playing women. So i have no anomosity for them. Good luck if thats how they make there money. Christopher Biggins made  pratically a whole career from it.  No one calls him a -transgender- or any other such derogatery term. Its just an act.

 

2 hours ago, Charlize said:

Ru Paul is a funny gay character.  His productions are in the tradition of drag.  While the performers dress in "female" attire they are way over the top.  Some may think they mock female beauty but at best are not hateful.

Not my taste but i've laughed at times.

 

I watch about 10 minutes of it once. I find it very droll. I would like to say it will not catch on here. We do not hold it in the same light. But when i see some of the rubbish hauled out on television. I believe they will just keep on until you have no choice. I do recall they refused to show the american version here a few years ago. However it did creep onto cable tv and such like. But the mainstream wouldnt touch it.  We have a show here. Called strictly come dancing. Its our version of Dancing with the stars. Which i do really enjoy. This year one of the drag race judges are a supposed  celebrity. Michelle Visage . I had to look up who she was. I will assume they are just trying to prepare the british public for drag race uk appearing. As she keeps saying it. We brits like to be eased in to things slowly. Blitzcreig a show rarely works over here.  I will say this regardless. I quite like her tenacity in getting on with it. She is actually a very good dancer. So far.

 

Im sure Drag Race UK may have funny moments. But ill be honest with you i will not be watching it.  Not because i find it rubbish telly. which it is. (My opnion) because. I dont watch that sort of stuff. Unless its a decent documentary on some poor trans girl that has stuggled or such like. However im sure someone will take offence to it in the climate we now live in.  Im surprised Drag Queens still exist. To me it wasnt danny La rue. Then it was just a cheap seedy club act. I do recall there was a big outcry when they tried to bring drag queens in to Childrens story times at primary age and such like

 

Just one story from the BBC

 

I do believe it is an American idea. That did not go down to well in certain quarters in the UK. As I said You cant just Blitzcreig things here. We Brits like to be introduced slowly to change.

Link to comment

I must admit that I am not very keen on drag queens.  I find them a bit creepy, rather like clowns.

 

They always seem to be very popular at LGBT events though.  Why do gay people like them so much?

 

Robin.

Link to comment
  • Admin
1 hour ago, Robin said:

 Why do gay people like them so much?

 

 

Drag Queens have been associated with Gay culture because the best know and most (in)Famous have been gay men and it has become an Icon of Gay culture since the 1920's and 30's.  It is this association that erroneously makes the conservative straight culture equate them to sexual perversion and as potential child molesters.  Some Drag performance is good theater, but most to me is obligatory exaggeration of something not worth seeing.  

 

The film / musical  Cabaret which takes place in emerging Nazi Germany is an insight into the Gay culture back in the 1930's.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 105 Guests (See full list)

    • Willow
    • MomTGDaughter
    • Karen Carey
    • Betty K
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,024
    • Most Online
      8,356

    JamesyGreen
    Newest Member
    JamesyGreen
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alscully
      Alscully
      (35 years old)
    2. floruisse
      floruisse
      (40 years old)
    3. Jasmine25
      Jasmine25
      (22 years old)
    4. Trev0rK
      Trev0rK
      (26 years old)
  • Posts

    • EasyE
      Republicans have long committed grave errors by emphasizing their social agenda and moral issues instead of just focusing on the economy, lowering taxes, keeping the public safe, building a strong national defense, promoting business, touting reasonable immigration policies, etc.   The country would thrive economically under Trump's tax and business policies. That's a fact. Another four years of Biden will run this country into the ground financially (including all of our 401Ks and IRAs). But the GOP continues to play right into the Dems' hands by leading with their moral crusades instead of staying the course and trusting their fiscal policies to win the day... 
    • Carolyn Marie
      https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-news/hundreds-athletes-urge-ncaa-not-ban-trans-athletes-womens-sports-rcna149033     Carolyn Marie
    • KymmieL
      Well first day is over and now getting ready for bed soon. Work was OK.   Don't know why but I am feeling down. I am heading to bed. Good Night.   Kymmie
    • Adrianna Danielle
      Boyfriend and I our time at my place.Both admit our sex life is good,got intimate for the 2nd time and he is good at it
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Thanks.  I will look those up in the document, hopefully tomorrow.   I always look at the source on stuff like this, not what someone, particularly those adversarial, have to say. 
    • MaeBe
      LGBTQ rights Project 2025 takes extreme positions against LGBTQ rights, seeking to eliminate federal protections for queer people and pursue research into conversion therapies in order to encourage gender and sexuality conformity. The policy book also lays out plans to criminalize being transgender and prohibit federal programs from supporting queer people through various policies. The project partnered with anti-LGBTQ groups the Family Policy Alliance, the Center for Family and Human Rights, and the Family Research Council. Project 2025 calls for the next secretary of Health and Human Services to “immediately put an end to the department’s foray into woke transgender activism,” which includes removing terms related to gender and sexual identity from “every federal rule, agency regulation, contract, grant, regulation, and piece of legislation that exists.” The Trump administration proposed a similar idea in 2018 that would have resulted in trans people losing protections under anti-discrimination laws. [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; The New Republic, 2/8/24] Similarly, the policy book calls for HHS to stop all research related to gender identity unless the purpose is conformity to one's sex assigned at birth. The New Republic explains: “That is, research on gender-nonconforming children and teenagers should be funded by the government, but only for the purpose of studying what will make them conform, such as denying them gender-affirming care and instead trying to change their identities through ‘counseling,’ which is a form of conversion therapy.” [The New Republic, 2/8/24] The policy book’s foreword by Kevin Roberts describes “the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children” as “pornography” that “should be outlawed,” adding, “The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned.” Roberts also says that “educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Roberts’ foreword states that “allowing parents or physicians to ‘reassign’ the sex of a minor is child abuse and must end.” Echoing ongoing right-wing attacks on trans athletes, Roberts also claims, “Bureaucrats at the Department of Justice force school districts to undermine girls’ sports and parents’ rights to satisfy transgender extremists.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; TIME magazine, 5/16/22] Dame Magazine reports that Project 2025 plans to use the Department of Justice to crack down on states that “do not charge LGBTQ people and their allies with crimes under the pretense that they are breaking federal and state laws against exposing minors to pornography.” [Dame Magazine, 8/14/23] Project 2025 also calls for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to repeat “its 2016 decision that CMS could not issue a National Coverage Determination (NCD) regarding ‘gender reassignment surgery’ for Medicare beneficiaries.” The policy book’s HHS chapter continues: “In doing so, CMS should acknowledge the growing body of evidence that such interventions are dangerous and acknowledge that there is insufficient scientific evidence to support such coverage in state plans.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Going further, Project 2025 also demands that the next GOP administration “reverse policies that allow transgender individuals to serve in the military.” The policy book’s chapter on the Defense Department claims: “Gender dysphoria is incompatible with the demands of military service, and the use of public monies for transgender surgeries … for servicemembers should be ended.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023]   …summaries of what’s within the rest of the document re: LGBTQ+ concerns. A person can believe their gender is fixed but incongruent with their physiology, but the authors and Trump (by his own words) just see the incongruity of an “expressed gender” that conflicts with what was/is in a person’s pants.
    • Mmindy
      Good catch… I took care of it.
    • Sally Stone
      I'm tired of the two-party system.  It has degraded to a system where there are only two diametrically opposed views, neither of which supports me.  I have conservative views regarding big government and government spending but I have very liberal views when it comes to protecting the rights of individuals.  And just elections of the past, I am stuck with two choices, neither of which I support. With only two parties, each with agendas that are off the left and right scales, I am not adequately represented.    Finally, I'm okay with party affiliated politicians running for office using their party views, but once elected to office, they are obligated to support the entire electorate not just the electorate members that voted for them.  Plain and simple, our government system is broken and dysfunctional.  I'll step down from my soapbox now.     
    • Sally Stone
      Thanks Mae.  She was an amazing friend and I grew to love her like a sister.
    • Sally Stone
      I did Ashley.  Non-rev travel was one of the major factors for taking the job.  At the time, US Airways had the best non-rev policy in the industry.  It cost $10 to fly coach and $25 to fly first class.  We flew first class whenever there were seats available.  
    • Abigail Genevieve
      You should have a moderator fix what you meant to write as "birth certificate".  Ooops.   I've gone over that verse and am wholly and completely dissatisfied with the SBC exegesis of it, so much so that it was one of the things that helped me break out of a mindset of guit.  Sometime I may strut by stuff as a Hebraist and show what it really means.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found this   — 450 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Goal #1: Protecting Life, Conscience, and Bodily Integrity. The Secretary should pursue a robust agenda to protect the fundamental right to life, protect con- science rights, and uphold bodily integrity rooted in biological realities, not ideology. From the moment of conception, every human being possesses inherent dignity and worth, and our humanity does not depend on our age, stage of development, race, or abilities. The Secretary must ensure that all HHS programs and activities are rooted in a deep respect for innocent human life from day one until natural death: Abortion and euthanasia are not health care. A robust respect for the sacred rights of conscience, both at HHS and among gov- ernments and institutions funded by it, increases choices for patients and program beneficiaries and furthers pluralism and tolerance. The Secretary must protect Americans’ civil rights by ensuring that HHS programs and activities follow the letter and spirit of religious freedom and conscience-protection laws. Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of “gender identity” and bases a person’s worth on his or her race, sex, or other identities. This destructive dogma, under the guise of “equity,” threatens American’s fundamental liberties as well as the health and well-being of children and adults alike. The next Secretary must ensure that HHS programs protect children’s minds and bodies and that HHS programs respect parents’ basic right to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their children.   https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_CHAPTER-14.pdf   First, that is not much, if that is all that is of concern.  Secondly, I have seen all sorts of anti-Trump slander, including the Steele dossier and the lawfare he is now undergoing, to be cynical of any criticism against him, and indirectly this document.    He deserves some of what he is getting, but not all.  Thirdly, I bolded one statement of concern.   I don't think gender identity is subjective.  "Radical actors" is name calling, and there is a lot of that going around.  Maybe I am not seeing everything of concern or reading this right, but i would discuss with the author of this document concerning this.
    • Willow
      Good evening   well I finally finished reading my textbook.  Yeah.  But I still have a lot more to go for the class.     My endocrinologist always asks me about lactation.  And yes I have had some very small amounts of leakage but not on any regular basis.  I figure I blocked the discharge Duce when I pierced my nipples with scare tissue.  But who knows.  I also get asked about mammograms.  I e had my first or baseline and this fall I will need to schedule my second.   As someone in the midst of studying the Old Testament, I can say that I haven’t found any mention of pending damnation for being transgender or intersex.  The closest it comes is a verse that says men should not wear women’s clothing.  Now I don’t know each and everyone’s particulars, but I know I meet the medical definition of female gender, and even in Ohio, a State that until recently refused to allow birth certificates to be changed, I meet the criteria.  Therefore I can only conclude I am not a man wearing women’s clothing.  But there is a somewhat different scholarly explanation of that law that it should not be taken as literally as the haters want.  Mostly men should not pretend to be women to ex ape from their enemies. Or tried to hide from God.     willow
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Well, the left wing has been doing that.    I read a few things while trying to find out what the problem is and liked what I read.  But I am a conservative.    Is there something specific in there that is of concern?  Does it promise somewhere to erase trans folk? That would be problematic.
    • Ivy
      It's a plan to basically completely take over the government by the right wing.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...