Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

On T and 60


jayjeep

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I started my  journey to my authentic self a little  over  a  year  ago. I started bi-weekly T  shots in February and had my top surgery 6 weeks ago. Last month i had a follow up with my endo. I  started with * ML every 14 days  but he reduced  me in June  to .*ML every  14 days. I saw changes right away with the * ML but have barely noticed  any difference at the * dose.  He  said my T  blood levels are that of a CIS male my age. He  told me I may not see  the changes beyond what I have now. This makes we wonder if I  should be on the T at all given the health risks it poses at my age. I wanted to know if anyone one else in my age  group is having a similar experience? Is  what he said true? I know everybody is different but I was disappointed by what he said. 

 

J

Edited by MaryEllen
Dosages removed per rule 13 of the community rules
Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

Well, for me on E, it's because I think better on E than I ever did on T. While I'm on the hormones my brain actually wants, I get clarity. a certain amount of serenity and I feel better about myself. I have to go off my precious, precious E in two weeks and I'm afraid I'm going to turn into a werewolf. Figuratively, naturally. Though it would be cool to go on a rampage during the full moon, it's probably not conductive to my long-term goals. So yeah, aside from the physical changes, that's what my drug-of-choice does for me and health risks be damned.

 

So in your shoes, I'd ask myself what does T do for me? How does it make me feel? Do I feel better or worse when I'm chasing the dragon (OK, I'm being silly again). Then I'd stop and ask myself if I think those things are worth the risk.

 

Hugs!

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

With reduced dosage you will see change, it will just be slower in coming.  Remember that as we age women and men's hormone levels drop so that may be why your doctor changed your dosage, to get you more in line with a natal level.  

 

You have to weigh the risks against the benefits.  Talk with your doctor and continue to monitor the levels in your body.  As long as you feel good that is a good sign.

 

Jani  

Link to comment

Thanks for the advice. I did forget how wonderful it felt the first time I got my shot. I  had a hystorectomy in my 20's due to endometriosis so  my natural estrogen is very low. 

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

I am on what some may call a low dose of E for health reasons.  I have rather severe heart issues so extremes could be extremely dangerous.  I think the same is true for T.  I've been on HRT for 7+ years now and while my E levels are low they are appropriate for a woman my age and i've found the results with time have helped me a great deal.  I would guess that you will see the changes you seek if a bit more slowly.  

 

Hugs,

 

Charlize

Link to comment

I went on T after being on E for 20+ years thinking it might boost the libido and bring little willy back for the missus, but alas little willy is dead for good and come to find out the missus doesn't miss him anyway, so I'm back on what would constitute a low dose post menopausal level of  a bi-monthly injectable E again and am actually feeling more myself that I was on T. I'm 76 years old and a low dose is age appropriate.

Link to comment
  • 4 weeks later...

Hey Jay.....I am 65 and started on T a few years back.  I did not have an Endo ….my doctor is MTF and she gave me the standard starting dose.  No Bueno.....like you I must have a high T level.  I liked it made me more "let's get er done",  I did NOT like how sexually preoccupied it made me.  My voice has always been deep and it dropped an octave (constantly heard do you have a cold?), my body fat shifted, my forearms ached (from expanding muscle) and I grew hair in unexpected places (lol).  It was good for awhile but I stopped because of medical issues.  I gave it a break and gave it another shot again...….no pun intended.  This time tried adjusting (lowering)the dosage amount and frequency.  Still it was problematic so I stopped again.   That was close to a year ago.    I feel like I have achieved the desired effects from the first two attempts and I agree is it worth the medical issues to start up again.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 98 Guests (See full list)

    • awkward-yet-sweet
    • VickySGV
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.6k
    • Total Posts
      768.2k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,020
    • Most Online
      8,356

    Tami
    Newest Member
    Tami
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Bebhar
      Bebhar
      (41 years old)
    2. caelensmom
      caelensmom
      (40 years old)
    3. Jani
      Jani
      (70 years old)
    4. Jessicapitts
      Jessicapitts
      (37 years old)
    5. klb046
      klb046
      (30 years old)
  • Posts

    • Carolyn Marie
      You make some good points, AYS.  But there are usually already too many ballot propositions each election, so the proponents know it's best to wrap it all up into a nice package.  Plus, it's easier for the signature gatherers.  Otherwise they have to have a separate clipboard for each proposition.  Too much paperwork, dontcha know?   This kind of proposition is a loser in CA, so the only possible way the proponents can succeed is to give it the scariest title imaginable and try to put one over on the voters before they get wise.  Bottom line; an ice cube on a hot summer sidewalk has a better chance of success.   Carolyn Marie
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      Reading that article, it seems like the attorney general gets to call it whatever unless its an outright lie.  Given the nature of politics in CA, it seems like one side has the bully pulpit for sure.  Labeling it "Restricts Rights" vs "Protects Kids" is very much a matter of perspective.  Unfortunately, that matters since many voters don't bother to read.  Perhaps a better (unbiased) way to handle it would be to simply give the ballot measure a number with no title, forcing folks to read it.    I think it would have been better to handle the various issues covered by the ballot measure separately, rather than all at once.  For example, issues relating to disclosure of medical and social information to parents.  That could be its own ballot measure, rather than lumped in with everything else.  Besides, shorter and more succinct measures are more likely to be read completely. 
    • Carolyn Marie
      https://calmatters.org/education/k-12-education/2024/04/trans-youth/     Yup, the existing title sound perfectly appropriate and accurate to me, too.   Carolyn Marie
    • Adrianna Danielle
      Seen my hrt specialist this morning and nothing but good news,estrogen levels looked good.Boyfriend was with me and I admit he has been learning well about my transition showing his support.Our relationship is going great and we both see each other much happier now.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      This reminded me of an individual who, due to child sexual abuse, lived as a woman for 15 years, detransitioned and noisily insists that all trans people have his story.  His name comes up fairly often because it fits the narrative.   I don't know that anyone actually has been railroaded.  People may say it, they may look back at what happened and decide that happened.  It's a he said / she said, but it feeds a narrative that is useful for those who are already convinced that trans people are abuse victims first and foremost.  That the detransition rate is so low tells me that railroading is not actually a problem, and I regret giving the impression that I thought it was.  That so few detransition is a success story.   What is pertitent at heart is that people hear and believe all the stories out there, and the story we have to tell is not heard, because TG folk are, after all, untrustworthy in their view and unworthy of an audience.  Somehow it needs to get out there as to what the real situation is. 
    • Ashley0616
    • Ashley0616
      I'm not saying that Christianity is wrong but at the same time there were more than 30,000 changes to it. The Bible doesn't state anything against transgender. The only point that can be proven by them is that people are giving into their desire. 1 John 2:15-17 ESV "Do not love the world or the things in the world. If anyone loves the world, the love of the Father is not in him. For all that is in the world—the desires of the flesh and the desires of the eyes and pride of life—is not from the Father but is from the world. And the world is passing away along with its desires, but whoever does the will of God abides forever." I would love to challenge them by asking who watches a movie, reads books, and listens to music that isn't Christian based because then they would be guilty as well. 1 Corinthians 10:31 ESV "So, whether you eat or drink, or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God. Probably not a single hand would still stand that they don't participate in everything they do gives glory to God. "
    • VickySGV
      My neighboring state got lucky a couple years ago. 
    • VickySGV
      https://www.wpath.org/soc8   I had been looking for this to respond to a member and could not find it .  Pinning it for now.
    • VickySGV
      @Abigail GenevieveSomewhere in the Forums here, we have a link to the World Professional Association for Transgender Health's Standards Of Care, now at revision 8 but it is available in plenty of places.   https://www.wpath.org/soc8.    These are the canons for the allied medical fields that deal with Trans people and are the guidance for those professionals.  I personally know members of the Association and have toyed with the idea of becoming an associate member since I am not a medical professional but because I like to keep on top of what is going on medically.  There are a number of Trans people who think they are overly oppressive as far as the gatekeeping goes, but the medical / psychological profession members who follow these guidelines for there patients WILL NOT be forcing their patients into unneeded or harmful surgery or medications.  I read my first pitiful and heart-rending  "detransitioning" story 60 years ago when I snuck a tabloid newspaper behind a comic book down at the neighborhood convenience store when I was 16 years old and reading it off the rack which should have been adult only.  I am afraid that it was the first thing I ever read that told me about Trans and Transsexual people, it would be another 30 years before I actually figured out my own story.  The story I later found out, was NOT written by a Trans person, but a well known Porn scribbler who wrote many fantastic and gory stories about what he thought Trans people were.  We are not anything like his imagination, but he was a "press agent" for Trans people of the time.  We do have some well known and noisy, negative view Detransitioners who have been found to have gone to multiple psychologists and lied their way Transitioning, one of the most infamous actually hid Dissociative Identity Disorder, right therapist wrong Identity that was being counseled.  It is a messy story.  The public, like my first encounter, was NOT getting their information from the scientific journals of the time, they were getting it from Adult Entertainment and Tabloids   We need to be careful of where we get some of our ideas from. Evidence is good that the person at the heart of this thread gets most of his information from us from the slanted and non-scientific sources most people get theirs.   OOPs, I( may have sent this off track here, but but but.    
    • Ivy
    • Ashley0616
      Yet another failed attempt. Glad to know that we are more important than education or health care to them.
    • Mmindy
      I agree with you.   Mindy🌈🐛🏳️‍⚧️🦋
    • Mmindy
      Well said, and I agree @VickySGV   Mindy🌈🐛🏳️‍⚧️🦋
    • Ashley0616
      Well the VA tried setting me up with another appointment with laser even though they won't cover it? This just doesn't make sense. Back to the waiting game on electrolysis. I'm in a area that doesn't do much of that. There is one place that covers face only. There is another one that looks like they do it in their home. Other than that it's it for nearby. I don't think they are wanting to do it due to how expensive it's going to be. Typical VA stuff dragging their feet. 
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...