Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Historical Non-Binary Question


Recommended Posts

Hi,

This is a bit of an unusual question but I hope someone can help. I am going to be involved in an RPG thing set in the 60s. I want to continue to keep up my non-binary\genderqueer identity but I am aware the term did not exist. So I wondered if anyone was aware of a good term I could use?

 

I know singular They and Mx. were likely being used so those are probably fine  but whilst I am aware of some terms none seem like they would be right. Androgyne is probably closest but was more referring to Agender, "Hemaphrodite" would usually refer to intersex and "Transexual" was generally used to refer to male to female transgender people planning to undergo GCS.

 

Now I am sure no one would care too much if I was anachronistic but I like to go for accuracy in these things. Does anyone have any ideas of possible terms that might have been in use?

 

 

Link to comment

Queer was a universally used word describing anyone that was odd having either different and androgenous gender proclivities and appearance or same sex attractions. All the rest of the identifications are more recent. I self identify as an androgenous non-binary type, in reality more of just a Eunuch having been surgically castrated.  Hope you find what fits.

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

In my younger days the word Queer was used to describe someone who was odd, but not in a nice way.  I used to describe things I did and the way I dressed as Androgynous.  In my circle I suppose not enough friends understood that term so it was safe.  In the late 60's/early 70's I would have never called myself queer as it would have indicated I was gay, which I wasn't.  

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

I have nothing to add, but I'm desperately curious as to what you're doing. Geek to geek.

 

Hugs!

Link to comment
7 hours ago, NB Adult said:

Queer was a universally used word describing anyone that was odd having either different and androgenous gender proclivities and appearance or same sex attractions. All the rest of the identifications are more recent. I self identify as an androgenous non-binary type, in reality more of just a Eunuch having been surgically castrated.  Hope you find what fits.

Yes. Although in my younger days I only heard the word "queer" as a suffix to "g_d d___ed". To this day, it is hard for me to hear the word, I've never been comfortable with it.

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator
1 hour ago, TammyAnne said:

Yes. Although in my younger days I only heard the word "queer" as a suffix to "g_d d___ed". To this day, it is hard for me to hear the word, I've never been comfortable with it.

Ah! ...the joys of childhood.  I can remember one of my first parades at age 7 in Ballard (a northwest Seattle suburb) with my Dad and my Uncle.  It was 1969.  Although I doubt it was a pride parade like we have today, several beautifully decorated floats came along that had colorful LGBT persons waving happily at the crowd along the street.  I thought it was so neat.  I didn’t understand what the floats were all about but from my Dad’s reaction, it couldn’t have been good.  He yelled out, “Go home, you d*mn*d queers!”.  I knew what ‘queers’ meant but had no idea my Dad hated anyone like this.  I never forgot that.  A few years later as I started to crossdress in secret against my mother’s wishes, I was scared to death my Dad was going to hate me if he found out or knew how I felt inside.  I still really don’t enjoy parades and find it hard to call myself ‘queer’.  Nothing a few hundred hours of good therapy can’t fix.

 

Susan R?

Link to comment
  • 3 weeks later...

In Northern Nevada and the Bay Area during the era between WWII and the Free Speech Movement, "queer" was the second most polite word. "Homosexual" was polite, "gay" was new and considered a way for "queers" to cheer themselves up. (Honest, those are the words and meanings I learned.) Then there were all the not-polite words, spat out by homophobic tough guys, afraid it was catching.

"Female Impersonators" were a floor-show in Reno and Vegas, and Finnochios (sp?) was a club on North Beach in The City, where they had a permanent show. Very talented people. 

Cis women were disrespected too, but they were considered "normal" "sex-objects." All kinds of not-nice terms, as if their job were  to arouse males.

But with the FSM and "do your own thing," the Pill, grass, acid -- things started changing, very slowly, as sensitivities grew, and the "Gay Community" took hold in the Castro. Think Harvey Milk. LA always had their own bizarre set of rules, but the same thing was happening on the Atlantic Coast.

Just my take, having grown up around it all. YMMV.

 

 

Link to comment
  • 1 month later...

According to my mother who grew up in the 50s and went to college in the 60s, most of the people in this area just said people like that were "different". I know a few euphemisms for gay men specifically such as "a friend of Dorothy", "on the bus", and over in England they used to say someone was "family".  Oh! The scholar Jennie June of 19th/20th century America self-identified as "faerie", "androgyne", and "effeminate man". But probably less anachronistic and pejorative by modern standards, they also identified as an "invert". I'm a bit late, but I hope that helps. 

P.S. - If you haven't heard of or read anything by Jennie June, please do. Quite the pioneering individual for trans and nonbinary people. 

Link to comment

 I have heard the term "invert."

Even funnier is i grew up in the 50s and went to college in the late 60s, so I'm about the same age as... your parents.

TA

Link to comment

try X that was the priest and nuns would someone in my school if they where diff. Different meaning (you where not Irish, Italian or white catholic )

Link to comment
  • 1 month later...

Hi, I registered just to post to this thread because it intersects with my story.  Also, I am the same age as the moderator and did not consider myself queer in 1984.  However, I have a memory of the end of my senior year of college from that year.  Some close acquaintance sent me off from school with some comment like, "[sleepinflame] I would have said you were gay if you hadn't been going out with [girlfriend] for the last three years."  The reason it is relevant is that, at that time, the culture, at least in the Midwest, knew of the existence of straights and gays.  That's it.  There was no place to understand some man who had some feminine qualities.  Now roll back to 1972.  I was 10.  I remember that my mom cautioned me about gay men who preyed on young boys.  At that time, culture in the U.S. didn't even understand that gay men were not the same as pedophiles.   Go back much further in time and you'd find that any woman who caused any trouble at all was just committed to an insane asylum.  Gay men were treated better than that.  I'm not sure exactly what to think of the 60's, but you didn't really want to be a cis-woman, much less anything more queer.  My mom once commented about the show Mad Men, "I can't watch it, I lived it."  She was one of the first female full professors at her university.  There is no past golden age and there were no terms for what you asked about.  It would have been a horror for most here to exist then, IMO.

Link to comment
7 hours ago, sleepinflame said:

Hi, I registered just to post to this thread because it intersects with my story.  Also, I am the same age as the moderator and did not consider myself queer in 1984.  However, I have a memory of the end of my senior year of college from that year.  Some close acquaintance sent me off from school with some comment like, "[sleepinflame] I would have said you were gay if you hadn't been going out with [girlfriend] for the last three years."  The reason it is relevant is that, at that time, the culture, at least in the Midwest, knew of the existence of straights and gays.  That's it.  There was no place to understand some man who had some feminine qualities.  Now roll back to 1972.  I was 10.  I remember that my mom cautioned me about gay men who preyed on young boys.  At that time, culture in the U.S. didn't even understand that gay men were not the same as pedophiles.   Go back much further in time and you'd find that any woman who caused any trouble at all was just committed to an insane asylum.  Gay men were treated better than that.  I'm not sure exactly what to think of the 60's, but you didn't really want to be a cis-woman, much less anything more queer.  My mom once commented about the show Mad Men, "I can't watch it, I lived it."  She was one of the first female full professors at her university.  There is no past golden age and there were no terms for what you asked about.  It would have been a horror for most here to exist then, IMO.

I got the warning from my mother in the late 50s.

But I think my mother always suspected my twig was bent differently.

TA

Link to comment

@TammyAnne

 

The funny thing was, just a few years later, circa 1975, my mother was commuting with a gay man to UIUC to get her PhD.  He became a good friend of hers and I even remember his name.  I don't remember mom issuing a retraction and I'm sure she would be embarrassed if I mentioned it.  I was just trying to get across how much the culture has shifted.  Like when I mentioned to my daughter something about 1992, "before the internet really existed."  She looked at me with such big unbelieving eyes.

 

I also wonder if there were something about me that made mom warn me or if some external event I don't know about brought the warning.

 

I know she asked my (estranged) father why I wasn't interested in girls in high school.  He replied, "Oh, he's interested."  I think projecting from his own experience.  He was right, but for the wrong reason; he didn't understand my situation in any way.  I started coming out to him when I was about 30.  He just forcefully said, "You're a man."  So, no meaningful conversation with him since 1992.  He seems to have constructed this idea that I'm autistic.  I just hide myself from him and he just doesn't understand.  I don't really care about that now, but too much ground to cover to try to set him straight.  And he has so many hangups about women.  It would be so amusing to switch roles just to wind him up.  Maybe when I get brave enough.

 

Link to comment

I recall that in the 50s and 60s things were relatively hostile to "us".

Christine Jorgensen was covered in news stories, but it was not necessarily positive coverage, and the table talk was all about how horrible that was. So it was not an avenue even considered at the time in the mid-south.

Time moves along slowly.

TA

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 190 Guests (See full list)

    • MaryEllen
    • Willow
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,024
    • Most Online
      8,356

    JamesyGreen
    Newest Member
    JamesyGreen
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alscully
      Alscully
      (35 years old)
    2. floruisse
      floruisse
      (40 years old)
    3. Jasmine25
      Jasmine25
      (22 years old)
    4. Trev0rK
      Trev0rK
      (26 years old)
  • Posts

    • Willow
      Good morning    Now @Abigail Genevieve and @Mmindy what makes you so certain I didn’t mean it to say bee itch certificate?  lol. Thanks Mindy. I was asleep when you saw this and fixed it, and yes Abigail, as a moderator I could have fixed it myself, or weren’t you pointing out the irony of that?   I use Alexis as my alarm to get up.  And I set the ringer to be two guys telling me to get up.  I was so sound asleep when they started telling me to get up that it scared me and my first thought were I had over slept.  Since I have a difficult time getting to sleep as early as I have to in order to get enough sleep I at least cut back my normal awake time to get ready.  But now I have to do my hair and get going.   enjoyed my coffee and a little time catching up   see you all later, for its hi ho hi ho it’s off to work I go.   Willow
    • EasyE
      Republicans have long committed grave errors by emphasizing their social agenda and moral issues instead of just focusing on the economy, lowering taxes, keeping the public safe, building a strong national defense, promoting business, touting reasonable immigration policies, etc.   The country would thrive economically under Trump's tax and business policies. That's a fact. Another four years of Biden will run this country into the ground financially (including all of our 401Ks and IRAs). But the GOP continues to play right into the Dems' hands by leading with their moral crusades instead of staying the course and trusting their fiscal policies to win the day... 
    • Carolyn Marie
      https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-news/hundreds-athletes-urge-ncaa-not-ban-trans-athletes-womens-sports-rcna149033     Carolyn Marie
    • KymmieL
      Well first day is over and now getting ready for bed soon. Work was OK.   Don't know why but I am feeling down. I am heading to bed. Good Night.   Kymmie
    • Adrianna Danielle
      Boyfriend and I our time at my place.Both admit our sex life is good,got intimate for the 2nd time and he is good at it
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Thanks.  I will look those up in the document, hopefully tomorrow.   I always look at the source on stuff like this, not what someone, particularly those adversarial, have to say. 
    • MaeBe
      LGBTQ rights Project 2025 takes extreme positions against LGBTQ rights, seeking to eliminate federal protections for queer people and pursue research into conversion therapies in order to encourage gender and sexuality conformity. The policy book also lays out plans to criminalize being transgender and prohibit federal programs from supporting queer people through various policies. The project partnered with anti-LGBTQ groups the Family Policy Alliance, the Center for Family and Human Rights, and the Family Research Council. Project 2025 calls for the next secretary of Health and Human Services to “immediately put an end to the department’s foray into woke transgender activism,” which includes removing terms related to gender and sexual identity from “every federal rule, agency regulation, contract, grant, regulation, and piece of legislation that exists.” The Trump administration proposed a similar idea in 2018 that would have resulted in trans people losing protections under anti-discrimination laws. [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; The New Republic, 2/8/24] Similarly, the policy book calls for HHS to stop all research related to gender identity unless the purpose is conformity to one's sex assigned at birth. The New Republic explains: “That is, research on gender-nonconforming children and teenagers should be funded by the government, but only for the purpose of studying what will make them conform, such as denying them gender-affirming care and instead trying to change their identities through ‘counseling,’ which is a form of conversion therapy.” [The New Republic, 2/8/24] The policy book’s foreword by Kevin Roberts describes “the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children” as “pornography” that “should be outlawed,” adding, “The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned.” Roberts also says that “educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Roberts’ foreword states that “allowing parents or physicians to ‘reassign’ the sex of a minor is child abuse and must end.” Echoing ongoing right-wing attacks on trans athletes, Roberts also claims, “Bureaucrats at the Department of Justice force school districts to undermine girls’ sports and parents’ rights to satisfy transgender extremists.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; TIME magazine, 5/16/22] Dame Magazine reports that Project 2025 plans to use the Department of Justice to crack down on states that “do not charge LGBTQ people and their allies with crimes under the pretense that they are breaking federal and state laws against exposing minors to pornography.” [Dame Magazine, 8/14/23] Project 2025 also calls for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to repeat “its 2016 decision that CMS could not issue a National Coverage Determination (NCD) regarding ‘gender reassignment surgery’ for Medicare beneficiaries.” The policy book’s HHS chapter continues: “In doing so, CMS should acknowledge the growing body of evidence that such interventions are dangerous and acknowledge that there is insufficient scientific evidence to support such coverage in state plans.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Going further, Project 2025 also demands that the next GOP administration “reverse policies that allow transgender individuals to serve in the military.” The policy book’s chapter on the Defense Department claims: “Gender dysphoria is incompatible with the demands of military service, and the use of public monies for transgender surgeries … for servicemembers should be ended.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023]   …summaries of what’s within the rest of the document re: LGBTQ+ concerns. A person can believe their gender is fixed but incongruent with their physiology, but the authors and Trump (by his own words) just see the incongruity of an “expressed gender” that conflicts with what was/is in a person’s pants.
    • Mmindy
      Good catch… I took care of it.
    • Sally Stone
      I'm tired of the two-party system.  It has degraded to a system where there are only two diametrically opposed views, neither of which supports me.  I have conservative views regarding big government and government spending but I have very liberal views when it comes to protecting the rights of individuals.  And just elections of the past, I am stuck with two choices, neither of which I support. With only two parties, each with agendas that are off the left and right scales, I am not adequately represented.    Finally, I'm okay with party affiliated politicians running for office using their party views, but once elected to office, they are obligated to support the entire electorate not just the electorate members that voted for them.  Plain and simple, our government system is broken and dysfunctional.  I'll step down from my soapbox now.     
    • Sally Stone
      Thanks Mae.  She was an amazing friend and I grew to love her like a sister.
    • Sally Stone
      I did Ashley.  Non-rev travel was one of the major factors for taking the job.  At the time, US Airways had the best non-rev policy in the industry.  It cost $10 to fly coach and $25 to fly first class.  We flew first class whenever there were seats available.  
    • Abigail Genevieve
      You should have a moderator fix what you meant to write as "birth certificate".  Ooops.   I've gone over that verse and am wholly and completely dissatisfied with the SBC exegesis of it, so much so that it was one of the things that helped me break out of a mindset of guit.  Sometime I may strut by stuff as a Hebraist and show what it really means.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found this   — 450 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Goal #1: Protecting Life, Conscience, and Bodily Integrity. The Secretary should pursue a robust agenda to protect the fundamental right to life, protect con- science rights, and uphold bodily integrity rooted in biological realities, not ideology. From the moment of conception, every human being possesses inherent dignity and worth, and our humanity does not depend on our age, stage of development, race, or abilities. The Secretary must ensure that all HHS programs and activities are rooted in a deep respect for innocent human life from day one until natural death: Abortion and euthanasia are not health care. A robust respect for the sacred rights of conscience, both at HHS and among gov- ernments and institutions funded by it, increases choices for patients and program beneficiaries and furthers pluralism and tolerance. The Secretary must protect Americans’ civil rights by ensuring that HHS programs and activities follow the letter and spirit of religious freedom and conscience-protection laws. Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of “gender identity” and bases a person’s worth on his or her race, sex, or other identities. This destructive dogma, under the guise of “equity,” threatens American’s fundamental liberties as well as the health and well-being of children and adults alike. The next Secretary must ensure that HHS programs protect children’s minds and bodies and that HHS programs respect parents’ basic right to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their children.   https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_CHAPTER-14.pdf   First, that is not much, if that is all that is of concern.  Secondly, I have seen all sorts of anti-Trump slander, including the Steele dossier and the lawfare he is now undergoing, to be cynical of any criticism against him, and indirectly this document.    He deserves some of what he is getting, but not all.  Thirdly, I bolded one statement of concern.   I don't think gender identity is subjective.  "Radical actors" is name calling, and there is a lot of that going around.  Maybe I am not seeing everything of concern or reading this right, but i would discuss with the author of this document concerning this.
    • Willow
      Good evening   well I finally finished reading my textbook.  Yeah.  But I still have a lot more to go for the class.     My endocrinologist always asks me about lactation.  And yes I have had some very small amounts of leakage but not on any regular basis.  I figure I blocked the discharge Duce when I pierced my nipples with scare tissue.  But who knows.  I also get asked about mammograms.  I e had my first or baseline and this fall I will need to schedule my second.   As someone in the midst of studying the Old Testament, I can say that I haven’t found any mention of pending damnation for being transgender or intersex.  The closest it comes is a verse that says men should not wear women’s clothing.  Now I don’t know each and everyone’s particulars, but I know I meet the medical definition of female gender, and even in Ohio, a State that until recently refused to allow birth certificates to be changed, I meet the criteria.  Therefore I can only conclude I am not a man wearing women’s clothing.  But there is a somewhat different scholarly explanation of that law that it should not be taken as literally as the haters want.  Mostly men should not pretend to be women to ex ape from their enemies. Or tried to hide from God.     willow
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Well, the left wing has been doing that.    I read a few things while trying to find out what the problem is and liked what I read.  But I am a conservative.    Is there something specific in there that is of concern?  Does it promise somewhere to erase trans folk? That would be problematic.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...