Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Medical care problems


Lucca

Recommended Posts

My experience with doctors and their staff hasn't been nearly as bad as that of many others', but it's still become pretty frustrating.

 

So, back when I switched insurance and went to my HRT-prescribing doctor for the first time on my new insurance, the insurance company ended up rejecting the claim. After arguing for awhile on the phone, it turned out that the reason for this was because the claim was filed with the diagnostic code of "transsexualism", and they refuse to pay for anything related to trans care, so I was liable for the entire bill. Great.

 

I talked to my doctor about this, and she told me that she'd send in all future claims with a different generic diagnostic code so they'd be covered, and she would dispute the rejected claim so I wouldn't have to pay it. Luckily, with the new diagnostic code, all my visits since then were covered, but I still kept receiving bills for the old visit.

 

I talked to the receptionist at a future visit a couple months later and told him that I was still getting messages about my past bill, even though the doctor said I wouldn't have to pay it. For some reason, he seemed incredulous that the doctor would have told me that. After repeatedly stating that yes, my doctor did in fact tell me that she'd find a way for me to not pay out of pocket due to a problem with my insurance that she was supposedly disputing, and he can ask the doctor herself for confirmation, I finally just spelled it all out for him. In front of the entire waiting room, who I was purposely trying to be discrete in front of, I explained that my claim was being rejected because I was trans, and because of the diagnostic code of "transsexualism" that was used.

 

That seemed to get him to shut up, but I have no idea why he was this clueless about insurance claims being rejected when he works in a doctor's office that is known for its transgender care. And with all that, after months of waiting for my doctor's office to do something, there was still no progress on getting me out of paying the bill. I eventually just paid out of pocket over the phone when the company called me.

 

Now recently, I went to a different doctor for a consultation for him to perform an orchiectomy. We got to talking about price, and whether insurance and/or Medicaid would cover it, with him insisting that Medicaid and most insurance do actually cover orchiectomy and other trans care. I don't still have that same insurance anymore, but I told him about my troubles with getting insurance to pay for my trans medical care in the past, with them covering absolutely nothing, and specifically mentioned the diagnostic code of "transsexualism" that gave me problems. He then told me "that's not a real thing" and brushed it off, and I had to reiterate that whether he thinks the term "transsexual" is politically correct or not, this was a real diagnostic code that was really used in my claim, and it's the real reason why my real doctor's visit wasn't covered and I had to pay real money for it. I think that got it through to him, but Jesus Christ.

 

Like, I don't get it; why do people who work in trans medical care have this much trouble understanding discrimination against trans people? They're either not properly discrete, or they sound like they're reading from a politically correct script instead of listening to what their patient is telling them. I mean, I've had a lot of garbage experiences with doctors in the past that have nothing to do with trans care or that I had before I even realized I was trans, so this is not something solely endemic to trans care, but it's more frustrating here because of the demographic/social differences between me and the doctor/administrative staff and the social stigma involved.

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

I'm sorry you are having so much trouble.  I do not believe there is a diagnostic code for "transsexualism".  My Therapist used the code for Anxiety when I saw her and my endocrinologist (trans specialist) uses Hormone Disorder.  My primary care doctor input the code the Gender Dysphoria, DSM-5 302.85 (F64.1). The older Gender Identity Disorder was removed in 2017 edition of the DSM.  Any of theses work to satisfy insurance although I have not filed any claim for anything transgender related at my primary doctor, the code is just for the record.    

 

The staff at these facilities should be more discrete in holding discussions about medical records in the lobby area.  Understand not everyone in the office is privy to the filing of claim information. You should speak with someone that does billing.

 

58 minutes ago, Lucca said:

...I've had a lot of garbage experiences with doctors in the past that have nothing to do with trans care or that I had before I even realized I was trans, so this is not something solely endemic to trans care...

Don't be bashful about speaking up when this happens, saying your transgender needs are not related to this.  This will give them an opportunity to reply and move on (or defend the point).  Often doctors, like many of us, fixate on the first thing or biggest issue they come across to the exclusion of the true problem.  You can say, OK but lets get back to the reason I'm here which is xxxx.

 

Jani  

Link to comment

I don't know all the behind-the-scenes details, but when I was on the phone with a representative from my old insurance company, they told me (without me telling them beforehand that I was trans or what the reason for my visit was) that my claim was rejected because of the "diagnosis", and that the diagnosis was "transsexualism". My doctor did not dispute that that's how it was filed when I talked to her, she was just surprised that they rejected the claim because of anything in the diagnosis. All future visits were given the diagnosis of "anxiety" for billing purposes, which worked.

 

I mean, it's not even an incorrect diagnosis. I'm just frustrated at the hubbub that has ensued as a result because my insurance company didn't take it.

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

You're absolutely right. I've been "outed" in front of a room full of people before. That's extra-fun for me because I don't generally respond to my dead name by default anymore so they get to repeat it a couple of time and say it louder before I realize they're calling ME. Then I'm mortified and do the walk of shame into the office. Fortunately, getting my name legally changed cleared most of that up.

 

I could rant about insurance in this country for days if you let me. I'm sorry that happened to you though. At least my insurance company is up front about when they give me the middle finger for trans care.

 

As for discrimination, I don't think it's intentional. There aren't that many of us so people don't get a lot of practice dealing with us. Mistakes are made, apologies usually given, but most people just don't give us the consideration they probably should. Not out of malice, but rather ignorance. They really don't know what it's like. Hopefully, given some time, that will change.

 

Hugs!

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   7 Members, 0 Anonymous, 175 Guests (See full list)

    • Abigail Genevieve
    • missyjo
    • Ashley0616
    • KathyLauren
    • KymmieL
    • SamC
    • Jet McCartney
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,024
    • Most Online
      8,356

    JamesyGreen
    Newest Member
    JamesyGreen
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alscully
      Alscully
      (35 years old)
    2. floruisse
      floruisse
      (40 years old)
    3. Jasmine25
      Jasmine25
      (22 years old)
    4. Trev0rK
      Trev0rK
      (26 years old)
  • Posts

    • MaeBe
      I have read some of it, mostly in areas specifically targeted at the LGBTQ+ peoples.   You also have to take into account what and who is behind the words, not just the words themselves. Together that creates context, right? Let's take some examples, under the Department of Health & Human Services section:   "Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of “gender identity” and bases a person’s worth on his or her race, sex, or other identities. This destructive dogma, under the guise of “equity,” threatens American’s fundamental liberties as well as the health and well-being of children and adults alike."   or   "Families comprised of a married mother, father, and their children are the foundation of a well-ordered nation and healthy society. Unfortunately, family policies and programs under President Biden’s HHS are fraught with agenda items focusing on “LGBTQ+ equity,” subsidizing single-motherhood, disincentivizing work, and penalizing marriage. These policies should be repealed and replaced by policies that support the formation of stable, married, nuclear families."   From a wording perspective, who doesn't want to protect the health and well-being of Americans or think that families aren't good for America? But let's take a look at the author, Roger Severino. He's well-quoted to be against LGBTQ+ anything, has standard christian nationalist views, supports conversion therapy, etc.   So when he uses words like "threatens the health and well-being of children and adults alike" it's not about actual health, it's about enforcing cis-gendered ideology because he (and the rest of the Heritage Foundation) believe LGBTQ+ people and communities are harmful. Or when he invokes the family through the lens of, let's just say dog whistles including the "penalization of marriage" (how and where?!), he idealizes families involving marriage of a "biological male to a biological female" and associates LGBTQ+ family equity as something unhealthy.   Who are the radical actors? Who is telling people to be trans, gay, or queer in general? No one. The idea that there can be any sort of equity between LGBTQ+ people and "normal" cis people is abhorrent to the author, so the loaded language of radical/destructive/guise/threaten are used. Families that he believes are "good" are stable/well-ordered/healthy, specifically married/nuclear ones.   Start looking into intersectionality of oppression of non-privileged groups and how that affects the concept of the family and you will understand that these platitudes are thinly veiled wrappers for christian nationalist ideology.   What's wrong with equity for queer families, to allow them full rights as parents, who are bringing up smart and able children? Or single mothers who are working three jobs to get food on plates?
    • Ashley0616
      Well yesterday didn't work like I wanted to. I met a guy and started talking and he was wanting to be in a relationship. I asked my kids on how they thought of me dating a man and they said gross and said no. I guess it's time to look for women. I think that is going to be harder. Oh well I guess.  
    • Ashley0616
      I don't have anything in my dress pocket
    • Carolyn Marie
      This topic reminds me of the lyrics to the Beatles song, "A Little Help From My Friends."   "What do you see when you turn out the lights?"   "I can't tell you but I know it's mine."   Carolyn Marie
    • Abigail Genevieve
      @Ivy have you read the actual document?   Has anyone else out there read it?
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I am reading the Project 2025 document https://www.project2025.org/policy/   This will take some time.  I read the forward and I want to read it again later.   I read some criticism of it outside here and I will be looking for it in the light of what has been posted here and there.  Some of the criticism is bosh.   @MaeBe have you read the actual document?
    • RaineOnYourParade
      *older, not holder, oops :P
    • Abigail Genevieve
      No problem!
    • RaineOnYourParade
      Old topic, but I gotta say my favorites are: "Stop hitting on minors" (doesn't work if you're holder tho) and "Sure as [squid] not you"
    • Carolyn Marie
      Abigail, I think we will just leave the other posts where they are, and the discussion can start anew here.  It is possible to do what you ask, but would disrupt the flow of the discussion in the other thread, and would require more work than it's worth.   Carolyn Marie
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I am in too good a mood to earn my certificate today. I am sure something will happen that will put me on the path to earning it.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      It's likely most cis-women consider a fitting unnecessary "because they know what  they wear" and get used to the wrong size.  The instructions for what your size is are simple and why go to any further effort?  You measure your bandsize and you measure your max and subtract the two to get the needed info for the cup size.  Then you buy the same size for years until it hurts or something.
    • KatieSC
      Congratulations Lorelei! Yes, it is a powerful feeling to have the documents that say "you are you".
    • Mmindy
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Here is space for discussion on this, since the topic is large and could derail another thread SOMEBODY started.   Could some dear, sweet, kind Moderator pull everything related to this from the Voting for Trump thread and put it here?  I don't know if you can do that; I am the new girl on the block after all (blinks sweetly).
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...