Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Male Privilege and Transgender Women


Dana Michelle

Recommended Posts

22 hours ago, Sally Stone said:

I don't believe this is a common view, however, because most cis women I have met and interacted with are perfectly okay with my feminine self-expression.

Thank you for your reply, Sally.  Between your response and @Susan R's this is comforting.


Maybe I already knew the answer?  this in not a trans/LGBTQ+, or cis-man/woman issue, its a human issue.  How we treat each other as human beings.  That's my experience in life also, that people who are secure in themselves will treat other with understanding and respect ... and those that aren't ... ?  Well I guess it doesn't matter what "category" they identify with.

Thanks again❣️

Link to comment

  Something my ex said years ago after coming home from a book club meeting has stuck with me and having left the dark, I am always checking myself to see if I am doing it. Men and boys in school, talk over women and girls in school. From a very early age males instinctively become the dominate gender.  Watch for it. It is always there. The notion of the male gender being stronger equates males being more important and being more important what they have to say is almost ALWAYS the implied consent to run over women. A friend of mine, a cultural anthropologist, lays the blame on patriarchal societies and in matriarchal societies the opposite is true. 
  In the thirty years since my ex’s revelation it is something I watch for and for the most part, it is a valid observation. Since transitioning the scenario plays out, time and time again. I would add that to feminine mannerisms to further your transition in order to be acceptable as a woman. Do I think we should acquiesce to male privilege rudeness? No, but be aware, it is there.

Link to comment
2 hours ago, Erikka said:

Watch for it. It is always there. The notion of the male gender being stronger equates males being more important and being more important what they have to say is almost ALWAYS the implied consent to run over women. 

In the thirty years since my ex’s revelation it is something I watch for and for the most part, it is a valid observation. Since transitioning the scenario plays out, time and time again. I would add that to feminine mannerisms to further your transition in order to be acceptable as a woman. Do I think we should acquiesce to male privilege rudeness? No, but be aware, it is there.

YES! Absolutely! Well written response right there Erikka! Here here!

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator
5 hours ago, KayC said:

That was an uplifting experience and nice to hear how much it helped you.  I hope I can experience the same someday.

I have no doubt you will.?

Link to comment

Very well said.

 

2 hours ago, MaryMary said:

We all have different experiences and I can only talk for myself but I grew up ... different. Although the word or concept of transgender did not exist at the time in my city and community I was quite visible in my transgenderness, lol (sorry for the new word, hahaha) When I think about male privilege I always feel like I almost had it. But the truth is that I was so different and cast aside that while the boys where having their special treatment I was beaten down by one anyway so I was not listening or there to receive this special treatment. Since it was not cool to be my friend I was rejected by gangs of girls too, or worst they made fun of me. Later when I was a teenager I did make a couple of friends but they always stopped hanging with me when they had a boyfriend.... lollll So I didn't even had what female had neither. I was just a reject and a miserable, suicidal misfit.

 

I think I did not have male privilege, nor even female privilege. I had knuckle privilege, I was the first to receive the punch, lol

 

 

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator
3 hours ago, Erikka said:

Men and boys in school, talk over women and girls in school. From a very early age males instinctively become the dominate gender.  Watch for it. It is always there. The notion of the male gender being stronger equates males being more important and being more important what they have to say is almost ALWAYS the implied consent to run over women. A friend of mine, a cultural anthropologist, lays the blame on patriarchal societies and in matriarchal societies the opposite is true.

 

In yet another unnoticed early hint that I was trans, I would let men talk over me and interrupt me.  I didn't instinctively claim that particular male privilege.  I did eventually claim it when I realized that I was being un-masculine in allowing others to do that.  Since at that point, I was still hiding from myself and trying to be male, I trained myself to interrupt others.

 

Now, I catch myself doing it, and a little warning bell goes off: "You just did it again.  Not very lady-like." 

 

There is probably a happy medium.  People should be allowed to finish their thoughts, provided they aren't hogging the conversation.

Link to comment
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 207 Guests (See full list)

    • Abigail Genevieve
    • Ashley0616
    • SamC
    • MaeBe
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,024
    • Most Online
      8,356

    JamesyGreen
    Newest Member
    JamesyGreen
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alscully
      Alscully
      (35 years old)
    2. floruisse
      floruisse
      (40 years old)
    3. Jasmine25
      Jasmine25
      (22 years old)
    4. Trev0rK
      Trev0rK
      (26 years old)
  • Posts

    • missyjo
      I've no desire to present androgynous..nothing wrong with it but I am a girl n wish to present as a girl. shrugs, if androgynous works fir others good. always happy someone finds a solution or happiness    today black jeans  black wedges..purple camisole under white n black polka dot blouse half open   soft smile to all 
    • MaeBe
      I have read some of it, mostly in areas specifically targeted at the LGBTQ+ peoples.   You also have to take into account what and who is behind the words, not just the words themselves. Together that creates context, right? Let's take some examples, under the Department of Health & Human Services section:   "Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of “gender identity” and bases a person’s worth on his or her race, sex, or other identities. This destructive dogma, under the guise of “equity,” threatens American’s fundamental liberties as well as the health and well-being of children and adults alike."   or   "Families comprised of a married mother, father, and their children are the foundation of a well-ordered nation and healthy society. Unfortunately, family policies and programs under President Biden’s HHS are fraught with agenda items focusing on “LGBTQ+ equity,” subsidizing single-motherhood, disincentivizing work, and penalizing marriage. These policies should be repealed and replaced by policies that support the formation of stable, married, nuclear families."   From a wording perspective, who doesn't want to protect the health and well-being of Americans or think that families aren't good for America? But let's take a look at the author, Roger Severino. He's well-quoted to be against LGBTQ+ anything, has standard christian nationalist views, supports conversion therapy, etc.   So when he uses words like "threatens the health and well-being of children and adults alike" it's not about actual health, it's about enforcing cis-gendered ideology because he (and the rest of the Heritage Foundation) believe LGBTQ+ people and communities are harmful. Or when he invokes the family through the lens of, let's just say dog whistles including the "penalization of marriage" (how and where?!), he idealizes families involving marriage of a "biological male to a biological female" and associates LGBTQ+ family equity as something unhealthy.   Who are the radical actors? Who is telling people to be trans, gay, or queer in general? No one. The idea that there can be any sort of equity between LGBTQ+ people and "normal" cis people is abhorrent to the author, so the loaded language of radical/destructive/guise/threaten are used. Families that he believes are "good" are stable/well-ordered/healthy, specifically married/nuclear ones.   Start looking into intersectionality of oppression of non-privileged groups and how that affects the concept of the family and you will understand that these platitudes are thinly veiled wrappers for christian nationalist ideology.   What's wrong with equity for queer families, to allow them full rights as parents, who are bringing up smart and able children? Or single mothers who are working three jobs to get food on plates?
    • Ashley0616
      Well yesterday didn't work like I wanted to. I met a guy and started talking and he was wanting to be in a relationship. I asked my kids on how they thought of me dating a man and they said gross and said no. I guess it's time to look for women. I think that is going to be harder. Oh well I guess.  
    • Ashley0616
      I don't have anything in my dress pocket
    • Carolyn Marie
      This topic reminds me of the lyrics to the Beatles song, "A Little Help From My Friends."   "What do you see when you turn out the lights?"   "I can't tell you but I know it's mine."   Carolyn Marie
    • Abigail Genevieve
      @Ivy have you read the actual document?   Has anyone else out there read it?
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I am reading the Project 2025 document https://www.project2025.org/policy/   This will take some time.  I read the forward and I want to read it again later.   I read some criticism of it outside here and I will be looking for it in the light of what has been posted here and there.  Some of the criticism is bosh.   @MaeBe have you read the actual document?
    • RaineOnYourParade
      *older, not holder, oops :P
    • Abigail Genevieve
      No problem!
    • RaineOnYourParade
      Old topic, but I gotta say my favorites are: "Stop hitting on minors" (doesn't work if you're holder tho) and "Sure as [squid] not you"
    • Carolyn Marie
      Abigail, I think we will just leave the other posts where they are, and the discussion can start anew here.  It is possible to do what you ask, but would disrupt the flow of the discussion in the other thread, and would require more work than it's worth.   Carolyn Marie
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I am in too good a mood to earn my certificate today. I am sure something will happen that will put me on the path to earning it.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      It's likely most cis-women consider a fitting unnecessary "because they know what  they wear" and get used to the wrong size.  The instructions for what your size is are simple and why go to any further effort?  You measure your bandsize and you measure your max and subtract the two to get the needed info for the cup size.  Then you buy the same size for years until it hurts or something.
    • KatieSC
      Congratulations Lorelei! Yes, it is a powerful feeling to have the documents that say "you are you".
    • Mmindy
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...