Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

STP or packer


Alex-John

Recommended Posts

hi  sorry av not been around in  an ages i hope you are all well ...i have had my second appointment  and i have a letter copyed from the psych from the gender clinic to my dr  she going to ask my psych if am stable  for T i want to get the t  but i also need to get something for down under  and am unsure weather to get STP or a packer  with the STP  am worried about using it  as i think i'll make a mess off myself  and am worried about going into men toilets  and using it and pee down my leg or they see am born female and attack me  i have no idea how to use it  i have a key for disabled toilets but sometimes there busy i am disabled ( hidden ) av never been to a male toilet and i dont know very much about proper behaviour in  mens toilets  etc

 

or i could get a packer but am unsure in what am getting or anywhere in  united kingdom that sells them  at the moment i have been putting socks there until i am able to get one 

 

oh i have been diagnosed with GID by the psych at the clinic i have changed my name already years ago  but its only been of late that i have been wanting to get a packer or stp i feel like things are moving forward  i feel so happy about this am less suicdal i still have mental health issues etc  but they seem better 

 

 

Link to comment

I use a Sam Stp packer and stick to briefs to keep it in place. It takes a bit getting use to and wouldn't recommend it for anyone cuz people be different. 'The Number One Stp',  'Model D Stp', and the smaller 'Sport Stp' is better in reviews, when it comes to easier using. Had to make the hole bigger in my Sam and learn major control of that stream. Plus I'm a small person so couldn't get anything at the time that was size appropriate that was ok. But the next try would be the Sport but for now the Sam is fine for regular packing.

I would go to babeland.com and look to see the different options and you can decide where and what to get. Hope this helps.

Link to comment

As far as using a men’s restroom is concerned, you don’t need to have an STP to use one. Plenty of cis men prefer to use a stall instead of a urinal anyway, so no one will be suspicious of you if you do that. I personally don’t use an STP and just go into a stall on the men’s room, so I can’t advise you on which STP would be a good match for you. I have heard from many that they take practice at home first to learn how to use properly.

 

On the topic of packers, I have a little bit more knowledge. There are soft packers and silicone packers generally, and each type has pros and cons.


Soft packers are, well, soft and therefore more squishy and easier to fit into tight clothes. They are, however, less sturdy and will wear down over time. They are less expensive, though, so they are good first packers in that respect.

 

Silicone packers are much more durable. They will usually last you years if you take care of them properly. They are harder in composition, so you may have more a bulge than you would like in tight jeans. If you do want to get a silicone packer, but you want it to still be somewhat squishy, the Archer packer by New York Toy Collective is a great option. They also have an uncircumcised version called the Pierre.

 

Lastly, take size into account. Some packers and much bigger than others and would not work realistically for a smaller person. Do some research and find what works best for you. Always read the reviews.

 

Happy hunting!

Link to comment

I agree with @TrIIIy when it comes to etiquette, a vast majority of guys could not care less. As long as you pass well enough, as in aren't covered in makeup and have size DD chest, they won't give you a second glance (unless they are in the process of doing something illegal). Plenty of guys go to the stall to pee, some are self conscious, some just can't be bothered, and others just want to play games the whole time. It is all about confidence, if you look like you are hiding then they will try and find you. Just a word of warning, when they say that men's rooms are gross, they are not kidding. I have been subject to some true horrors, so prepare yourself. Also, it is apparently some guys' pastime to play Candy Crush incredibly loudly while grunting in the only working stall. 

 

Also, same, I am keeping with the sock packers for now. Always on hand, easy to wash, and inconspicuous. Whatever makes you feel comfortable is the choice for you though, and clearly these two know a lot more than I do about this. Wish you the best of luck!

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

I remember how terrified I was using male bathrooms at first. Now 9 years later I have never had a single incident. I've been spoken to 3 times in those 9 years of using mens exclusively. Twice someone said "nice shirt" about an Affliction the I was wearing and once in a very large crowded restroom at a festival the guy in front of me in line said "Did you see that?" When a very pretty scantily clad girl walked out of one of the stalls. Every jaw in the room - maybe 75 people - dropped but no one said anything to her.

As for a STP. I hike in the national forest around 100 hours a month and I don't  know where the deer stands and game cams are hidden. I had to master a STP for my own safety since I live in an ultra conservative area - I'm the only trans person ever in my county- and s drunk bigot with a gun just isnt safe. What surprised me was how right it felt.

It aldo made me feel much safer using the mens at first. People dont think about STPs so if you are standing in a stall it answers any doubts anyone may have had. Sure men do sit to pee but they dont have to worry about questioning it. It does take awhile to master one. I spent a fortune on all kinds of them and would recommend going with a silicone for realism and durability. The cheap ones are not realistic and usually a baby doll pink. I use a Che from T-Mensjunkshop. They are the cheapest for silicone by far. I've worn mine every day for about 3 years and it still looks good. They have really good customer service too. Silicone is more expensive initially but really saves in the long run. The Che is realistic  enough that I use it with no problems at urinals with people on either side when the stalls are full.

I practiced with mine for a couple of weeks before I mastered it enough to wear it in public.

Link to comment
On 6/15/2020 at 7:02 PM, JJ said:I use a Che from T-Mensjunkshop. They are the cheapest for silicone by far.  I've worn mine every day for about 3 years and it still looks good. They have really good customer service too. Silicone is more expensive initially but really saves in the long run. The Che is realistic  enough that I use it with no problems at urinals with people on either side when the stalls are full.

 

I just ordered the Sebastian packer from T-Mensjunkshop based on your recommendation of the Che. I just don’t think I’d be able to use an STP effectively, but I loved what I saw on their website. 

Link to comment

hi , thank you all for replying to me am using a sock at the moment , i have an appointment either over video or face to face am unsure due to covid- 19 , they are going to call me the week before to tell me what is going on. hopefully its face to face as i hate video appointments  . 

 

sock will do at the moment i cant afford to buy one yet ...got other things to pay for  oh and i have lost 10kgs as well am was 97kgs am now 87kgs  . i have been on the treadmill my partner bought me a year ago for half the price off the full price , i am on it every day and on diet keep my self active on top of the walking  as well 

as soon as i start hormones my partner are going to tell his family about me being transgender  hopefully they will be supportive  :) 

 

thank you all again and keep safe    

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 153 Guests (See full list)

    • KymmieL
    • Betty K
    • VickySGV
    • Adrianna Danielle
    • SamC
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,024
    • Most Online
      8,356

    JamesyGreen
    Newest Member
    JamesyGreen
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alscully
      Alscully
      (35 years old)
    2. floruisse
      floruisse
      (40 years old)
    3. Jasmine25
      Jasmine25
      (22 years old)
    4. Trev0rK
      Trev0rK
      (26 years old)
  • Posts

    • Adrianna Danielle
      Boyfriend and I our time at my place.Both admit our sex life is good,got intimate for the 2nd time and he is good at it
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Thanks.  I will look those up in the document, hopefully tomorrow.   I always look at the source on stuff like this, not what someone, particularly those adversarial, have to say. 
    • MaeBe
      LGBTQ rights Project 2025 takes extreme positions against LGBTQ rights, seeking to eliminate federal protections for queer people and pursue research into conversion therapies in order to encourage gender and sexuality conformity. The policy book also lays out plans to criminalize being transgender and prohibit federal programs from supporting queer people through various policies. The project partnered with anti-LGBTQ groups the Family Policy Alliance, the Center for Family and Human Rights, and the Family Research Council. Project 2025 calls for the next secretary of Health and Human Services to “immediately put an end to the department’s foray into woke transgender activism,” which includes removing terms related to gender and sexual identity from “every federal rule, agency regulation, contract, grant, regulation, and piece of legislation that exists.” The Trump administration proposed a similar idea in 2018 that would have resulted in trans people losing protections under anti-discrimination laws. [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; The New Republic, 2/8/24] Similarly, the policy book calls for HHS to stop all research related to gender identity unless the purpose is conformity to one's sex assigned at birth. The New Republic explains: “That is, research on gender-nonconforming children and teenagers should be funded by the government, but only for the purpose of studying what will make them conform, such as denying them gender-affirming care and instead trying to change their identities through ‘counseling,’ which is a form of conversion therapy.” [The New Republic, 2/8/24] The policy book’s foreword by Kevin Roberts describes “the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children” as “pornography” that “should be outlawed,” adding, “The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned.” Roberts also says that “educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Roberts’ foreword states that “allowing parents or physicians to ‘reassign’ the sex of a minor is child abuse and must end.” Echoing ongoing right-wing attacks on trans athletes, Roberts also claims, “Bureaucrats at the Department of Justice force school districts to undermine girls’ sports and parents’ rights to satisfy transgender extremists.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; TIME magazine, 5/16/22] Dame Magazine reports that Project 2025 plans to use the Department of Justice to crack down on states that “do not charge LGBTQ people and their allies with crimes under the pretense that they are breaking federal and state laws against exposing minors to pornography.” [Dame Magazine, 8/14/23] Project 2025 also calls for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to repeat “its 2016 decision that CMS could not issue a National Coverage Determination (NCD) regarding ‘gender reassignment surgery’ for Medicare beneficiaries.” The policy book’s HHS chapter continues: “In doing so, CMS should acknowledge the growing body of evidence that such interventions are dangerous and acknowledge that there is insufficient scientific evidence to support such coverage in state plans.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Going further, Project 2025 also demands that the next GOP administration “reverse policies that allow transgender individuals to serve in the military.” The policy book’s chapter on the Defense Department claims: “Gender dysphoria is incompatible with the demands of military service, and the use of public monies for transgender surgeries … for servicemembers should be ended.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023]   …summaries of what’s within the rest of the document re: LGBTQ+ concerns. A person can believe their gender is fixed but incongruent with their physiology, but the authors and Trump (by his own words) just see the incongruity of an “expressed gender” that conflicts with what was/is in a person’s pants.
    • Mmindy
      Good catch… I took care of it.
    • Sally Stone
      I'm tired of the two-party system.  It has degraded to a system where there are only two diametrically opposed views, neither of which supports me.  I have conservative views regarding big government and government spending but I have very liberal views when it comes to protecting the rights of individuals.  And just elections of the past, I am stuck with two choices, neither of which I support. With only two parties, each with agendas that are off the left and right scales, I am not adequately represented.    Finally, I'm okay with party affiliated politicians running for office using their party views, but once elected to office, they are obligated to support the entire electorate not just the electorate members that voted for them.  Plain and simple, our government system is broken and dysfunctional.  I'll step down from my soapbox now.     
    • Sally Stone
      Thanks Mae.  She was an amazing friend and I grew to love her like a sister.
    • Sally Stone
      I did Ashley.  Non-rev travel was one of the major factors for taking the job.  At the time, US Airways had the best non-rev policy in the industry.  It cost $10 to fly coach and $25 to fly first class.  We flew first class whenever there were seats available.  
    • Abigail Genevieve
      You should have a moderator fix what you meant to write as "birth certificate".  Ooops.   I've gone over that verse and am wholly and completely dissatisfied with the SBC exegesis of it, so much so that it was one of the things that helped me break out of a mindset of guit.  Sometime I may strut by stuff as a Hebraist and show what it really means.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found this   — 450 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Goal #1: Protecting Life, Conscience, and Bodily Integrity. The Secretary should pursue a robust agenda to protect the fundamental right to life, protect con- science rights, and uphold bodily integrity rooted in biological realities, not ideology. From the moment of conception, every human being possesses inherent dignity and worth, and our humanity does not depend on our age, stage of development, race, or abilities. The Secretary must ensure that all HHS programs and activities are rooted in a deep respect for innocent human life from day one until natural death: Abortion and euthanasia are not health care. A robust respect for the sacred rights of conscience, both at HHS and among gov- ernments and institutions funded by it, increases choices for patients and program beneficiaries and furthers pluralism and tolerance. The Secretary must protect Americans’ civil rights by ensuring that HHS programs and activities follow the letter and spirit of religious freedom and conscience-protection laws. Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of “gender identity” and bases a person’s worth on his or her race, sex, or other identities. This destructive dogma, under the guise of “equity,” threatens American’s fundamental liberties as well as the health and well-being of children and adults alike. The next Secretary must ensure that HHS programs protect children’s minds and bodies and that HHS programs respect parents’ basic right to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their children.   https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_CHAPTER-14.pdf   First, that is not much, if that is all that is of concern.  Secondly, I have seen all sorts of anti-Trump slander, including the Steele dossier and the lawfare he is now undergoing, to be cynical of any criticism against him, and indirectly this document.    He deserves some of what he is getting, but not all.  Thirdly, I bolded one statement of concern.   I don't think gender identity is subjective.  "Radical actors" is name calling, and there is a lot of that going around.  Maybe I am not seeing everything of concern or reading this right, but i would discuss with the author of this document concerning this.
    • Willow
      Good evening   well I finally finished reading my textbook.  Yeah.  But I still have a lot more to go for the class.     My endocrinologist always asks me about lactation.  And yes I have had some very small amounts of leakage but not on any regular basis.  I figure I blocked the discharge Duce when I pierced my nipples with scare tissue.  But who knows.  I also get asked about mammograms.  I e had my first or baseline and this fall I will need to schedule my second.   As someone in the midst of studying the Old Testament, I can say that I haven’t found any mention of pending damnation for being transgender or intersex.  The closest it comes is a verse that says men should not wear women’s clothing.  Now I don’t know each and everyone’s particulars, but I know I meet the medical definition of female gender, and even in Ohio, a State that until recently refused to allow birth certificates to be changed, I meet the criteria.  Therefore I can only conclude I am not a man wearing women’s clothing.  But there is a somewhat different scholarly explanation of that law that it should not be taken as literally as the haters want.  Mostly men should not pretend to be women to ex ape from their enemies. Or tried to hide from God.     willow
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Well, the left wing has been doing that.    I read a few things while trying to find out what the problem is and liked what I read.  But I am a conservative.    Is there something specific in there that is of concern?  Does it promise somewhere to erase trans folk? That would be problematic.
    • Ivy
      It's a plan to basically completely take over the government by the right wing.
    • Ivy
      I'm actually in Asheville tonight.  Some of the people in the support group invited me for dinner after the meeting.  We're going to get together again tomorrow again. It's been nice, 4 trans women and 1 trans man, together ar a restaurant.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found https://www.project2025.org/policy/   I will have to read it.  I have not.  What is of concern?   The link provided earlier goes back to this forum.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      My parents were life long Democrats. 
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...