Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Trump is putting a neon lit target on our backs.


Erikka

Recommended Posts

20 hours ago, The Viv Element said:

you make people feel unsafe in their own country & on these forums

 

Not singling out Viv by any means, but from a more general perspective, ALL of us need to take a deep breath and try to stay away from first person 'criticisms'. Attack is too strong a word. 

 

Trump is an ass, on that we can all pretty much agree. Just read his Twitter feeds. But I like to think that, as a result, he'll be the architect of his own downfall. I won't allow myself to become emotional about such a politically charged discussion, and if I wasn't crazy busy today, I'd elaborate why. I'd rather use my energy for more constructive efforts that might bring about change. I think that in one of your unrelated previous posts, Viv, you mentioned something to the effect that 'once you react, they can see that. Then they gotcha and it helps to feed their egos'. Well said. I think it applies here, today.

 

I guess that what I'm saying is that Transgender Pulse should be a safe place to express our ideas, opinions, etc without fearing hostile reactions. Suzanne1 should have the same ability  to speak her mind without fear of intense, first person criticism. IMHO

Link to comment

What prompted the vitriolic thread is the attack on transgender people by the president, an attack that not only hits at transgender folk but to all LGBTQ. It is NOT that the transgender community is seeking more rights than any other group, it is that ALL minorities are under attack from this president, a message that is very clear, if you are not white and straight, there is no place for you here. A message that to his more fervent followers sends a message that those not within "The Club" are inferior, less than human, a pestilence to be eradicated, a drain of resources that should only be given to those who think like trump. It is not about superior rights...it is about equal rights. Equal=the same, no preferential treatment of any segment of this nation.

In Genesis God gives man dominion over the world...but the definition of dominion is stewardship NOT domination. Those are two very different words with very different meanings. The trans community does not seek to dominate over any other group, just as Black Lives Matter is not any higher status than all lives matter. Equality, dignity, the right to exist and breathe the same air, as put forth by the U.S. Constitution.. the right to pursue life, liberty and justice.

When the president, the person who is to lead and unite the country, openly and loudly, discriminates against women, persons of color, the LGBTQ community, the media, and any group that he dislikes,  those of his followers who share his discriminatory and hateful sentiments, feel free to not only verbally attack but also physically attack the very groups the president has issues with. 

We are at a level of disunity that exceeds the chasm of the hawks and doves of the 60's. A president should be the instrument of unity. What we have is president who encourages a dialogue of disunity and his followers will listen and I fear will act. 

I live in California. A state that I feel is a safer place for people like me...but that like the wind can change in a moment.

Link to comment
58 minutes ago, Patti Anne said:

 

Not singling out Viv by any means, but from a more general perspective, ALL of us need to take a deep breath and try to stay away from first person 'criticisms'. Attack is too strong a word. 

 

Trump is an ass, on that we can all pretty much agree. Just read his Twitter feeds. But I like to think that, as a result, he'll be the architect of his own downfall. I won't allow myself to become emotional about such a politically charged discussion, and if I wasn't crazy busy today, I'd elaborate why. I'd rather use my energy for more constructive efforts that might bring about change. I think that in one of your unrelated previous posts, Viv, you mentioned something to the effect that 'once you react, they can see that. Then they gotcha and it helps to feed their egos'. Well said. I think it applies here, today.

 

I guess that what I'm saying is that Transgender Pulse should be a safe place to express our ideas, opinions, etc without fearing hostile reactions. Suzanne1 should have the same ability  to speak her mind without fear of intense, first person criticism. IMHO

Nobody needs to attack anybody or call them names either. The president is obviously a danger to himself, because of his lack of understandings. Reasons why discussion is so important. We all should have the ability to reach the same page and move on. "The president" had to observe interior of official bunker. Why? So curious... His dietary consumption is also well documented, as well as his affairs. I guess he just likes publicly eating his own feet and shouting his "stable genius" as far as ears and eyes can see. "Witness me! Shiny and Chrome" - Mad Max

I'm happy he's so talkative on twitter, otherwise I wouldn't be able to have quotes to warrant my conclusions and solutions. Best part is we also have video footage, and voice recordings for the kids to remember. And they will... Too bad he doesn't read very much. I heard he loves them pictures, especially if he's in them. So much data. Love them charts and graphs at least I understand their importance.

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

No personal attacks please, everyone gets a chance here,

 

Thanks

Link to comment
22 hours ago, Suzanne1 said:

Well, I voted for Mr. Trump when he ran for the Presidency in 2016, and I will vote for President Trump in the 2020 election.  I voted for him initially because I believed that he would restore the USA to its former greatness.  I will vote for him again in order to both preserve & continue the gains this country has made during his first term in office.  As far as being a hateful person, I disagree.  I am a supporter of President Trump; personally, I like him & admire his style.  If he wins the 2020 election, my family & I look forward to another invitation to his inauguration.

 

 

Another of the many reasons I have & will vote for Donald Trump for President of the United States.  Between the appointments to the US Supreme Court and other federal courts, I believe our Constitutional Republic will be protected from those who wish to destroy it for at least another generation.

 

 

Hopefully, not another Franklin Roosevelt.  My spouse's family & untold others, especially those living in rural areas, suffered greatly under that Roosevelt's reign as President of the USA.

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

By the way, what precipitated this vitriolic thread?  Was it that AP-story in the News Sub-forum about the "Trump Administration Revokes Transgender Health Protection" removing privileged/protected status for TG's???  Yeah, I read that-----I just figured I'd be able to get by w/ the same equal rights as everyone else in the country.  I mean, why do TG's need to be a protected (privileged?) class???  I really don't get it-----I'm pretty certain most folks on this TG-Pulse Forum would agree that being TG is not a mental illness, at least in & of itself.  Certainly, I don't think that our TG/TS status qualifies us as being physically disabled.  Just what is it that warrants our inclusion as a protected group/class, entitled to special considerations/privileges?   With increasing frequency, I'm thinking that an awfully large majority of our TG-population just isn't satisfied with equal rights, we seem to be in a constant quest for superior rights.

 

Just my 2-cents worth, and as I've often stated that doesn't buy much entertainment or patronage, these days.

why do TG's need to be a protected (privileged?)  

 

WHY? Because:

https://www.hrc.org/blog/hrc-releases-annual-report-on-epidemic-of-anti-transgender-violence-2019

https://time.com/5601227/two-black-trans-women-murders-in-dallas-anti-trans-violence/

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/27/us/transgender-women-deaths.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_people_killed_for_being_transgender

 

In the same way that WOMEN FOUGHT FOR THE RIGHT TO VOTE

In the same way that POC FOUGHT FOR THE RIGHT TO LIVE (AND CONTINUE TO DO SO)

affirmative action

immigrants

asians

latinx

the need for LGBTQ

naacp

 

Are these enough examples of why minorities need protection from violence? How many more people need to be raped and killed to warrant protect-for the HUMAN right to walk the street without being attacked for just existing? I. I can't write anymore or it's gonna be vitriolic.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment

Here, here, very well said, @Patti Anne and @Erikka!  Personal attacks are counter-productive, just like the riots and looting we're seeing.  I have mostly tuned out this administration and the news because it brings way too much negativity into my life.  At least until issues come up that affect me and "my kind" directly such as this attack on transgender health care.  That doesn't mean I don't care about the injuries to other groups, it just means I can only care so much before my own emotional health is threatened.  Yes, I'm limited but I don't just sit on the sidelines in ignorance or defiance.

 

I hope my comments on this thread are seen as factually based and not a criticism of anyone's else's thoughts or feelings.  I try really hard not to take or make politics personal.  My concern is always on the well-being of all Americans.

 

On that note, one thing I would like to add to my earlier comments is that this administration and republicans in general are always talking about "protecting capitalism".  Folks, capitalism is doing just FINE, it's the people who need some help now.

 

Despite the controversies and our current shortcomings, I think we are living in the greatest age in the history of the world.  I certainly don't see any time in humanity's past that I would want to go back to.  At the moment, things seem more complicated than ever, but that's just a sign of growth.

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

Hi everyone,

I believe trump did this almost entirely for political reasons. With all the trouble he's having over race issues and protests, his pathetic response to the pandemic, and the economy, there has been a little softening in support from the right wing evangelicals. With all the distractions right now, the only two groups that will really take big notice of this are the LGBTQ community and the right wing evangelicals. I don't think trump really cares all that much about the LGBTQ community either way. But he desperately needs the right wing evangelicals coming to the poles in droves this November. That is also why he did that horrible photo opp with the Bible in front of that church. Unlike the photo opp fiasco, attacks on the LGBTQ community will not be controversial with the right wing evangelicals. Anything he does to us, the evangelicals will applaud and support. As things go worse for trump, he may target us again. We're marginalized and a relatively safe target for trump right now.?

 

Hopefully we will have a new President this January. Let's just hang on to that hope!?

 

Lots of love,

Timber Wolf ?

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Cyndee said:

No personal attacks please, everyone gets a chance here,

 

Thanks

I agree!

Link to comment
  • Admin

OK, I have reviewed the entire Topic here, and by my count almost everyone has had two shots at comment here and no one has changed anyone's mind and is taking out of it what they went in with.  I am going to cut off commenting for at least 24 hours to let the dust settle. 

Link to comment
  • VickySGV locked this topic
  • Root Admin

Should this topic be reopened, I would request that every one read and heed rule #6 of the community rules.

 

The following behavior is strictly forbidden everywhere on the site: flame wars, trolling, deliberately provoking arguments, intentionally insulting others or yourself. . . you get the idea.

Link to comment
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 94 Guests (See full list)

    • Betty K
    • Adrianna Danielle
    • VickySGV
    • Timi
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,024
    • Most Online
      8,356

    JamesyGreen
    Newest Member
    JamesyGreen
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alscully
      Alscully
      (35 years old)
    2. floruisse
      floruisse
      (40 years old)
    3. Jasmine25
      Jasmine25
      (22 years old)
    4. Trev0rK
      Trev0rK
      (26 years old)
  • Posts

    • KymmieL
      Well first day is over and now getting ready for bed soon. Work was OK.   Don't know why but I am feeling down. I am heading to bed. Good Night.   Kymmie
    • Adrianna Danielle
      Boyfriend and I our time at my place.Both admit our sex life is good,got intimate for the 2nd time and he is good at it
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Thanks.  I will look those up in the document, hopefully tomorrow.   I always look at the source on stuff like this, not what someone, particularly those adversarial, have to say. 
    • MaeBe
      LGBTQ rights Project 2025 takes extreme positions against LGBTQ rights, seeking to eliminate federal protections for queer people and pursue research into conversion therapies in order to encourage gender and sexuality conformity. The policy book also lays out plans to criminalize being transgender and prohibit federal programs from supporting queer people through various policies. The project partnered with anti-LGBTQ groups the Family Policy Alliance, the Center for Family and Human Rights, and the Family Research Council. Project 2025 calls for the next secretary of Health and Human Services to “immediately put an end to the department’s foray into woke transgender activism,” which includes removing terms related to gender and sexual identity from “every federal rule, agency regulation, contract, grant, regulation, and piece of legislation that exists.” The Trump administration proposed a similar idea in 2018 that would have resulted in trans people losing protections under anti-discrimination laws. [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; The New Republic, 2/8/24] Similarly, the policy book calls for HHS to stop all research related to gender identity unless the purpose is conformity to one's sex assigned at birth. The New Republic explains: “That is, research on gender-nonconforming children and teenagers should be funded by the government, but only for the purpose of studying what will make them conform, such as denying them gender-affirming care and instead trying to change their identities through ‘counseling,’ which is a form of conversion therapy.” [The New Republic, 2/8/24] The policy book’s foreword by Kevin Roberts describes “the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children” as “pornography” that “should be outlawed,” adding, “The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned.” Roberts also says that “educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Roberts’ foreword states that “allowing parents or physicians to ‘reassign’ the sex of a minor is child abuse and must end.” Echoing ongoing right-wing attacks on trans athletes, Roberts also claims, “Bureaucrats at the Department of Justice force school districts to undermine girls’ sports and parents’ rights to satisfy transgender extremists.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; TIME magazine, 5/16/22] Dame Magazine reports that Project 2025 plans to use the Department of Justice to crack down on states that “do not charge LGBTQ people and their allies with crimes under the pretense that they are breaking federal and state laws against exposing minors to pornography.” [Dame Magazine, 8/14/23] Project 2025 also calls for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to repeat “its 2016 decision that CMS could not issue a National Coverage Determination (NCD) regarding ‘gender reassignment surgery’ for Medicare beneficiaries.” The policy book’s HHS chapter continues: “In doing so, CMS should acknowledge the growing body of evidence that such interventions are dangerous and acknowledge that there is insufficient scientific evidence to support such coverage in state plans.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Going further, Project 2025 also demands that the next GOP administration “reverse policies that allow transgender individuals to serve in the military.” The policy book’s chapter on the Defense Department claims: “Gender dysphoria is incompatible with the demands of military service, and the use of public monies for transgender surgeries … for servicemembers should be ended.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023]   …summaries of what’s within the rest of the document re: LGBTQ+ concerns. A person can believe their gender is fixed but incongruent with their physiology, but the authors and Trump (by his own words) just see the incongruity of an “expressed gender” that conflicts with what was/is in a person’s pants.
    • Mmindy
      Good catch… I took care of it.
    • Sally Stone
      I'm tired of the two-party system.  It has degraded to a system where there are only two diametrically opposed views, neither of which supports me.  I have conservative views regarding big government and government spending but I have very liberal views when it comes to protecting the rights of individuals.  And just elections of the past, I am stuck with two choices, neither of which I support. With only two parties, each with agendas that are off the left and right scales, I am not adequately represented.    Finally, I'm okay with party affiliated politicians running for office using their party views, but once elected to office, they are obligated to support the entire electorate not just the electorate members that voted for them.  Plain and simple, our government system is broken and dysfunctional.  I'll step down from my soapbox now.     
    • Sally Stone
      Thanks Mae.  She was an amazing friend and I grew to love her like a sister.
    • Sally Stone
      I did Ashley.  Non-rev travel was one of the major factors for taking the job.  At the time, US Airways had the best non-rev policy in the industry.  It cost $10 to fly coach and $25 to fly first class.  We flew first class whenever there were seats available.  
    • Abigail Genevieve
      You should have a moderator fix what you meant to write as "birth certificate".  Ooops.   I've gone over that verse and am wholly and completely dissatisfied with the SBC exegesis of it, so much so that it was one of the things that helped me break out of a mindset of guit.  Sometime I may strut by stuff as a Hebraist and show what it really means.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found this   — 450 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Goal #1: Protecting Life, Conscience, and Bodily Integrity. The Secretary should pursue a robust agenda to protect the fundamental right to life, protect con- science rights, and uphold bodily integrity rooted in biological realities, not ideology. From the moment of conception, every human being possesses inherent dignity and worth, and our humanity does not depend on our age, stage of development, race, or abilities. The Secretary must ensure that all HHS programs and activities are rooted in a deep respect for innocent human life from day one until natural death: Abortion and euthanasia are not health care. A robust respect for the sacred rights of conscience, both at HHS and among gov- ernments and institutions funded by it, increases choices for patients and program beneficiaries and furthers pluralism and tolerance. The Secretary must protect Americans’ civil rights by ensuring that HHS programs and activities follow the letter and spirit of religious freedom and conscience-protection laws. Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of “gender identity” and bases a person’s worth on his or her race, sex, or other identities. This destructive dogma, under the guise of “equity,” threatens American’s fundamental liberties as well as the health and well-being of children and adults alike. The next Secretary must ensure that HHS programs protect children’s minds and bodies and that HHS programs respect parents’ basic right to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their children.   https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_CHAPTER-14.pdf   First, that is not much, if that is all that is of concern.  Secondly, I have seen all sorts of anti-Trump slander, including the Steele dossier and the lawfare he is now undergoing, to be cynical of any criticism against him, and indirectly this document.    He deserves some of what he is getting, but not all.  Thirdly, I bolded one statement of concern.   I don't think gender identity is subjective.  "Radical actors" is name calling, and there is a lot of that going around.  Maybe I am not seeing everything of concern or reading this right, but i would discuss with the author of this document concerning this.
    • Willow
      Good evening   well I finally finished reading my textbook.  Yeah.  But I still have a lot more to go for the class.     My endocrinologist always asks me about lactation.  And yes I have had some very small amounts of leakage but not on any regular basis.  I figure I blocked the discharge Duce when I pierced my nipples with scare tissue.  But who knows.  I also get asked about mammograms.  I e had my first or baseline and this fall I will need to schedule my second.   As someone in the midst of studying the Old Testament, I can say that I haven’t found any mention of pending damnation for being transgender or intersex.  The closest it comes is a verse that says men should not wear women’s clothing.  Now I don’t know each and everyone’s particulars, but I know I meet the medical definition of female gender, and even in Ohio, a State that until recently refused to allow birth certificates to be changed, I meet the criteria.  Therefore I can only conclude I am not a man wearing women’s clothing.  But there is a somewhat different scholarly explanation of that law that it should not be taken as literally as the haters want.  Mostly men should not pretend to be women to ex ape from their enemies. Or tried to hide from God.     willow
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Well, the left wing has been doing that.    I read a few things while trying to find out what the problem is and liked what I read.  But I am a conservative.    Is there something specific in there that is of concern?  Does it promise somewhere to erase trans folk? That would be problematic.
    • Ivy
      It's a plan to basically completely take over the government by the right wing.
    • Ivy
      I'm actually in Asheville tonight.  Some of the people in the support group invited me for dinner after the meeting.  We're going to get together again tomorrow again. It's been nice, 4 trans women and 1 trans man, together ar a restaurant.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found https://www.project2025.org/policy/   I will have to read it.  I have not.  What is of concern?   The link provided earlier goes back to this forum.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...