Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Odds of prostate cancer in post-HRT trans women


Dana Michelle

Recommended Posts

Does anyone have any idea what the odds are of transgender women getting prostate cancer? Prostate cancer runs in my family. I asked my endocrinologist and she said there has not been enough research to determine the odds. I wonder if there is at least anecdotal reports of what the odds are. Does anyone know? I found an article that said there have only been four reported cases of prostate cancer in transgender women, all of which started HRT after age 45 (I started at 36) https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(15)00439-8/fulltext. However, there could be many more unreported cases.

 

I do plan to have prostate cancer screening once I am 50 years old, but I am still wondering if anyone has any idea what the odds are. Given that 1 in 7 cis men (and presumably pre-HRT trans women) gets prostate cancer, it seems like if the odds were as high for post-HRT trans women, it would be known. Also, does anyone know how the odds of post-HRT trans women getting prostate cancer compares to cis women getting Skene's gland cancer? I read that Skene's gland cancer makes up 1 in 30000 female genital cancers, but that doesn't say what the odds are of cis women (and presumably, pre-HRT trans men) getting it (just the odds that, if a cis woman will get genital cancer, it will be in the Skene's gland).

 

Also, for the sake of trans men, it would also be worth asking what the odds are of post-HRT trans men getting Skene's gland cancer.

 

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

Dana I don't believe there has much study on this subject.  I am one of those 1 in 7 that got it and had it rectified years ago.  I would think (my opinion only) that taking estrogen would lessen the chances.  I've read anecdotal evidence that it shrinks testes so it might also affect this gland as well.

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Dana Michelle said:

Does anyone have any idea what the odds are of transgender women getting prostate cancer? Prostate cancer runs in my family. I asked my endocrinologist and she said there has not been enough research to determine the odds. I wonder if there is at least anecdotal reports of what the odds are. Does anyone know? I found an article that said there have only been four reported cases of prostate cancer in transgender women, all of which started HRT after age 45 (I started at 36) https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(15)00439-8/fulltext. However, there could be many more unreported cases.

 

I do plan to have prostate cancer screening once I am 50 years old, but I am still wondering if anyone has any idea what the odds are. Given that 1 in 7 cis men (and presumably pre-HRT trans women) gets prostate cancer, it seems like if the odds were as high for post-HRT trans women, it would be known. .

 

 

As Jani, I have had prostate cancer. I had the surgery to remove it and 2 years later ADT + radiation. It also runs in my family. I am not a doctor, but have talked to people on almost every English speaking prostate cancer website out there. I am on Lupron, which shuts down testosterone and estrogen, except from the adrenal glands. It causes both the testes and the prostate to shrink if you still have them. Odds of cancer should be substantially reduced at your age by HRT, but not to zero. I have no idea how it compares to Skene's gland cancer

 

Hugs,

Mike

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

I've read that it reduces your risk, but as others have said, there haven't been a ton of studies. I couldn't tell you exactly how much.

 

We're hard to study considering that we're on the rare side and kind of reclusive. Like bigfoot.

 

Hugs!

Link to comment
  • 1 month later...

This topic is something I am researching and I am in the process of discussing with the medical profession. I read somewhere on the internet, must be true,  that prostrate cancer in transgender women is extremely rare, in the magnitude of less than 10 per year? If true there are a number of explanations for this phenomenon. Transgenders die earlier of other causes before prostrate cancer comes into play and or HRT hormones slow down the progression of the disease so that other causes of morbidity comes into play.  I do not know if this internet rumor  applies to fully transitioned SRS transgender women or transgender women just on HRT? Given my advance age of 67 and just starting HRT this past March, family history of prostrate cancer,  both father and my father's father were dead at 72 from prostrate cancer related causes,  I am of the mind that the risk posed by HRT might  outweighed by benefits of HRT.  2 percent increased risk of stroke and DVT verses near certain prostrate cancer. I know that this a huge leap to think that being on HRT might be able to prevent prostrate cancer  given prostate cancer possible genetic component which might equates to inevitable certainty of getting prostrate cancer. My hairball unsubstantiated medical ignorant wishful thinking theory is that HRT hormones and blockers along with castration will slow down disease progression to the point where the transgenders dies from other causes before prostrate cancer come into play.  I suppose we could start by just looking  at transgender cause of death statistics and then compare them against other demographics to see if further investigation is be warranted. This is a subject for a  PHD thesis. 

Link to comment

Hi Rami,

 

As a person who had prostate removed and salvage radiation 2 years later (this year) I will comment. Of course I am not an expert or doctor. I found out age 62 that I had almost the most aggressive cancer possible with a large part of my prostate involved. Many in my family have had this cancer, but never this young.

 

My point is this: If you have no cancer to start with, I think HRT might keep you from getting it or at least make it less likely. However, I had a pretty low PSA when it was discovered, so it is possible you could already have it and not know it yet. Just proceed with caution, although obviously most never have this problem.

 

I am on Lupron to shut down hormones for 2 years starting right before the radiation early this year. I had an endocrinologist ready to give me estrogen. My urologist won't give the OK for estrogen because he says it could cause my cancer to grow again if radiation didn't get it all. Lets just say that conversation did not go well during my last visit with him! I am still pretty bummed out. I told him I would wait for a little while, but if I didn't have estrogen soon after my hopefully upcoming GCS, I might have another doctor by then. YMMV

 

Hugs,

Mike

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   8 Members, 0 Anonymous, 178 Guests (See full list)

    • Willow
    • Abigail Genevieve
    • Pip
    • Ashley0616
    • Timi
    • awkward-yet-sweet
    • MaeBe
    • SamC
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,025
    • Most Online
      8,356

    JamesyGreen
    Newest Member
    JamesyGreen
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alscully
      Alscully
      (35 years old)
    2. floruisse
      floruisse
      (40 years old)
    3. Jasmine25
      Jasmine25
      (22 years old)
    4. Trev0rK
      Trev0rK
      (26 years old)
  • Posts

    • Ashley0616
      Just a comfortable gray sweater dress and some sneakers. Nothing special today. 
    • VickySGV
      I do still carry a Swiss Army knife along with my car keys.  
    • Timi
      Jeans and a white sweater. And cute white sneakers. Delivering balloons to a bunch of restaurants supporting our LGBT Community Center fundraiser today!
    • April Marie
      Congratulations to you!!!This is so wonderful!!
    • missyjo
      I've no desire to present androgynous..nothing wrong with it but I am a girl n wish to present as a girl. shrugs, if androgynous works fir others good. always happy someone finds a solution or happiness    today black jeans  black wedges..purple camisole under white n black polka dot blouse half open   soft smile to all 
    • MaeBe
      I have read some of it, mostly in areas specifically targeted at the LGBTQ+ peoples.   You also have to take into account what and who is behind the words, not just the words themselves. Together that creates context, right? Let's take some examples, under the Department of Health & Human Services section:   "Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of “gender identity” and bases a person’s worth on his or her race, sex, or other identities. This destructive dogma, under the guise of “equity,” threatens American’s fundamental liberties as well as the health and well-being of children and adults alike."   or   "Families comprised of a married mother, father, and their children are the foundation of a well-ordered nation and healthy society. Unfortunately, family policies and programs under President Biden’s HHS are fraught with agenda items focusing on “LGBTQ+ equity,” subsidizing single-motherhood, disincentivizing work, and penalizing marriage. These policies should be repealed and replaced by policies that support the formation of stable, married, nuclear families."   From a wording perspective, who doesn't want to protect the health and well-being of Americans or think that families aren't good for America? But let's take a look at the author, Roger Severino. He's well-quoted to be against LGBTQ+ anything, has standard christian nationalist views, supports conversion therapy, etc.   So when he uses words like "threatens the health and well-being of children and adults alike" it's not about actual health, it's about enforcing cis-gendered ideology because he (and the rest of the Heritage Foundation) believe LGBTQ+ people and communities are harmful. Or when he invokes the family through the lens of, let's just say dog whistles including the "penalization of marriage" (how and where?!), he idealizes families involving marriage of a "biological male to a biological female" and associates LGBTQ+ family equity as something unhealthy.   Who are the radical actors? Who is telling people to be trans, gay, or queer in general? No one. The idea that there can be any sort of equity between LGBTQ+ people and "normal" cis people is abhorrent to the author, so the loaded language of radical/destructive/guise/threaten are used. Families that he believes are "good" are stable/well-ordered/healthy, specifically married/nuclear ones.   Start looking into intersectionality of oppression of non-privileged groups and how that affects the concept of the family and you will understand that these platitudes are thinly veiled wrappers for christian nationalist ideology.   What's wrong with equity for queer families, to allow them full rights as parents, who are bringing up smart and able children? Or single mothers who are working three jobs to get food on plates?
    • Ashley0616
      Well yesterday didn't work like I wanted to. I met a guy and started talking and he was wanting to be in a relationship. I asked my kids on how they thought of me dating a man and they said gross and said no. I guess it's time to look for women. I think that is going to be harder. Oh well I guess.  
    • Ashley0616
      I don't have anything in my dress pocket
    • Carolyn Marie
      This topic reminds me of the lyrics to the Beatles song, "A Little Help From My Friends."   "What do you see when you turn out the lights?"   "I can't tell you but I know it's mine."   Carolyn Marie
    • Abigail Genevieve
      @Ivy have you read the actual document?   Has anyone else out there read it?
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I am reading the Project 2025 document https://www.project2025.org/policy/   This will take some time.  I read the forward and I want to read it again later.   I read some criticism of it outside here and I will be looking for it in the light of what has been posted here and there.  Some of the criticism is bosh.   @MaeBe have you read the actual document?
    • RaineOnYourParade
      *older, not holder, oops :P
    • Abigail Genevieve
      No problem!
    • RaineOnYourParade
      Old topic, but I gotta say my favorites are: "Stop hitting on minors" (doesn't work if you're holder tho) and "Sure as [squid] not you"
    • Carolyn Marie
      Abigail, I think we will just leave the other posts where they are, and the discussion can start anew here.  It is possible to do what you ask, but would disrupt the flow of the discussion in the other thread, and would require more work than it's worth.   Carolyn Marie
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...