Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Killer Of Transgender Woman Gets 25 Years


Carolyn Marie

Recommended Posts

  • Admin

From today's Los Angeles Times.

New York man gets 25 years for transgender killing

Dwight DeLee was found guilty of manslaughter in the shooting death of Lateisha Green, who was born Moses Cannon.

Times Staff And Wire Reports

August 19, 2009

Syracuse, N.Y. - An upstate New York man has been sentenced to the maximum 25 years in prison for the hate-crime killing of a transgender woman.

Dwight DeLee was found guilty of manslaughter last month for shooting Lateisha Green because of anti-gay bias.

The 20-year-old construction laborer is only the second person in the nation to be convicted of a hate crime for killing a transgender victim. In April, a man was convicted of first-degree murder and a hate crime in the death of a transgender teen in Colorado.

Green, 22, was born and raised in Syracuse as Moses Cannon. At age 16, Green came out as transgender and began living as a girl.

She faced bullies and threats at school but had a supportive family, said Michael Silverman, director of the Transgender Legal Defense and Education Fund, which has worked closely with Green's family.

In November, Green and her brother, Mark Cannon, drove to a small house party. When they arrived, several guests started yelling slurs about Green's sexuality, witnesses later testified.

Green was sitting with her brother in their car outside the house when DeLee walked up, raised a .22-caliber rifle and fired a single shot.

DeLee was acquitted of murder.

The manslaughter conviction means he intended to injure, not kill, his victim.

Copyright © 2009, The Los Angeles Times

Link to comment
Guest Elizabeth K

Why it wasn't murder I do not understand - but that is not a huge issue.. The huge issue is the 25 years! Hopefully it is a TRUE 25 years and this murderer is not out on the streets in seven, hunting you or me down with a rifle, intending to 'injure' us.

{oooops, did I kill you ? Sorry! There goes another few years off my freedom! Hum - at my age... thinking math...carry the one... I can take out about six of you people!}

Lizzy

Link to comment
The manslaughter conviction means he intended to injure, not kill, his victim.

Does it really matter if his intent wasn't to kill? The girls dead and nothings going to bring her back. How this isn't first degree murder is beyond me- he raised a gun and pulled the trigger- what did he bloody well expect? The purpose of the gun is to kill, not maim or injure.

{oooops, did I kill you ? Sorry! There goes another few years off my freedom! Hum - at my age... thinking math...carry the one... I can take out about six of you people!}

:lol: in a very terrible sort of way.

Link to comment
Guest Valentine

The shooters intent is important, but in this case I think that his intent went beyond an attempt to injure.

Let's hope that he serves all of his sentence.

Link to comment

I the only thing I can come up, is somehow his lawyer turned into man slaughter because the shooter was using such a small caliber weapon. I am not saying a .22 could not kill someone, because it can. He did only fire one shot, so I'm sure his lawyer got the jury to buy into that some how. I think it is pretty messed up, he should be doing harder time. How much time do people tend to due for first degree murder?

Link to comment
Guest NatalieRene

Even if it wasn't his intent to kill the person shooting the person and "accidentally" killing the person should not be a excuse. It was a hate crime that resulted in a death. He should be on death row waiting for his turn to ride the lighting not getting out in 25 years or earlier for good behavior so he can just maim the next victim.

Link to comment
  • 2 months later...

In Australia we don't have the option of Capital Punishment... we haven't used the gallows since 1966 ( Ronald Ryan was the last from memory in Victoria). If ever there was an Argument for the implementation of the full consequences of the law, a Hate crime is it. Regardless of his intentions, the result was Murder. The number of shots fired is irrelevant. I am prepared to bet there wasn't one Transsexual on the jury. Given that the crime was against a Transsexual wouldn't you think they would require at least one in the jury room during deliberation ?

An injustice is an injustice regardless of who was the victim.

If you point a gun at someone, Deliberately pull the trigger, it is murder.... NO Ifs, NO Buts

Link to comment

In reading this again, I have to wonder just how stupid or transphobic the jury had to be - think about it, if you are sitting in a car and someone walks up to you with a rifle to shoot you - what is the most visible area - YOUR HEAD!

I have often heard that shooting someone in the head will only injure them haven't you - baloney!

It was hiw intent to kill her and that is obvious and 25 years is barely a slap on the wrist most prisoners do about a third of their actual sentence because of early parole for good behavior (We need the room for someone else so get out and go do it again).

Forgive me for being so cynical but our Criminal Justice System is well named.

Love ya,

Sally

Link to comment
Guest ChloëC

I agree with everyone that from what I've read, it was a hate crime, the man had every intention of doing great bodily harm which includes killing and should have been convicted of murder, but...I've also been called for jury duty six times and have sat on 5 trials (actually a 6th but the suspect pled at the last minute), including a murder trial and things just aren't that cut and dried.

From my experience (and following a lot of other trials), a defendent in a criminal trial is not particularly tried on the actual act, he/she is tried for violation of some kind of law (federal, state, etc.). The actual act is the outcome or result of the violation of the law and is part of the evidence used to present to the jury for conviction. The prosecution has to prove that the defendent violated the statute beyond a reasonable doubt which is different then proving the defendent actually committed the act.

Next, the prosecution is trying to get a conviction of some kind, any kind, and they'll often take whatever they can get. I would like to know all the possible alternatives the prosecution (or judge) offered the jury. From the article it sounds like the jury basically reported out - acquited of this, guilty of that, etc. I don't think that's really how it works. In the murder trial I was on, we were given four possible verdicts to consider. We first had to debate if the suspect was guilty of any of them, and then determine which one. We only reported out one, and would never had said he was 'acquited' of the others.

Next, there is the 'reasonable doubt', and that is where a lot of juries get awfully confused, and the prosecution, defense (intentionally!!!), and especially the judge don't make it any easier. There may have been 11 people in the jury room that wanted the 1st degree murder conviction, but one person holding out against that is enough. So the other eleven were forced to find a verdict that they all could support.

Finally, it would appear the judge was probably wanting the murder verdict, which is why he ordered the maximum sentance.

And I will tell you, um, interesting things happen in the jury room. And it's not 12 Angry Men.

I hope the family will also take this to civil court. Any additional penalties wouldn't be enough, but they would help.

Chloë

Link to comment
Guest Sakura_Stingray

Ok here is a question... with the new law about to be signed(or it has been signed) will the court system review past hate crime accused cases? and if not is there a way to reopen a case by the victem/parents of the victem to appeal a previous decision in the grounds of prejudice jury or something so that the new law will be in effect for the new trial?

im not into law or anything but i think something similar happened in years past with hate crimes against the african american culture

Link to comment
  • Admin
Ok here is a question... with the new law about to be signed(or it has been signed) will the court system review past hate crime accused cases? and if not is there a way to reopen a case by the victem/parents of the victem to appeal a previous decision in the grounds of prejudice jury or something so that the new law will be in effect for the new trial?

im not into law or anything but i think something similar happened in years past with hate crimes against the african american culture

I'm afraid not, Sakura. You have to be tried under the laws that were in effect at the time of the crime, unless the U.S. Attorney can try him under some

other statute. Anything is possible, but that seems unlikely.

Carolyn Marie

Link to comment

Sakura,

You can't introduce a new law and make it retrospective ( for crimes committed in the past). The Director of Public Prosecution or in the US ( District Attorney ) can appeal the leniency of a sentence But from reading about this case it looks like a Plea Bargain. IE: Plead guilty to a lesser charge to guarantee a conviction.

Regards, Tiff.

Link to comment
Guest Anna_Banana

Oh I see. Obviously people use rifles to wound, not kill. It is so blatantly evident to me that this jerk was just "toying around," only intending to injure her. What idiot judge ruled this? I smell conservative bias. I had to do some research as to what a .22 caliber rifle is because I'm not in the know. While they are primarily used to hunt squirrels, rabbits, and foxes, the .22 is capable of taking down a coyote, assuming the range isn't too large. However, at point-blank range, any ballistic-firing weapon is fatal. The person walked up to the car, raised the gun, and fired. You don't wound, laugh, and run away at point-blank range. You kill. Maybe if it was a BB gun, you might have an argument. I don't think people realize how effective bullets can be.

Let's take a look at the cartridges the murderer was using:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:22-45.jpg

In comparison to the .45, the bullet-head of the .22's are rather small. But still, a projectile that size going through your head, face, neck, or any other major artery is very deadly, especially at point-blank range. This man should be facing life in prison for this crime, no less.

.Anna

Link to comment
  • 1 month later...
...I am prepared to bet there wasn't one Transsexual on the jury. Given that the crime was against a Transsexual wouldn't you think they would require at least one in the jury room during deliberation ?

That would be prejudicing the jury. The only time I ever went to a trial, any of my "peers" were specifically excluded from the jury. This is legal and common. You wouldn't, as a defense attorney, want someone familiar enough with the facts and issues on the jury. You want people who are as ignorant as possible to reduce the likelihood of a conviction. Just imagine what would be said in that deliberation room if YOU were in there on that jury!

Love

Pam

Link to comment
  • Admin

Pam, I have to agree with you, sadly.

Neither the prosecutors nor the defense counsel typically want intelligent, objective and

independent-minded jurors. What they want are sheep who can easily be swayed their way.

Somehow it manages to work out fairly well despite the courtroom shenanigans by both sides.

Although fictional, see the movie "The Verdict" to see the above in action. Great movie, BTW.

One thing you will rarely see is someone allowed as a juror who has an emotional tie to the case.

For example, in a medical malpractice case, someone who had also been a victim of that would not be

allowed by the defendant;s counsel to become a juror. I can understand that rationale. So in a case

involving a transperson as a victim, another transperson would never knowingly be allowed on the jury

by the defense counsel.

Carolyn Marie

Link to comment
  • 3 weeks later...
Guest Ryles_D

To be fair.... this guy had a history of violence and beat the poor thing to death with a hammer. We don't know about this guy's history and he only fired one shot- it doesn't sound like she died a particularly gruesome death, either.

Link to comment
Guest Miss Aeryn
To be fair.... this guy had a history of violence and beat the poor thing to death with a hammer. We don't know about this guy's history and he only fired one shot- it doesn't sound like she died a particularly gruesome death, either.

How is that even remotely relevant? Tell me one good way to die? Apart from in your sleep? And who cares if he's been a goody two-shoes his whole life?

One second she was a young woman with her whole life in front of her. The next, dead.

Ride the lightning.

Link to comment
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 133 Guests (See full list)

    • Betty K
    • Ivy
    • VickySGV
    • April Marie
    • Maddee
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      769.3k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,058
    • Most Online
      8,356

    Aleksandria
    Newest Member
    Aleksandria
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Conner_Sent_By_Cyberlife
      Conner_Sent_By_Cyberlife
      (22 years old)
    2. CtN1p
      CtN1p
    3. heyim_finn
      heyim_finn
      (21 years old)
    4. Jayn
      Jayn
    5. joni_girl_1988
      joni_girl_1988
      (51 years old)
  • Posts

    • Betty K
      Yes, essentially. As Julia Serano says, they view trans outcomes as intrinsically worse than cis outcomes. 
    • Jani
      I used to but now its just lip gloss every now and then, in a subdued tone.
    • Ivy
      Yeah, a lot of times I don't really have anything to add to the conversation. There are some threads I seldom post on.
    • Ivy
      I have seen some things about this.  As I remember it was not very trans-friendly. The people doing these things seem to minimize the positive aspects of transition, and maximize the potential problems. Basically, make it as difficult as possible (without outright banning it) to discourage anyone from doing it.
    • Willow
      Good morning    woke up to some light rain this morning.  Maybe I should run out with a giant umbrella to cover the car.   Ha ha ha.     I’ve had really nice cars before but never something like this.     @KymmieL I hope you got to go on your ride. Back when I had my Harley we went out for a ride almost every weekend. We would head either SW down the Shenandoah Valley or Skyline Drive which danced along the tops of the Mountains or we would head west into West Virginia and just travel along until it was time to find our way home.   occasionally I wish I still had a bike but I usually quickly for get that. The only thing I ever wanted as a young person that I never had was a late 50s vette.      
    • April Marie
      I admit to wearing make-up. Actually, I'll admit to enjoying wearing make-up. For me, it's been part of learning about myself as a woman and finding a style and look that reflects my personality.    Sometimes, it will just be a bit of mascara and a touch of lipstick. But, most often I wear foundation with setting powder, gel eyeliner, mascara, a little blush on my cheek line and lipstick. I also use an eyebrow pencil to darken my brows a bit.  Infrequently, I will add some eye shadow.   Most of my make-up is from Mary Kay although my lipsticks or from various manufacturers and eyeliners are mostly Maybelline. My wife purchases most of her make-up from Mary Kay and so we order together from our local representative. Of course, I don't have much brand experience but I'm happy with the Mary Kay products and find myself transitioning almost entirely to their line of make-up.
    • KathyLauren
      I did early on, out of necessity.  Regardless of how close you shave, beard shadow shows through.  I just used a bit of foundation, setting powder and blush.    I didn't use much eye makeup.  I started out with a bit of eye liner, but I thought it gave me a "trying too hard" look.  So I mostly didn't use any.   With covid and masking, I stopped using makeup altogether.  Why bother when no one can see your face and the mask smears the makeup anyway?   When restrictions were lifted, I didn't go back to wearing makeup.  My face feminized quite nicely over the first few years of HRT.  I'll never be pretty, but I look more female than male.  (Or I like to tell myself that anyway.)  With several years of electrolysis, and with what facial hair remains turning white, I don't have much beard shadow, so there is nothing to cover up.
    • Heather Shay
    • Heather Shay
      Do you use make-up? If so, why and what  types?
    • Heather Shay
      Pride is primarily about yourself, even when it is not you who did something that you are proud about. You can also be proud of something someone else did, who you associate with, such as your children or your favorite football team. People can feel proud of their culture, their family name, or their appearance, none of which require them to actively contribute to the praiseworthy thing1. However, the opinions of others are of crucial importance, as best demonstrated when you purposefully do something that other people praise. Pride is a social emotion, and to feel proud, you need other people’s (real or imagined) confirmation that you have a reason to feel that way. Because of this, other people can also ‘be in your head’ and prevent you from feeling pride. Namely, what is praiseworthy is subjective. Things that may be considered good in a certain (cultural) group may not be praiseworthy in another (e.g., if you grew up in a family that greatly values academics, your athletic abilities may not evoke much praise). Moreover, what is praiseworthy is relative (e.g., if you are a good runner in an athletically average school, you may regularly feel proud about your times; but if you move to a school with highly competent athletes, these same times may seem unremarkable to you). Thus, the more exclusive your quality is in your surroundings, the prouder you feel. Pride has recognizable features. Although its static facial expression (typically a smile or laugh) does not clearly distinguish it from other positive emotions, it typically results in a bodily posture, gestures, and behavior that are clearly recognizable: lifting your chin, looking people in the eye, walking confidently, or in extreme cases, raising arms above your head. In a way, you try to make yourself larger and more noticeable, as if to say: ‘look at me!’ You may also exhibit more perseverance in your activities2. People generally find it very pleasant to experience pride, as it elevates our feeling of social self-worth and status3. At the same time, many social groups, religions, and cultures (especially those that are highly collectivistic, such as the East Asian or African culture) believe that pride needs to be checked. Unchecked pride leads to arrogance and misplaced feelings of superiority (‘letting something get to your head’, ‘hubris comes before the fall’), and social groups typically do not tolerate members feeling like they are superior or deserve special treatment.  
    • Heather Shay
    • Heather Shay
    • Heather Shay
    • April Marie
      Thank you @missyjo! You do wonders for my ego.   It turns out that pastel colors were the "thing" at Kentucky Derby Day so my dress was perfect. I went with white 5" heeled sandals and a wide-brimmed fuscia hat. Dinner and Mint Juleps added to the fun of watching the (recorded) festivities and races.   Perhaps, we'll repeat it for the Preakness in 2 weeks.   Right now it's just blue striped sleep shorts with pink flowers, a pink t-shirt and flip flops. I can't tell you how much wearing  sleep-rated breast forms at night has done to quell my dysphoria. 
    • April Marie
      I can still rock 5" heels.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...