Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Transgender Movement At A Crossroads: Poll On Hrc


Guest

Peace with HRC?  

32 members have voted

  1. 1. Should The Transgender Community make peace with HRC?

    • Yes
      13
    • No
      10
    • Undecided
      9
  2. 2. Should the Transgender Community go it alone and drop the "T" from LGB?

    • Yes
      11
    • No
      17
    • Undecided
      4
  3. 3. Should the Transgender Community accept financial or other help from HRC?

    • Yes
      14
    • No
      6
    • Undecided
      12


Recommended Posts

Here's an interesting article and opinion about the TRansgender Communities fight against HRC http://www.baywindows.com/index.php?ch=col...3=&id=54944 that should spark a debate. Some say we should go it alone without them. Others say we should stick together. There are several articles about this in the Transgender news on the site. http://www.lauras-playground.com/trans_news.htm

Intrestingly my email is pretty much evenly split when it comes to the Transgender Community making peace with HRC. What do you think?

Laura

Link to comment
Guest Leah1026

I think the HRC can not be trusted period. They clearly don't get the implications of what they've done (unnecessarily split the community over a flawed bill that will NEVER see the light of day with Bush in the White House) At last count we had over 300 organizations that supported us. The HRC stands alone and IMO should be shunned for throwing us under the bus.

I am still VERY, VERY angry at the HRC, Barney Frank and Nancy Pelosi over this whole fiasco.

:angry::angry::angry::angry::angry::angry: X infinity (well almost)

Three cheers for Rep Tammy Baldwin for standing up for us.

Link to comment
  • 2 weeks later...
Guest savagedm

what happened? I have been busy with my nose up my industrializing nations term projects so domestic news has not really been much of a concern for me haha

Link to comment
Guest Leah1026
what happened? I have been busy with my nose up my industrializing nations term projects so domestic news has not really been much of a concern for me haha

Looooonnnnggggg story.

1969: Stonewall Rebellion. This is the beginning of the modern gay/lesbian movement. But guess who started it all? Trans people, but that inconvenient truth is lost on many today.

1970's: First attempt at getting an ENDA (Employment Non Discrimination Act) passed. We were the first casualties of this effort and thrown under the bus.

Late 70's: We (MtF's) become vilified by Janice Raymond and other radical feminists.

80's: A bad time for us period.

Early 90's: We start to re-organize and start assimilating back into the community, which adds the letter T, as in GBLT.

1994: The second betrayal. As a new effort is being made to create a new version ENDA, gets who gets thrown under the bus again?

Late 90's-early 00's: We reorganize again. The internet allows us to do this like never before. We make ourselves heard!

Jan 2007: After intense lobbying we are included in the new proposed ENDA legislation. We are promised that we will stick together no matter what. We give lots of time and money to the effort and we testify before Congress.

Setp 26, 2007: Black Wednesday. In the days before ENDA will finally be formally introduced rumors fly that we're going to be thrown under the bus again. In the spring Rep Barney Frank (openly gay) had been made the chief sponsor of our bill. He had a history of transphobia, but people thought he was more educated now. WRONG. He announces that we are to be thrown under the bus AGAIN. His plan is to split ENDA in two (a gay part and a trans part) and submit both bills separately. He is immediately denounced by us and over 300 GBLT oprganization nationwide. Because of the ruckus the vote is delayed, but ultimately the spilt is formalized (2 separate bills). It's clear that Rep Frank and Rep Pelosi don't care about us, they just want to pass something as resume fodder. The new gay only ENDA is filled with loopholes that will make it ineffective, but our opponents won't be swayed. The fact that the bill will never be signed by Bush doesn't sway them either. It was a HUGE mess that was totally ignored by the press. It makes me sooooo angry.

More here:

http://blog.glad.org/2007/10/weakened-enda...s-no-sense.html

http://www.unitedenda.org/

ENDA Blog starts here:

http://endablog.wordpress.com/2007/10/page/9/

To sum up: It was an incredibly intense and disappointing chapter in GBLT history. We were betrayed by some allies and politicians. So much happened in those couple months it's almost impossible to document it all. The question now is how damaged is the community (GBLT) and can we get it together for a new push in 2009?

Link to comment
Guest savagedm

Well then we should just abandon them and take our own movement up. If others want to join us then they are welcome, but those that do not want us can go kick rocks.

Link to comment
  • 2 months later...
Guest Keri

It is unfortunate that during the limited time I have been going over the political movement for LBGT, and also the various organizations out there.... seems alot like the "T" gets merely lip service. Even my union's national "GLBT" group, which is supposed to be my advocate for possibly coming out, simply either does not understand 'T" or just doesn't want to deal with it - I was referred to HRC's site for their "coming out" brochure! Sad fact is if you're gay or lesbian, you're better off than being TG.... we're definitely the unwanted children.

Link to comment
  • 3 months later...
Guest RubyShana
It is unfortunate that during the limited time I have been going over the political movement for LBGT, and also the various organizations out there.... seems alot like the "T" gets merely lip service. Even my union's national "GLBT" group, which is supposed to be my advocate for possibly coming out, simply either does not understand 'T" or just doesn't want to deal with it - I was referred to HRC's site for their "coming out" brochure! Sad fact is if you're gay or lesbian, you're better off than being TG.... we're definitely the unwanted children.

QFT, Sister....qft....I found it was alot easier to come out as a "gay man" than a "straight woman in a mans body"....Gotta love labels, eh?

(QFT = Quoted for truth....I knew someone would ask so I just beat ya to the mark hehe :P)

Link to comment
  • 3 months later...
Guest Zoharstoi
Looooonnnnggggg story.

1969: Stonewall Rebellion. This is the beginning of the modern gay/lesbian movement. But guess who started it all? Trans people, but that inconvenient truth is lost on many today.

1970's: First attempt at getting an ENDA (Employment Non Discrimination Act) passed. We were the first casualties of this effort and thrown under the bus.

Late 70's: We (MtF's) become vilified by Janice Raymond and other radical feminists.

80's: A bad time for us period.

Early 90's: We start to re-organize and start assimilating back into the community, which adds the letter T, as in GBLT.

1994: The second betrayal. As a new effort is being made to create a new version ENDA, gets who gets thrown under the bus again?

Late 90's-early 00's: We reorganize again. The internet allows us to do this like never before. We make ourselves heard!

Jan 2007: After intense lobbying we are included in the new proposed ENDA legislation. We are promised that we will stick together no matter what. We give lots of time and money to the effort and we testify before Congress.

Setp 26, 2007: Black Wednesday. In the days before ENDA will finally be formally introduced rumors fly that we're going to be thrown under the bus again. In the spring Rep Barney Frank (openly gay) had been made the chief sponsor of our bill. He had a history of transphobia, but people thought he was more educated now. WRONG. He announces that we are to be thrown under the bus AGAIN. His plan is to split ENDA in two (a gay part and a trans part) and submit both bills separately. He is immediately denounced by us and over 300 GBLT oprganization nationwide. Because of the ruckus the vote is delayed, but ultimately the spilt is formalized (2 separate bills). It's clear that Rep Frank and Rep Pelosi don't care about us, they just want to pass something as resume fodder. The new gay only ENDA is filled with loopholes that will make it ineffective, but our opponents won't be swayed. The fact that the bill will never be signed by Bush doesn't sway them either. It was a HUGE mess that was totally ignored by the press. It makes me sooooo angry.

More here:

http://blog.glad.org/2007/10/weakened-enda...s-no-sense.html

http://www.unitedenda.org/

ENDA Blog starts here:

http://endablog.wordpress.com/2007/10/page/9/

To sum up: It was an incredibly intense and disappointing chapter in GBLT history. We were betrayed by some allies and politicians. So much happened in those couple months it's almost impossible to document it all. The question now is how damaged is the community (GBLT) and can we get it together for a new push in 2009?

:mellow: I have One Question, What group stands to gain from the split? I have read stories in New England paper's on third

parties starting "stuff" for some sort of gain.

I am new here and alway's ask WHY! :mellow:

Link to comment

I am extremely non-political, I avoid confrontations and politics as we know it is nothing but.

One of the problems that I see for being more accepted as a medical condition rather than a lifestyle choice is the fact that we are in the GBLT! For the uniformed this reinforces the idea that it is a choice and that it is directly linked to having sex as a different gender - after all the other three letters are all based on sexual preference - not gender!

While I can see that being part of a much larger group can be helpful in applying leverage, it seems that whenever it seems that we might cost them anything - we're gone anyway! Maybe we should be on our own, I haven't seen a lot of help from anybody else anyway!

But remember, I've been living with my head buried in the sand for my entire life!

Link to comment

In the beginning I felt unity was the way to go. That there was "strength in numbers". And there is strength in numbers I'm just not sure that our numbers are strengthing our cause anymore. Especially when , not only are we not getting any of the "group" benefits offered the rest of the letters -LGB- but we're actually being misused in some instances by oppenents of the LGB to justify continuing discriminaton against them while simultaneously undermining our own hope of being recognized as a part of the population battling a medical issue not an orientation issue and seeking legislation and seeking to be recognized for that not "sex and relationships".

I additonally realize the greatest obstacle we actually face is the mainstream fear of us transitioning successfully. To them it means the possibility of getting too close to "one of us" without knowing it and for them that is just a "horror". I think the greatest aid to any of us with this regard will be to give them opportunities to actually know/see us without it being for any "sensational" or controversial reason. Until transpeople aren't doing something "odd" for the gender they are living as I don't see the multitudes being ready to "open their arms in understanding." And I'm sorry but all the "deviating outside of the binary" and "abolishing the binary" etc. that some peeps want to do is not going to cut it if you want these people to buy what you're selling because (and I think some people overlook this) the gender that some people want to "rewrite" and "deconstruct" is already being lived in by a whoooole bunch of folks who like it just the way it is and don't want to be one of what it is they want to "make being a man be" or "make being a woman be". And honestly who are you to change someone else's gender's definition?

Link to comment
Guest Kelly Ann

Politics has plenty of very apt descriptions...Mark Twain and Will Rodgers were masters at it. Evan is, as per the usual, spot on in his assessment. Leah is immersed and more than versed with this issue. There's LOTS that smells about politics...and then leaves a bad taste afterwards that no amount of brushing or air sanitizer will remove. I will profess a bit of political ignorance here but isn't it really about persuasion? Politics that is...If there is a tendancy for the 'T' to be run over by the Freedom Bus as the GLB Community goes down the highway like a band of gypsies, are they perhaps under-estimating the intellectual and financial clout of this aspect? Barney Frank is one of the more adept politicians I have ever witnessed at the mystical art of talking out of both sides of the mouth while saying nothing. Sad but true it would probably be wiser to reinforce just how much more effective the GLB is when it has the 'T' added.

Link to comment
  • 10 months later...
Guest Syamantaka

As a group, there is strength in numbers. To go it alone is suicide, especially in todays

techno glass house. I think stronger ties to the global community should be made keep

up with new developments and I say this as a 15yr net junkie, Strides should be taken to

get some protection from the U.N. as a Global Community.

Link to comment
Guest Joanna Phipps

The idea of the UN is good but for the most part it is a paper tiger, it is good about passing resolutions but it has no powers of enforcement so countries can do as they wish.

To go it alone I agree is near on suicide but since the other parts of the glbT movement insist on giving us the left overs then we may need to think of something. One of the first things we need to do is get some accurate numbers as to how many of us there are the stats I have found are all over the map. Unless we can nail it down to something a politician can wrap his/her mind around then we dont stand a chance.

How many of us are there?

what is it we as a group want?

what is the best way to get it?

should we start at the state and local level and work up?

Here at Laura's we are international in scope and have a very active user base, this might give us something to work from but I dont know. The only thing the organs of state understand is numbers, how many of you are there and can you help me get elected.

Link to comment
Guest Elizabeth K

Yikes these old topics keep coming up!

The GLBT community in New Orleans has been cautioned to keep the "T" in their fight for rights or we will not support them. They have reluctantly agreed.

Apparently it has to be a GLBT by GLBT local group battle. There is a tendancy to sacrifice us to appease politicians, and the excuse is they will come back later and fight for us. DON"T ACCEPT THAT!

Lizzy

Link to comment
Guest Charlene_Leona

I was working with an advocacy group named PROMO here in Missouri, on one of our trips to the state capital to educate our state legislators I wanted to bring up the fact the for the Transgendered it was a medical condition and nothing else. I was told not to do this by the state director of PROMO that wasn't how they wanted to handle us. When I realized this I basically went on my own the rest of that trip and did things my way and have not worked with PROMO since. I will not stand with those who push us to the back or onto the floor to be walked on by the world it's night fair or right.

Charlene Leona

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   9 Members, 0 Anonymous, 166 Guests (See full list)

    • KayC
    • missyjo
    • AllieJ
    • MaeBe
    • Ashley0616
    • Evelyn J
    • MaybeRob
    • RaineOnYourParade
    • Betty K
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.7k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,033
    • Most Online
      8,356

    ArtavikenGenderflui
    Newest Member
    ArtavikenGenderflui
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. afraid of self
      afraid of self
    2. Chaidoesart
      Chaidoesart
      (14 years old)
    3. Faith57
      Faith57
    4. Joyce Ann
      Joyce Ann
      (70 years old)
    5. Kelly21121
      Kelly21121
      (56 years old)
  • Posts

    • MaeBe
      Let’s stick to cite-able fact. Most of my posts have been directly in relation to LGBTQ+ rights as it pertains to P2025 and I have drawn direct links between people, their quotes, and their agenda. I have made reference to the cronyism that P2025 would entail as well, by gutting, not cutting, broad swathes of government and replacing it with “conservative warriors” (I can get you the direct quote, but rest assured it’s a quote). All this does is constantly force the cogs to be refitted, not their movement. To say that agencies have directly defied a President is a bit much, the EPA did what Trump told them to do at the direct harm to the environment, the department of agriculture did the same by enacting the administrations forced move to KC which decimated the USDA.      How about Betsy DeVoss for Education? Or Bannon for anything? What about the revolving Chief of Staff position that Trump couldn’t stay filled? Or the Postmaster General, who did much to make the USPS worse?   Let’s not mix politics with racism, sexism, or any other ism. Because Trump made mainly white, male, appointments—many of them not, arguably, people fit for service—or unwilling to commit to term. I can argue this because, again, he’s up for election and will do what he did before (and more of the same, his words).   Please delineate how the selected diversity appointments have negatively affected the US, other than being black, women, or queer? Representation matters and America benefits when its people are inspired and empowered.
    • missyjo
      ok ladies if I've asked this before I'm sorry please delete    ok so I have 2vsiblings..one is overly religious..n preachy n domineering..so he keeps trying to talk with me n I'd like to..but he always falls into this all knowing all wise domineering preachy thing tjaz tells me he's praying for christ to beat Satan for control of my soul..which is doomed to hell bc I'm transgender    I'd like to try to have a civil conversation n try to set him strait n gsin a cooperation n real conversation    any suggestions?
    • missyjo
      abigail darling what about extensions or a wig? be brave n hang in there  to thine own self be true  good luck
    • RaineOnYourParade
      When I first started figuring things out, I got a lot more euphoria. Every time a friend would use he/they pronouns for me, I'd get this bubbly feeling, and seeing myself look masculine made me really happy. Dysphoric state felt more normal, so I guess I noticed the pain it caused me less.   Now, it's more just that my pronouns and such things feel natural, and dysphoria is a lot stronger -- I know what's natural, so experiencing the opposite is more jarring than everything. The problem is, most of my natural experiences are from friends, and I rarely get properly gendered by strangers, much less by my family. I've found myself unable to bind in months due to aches, colds,, and not wanting to risk damage.    It partially makes me want to go back to the beginning of my journey, because at least then I got full euphoria. I'm pretty sure it'll be like this until I medically transition, or at the very least get top surgery (you know all those trans dudes online with tiny chests? Not me, unfortunately). It's a bit depressing, but at least I know that, eventually, there's a way out of this.
    • RaineOnYourParade
      Major mood, right here ^^^    I've listened to Lumineers to a long time (a major portion of it by osmosis via my mom), so that is almost painfully relatable
    • RaineOnYourParade
      As for getting a button-up/formal pants suit, you can try to talk to her more -- Cis women in tuxes have worn tuxes in recent years, after all, (for example, Zendaya) so it can still be a relatively safe topic. For jumpsuits, I'd recommend going with a simple one with a blazer, if you can -- this'll make it look overall more masculine. There's a lot of good brands, but going for one without a lot of extra glitz on it will make it look less feminine under a blazer. I don't know many specific brands though since I usually just get my stuff from chain stores, sorry :<   When it comes to your hair, if you can't cut it, you can look up tutorials on fluffing it up instead. If you can pull it off, it can look a lot shorter and more androgynous instead!
    • RaineOnYourParade
      As far as I'm aware, he wasn't -- he just sometimes wore skirts, which was why it was a question in the first place.   In my opinion, part of that is because of the way press spares attention on issues like that. As a bit of a true crime nut and what I see: Child predator cases' (and cases of a sexual nature in general) press focus on those with an AMAB perpetrator generally, and very rarely are AFAB perpetrators given much press time or even getting tried due to a whole bunch of issues I'm not gonna get into. Because of this, when you see these types of cases and a boy is the victim, it's almost always a queer person who is the one who committed a crime that gets press. Therefore, with the amount of cases seen with this type of perpetrator (and due to the fact "99% of queer people are not sexual criminals" doesn't attract eyes), the human brain can kind of naturally makes an association with it. It's not right, but it's also a fault I think falls partially on the media.   That's all my opinion, though!   This is extra confusing to me, as a feminine man is usually viewed as gay. If someone is refusing the acknowledge the existence of trans people, then gay would be the societal connection that comes after, I think. So, that sorta implies that trans women wouldn't be interested in women in the first place by those assumptions? Of course, trans lesbians exist (most trans women I know like women, actually), but it's a little ridiculous to me that people will deny trans people's existence, call all feminine AMAB people gay, and say that trans people are looking to peep all in the same breath.   Wow, this was a lot longer of a response than I was planning to write--
    • Abigail Genevieve
      For one thing, the practice of putting into office wholly unqualified people simply because of racial, sexual or national characteristics.  It is no accident that Karine is a Haitian immigrant, Black and lesbian.  Kamala Harris is a Black female. Pete Buttigieg is gay.  Often you find that Biden explicitly stated that this is why he hired them, not because of competence, but because they checked so many boxes on his little list.  It makes a mockery of people and is a disservice to the US. 
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I am not sure why people are in favor of unaccountable agencies with bloated budgets and wasteful spending. 
    • Abigail Genevieve
      What about it?
    • SydneyAngel
      Hey girl  I had a problem like you happen to me also. In my first year of estrogen I had a period where my level were good then they got really bad where my testosterone spike high.  I felt like you with all that disforia coming hard. Our bodies need time to adjust. The process is a real pain in the beginning. It levels out eventually and you don't even think about it. Hang in there hugs 
    • Ivy
      Biden's woke agenda?
    • KatieSC
      I wonder if there will be law enforcement procedural shows coming this fall. I can imagine Law and Order: Genital Crimes Unit, or perhaps, FBI: Domestic Genitalia. Then again, maybe they will dedicate a CSI program about the dedicated members of the Oklahoma State Police Genital Screening Unit. Good to know that those Oklahomans have their priorities squared away.
    • KatieSC
      Protections? Well, when they mandate that some who is transgender can get facial and genital electrolysis paid as it is essential to affirming care, or when they mandate and pay for facial feminization surgery, speech therapy/voice affirmation surgery, I will believe that the order is effective. One of biggest hurdles for many transgender individuals is the cost of care. I remember when my one insurance company tried to say that my speech therapy and voice surgery were "cosmetic". I remember when they blocked paying for my facial surgery. I remember the fight I had to get electrolysis. These procedures could save someone's life if the procedures help the individual successfully transition, and are no longer misgendered. 
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I don't think it should be.  Nor do I see Project 2025 as pushing Christian nationalism.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...