Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Laser Or Electrolosis


Guest avirone

Recommended Posts

Guest avirone

OK, My original hair color is dirty blond and my facial hair is now mostly white.

I'm lined up for four laser treatments for four different parts of face at $200 each. She's real quick to say from her experience laser would mostly work to be cleaned up by electrolysis. When I contact any other electrologist or even some national laser places (too big and embarrassed to go to) they say point blank "it does not work on white hair"

Am I heading for a rip off at the expense of comfort (she caters to the Trans community)?

Thanks,

Avirone

Link to comment

Laser for the most part does work on grey/white hairs, electrolysis is your best bet, Save the $800 and start electrolysis, it costs anywhere from $45 to $90 an hour, i pay $80 per hour, that $800 will buy quite a few electrolysis sessions, no sense wasting money unless you are rich, and if you are shoot some my way.

Paula

Link to comment
  • 2 weeks later...
Guest TracieV3

Laser for the most part does work on grey/white hairs, electrolysis is your best bet, Save the $800 and start electrolysis, it costs anywhere from $45 to $90 an hour, i pay $80 per hour, that $800 will buy quite a few electrolysis sessions, no sense wasting money unless you are rich, and if you are shoot some my way.

Paula

$45 an hour is not a bad price. I was wondering, it is possible stretch electrolysis treatments, due to budgeting and costs, one hour once every few weeks. Or what do you suggest?

I am not there yet, probably by years. But it would would be nice to get an idea of how many visits, and what the prices are so I start factoring that price in when I am ready for it.

After looking into HRT, I have found that prices were vastly exaggerated for HRT. I thought that electrolysis was a $110.00 for an hour. I am glad I was wrong.

Tracie

Link to comment
Guest Arielle

$45 is probably the best price that I was quoted too for electro.

I've not done it but I'm also not gonna tell you that it's right or wrong to go with either. It really depends on your skin and hair colour. The arguement is like Ford/Chevrolet, PC/Mac, Avon/Clinique, everyone has their own opinion and everyone is right about everything. Just do what you can afford and what you think is best. One advantage I can say about electro is it's a guaranteed way to kill the hair the first time, every time. Laser goes over a spot and the light shoots it, might not be dead, or it might so that's where the multiple sessions come in. Electro electrocutes the hair and it IS dead. Electro is way slower though, one follicle at a time, laser is one square inch at a time and takes about a second per shot.

laser doesn't work on everyone yet, electro does.

Link to comment
Guest TracieV3

$45 is probably the best price that I was quoted too for electro.

I've not done it but I'm also not gonna tell you that it's right or wrong to go with either. It really depends on your skin and hair colour. The arguement is like Ford/Chevrolet, PC/Mac, Avon/Clinique, everyone has their own opinion and everyone is right about everything. Just do what you can afford and what you think is best. One advantage I can say about electro is it's a guaranteed way to kill the hair the first time, every time. Laser goes over a spot and the light shoots it, might not be dead, or it might so that's where the multiple sessions come in. Electro electrocutes the hair and it IS dead. Electro is way slower though, one follicle at a time, laser is one square inch at a time and takes about a second per shot.

laser doesn't work on everyone yet, electro does.

Thank you for the info, Arielle.

Do you know a website or form that lists what skin types and hair colors work best for electrolysis?

Tracie

Link to comment
Guest miss kindheart

Laser generally doesn't work on light colored hair, but you can give it a try if you want to.

You will know if it works for you , or if it is a waste of your money after the first session.

Good luck :)

<<< hug >>>

:wub: vanna

Link to comment
  • 1 month later...

Laser is actually not always permanent. After doing the research and speaking with doctors laser slows the growth rate and thins the hairs when the come back, but only goes that far. Electrolosis is, as far as I know, the only permanent solution. I do wish you the best of luck.

Sere

Link to comment
Guest Donna Jean

Electrolosis is, as far as I know, the only permanent solution. I do wish you the best of luck.

Sere

True.....

Hair grows in cycles and when you get lasered, some of the hairs are dormant...months later they come in and need to be treated...

Electrolysis is more on going and usually catches all the hair because of the amount of time you are doing it...,

I've had 65 hours so far....

Plus....laser works on a narrow band of conditions...darker hair and lighter skin...the hair has to absorb the laser and if it's gray/white (like mine) laser won't really work...a waste of money to try...

G'luck

Donna Jean

Link to comment
Guest Karen K

Alright ladies.

I went to an American Laser Center and discussed this with them. My hair is dark brown and my skin tone is lightly tanned. They do need a good differential between hair color and skin tone. The wider this differential the better. Now, I signed up for a two year period for $1800.00 and I believe that they will treat me as many times, in that two year period, as it takes. At the age of 49, I do have some grey in my beard so I will need some electro to get those hairs. So far the reduction is noticable, especially on the cheeks and neck (areas where the hair wasn't very dense) however, the upper lip and chin area is only slowly reducing (hair here is coarser and denser). I have had 8 treatments so far and have another one scheduled for Thursday.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 116 Guests (See full list)

    • MaeBe
    • Ashley0616
    • Timber Wolf
    • KathyLauren
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,029
    • Most Online
      8,356

    Selkimur
    Newest Member
    Selkimur
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Anyatimenow
      Anyatimenow
      (23 years old)
    2. Aria00
      Aria00
    3. Ava B.
      Ava B.
      (24 years old)
    4. Claire Heshi
      Claire Heshi
    5. CrystalMatthews0426
      CrystalMatthews0426
      (41 years old)
  • Posts

    • MaeBe
      Congrats to you and yours!
    • Ashley0616
      YAY! Congratulations on a granddaughter!
    • Ashley0616
      I recommend CarComplaints.com | Car Problems, Car Complaints, & Repair/Recall Information. A lot of good information
    • LucyF
      I've got Spironolactone ___mg and Evorel ___mcg Patches (2 a week) going up to ___mg after 4 weeks 
    • Ivy
      Got a new Granddaughter this morning.  Mother and child (and father) are doing fine. This makes 7 granddaughters and one grandson.  I have 2 sons and 6 daughters myself.  And then I  switched teams.  I think this stuff runs in the family. Another hard day for the patriarchy.
    • Ivy
      Like @MaeBe pointed out, Trump won't do these things personally.  I doubt that he actually gives a rat's a$$ himself.  But he is the foot in the door for the others.   I don't really see this.  Personally, I am all in favor of "traditional" families.  I raised my own kids this way and it can work fine.  But I think we need to allow for other variations as well.   One thing working against this now is how hard it is for a single breadwinner to support a family.  Many people (I know some) would prefer "traditional" if they could actually afford it.  Like I mentioned, we raised our family with this model, but we were always right at the poverty level.   I was a "conservative evangelical" for most of my life, actually.  So I do understand this.  Admittedly, I no longer consider myself one. I have family members still in this camp.  Some tolerate me, one actually rejects me.  I assure you the rejection is on her side, not mine.  But, I understand she believes what she is doing is right - 'sa pity though. I mean no insult toward anyone on this forum.  You're free to disagree with me.  Many people do.   This is a pretty complex one.  Socialism takes many forms, many of which we accept without even realizing it.  "Classism" does exist, for what it's worth.  Always has, probably always will.  But I don't feel like that is a subject for this forum.   As for the election, it's shaping up to be another one of those "hold your nose" deals.
    • Ivy
      Just some exerts regarding subjects of interest to me.
    • Ivy
      Yeah.  In my early teens I trained myself out of a few things that I now wish I hadn't.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I was thinking in particular of BLM, who years ago had a 'What We Believe' section that sounded like they were at war with the nuclear family.   I tried to find it. Nope.  Of interest https://www.politifact.com/article/2020/aug/28/ask-politifact-does-black-lives-matter-aim-destroy/   My time is limited and I will try to answer as I can.
    • Ivy
      Well, I suppose it is possible that they don't actually plan on doing what they say.  I'm not too sure I want to take that chance.  But I kinda expect to find out.  Yet, perhaps you're right and it's all just talk.  And anyway, my state GOP is giving me enough to worry about anyway. I remember a time when being "woke" just meant you were paying attention.  Now it means you are the antichrist. I just don't want the government "protecting" me from my personal "delusions."
    • MaeBe
      1.  I think there are some legitimate concern.   2. Thoroughly discussing this will consume many threads.   3. I disagree partially with @MaeBe but there is partial agreement.   4. The context includes what is happening in society that the authors are observing.  It is not an isolated document.   The observation is through a certain lens, because people do things differently doesn't mean they're doing it wrong. Honestly, a lot of the conservative rhetoric is morphing desires of people to be treated with respect and social equity to be tantamount to the absolution of the family, heterosexuality, etc. Also, being quiet and trying to blend in doesn't change anything. Show me a social change that benefits a minority or marginalized group that didn't need to be loud.   5. Trump, if elected, is as likely to spend his energies going after political opponents as he is to implementing something like this.   Trump will appoint people to do this, like Roger Severino (who was appointed before, who has a record of anti-LGBTQ+ actions), he need not do anything beyond this. His people are ready to push this agenda forward. While the conservative right rails about bureaucracy, they intend to weaponize it. There is no question. They don't want to simplify government, they simply want to fire everyone and bring in conservative "warriors" (their rhetoric). Does America survive 4 year cycles of purge/cronyism?   6. I reject critical theory, which is based on Marxism.  Marxism has never worked and never will.  Critical theory has problems which would need time to go into, which I do not have.   OK, but this seems like every other time CRT comes up with conservatives...completely out of the blue. I think it's reference is mostly just to spark outrage from the base. Definitely food thought for a different thread, though.   7. There are groups who have declared war on the nuclear family as problematically patriarchal, and a lot of other terms. They are easy to find on the internet.  This document is reacting to that (see #4 above).   What is the war on the nuclear family? I searched online and couldn't find much other than reasons why people aren't getting married as much or having kids (that wasn't a propaganda from Heritage or opinions pieces from the right that paint with really broad strokes). Easy things to see: the upward mobility and agency of women, the massive cost of rearing children, general negative attitudes about the future, male insecurity, etc. None of this equates to a war on the nuclear family, but I guess if you look at it as "men should be breadwinners and women must get married for financial support and extend the male family line (and to promote "National Greatness") I could see the decline of marriage as a sign of the collapse of a titled system and, if I was a beneficiary of that system or believe that to NOT be tilted, be aggrieved.   8.  Much of this would have to be legislated, and this is a policy documented.  Implementation would  be most likely different, but that does not mean criticism is unwarranted.   "It might be different if you just give it a chance", unlike all the other legislation that's out there targeting LGBTQ+ from the right, these are going to be different? First it will be trans rights, then it will be gay marriage, and then what? Women's suffrage?   I get it, we may have different compasses, but it's not hard to see that there's no place for queer people in the conservative worldview. There seems to be a consistent insistence that "America was and is no longer Great", as if the 1950s were the pinnacle of society, completely ignoring how great America still is and can continue to be--without having to regress society to the low standards of its patriarchal yesteryears.    
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      Cadillac parts are pretty expensive, so repairing them costs more.  But they don't seem to break down more than other makes.  Lots of Lincoln models use Ford cars as a base, so you can get parts that aren't much more expensive.    My family has had good luck with "Panther platform" cars.  Ford Crown Victoria, Mercury Marquis, Lincoln Towncar or Continental.  4.6 V8 and 5.0 V8.  Reasonable fuel economy, and fairly durable.  Our county sheriff's office was running Chargers and SUV's for a while, but has gone back to older Crown Victorias for ease of maintenance.  GF rebuilds them here.  But they are getting more scarce, since the newest ones were made in 2011.    1992-1997 years were different than the later years.  1998-2001 they did some changes, and apparently the best years are 2003 to 2011.  Check Craigslist, and also government auctions.  GF has gotten a lot of them at auction, and they can be had in rough-but-running shape for around $1,000.  Ones in great shape can be found in the $5,000+ range.  Good for 200,000 miles without significant rebuilding.  Go through engine and transmission and electrical systems, and they go half a million.    Some Chrysler models are OK.  The 300 mostly has the same engines as the Charger and Challenger, so parts availability is pretty good.  But they tend to get timing issues.  The older Chrysler Sebring convertibles were pretty reliable, sometimes going 200,000 miles without tons of problems, although after that they were pretty much worn out. 
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I think I have read everything the Southern Baptists have to say on transgender, and it helped convince me they are dead wrong on these issues.  They can be nice people.  I would never join an SBC church.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      You come across as a thoughtful, sweet, interesting and pleasant person.    There are parts of this country, and more so the world, where evangelicals experience a great deal of finger wagging.
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      It has been an interesting experience being in a marriage in a Christian faith community, yet being intersex/trans.  I stay pretty quiet, and most have kind of accepted that I'm just the strange, harmless exception.  "Oh, that's just Jen.  Jen is...different."  I define success as being a person most folks just overlook. 
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...