Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Being Trans in the Military. Would it work?


Recommended Posts

Guest Karen K

It is sad, that with the end of DADT, the military still views transgenderism as a mental disease and thereby a dischargable offense (dishonorable I believe). And this despite the current debate of allowing women assignmet to more hazardous combat duties.

Laura Jane

Link to comment
Guest crissy_oakley

Karen,

If one were to come as as being Transgendered, you would be medically discharged. I find it odd that you would be medically discharged, since no medical proof is necessary. All you have to do is, say that you are transgendered and that apparently is proof enough. If it were truly a medical condition, the DoD would be required to treat you.

Link to comment
Guest Kelly-087

The main thing that comes to mind for me is what happens if a deployed person runs out of hormones?

MTF?

T rage maybe lol.

Cassie, I think I posted earlier on this threat with comments similar to yours. I've never served. I agree that it would logistically be too much at this time to allow transitioning members. However, do you think it would be possible within this decade to allow a transitioned person to serve?

This is of course assuming the military knows this person was born a different gender. It is possible that perhaps someone could enlist and manage to slip through the cracks. This could become a more serious question since we're now having much younger people that are of age and transition (for the most part) in their teens as opposed to in the past where it seems only adults could find the resources to make a transition.

Link to comment
  • 4 weeks later...

The Army Times actually featured a story on this. It was on a FTM, and the author even admitted that the Army hosted a pro-masculine arena. I just thought it was interesting that even though it makes you "medically unfit," it made the news on the Army Times.

My supervisor actually took a picture of it and sent it to me(it's true!).

Link to comment
Guest GinaInside

I served ias a tanker in a line unit, it was in the peacetime Army, and never saw combat. I have mixed feelings over this issue. Ultimately, being TS is what got me discharged...long story.

One of he problems I see are the unique medical issues TG/TSs face. Maybe it would not cost that much in terms of dollars as we see it, but it would add a strain to the logistics system that would have to be justified in terms of personnel value. Is that cold? Probably, but the military is'nt about "being fair", the military is about fighting wars. This goes beyond legislating people's behavior and acceptance. TG/TS personnel would have to be pretty valuable to justify the added administrative, medical, and logistical expense.

If 20% of the population were TG/TS, the military would have little option but to start making accomodations, but we are more like less than 1%, and still little understood. It is not practical to make accomodations for TG/TSs, who may be less likely to be deployable to anywhere for extended periods witout special care. On a ship, it may be different, but for the rest of the military it is not practical to have people transitioning there. It is true that smaller militaries are doing it, but they are not used like the US Military.

However, it would be nice if TG/TSs were not discharged, but allowed to serve thier tours. But, then we get into the issue of people being unable to maintain self-discipline to not come out. Or, in my case, I am not very masculine, and had a difficult time making it as a "man", even more so as a Soldier, but I tried. But, try as I might, I was read pretty clearly, the results were not pleasant.

So, I am torn about this issue. Even though we may be patriotic, and want to serve our country, the military is a hard life. I don't think it's a matter of some kind of "evolution of attitudes" at this time, that can be changed by getting rid of archaic thinkers. Until civilization as a whole is ready to accept TG/TS people, the military is not likely to justify such change.

Link to comment
  • 2 months later...
Guest Gina9223

umm... A lot of valid points here. The reality is, when Transgender service members are accepted (and that time is sooner than you think) it will start with those who are post and medically fit to return to service. Brynn Tannehill wrote an article that was in both OutServe and Huffington Post about an ND1 who tried to get back in after transition. ND's (Navy Diver) are hard to come by to start with. The response she got back from the Navy (I read the full letter, 'OMG' about sums it up at the ignorance in it) was actually quite idiotic even by goverment standards.

With SLDN/OutServe working to bring the matter to the fore, within the next year you'll see some govermental action. Probably in the form of Senate and House having hearings.

At first, those who are post-op and medically able to return to service.

Then those who have been in and want to remain in the military. They will transition INCONUS unless they have to go to a theater of operations. Only those who have had surgery and recovering will remain INCONUS. Taking HRT, even in a full blown war? I have a few freinds who have done that. One of them offically was supported by Army Medical thru a 18 month tour of duty in the warzone. (see Bilerico Project for those articles)

Poeple having surgery? I have two friends who worked as contractors and worked in the warzone before, during and after. One of those transitioned 'at work' in the warzone. Was it akward at times for her? Yes, but she went from 'him' to her while she was there. Right now, she's still there working. So that is doable.

Anything is possible unless you start out by placing barriers in your own way.

Link to comment
Guest sophia.gentry58

To Donna Jean's point, I'm not so sure that it is going to take a long time before it happens. To be sure, it will be a logistical nightmare to hash everything out so that it can work, at some point people will come to understand that one's preference, orientation, or acknowledement of who they really are has nothing to do with one's performance; except maybe it will only boost that constructive output.

Sophia

Link to comment
Guest Gina9223

Um... I still think I could make it work. I was in a NATO Battle Group and one ship had 2 Trans members. They were deployed as a team so they could watch each others backs around the ugly Americans. I know quite a few Trans active duty service members from the UK, Ireland, Canada, Australia and New Zealand and they make it work every day.

I agree with Yoda on this, saying you cant means you won't. No try, DO!

Link to comment
  • 3 years later...
Guest rebeccaanne07

Like stated before, but with updates!!! PLEASE MY TS sisters, join now!!! I am an active duty CSM in the Army!!! I will out myself soon, but want to protect my sisters as much as I can before then. 27 years!!! All Infantry, OMG I did not have mental problems, nor did I fail in combat!! So all your reasons!!! --Censored Word--!!!!

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   8 Members, 0 Anonymous, 163 Guests (See full list)

    • Carolyn Marie
    • RaineOnYourParade
    • Abigail Genevieve
    • LC
    • EasyE
    • Birdie
    • Pip
    • AllieJ
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.7k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,033
    • Most Online
      8,356

    ArtavikenGenderflui
    Newest Member
    ArtavikenGenderflui
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. afraid of self
      afraid of self
    2. Chaidoesart
      Chaidoesart
      (14 years old)
    3. Faith57
      Faith57
    4. Joyce Ann
      Joyce Ann
      (70 years old)
    5. Kelly21121
      Kelly21121
      (56 years old)
  • Posts

    • RaineOnYourParade
      As far as I'm aware, he wasn't -- he just sometimes wore skirts, which was why it was a question in the first place.   In my opinion, part of that is because of the way press spares attention on issues like that. As a bit of a true crime nut and what I see: Child predator cases' (and cases of a sexual nature in general) press focus on those with an AMAB perpetrator generally, and very rarely are AFAB perpetrators given much press time or even getting tried due to a whole bunch of issues I'm not gonna get into. Because of this, when you see these types of cases and a boy is the victim, it's almost always a queer person who is the one who committed a crime that gets press. Therefore, with the amount of cases seen with this type of perpetrator (and due to the fact "99% of queer people are not sexual criminals" doesn't attract eyes), the human brain can kind of naturally makes an association with it. It's not right, but it's also a fault I think falls partially on the media.   That's all my opinion, though!   This is extra confusing to me, as a feminine man is usually viewed as gay. If someone is refusing the acknowledge the existence of trans people, then gay would be the societal connection that comes after, I think. So, that sorta implies that trans women wouldn't be interested in women in the first place by those assumptions? Of course, trans lesbians exist (most trans women I know like women, actually), but it's a little ridiculous to me that people will deny trans people's existence, call all feminine AMAB people gay, and say that trans people are looking to peep all in the same breath.   Wow, this was a lot longer of a response than I was planning to write--
    • Abigail Genevieve
      For one thing, the practice of putting into office wholly unqualified people simply because of racial, sexual or national characteristics.  It is no accident that Karine is a Haitian immigrant, Black and lesbian.  Kamala Harris is a Black female. Pete Buttigieg is gay.  Often you find that Biden explicitly stated that this is why he hired them, not because of competence, but because they checked so many boxes on his little list.  It makes a mockery of people and is a disservice to the US. 
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I am not sure why people are in favor of unaccountable agencies with bloated budgets and wasteful spending. 
    • Abigail Genevieve
      What about it?
    • SydneyAngel
      Hey girl  I had a problem like you happen to me also. In my first year of estrogen I had a period where my level were good then they got really bad where my testosterone spike high.  I felt like you with all that disforia coming hard. Our bodies need time to adjust. The process is a real pain in the beginning. It levels out eventually and you don't even think about it. Hang in there hugs 
    • Ivy
      Biden's woke agenda?
    • KatieSC
      I wonder if there will be law enforcement procedural shows coming this fall. I can imagine Law and Order: Genital Crimes Unit, or perhaps, FBI: Domestic Genitalia. Then again, maybe they will dedicate a CSI program about the dedicated members of the Oklahoma State Police Genital Screening Unit. Good to know that those Oklahomans have their priorities squared away.
    • KatieSC
      Protections? Well, when they mandate that some who is transgender can get facial and genital electrolysis paid as it is essential to affirming care, or when they mandate and pay for facial feminization surgery, speech therapy/voice affirmation surgery, I will believe that the order is effective. One of biggest hurdles for many transgender individuals is the cost of care. I remember when my one insurance company tried to say that my speech therapy and voice surgery were "cosmetic". I remember when they blocked paying for my facial surgery. I remember the fight I had to get electrolysis. These procedures could save someone's life if the procedures help the individual successfully transition, and are no longer misgendered. 
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I don't think it should be.  Nor do I see Project 2025 as pushing Christian nationalism.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      The agencies are supposed to work for him.  The problem, as conservatives found out in Trump 1, was they will ignore the president and do their own thing.  The agencies are supposed to be under his control.   Congress delegated some of its law making authority to the agencies, which is another problem.   The bloated federal government needs to be trimmed.  Dept Education is worthless - test scores have dropped since it was instituted in the Carter administration consistently, and it is currently implementing Biden's woke agenda more than doing anything else.
    • FinnyFinsterHH
      I hope to eventually wear a suit for dance but don't know what exactly to look for. I feel like jumpsuit is safe option but I have been interested in wearing button up and formal pants. Is there a certain brand i should look for or sites I should look at for tips? My mom is not exactly keen on me wearing too masc clothing like suits just yet but is okay with jumpsuits. Also is there hair styling tips availible, my hair looks like image below. I might be able to get shorter haircut like pixie but am not sure yet.  
    • MaeBe
      It’s never been about him, but he is the Presidential nominee for the Presidency that starts in…2025. I don’t see a lot of conflation that this is a “Trump doctrine”, it a doctrine that benefits him surely, but it is a plan to instill crony governance and enact very Christian conservative (if not purely Christian nationalist) “order” on the country. If you don’t see this as the Right doubling down on Big G government, I don’t know what to tell them. Getting rid of agencies and giving the authority directly to the Executive isn’t shrinking government. It’s consolidation power. 
    • MaeBe
      It is the made up ideology they believe trans people are pushing on the world, those “poor young girls who are being coerced into believing they are men” and the “perverts who put on dresses and think they’re girls”. The anti-LGBTQ+ movement came up with the term. Being trans = you believe in trans ideology/transgenderism, supporting trans people = the same.   In the end anyone that acts on or thinks gender is anything but what is in your pants is a “transgenderist”, why not make it a word if it’s not, there is no real grey area. Unless you acknowledge there is transgenderism, but use your knowledge to “correct it”.  So I guess there could be transgenderist conversion “therapists”.  Face it, we deface the America they want. Land of the Free and Home of the Brave? I think being out and queer is pretty brave. And freedom shouldn’t just be for those who push a narrow “Christian ideology” as the “true” governing model.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Over here muttering about "a new Jim Crow against a persecuted minority."    
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Rants are not a problem.  My favorite hobby! :)   What's out there is bad enough that I wonder why some people feel they need to embellish it.  Be alert.   Some of this will need to be fought in court if they try to implement it. If people are out to get me, paranoia is justified.  And this may not be the only document.   Abby
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...