Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Packing and Flying


Guest Wanderer ~

Recommended Posts

Guest Wanderer ~

Hello,

I was wondering if anyone here has had any experience flying while packing. I have a trip soon and can't really see myself not packing for over a week but I don't want to run into major complications. If any of you wouldn't mind sharing your expierences, it would be greatly appreciated. Also, whether or not you had to deal with those body scanners.

Thanks, Warren.

Link to comment
Guest aleon515

Well according to the law, the TSA can't examine your prosthetic (which is what you would call it), require you to remove it, etc. That doesn't, of course mean, that there aren't ever problems, because there sometimes are. You could carry the policy info on you and be able to spout it, if needed. I know of people who flew and asked for a pat down and they found the packer and were quite nice about it. I am personally worried about a pat-down due to my autism. I really dislike being touched, esp the way that they would touch you in a pat-down. BTW, I heard that the x-ray scanner things are so expensive they are not fixing them if they go bad. They keep them up and pretend or just do the other type scans.

How long is your flight? Are you okay without it for that period, if so you can pack it in your luggage. If you don't want any problems at all you can put it in your regular luggage. I am guessing it might be embarrasing to put it in your carry on luggage. I am also guessing even if they figured out what it looked like that they would be more embarrassed than you to actually mention it.

I am flying pretty soon. I am planning on putting my packer in the carry on, as I would not put something as expensive as the RM basic packer in a suitcase that I might never see again. I am guessing if they run across it they wouldn't point it.

I am pre-T myself.

--Jay

Link to comment
Guest Wanderer ~

I've thought about putting it in luggage but its a 4 hour flight. I dont really feel comfortable going that long without packing especially in public.

And I haven't even thought about looking up the laws and such, would you mind sending me a link?

As far as those scanners- I've been through them before but I wasnt packing...I'm just worried they can somehow tell its not..."connected" or something and then raise questions.

Link to comment
Guest Madrone26

Here's the guidelines from the TSA:

http://www.tsa.gov/traveler-information/transgender-travelers

Somewhere on youtube there's a video of a transguy describing his interactions with TSA. His experience was the scanner did read his packer as "not attached" and that the TSA pulled him out for a patdown. He responded by pulling out his packer, and weirding out the agent, which you do not have to do!

If you're uncomfortable with the possibility of a pat down you could put the packer in your carry on for screening and then put it back once you've gone through security and before you're on the plane. I'm also thinking through these possibilities as I'm flying in a few weeks and my gender marker on my ID hasn't been changed.

Link to comment
Guest Raging Shadow

i packed mine because i knew id have less anxiety from not packing than i would about possibly having issues. ive heard that even thought ur not supposed to be asked to show/offer to show ur prosthetic, some agents get rather...persnickety and insistent. but i think if you recited their guidelines enough times and called for a supervisor person u'd get through eventually. might be an issue if you're late for ur flight though...

Link to comment
Guest aleon515

The guy who weirded out the TSA agents-- funny guy. Sounds like his personality. Even he did not have to do this. I do not recommend this at all.

I do not always pack but need it in certain situations that's why I'm putting it on carry-on. I don't want to put a $100 packer (Reel Magik) that took a month and a half to get to me in my luggage and possibly never seeing it again. I feel that a penis shaped item in carry-on might make them stop and do a double take but I think it will be thought of as a sex toy by security which has probably seen weirder stuff!

I believe looking at the regulations and being ready to call the supervisors is your best option. You can also print them out. They can't ask you to remove it and that kind of thing.

Get to the airport early and any delays will be no issue. I've actually heard more problems with the ID than with packers.

Memorize the word "prosthetic" as I think this word is more meaningful to the TSA which must run into all prosthetics imaginable.

I'm guessing that the scanners would pick it up, and that it would depend on the experience of the screener as to whether they would pull you aside for a pat-down. I have heard of people going thru a scanner without incident or being pulled out.

--Jay

Link to comment
Guest Wanderer ~

Thanks for the responses. And I've seen that video before lol-I think I'll print out the guidelines. I have been thinking a bit though how they would respond to an underage solo flyer with ...technically whats considered a sex toy in his bag :huh: . Also where I'm flying-even though it'll be in major cities, its also in the southern US which worries me a tad more but I'm not sure if that worry is founded.

Link to comment
Guest Gregg Jameson

Hi guys,

Interesting discussion!

I would also suggest printing out policy and having it on hand. The suggestion the know the word, "prosthetic" is a fantastic suggestion!

I had traveled across the country and back, twice this calendar year. The intensity of the search of body and of carry-on had varied.

In all cases, if there was any question, at all, about anything in my carry-on, they simply pulled it all apart... no questions asked of me... just tore it apart, emptying it right then and there, in public view. They never said a word to me before attacking the carry on.

In the case where they really did a number on the bag, it was because of "chapstick" in the carry on. Yes.

The second time, it was because there was a small pack of chewing gum in the carry on. Yes.

Our luggage (non-carry-on) was fine at all times, but was totally wrecked (inside) just once. We had used the TSA-approved locks and they went into one and rummaged through. Have no idea as to why. Maybe just random.

If there was a packer in my carry-on, it would have likely been on the counter for many to see.

The TSA would have likely considered it a sex toy, yes. Anyone else around may have thought the same. No big deal.

You are taking a chance, either way. Sorry its true.

If you wear the packer, I'd highly recommend you have chapter and verse of the TSA guidelines printed out and, as Mike suggests, use the same terminology as in the TSA policies/guidelines. "PROSTHETIC"

Enjoy your trip! :D

Brad

Link to comment
Guest aleon515

If my packer weren't worth $100 and didn't take 1 1/2 months to get to me, then I'd put it my bag and take my chances. I think age is a factor here. An underage person with what would be considered a sex toy, well that would cause some talk perhaps. OTOH, they aren't really looking for it, and really aren't worried about them. But I am thinking that a person in their sixties with what they will think is a sex toy, well I think they will be as embarrassed as I would be.

I am guessing that there is a chance that they go thru the luggage and a chance they won't. I am going to make sure there are no other items that could set them off (liquids, gels, etc.)

BTW, it was I who mentioned the use of the word "prosthetic". To us it is meaningful, but only prosthetic is meaningful to the TSA.

--Jay

Link to comment
Guest Gregg Jameson

Hi Jay, It was YOU! :agreed:

You had mentioned the word "Prosthetic" and I had erroneously attributed this to Mike in my last post!

My apologies!

It's a brilliant suggestion, by the way! :D

Enjoy your trip!

Brad

Link to comment
Guest aleon515

The policy clearly relates to prosthetics, they have no idea what a "packer" is. We make a differentiation here between packers and prosthetics (the later being much more expensive and realistic) but the feds would not.

--Jay

Link to comment

Here are my two cents:

A couple of times, I have flown carrying some adult toy in my backpack (which I brought in as hand luggage, so I wouldn't have to pay for checked-in bags). Although I won't go into details, I have to mention that the thing has a couple of AA batteries and some metallic / electronic pieces, so it'd would be noticed when my backpack was scanned. The folks at the airport would then manually check the contents of the bag and, although I could know from their faces they had noticed it and knew what it was, they didn't mention anything.

So, one option worth considering would be to take the packer into your hand luggage. Then, as soon as you pass the security check, you might go to any restroom and pack again. That would reduce the time you have to go without packing down to a few minutes. It's up to you to decide if you'd be OK with that time; and keep in mind that the security people at the airport might actually mention / ask about it anyway. In any case, this is just an option, the final choice is yours.

Regards,

Ethain

Link to comment
Guest aleon515

Of course a packer, um I mean prosthetic, does not have batteries and metal parts. I've heard the advanced ones may have innards similar to C4, but I don't think that's the case with the cheaper ones. It's a good idea.

If you have an idea what you might say, or are ready to talk about this as your prosthetic it might be easier.

--Jay

Link to comment

I don't see why you couldn't just wear the packer instead of making a big deal and putting in a handbag? You don't have to go through those scanners if you don't want too. Its not required. They will just say that you'll have to be patted down, and from my experience they can't tell between a fake penis and a real one. It all feels the same when they pat you down.

Link to comment
Guest (Lightsider)

One of the biggest problems I have with the TSA is the violation of personal space. But we allow it to happen. But that is a rant for another post. I do believe Aadenr is correct.

Link to comment
Guest aleon515

I don't see why you couldn't just wear the packer instead of making a big deal and putting in a handbag? You don't have to go through those scanners if you don't want too. Its not required. They will just say that you'll have to be patted down, and from my experience they can't tell between a fake penis and a real one. It all feels the same when they pat you down.

Well supposedly the pat down is done with the back of your hand which is not as sensitive. I've heard of TSA agents figuring out that it was somehow detached. Many scanners now don't work so I am guessing more people get subjected to pat downs.

--Jay

Link to comment
Guest Wanderer ~

Hello, thank you all for the replies. I still have yet to go through the Atlanta security where I've had to go through the scanners but went through the Texas security and all was fine. Ended up just packing without the harness I have because it has a metal snap-didn't want to take chances. They didn't even look at me twice when I went through today.

Link to comment

I don't see why you couldn't just wear the packer instead of making a big deal and putting in a handbag? You don't have to go through those scanners if you don't want too. Its not required. They will just say that you'll have to be patted down, and from my experience they can't tell between a fake penis and a real one. It all feels the same when they pat you down.

Well supposedly the pat down is done with the back of your hand which is not as sensitive. I've heard of TSA agents figuring out that it was somehow detached. Many scanners now don't work so I am guessing more people get subjected to pat downs.

--Jay

What do you mean with the back of your hand? I'm confused.

I'm guessing they are able to feel its some how detached because of the type of underwear. I wear boxer briefs so things stay in one place and pretty tight. I've never had a problem, and I'm sure if you were wearing just boxers I'd be easier to tell that its not attached to you. I just really feel like the only way they would be able to tell its detached is if they grab you down there like theres no tomorrow haha

Link to comment
Guest aleon515

They are supposed to touch private part areas with the back of their hand.

No no they are never ever supposed to grab. I think it would be grounds for a law suit.

I have heard of them figuring out someone had a packer and in some cases not figuring it out. It might be the underwear or it might just be how experienced they are.

--Jay

Link to comment
Guest Gregg Jameson

If you have a "pat down," by hand, you may have this done in a totally public area or you may ask for some privacy.

If you fear prosthetic will be discovered and questions may follow, you may request some privacy during the pat down.

Otherwise, the pat downs are often done out in the open, which I think is safer, personally. Yet, others feel otherwise.

I was at the airport to drop off a friend the other day and we could all see all the detailed pat downs at the gates. There was glass separating us from the TSA and those being screened, but we could see everything.

Yes... in a pat down, they use the back of their hands when they approach the genital area, etc.

Enjoy your trip!

Brad

Link to comment
Guest Gregg Jameson

Oh I see what you meant by the back of hand now

Yes, they use the "tops" or "backs" of their hands, where the knuckles are on the top.

They press this part of their hand(s) against the genital regions, etc.

For the rest of the pat down, they use the palm side of the hands and can grasp a little more with this hand position, although they still don't grasp much. I am mentioning the ability to grasp with this side of the hand(s) just to clarify which side of the hand is being used.

I hope this helps to clarify!

Brad

Link to comment
Guest aleon515

I just flew this week. Leaving from Albuquerque, I had a fun experience. I was carrying my RM packer in my carry on due to the cost of it. Anyway I actually got stopped and they wanted to search my carry on. Oh boy, I was sweating this. I decided I would say taht that I was trans and that this was my prosthetic. Anyway, they weren't the slightest bit interested in it. They just said I had so much stuff in the bag that they couldn't search it. Btw, it was in a little black sack so that was kind of nice.

--Jay

Link to comment
Guest Gregg Jameson

I just flew this week. Leaving from Albuquerque, I had a fun experience. I was carrying my RM packer in my carry on due to the cost of it. Anyway I actually got stopped and they wanted to search my carry on. Oh boy, I was sweating this. I decided I would say taht that I was trans and that this was my prosthetic. Anyway, they weren't the slightest bit interested in it. They just said I had so much stuff in the bag that they couldn't search it. Btw, it was in a little black sack so that was kind of nice.

--Jay

Great! :D I am glad that all worked out so well for you!

The little black sack helped out quite a bit!

Thanks for sharing with us here!

Brad

Link to comment
Guest aleon515

Great! :D I am glad that all worked out so well for you!

The little black sack helped out quite a bit!

Thanks for sharing with us here!

Brad

I'm guessing that if I hadn't had it in the sack, someone might have had a bit of a surprise (perhaps one of a few for the year).

A great idea for carrying a packer on the carry on. Not sure where the packer sack came from, though I think it is actually a little sack/sock used for packing in underwear. No hole for the shaft though.

--Jay

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 77 Guests (See full list)

    • Davie
    • Ivy
    • Maddee
    • Ashley0616
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.8k
    • Total Posts
      770.3k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,105
    • Most Online
      8,356

    Nicola_Atherton
    Newest Member
    Nicola_Atherton
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Bobbijean
      Bobbijean
    2. Bryan
      Bryan
      (61 years old)
    3. jlw5ju
      jlw5ju
      (27 years old)
    4. ladykirabellum
      ladykirabellum
      (47 years old)
    5. Lizzie17
      Lizzie17
  • Posts

    • Ivy
    • Ivy
      I'm aware that the young US ended up fighting a war with these people, and that phrase was not meant to address Church & state.  But somebody was willing to include it at the time.   I am also aware that your family arrangements would not go over well with most christian nationalists.  But that is kinda where I'm coming from on this.  I believe you and others of us with an unconventional lifestyle should be free to live as we desire - as long as we are not hurting anyone else.  And by "hurting" I don't mean only their feelings.   Using christianity to justify oppression is just wrong.  As is forced conversion, or forced conversion therapy.   Regarding public funds, LGBTQetc people have as much right to them as straight-cis folks.  I'm not arguing that queer people have more rights, just equal rights.
    • Davie
      Even better news:  It turns out for my sister it was cardio not stroke. She’s put on new blood thinner and sent home. False alarm! Yay.
    • JenniferB
      Things have changed since I've been on HRT for about 15 years. The consequence is I am not so concerned about how I present all the time.  I wear t-shirts a lot. I am pragmatic in how I shop. No, I don't want to look male, but will buy some male clothing because it fits. I am tall and built like a football linebacker, so buying women's clothes that fit can be difficult. For one I have no problem buying men's sneakers if they can pass as unisex. I wear size 12-13 women's shoes. And that can be hard to find. And, I don't like wearing slacks without pockets. I use pockets for work.    I've learned to be pragmatic. I dress up when I want to go out in public, and not so much at work. I do have a favorite blouse that accentuates the girls. And one blue striped blouse where I wear a cami top.
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      https://www.patheos.com/blogs/danthropology/2016/05/secularists-please-stop-quoting-the-treaty-of-tripoli/   ^^^ an interesting piece about the treaty, written by an atheist.   I totally understand why the Christian nationalist stuff makes people uncomfortable. For me, it is uncomfortable in a different way, as modern Christian nationalism is not nearly as "generic" as the views of the Founders.  Its specifically Evangelical.  I'm in a plural marriage, so definitely not approved of.    I believe the intent of the Founders was to uhold generic Christian ideas... "in God we trust" and "there's a God who created the world and He wrote ten commandments for us" sort of stuff.  Nothing beyond that, nothing specific enough to use against folks.
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      Free?!?!  That's insane.  I can understand perhaps mistaking somebody's well equipped garage as a business, but demanding free work is ridiculous.   My GF once remarked that while few things in life are free, butt-kickings are an exception. She offers those free-of-charge, to any who ask. A little charity helps the world go round 🤣
    • Ivy
      I had a CDL when I was working for the city.  But I let it go when I retired.  I couldn't justify paying so much just to drive myself around.
    • Ivy
      While I'm sure the "Founders" had the 30 years war, etc. on their minds, they didn't write the constitution as considering only Christian sects. The early colonists (I used the word) did mostly come from areas of "christian culture" but it's hard to reconcile some of their actions with what Christ himself taught.   Christians have a right to their beliefs, but there are a lot of American citizens that do not consider themselves "christian."  I have seen writings where the US was specifically said not to be a "Christian Nation". "The 1797 Treaty of Tripoli that sought to secure America from attacks by the so-called Barbary pirates who were Muslim made a point to say that the United States "is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion.""    It shouldn't be difficult to understand why the "Christian Nationalist" movement makes some of us uncomfortable.  
    • EasyE
    • Adrianna Danielle
      She wanted it done now for free,I hate the Karen's whom are a pain in the butt
    • EasyE
      just found a cute pair of denim shorts with flowers embroidered in two places on the front ... daring myself to wear them around family today ... the flowers match the deep rose of the t-shirt I just bought... 
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      Not to justify it, but this is what happens when folks rely on accepting money from the government.  It just isn't secure!  When the times change and different winds blow, you find yourself coming up short on funds.  Don't trust the feds, don't trust the state.    I don't believe in separation of church and state.  I believe the USA is a Christian nation, but that Congress doesn't make an establishment of which kind of church that refers to.  Reading the writings left by the Founders (who were mostly Christian or Deist), I think it is pretty clear that they wanted to avoid the bloody Protestant vs. Catholic conflicts that had been going on in Europe for the previous 250 years.    I think one huge problem is that we've had a separation of culture and state already.  There's been an abandonment of traditional American culture, or at least a significant change in it.  People often act servile, not independent.  People seek government help rather than taking care of themselves and those around them.  Its like everybody is waiting for an answer, like baby birds in the nest chirping to have something delivered to them from up above.    To me, the federal government has two purposes - to keep foreign forces and influence out of our territory, and to tax foreign trade to protect domestic economy.  They've pretty much failed at both. 
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      Actually, yes!  Its how I met my two trans friends.  My husband helped to arrange jobs and housing for both of them.  And in the process, they also fell in love, and so far their relationship is going well.  I'm glad to have been part of helping out.
    • KathyLauren
      I am not sure what "it" you are asking about.  The surgery, or the increased urgency of peeing?   I haven't felt any increased urgency.  I can hold it for as long as I used to, I think.  One thing that is different is that, once I start, it is almost impossible to stop the flow.  My pelvic floor physio said I had really good control of my pelvic floor muscles, but it didn't help with that.   My goal for surgery was just to have a female body.  I think I was foreseeing the persecution that is rising now.  Part of my reasoning, though I didn't plan it out clearly in those terms, was that I would be able to pass a strip-search gender check.  I was thinking more about passing in locker rooms, but passing in police lineups may be more necessary if certain political elements get their way.  
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      Wow.  That's crazy that somebody just comes onto your private place and starts demanding stuff.  You're absolutely right to press charges.  It seems like there's very little respect for private property these days. 
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...