Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Arizona legislator proposes anti-transgender bill


JenniferB

Recommended Posts

You would have to show your birth certificate that matches the gender of the public restroom you are entering if someone suspects you are transgender.

Showing your birth certificate to use a public bathroom?

So stupid, and full of fear, only an Arizona legislator could propose it.

http://www.azcentral.com/community/phoenix/articles/20130319law-governing-transgender-use-restrooms-proposed.html

Jenny

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

That is clearly unconstitutional. There is no way i'm walking around with my birth certificate so i can use the ladies room . Sounds like a sit down strike might be good. Who knows what would be left behind when you stood up.

Hugs,

Charlie

Link to comment
  • Admin

Ugh! Every legislature has at least one moron in it. Let's hope there aren't a majority of morons there. So, first they pass a law requiring anyone who looks Hispanic to carry papers, and now they want anyone who doesn't look manly enough or girly enough to carry papers. Pretty soon everyone in Arizona will have to carry around a file folder with all the required papers they need to live their lives.

Full employment for Arizona cops, who'll soon be too busy checking papers to catch any crooks.

Carolyn Marie

Link to comment
Guest Sarah Faith

Well next they'll want to pass laws so that they can deport us too.. News like this makes me kinda glad I don't live in Arizona anymore..

Link to comment
  • Admin

The politest word in the responses was "moron", but now we will have to worry about offending morons.

Link to comment
Guest JazzySmurf

mmm, it seems very difficult to enforce... i.e., say somebody just runs around accusing everyone of being transgender. Perhaps, just have a large group of people in the state capitol accusing every legislator of being transgender. To be honest/serious though, I don't think it will pass; it looks to be the bill of one person knee-jerking and trying to make a splash.

Link to comment

Just reading the responses on the board, the comments in the articles, and how many threads started about the same issue, there is going to be a major backlash against this legislator.

I'm now wondering if this may actually turn out to be a good thing, and bring more awareness to what transsexuals have to deal with.

Jenny

Link to comment

I used to be conservative, mostly fiscal conservative and common sense social issues. It has gotten so rediculous these days, I'm voting democratic until the morons in the Republican party pull their heads out of rectal defilade which by what I have seen may be a long while. Is there no one in the Republican Party with an ounce of common sense? Someone who looks at people who have needs that really need government to work to solve problems. I throw my hands up. Kathryn

Link to comment
  • Admin

We won't know until there is a committee vote, but I haven't seen any verbal support for the author yet, even among fellow Republicans. I'll give the rest of 'em the BOD for now. With a little luck, Kavanagh may be the only "aye" vote on this ill begotten piece of trash.

Carolyn Marie

Link to comment
Guest Sarah Faith

Wow... I just noticed this state representative who is proposing this bill is actually from the town I grew up in.. And worse I'm pretty certain he's the father of someone I went to school with. :(

I wish I could say I was shocked though, but I'm really not. *sigh

Link to comment

The bill is changed, but I wouldn't say it is any better.

http://azstarnet.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/arizona-bathroom-gender-bill-revised-to-give-business-owners-immunity/article_50b615c2-9c84-5e59-998c-e8873abd6f5c.html

This revision could anger the LBG community too. Imagine if you are a butch lesbian who identifies as female, but is told she must use the men's restroom.

Jenny

Link to comment
Guest RachelAnn

According to an article that came out from the Arizona Daily Star:
http://azstarnet.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/arizona-bathroom-gender-bill-revised-to-give-business-owners-immunity/article_50b615c2-9c84-5e59-998c-e8873abd6f5c.html

There is, perhaps, a small inkling of the good senator's motives. Or, at least, a shred of a viable reason. He mentions:

Kavanagh said that preserves protections for those who may be concerned who else is sharing a restroom. "We don't want to have young girls in women's locker rooms being exposed to basically biological men in a state of undress," he said.

With the extreme awareness of child sexual abuse, this comment by Kavanagh, whether he means it truthfully or not, will have resonance to a lot of people. However this bill is opposed, there must be awareness that, for the vast majority of people, they will stand up for their children's sense of safety than they will for the rights of a fringe minority group. And WE need to be aware that though awareness and understanding of the TG condition has become better known in the past ten to twenty years, we don't want to make the mistake of thinking society is more aware or understanding than they really are.

Link to comment

According to an article that came out from the Arizona Daily Star:

http://azstarnet.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/arizona-bathroom-gender-bill-revised-to-give-business-owners-immunity/article_50b615c2-9c84-5e59-998c-e8873abd6f5c.html

There is, perhaps, a small inkling of the good senator's motives. Or, at least, a shred of a viable reason. He mentions:

Kavanagh said that preserves protections for those who may be concerned who else is sharing a restroom. "We don't want to have young girls in women's locker rooms being exposed to basically biological men in a state of undress," he said.

With the extreme awareness of child sexual abuse, this comment by Kavanagh, whether he means it truthfully or not, will have resonance to a lot of people. However this bill is opposed, there must be awareness that, for the vast majority of people, they will stand up for their children's sense of safety than they will for the rights of a fringe minority group. And WE need to be aware that though awareness and understanding of the TG condition has become better known in the past ten to twenty years, we don't want to make the mistake of thinking society is more aware or understanding than they really are.

I can understand this. Even though I currently can use the women's locker room at the gym, I don't because I don't want to make a scene and I don't believe I should until after surgery. Yet why didn't Rep Kavanagh specifically make this bill about locker rooms?

Jenny

Link to comment
  • Admin

The revised bill allows legal immunity for business owners who may use prejudice to determine who can use their restrooms. That is only marginally better than the original bill, and does nothing to preserve the rights of those in Phoenix to use the gender-appropriate restroom. Phoenix did the right thing. Kavanagh and company ought to leave it at that.

Carolyn Marie

Link to comment
Guest RachelAnn

I can understand this. Even though I currently can use the women's locker room at the gym, I don't because I don't want to make a scene and I don't believe I should until after surgery. Yet why didn't Rep Kavanagh specifically make this bill about locker rooms?

Jenny

Yeah, I'm the same at the Y. I can't legally use the women's locker, though they implied I could. And I can't use the men's locker room because I not only die from embarrassment and discomfort, the fact is that I was nicely blessed during HRT and have long, thick hair and wear a B cup. Yeaaaah... I'm not going to the men's locker room.

Fortunately, they have several family changing rooms, even one with a shower, so I get to go into the one-person/family only locked room and shower/change in comfort.

My next challenge is finding a trainer who is willing to overlook my 6'1" frame and deep voice and work me out with a women's regimen.

Rachel

Link to comment
Guest Mia J

I agree with Carolyn on this. The revised bill would still let a business to discriminate against just about anyone not only by how someone appears but by their own prejudice by being able say they looked to much like a male or female.

His comments about not wanting young girls to be exposed is only there to stir up the public to support this.

There are already exposure laws on the books that would take care of someone purposely exposing themselves.

Mia

Link to comment

I envision two things. Petitions all over town for his job on a plate, with big yellow posters that read. Mecham, Symington, Kavanagh, The Winning Team! That, and all the unclockable trans men, legally flash mobbing the ladies rooms at churches, sporting events and other mass public functions. They especially need to hang out there when his contistuants families use them too. Flood the web with those reactions.

I was lt go from a job resently, one of the employrs comments was that since I am male, my appearance was considered too disruptive. This was in reference to my breasts. They have since played many more shinangans claiming to the State, that I quit and was not termnated. Long story... JodyAnn

PS--- should I re-apply now that I am legally female? LOL! Not, I would puke.JA

Link to comment
Guest KimberlyF

to p or not to p :)

Guess all other problems in Phoenix are solved that they have time for p related stuff.

I agree that all of these public accommodation bills should be dealt with after these states fix their budgets and pensions and school issues.

Link to comment
  • Who's Online   7 Members, 0 Anonymous, 203 Guests (See full list)

    • MaryEllen
    • Ashley0616
    • Adrianna Danielle
    • Abigail Genevieve
    • Vidanjali
    • Ivy
    • Wasylyna
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.7k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,033
    • Most Online
      8,356

    ArtavikenGenderflui
    Newest Member
    ArtavikenGenderflui
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Adele Svetova
      Adele Svetova
      (25 years old)
    2. BROOKSGLASS
      BROOKSGLASS
      (34 years old)
    3. FinnyFinsterHH
      FinnyFinsterHH
      (16 years old)
    4. fool4luv
      fool4luv
      (26 years old)
    5. itsaddison
      itsaddison
      (20 years old)
  • Posts

    • Abigail Genevieve
      Rants are not a problem.  My favorite hobby! :)   What's out there is bad enough that I wonder why some people feel they need to embellish it.  Be alert.   Some of this will need to be fought in court if they try to implement it. If people are out to get me, paranoia is justified.  And this may not be the only document.   Abby
    • Ivy
      Not in so many words, therefore it's not there at all.  Excuse my paranoia. And the states passing laws against us are nothing to worry about either. Having to change my gender back to male (like in Florida) is reasonable.  I should just accept it, I mean I was born with a dk.  So that "F" is lie, and a fraud.  My delusions need to be dealt with for my own good.   I'm just frustrated these days.  Just a bit of a rant.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      You probably remember the Target PR fiasco.  I remember reading an account from a woman who shopped there.  She went into a stall and did her business, and someone came into the bathroom and began swinging stall doors open, and when she came to her stall, the woman peeked at her through the crack. "What are you doing?" "Checking for perverts." The writer was so stunned by the absurdity that she finished up ASAP and got out of there, while the other woman entered a stall and locked it, made sure it was locked, and locked it again. 
    • Adrianna Danielle
      Been a good day.Cleaned my closet of clothes that I do not wear anymore and do not fit me.It looks better now.Came down to my newest property beside mine,owner passed and I inherited it.There was a double wide there that was removed,it was in bad shape.It is the shop part I am keeping which I got the tools,shop equipment,benches,hoists and shelving too.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Nothing about eradicating TG folk. 
    • Ivy
      If 9 out of 10 parts are ok, that doesn't mean I need to accept the bad parts (that are aimed directly at me).  That seems suicidal.
    • Ivy
      True, most of it has nothing to do directly with us.  It's the parts that do that are the problem.   I see the  few problematic statements as being a big problem.  Just because a lot of it may be okay, doesn't change that. Even supposing the rest of it might be good for the country, it doesn't help me if I'm being "eradicated".  I suppose I should be good with that, because it's for the "greater good".  If me being gone would please a number of people, then it's my civic duty to disappear, and vote to implement that.
    • Ivy
      Yeah.  There are already laws against assault.  I don't think the overwhelming majority of trans women have any desire to harass cis women.  Speaking for myself, if I go into a women's washroom, it's because my eyeballs are already floating - not for kicks.  And I worry about getting clocked and assaulted by some guy being a "hero."
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Only three, maybe four, sections even mention transgender.  Most is a conservative agenda I have no problem with.   In the sections that mention transgender, there are very few lines.  Those lines ARE problematic, in every case. Unequivocally.  I can't see some of them standing up in court.  In one case a recommended policy goes against a court decision, which strongly suggests the implementation of that policy would be stopped in court.    Anyone maintaining that this is written simply to support Trump, to support him becoming a dictator, to crush transgender people is feeding you a line.  Nor is it an attempt to erase transgender people.   People will have to decide if the overall goals are worth the few problematic statements.  Overall, I support it.  Of course, I have some reservations.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      It is unfamiliar, therefore threatening.   For 90% or so of the population, gender id can be simply and quickly determined by a quick anatomical observation.  They have no understanding and cannot imagine what it would mean to have a body different from the id.  It is unimaginable.  Therefore, wrong.   So there is this strong headwind.   I haven't entered this discussion, but here is a script: A: I can't imagine what it must be to have TG. B: You're a man, right? A: Well, of course. "amused" B: Imagine you were required by law and custom to wear women's clothing all the time. A: It wouldn't happen. B: Okay, but for the sake of the argument... A: That would be disgusting.  I would be very uncomfortable. B: You have it.  That is what TG people go through all the time. 24-7-365. A: Really? B: And then they are told they are perverts for having those feelings.  The same you just described. A: I see. B: And someone comes along and tells you you need conversion therapy so you will be comfortable wearing women's clothing all the time. A: I think I would break his nose. B: You understand transgender folk better than you think.
    • EasyE
      I have found some people correlate TG = child predator ... just as some have correlated homosexual = child predator...    I am baffled by the TG = unsafe connection ... my wife tends to think this way, that this is all about sexual deviancy ... I try to ask how my preference for wearing frilly socks with embroidered flowers and a comfortable camisole under my lavender T-shirts is sexually deviant (or sexual anything) but I don't get very far... 
    • EasyE
      Best wishes to you as you take this step ... many blessings to you! 
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Not sure.  The perp is a minor.  The problem here is NOT transgender, the problem here is incompetent and criminal administration.  See https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/family-of-loudoun-co-student-sexually-assaulted-ineptitude-of-all-involved-is-staggering/3231725/ It is more than annoying that people think the problem here is TG and that other people think the solution is some stupid statewide law.  Like an appendectomy to deal with an ingrown toe nail.    Since Loudon, I recall a boy was asked not to use the girl's restroom at a high school by one of the girls.  He, overwhelming her with height and weight,  assaulted her, claiming he had a right to be there.   Later I think eight girls beat him severely in another girl's restroom.  Again the problem is not transgender, the problem is assaults in restrooms and common courtesy.  TG is used as a smokescreen and it seems to paralyze thought among administrators who do not want to do anything to provoke controversy.
    • VickySGV
      Time to get with your Primary Care doctor and be referred to a neurologist or an orthopedist.  It could be many things, too many for any of us here to guess at. 
    • Mmindy
      Other than the Boy Scout motto, oath, and law. I use two:   When asked how I'm doing? In all honesty I reply. I would have to make something up to complain. If asked to explain further: I reply. I know someone is having a tougher time than I am, and I pray God blesses them.   I also recite this quote that I have tagged in my signature: Courage, doesn't always roar. Sometimes it's the quiet voice at the end of the day saying, "I will try again tomorrow."-Unknown    Saying these things daily keep me motivated.   Mindy🌈🐛🏳️‍⚧️🦋
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...