Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Arizona legislator proposes anti-transgender bill


JenniferB

Recommended Posts

You would have to show your birth certificate that matches the gender of the public restroom you are entering if someone suspects you are transgender.

Showing your birth certificate to use a public bathroom?

So stupid, and full of fear, only an Arizona legislator could propose it.

http://www.azcentral.com/community/phoenix/articles/20130319law-governing-transgender-use-restrooms-proposed.html

Jenny

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

That is clearly unconstitutional. There is no way i'm walking around with my birth certificate so i can use the ladies room . Sounds like a sit down strike might be good. Who knows what would be left behind when you stood up.

Hugs,

Charlie

Link to comment
  • Admin

Ugh! Every legislature has at least one moron in it. Let's hope there aren't a majority of morons there. So, first they pass a law requiring anyone who looks Hispanic to carry papers, and now they want anyone who doesn't look manly enough or girly enough to carry papers. Pretty soon everyone in Arizona will have to carry around a file folder with all the required papers they need to live their lives.

Full employment for Arizona cops, who'll soon be too busy checking papers to catch any crooks.

Carolyn Marie

Link to comment
Guest Sarah Faith

Well next they'll want to pass laws so that they can deport us too.. News like this makes me kinda glad I don't live in Arizona anymore..

Link to comment
  • Admin

The politest word in the responses was "moron", but now we will have to worry about offending morons.

Link to comment
Guest JazzySmurf

mmm, it seems very difficult to enforce... i.e., say somebody just runs around accusing everyone of being transgender. Perhaps, just have a large group of people in the state capitol accusing every legislator of being transgender. To be honest/serious though, I don't think it will pass; it looks to be the bill of one person knee-jerking and trying to make a splash.

Link to comment

Just reading the responses on the board, the comments in the articles, and how many threads started about the same issue, there is going to be a major backlash against this legislator.

I'm now wondering if this may actually turn out to be a good thing, and bring more awareness to what transsexuals have to deal with.

Jenny

Link to comment

I used to be conservative, mostly fiscal conservative and common sense social issues. It has gotten so rediculous these days, I'm voting democratic until the morons in the Republican party pull their heads out of rectal defilade which by what I have seen may be a long while. Is there no one in the Republican Party with an ounce of common sense? Someone who looks at people who have needs that really need government to work to solve problems. I throw my hands up. Kathryn

Link to comment
  • Admin

We won't know until there is a committee vote, but I haven't seen any verbal support for the author yet, even among fellow Republicans. I'll give the rest of 'em the BOD for now. With a little luck, Kavanagh may be the only "aye" vote on this ill begotten piece of trash.

Carolyn Marie

Link to comment
Guest Sarah Faith

Wow... I just noticed this state representative who is proposing this bill is actually from the town I grew up in.. And worse I'm pretty certain he's the father of someone I went to school with. :(

I wish I could say I was shocked though, but I'm really not. *sigh

Link to comment

The bill is changed, but I wouldn't say it is any better.

http://azstarnet.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/arizona-bathroom-gender-bill-revised-to-give-business-owners-immunity/article_50b615c2-9c84-5e59-998c-e8873abd6f5c.html

This revision could anger the LBG community too. Imagine if you are a butch lesbian who identifies as female, but is told she must use the men's restroom.

Jenny

Link to comment
Guest RachelAnn

According to an article that came out from the Arizona Daily Star:
http://azstarnet.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/arizona-bathroom-gender-bill-revised-to-give-business-owners-immunity/article_50b615c2-9c84-5e59-998c-e8873abd6f5c.html

There is, perhaps, a small inkling of the good senator's motives. Or, at least, a shred of a viable reason. He mentions:

Kavanagh said that preserves protections for those who may be concerned who else is sharing a restroom. "We don't want to have young girls in women's locker rooms being exposed to basically biological men in a state of undress," he said.

With the extreme awareness of child sexual abuse, this comment by Kavanagh, whether he means it truthfully or not, will have resonance to a lot of people. However this bill is opposed, there must be awareness that, for the vast majority of people, they will stand up for their children's sense of safety than they will for the rights of a fringe minority group. And WE need to be aware that though awareness and understanding of the TG condition has become better known in the past ten to twenty years, we don't want to make the mistake of thinking society is more aware or understanding than they really are.

Link to comment

According to an article that came out from the Arizona Daily Star:

http://azstarnet.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/arizona-bathroom-gender-bill-revised-to-give-business-owners-immunity/article_50b615c2-9c84-5e59-998c-e8873abd6f5c.html

There is, perhaps, a small inkling of the good senator's motives. Or, at least, a shred of a viable reason. He mentions:

Kavanagh said that preserves protections for those who may be concerned who else is sharing a restroom. "We don't want to have young girls in women's locker rooms being exposed to basically biological men in a state of undress," he said.

With the extreme awareness of child sexual abuse, this comment by Kavanagh, whether he means it truthfully or not, will have resonance to a lot of people. However this bill is opposed, there must be awareness that, for the vast majority of people, they will stand up for their children's sense of safety than they will for the rights of a fringe minority group. And WE need to be aware that though awareness and understanding of the TG condition has become better known in the past ten to twenty years, we don't want to make the mistake of thinking society is more aware or understanding than they really are.

I can understand this. Even though I currently can use the women's locker room at the gym, I don't because I don't want to make a scene and I don't believe I should until after surgery. Yet why didn't Rep Kavanagh specifically make this bill about locker rooms?

Jenny

Link to comment
  • Admin

The revised bill allows legal immunity for business owners who may use prejudice to determine who can use their restrooms. That is only marginally better than the original bill, and does nothing to preserve the rights of those in Phoenix to use the gender-appropriate restroom. Phoenix did the right thing. Kavanagh and company ought to leave it at that.

Carolyn Marie

Link to comment
Guest RachelAnn

I can understand this. Even though I currently can use the women's locker room at the gym, I don't because I don't want to make a scene and I don't believe I should until after surgery. Yet why didn't Rep Kavanagh specifically make this bill about locker rooms?

Jenny

Yeah, I'm the same at the Y. I can't legally use the women's locker, though they implied I could. And I can't use the men's locker room because I not only die from embarrassment and discomfort, the fact is that I was nicely blessed during HRT and have long, thick hair and wear a B cup. Yeaaaah... I'm not going to the men's locker room.

Fortunately, they have several family changing rooms, even one with a shower, so I get to go into the one-person/family only locked room and shower/change in comfort.

My next challenge is finding a trainer who is willing to overlook my 6'1" frame and deep voice and work me out with a women's regimen.

Rachel

Link to comment
Guest Mia J

I agree with Carolyn on this. The revised bill would still let a business to discriminate against just about anyone not only by how someone appears but by their own prejudice by being able say they looked to much like a male or female.

His comments about not wanting young girls to be exposed is only there to stir up the public to support this.

There are already exposure laws on the books that would take care of someone purposely exposing themselves.

Mia

Link to comment

I envision two things. Petitions all over town for his job on a plate, with big yellow posters that read. Mecham, Symington, Kavanagh, The Winning Team! That, and all the unclockable trans men, legally flash mobbing the ladies rooms at churches, sporting events and other mass public functions. They especially need to hang out there when his contistuants families use them too. Flood the web with those reactions.

I was lt go from a job resently, one of the employrs comments was that since I am male, my appearance was considered too disruptive. This was in reference to my breasts. They have since played many more shinangans claiming to the State, that I quit and was not termnated. Long story... JodyAnn

PS--- should I re-apply now that I am legally female? LOL! Not, I would puke.JA

Link to comment
Guest KimberlyF

to p or not to p :)

Guess all other problems in Phoenix are solved that they have time for p related stuff.

I agree that all of these public accommodation bills should be dealt with after these states fix their budgets and pensions and school issues.

Link to comment
  • Who's Online   7 Members, 0 Anonymous, 173 Guests (See full list)

    • KatieSC
    • FinnyFinsterHH
    • KathyLauren
    • Abigail Genevieve
    • Ivy
    • Ashley0616
    • awkward-yet-sweet
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.7k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,033
    • Most Online
      8,356

    ArtavikenGenderflui
    Newest Member
    ArtavikenGenderflui
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. afraid of self
      afraid of self
    2. Chaidoesart
      Chaidoesart
      (14 years old)
    3. Faith57
      Faith57
    4. Joyce Ann
      Joyce Ann
      (70 years old)
    5. Kelly21121
      Kelly21121
      (56 years old)
  • Posts

    • Abigail Genevieve
      I don't think it should be.  Nor do I see Project 2025 as pushing Christian nationalism.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      The agencies are supposed to work for him.  The problem, as conservatives found out in Trump 1, was they will ignore the president and do their own thing.  The agencies are supposed to be under his control.   Congress delegated some of its law making authority to the agencies, which is another problem.   The bloated federal government needs to be trimmed.  Dept Education is worthless - test scores have dropped since it was instituted in the Carter administration consistently, and it is currently implementing Biden's woke agenda more than doing anything else.
    • FinnyFinsterHH
      I hope to eventually wear a suit for dance but don't know what exactly to look for. I feel like jumpsuit is safe option but I have been interested in wearing button up and formal pants. Is there a certain brand i should look for or sites I should look at for tips? My mom is not exactly keen on me wearing too masc clothing like suits just yet but is okay with jumpsuits. Also is there hair styling tips availible, my hair looks like image below. I might be able to get shorter haircut like pixie but am not sure yet.  
    • MaeBe
      It’s never been about him, but he is the Presidential nominee for the Presidency that starts in…2025. I don’t see a lot of conflation that this is a “Trump doctrine”, it a doctrine that benefits him surely, but it is a plan to instill crony governance and enact very Christian conservative (if not purely Christian nationalist) “order” on the country. If you don’t see this as the Right doubling down on Big G government, I don’t know what to tell them. Getting rid of agencies and giving the authority directly to the Executive isn’t shrinking government. It’s consolidation power. 
    • MaeBe
      It is the made up ideology they believe trans people are pushing on the world, those “poor young girls who are being coerced into believing they are men” and the “perverts who put on dresses and think they’re girls”. The anti-LGBTQ+ movement came up with the term. Being trans = you believe in trans ideology/transgenderism, supporting trans people = the same.   In the end anyone that acts on or thinks gender is anything but what is in your pants is a “transgenderist”, why not make it a word if it’s not, there is no real grey area. Unless you acknowledge there is transgenderism, but use your knowledge to “correct it”.  So I guess there could be transgenderist conversion “therapists”.  Face it, we deface the America they want. Land of the Free and Home of the Brave? I think being out and queer is pretty brave. And freedom shouldn’t just be for those who push a narrow “Christian ideology” as the “true” governing model.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Over here muttering about "a new Jim Crow against a persecuted minority."    
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Rants are not a problem.  My favorite hobby! :)   What's out there is bad enough that I wonder why some people feel they need to embellish it.  Be alert.   Some of this will need to be fought in court if they try to implement it. If people are out to get me, paranoia is justified.  And this may not be the only document.   Abby
    • Ivy
      Not in so many words, therefore it's not there at all.  Excuse my paranoia. And the states passing laws against us are nothing to worry about either. Having to change my gender back to male (like in Florida) is reasonable.  I should just accept it, I mean I was born with a dk.  So that "F" is lie, and a fraud.  My delusions need to be dealt with for my own good.   I'm just frustrated these days.  Just a bit of a rant.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      You probably remember the Target PR fiasco.  I remember reading an account from a woman who shopped there.  She went into a stall and did her business, and someone came into the bathroom and began swinging stall doors open, and when she came to her stall, the woman peeked at her through the crack. "What are you doing?" "Checking for perverts." The writer was so stunned by the absurdity that she finished up ASAP and got out of there, while the other woman entered a stall and locked it, made sure it was locked, and locked it again. 
    • Adrianna Danielle
      Been a good day.Cleaned my closet of clothes that I do not wear anymore and do not fit me.It looks better now.Came down to my newest property beside mine,owner passed and I inherited it.There was a double wide there that was removed,it was in bad shape.It is the shop part I am keeping which I got the tools,shop equipment,benches,hoists and shelving too.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Nothing about eradicating TG folk. 
    • Ivy
      If 9 out of 10 parts are ok, that doesn't mean I need to accept the bad parts (that are aimed directly at me).  That seems suicidal.
    • Ivy
      True, most of it has nothing to do directly with us.  It's the parts that do that are the problem.   I see the  few problematic statements as being a big problem.  Just because a lot of it may be okay, doesn't change that. Even supposing the rest of it might be good for the country, it doesn't help me if I'm being "eradicated".  I suppose I should be good with that, because it's for the "greater good".  If me being gone would please a number of people, then it's my civic duty to disappear, and vote to implement that.
    • Ivy
      Yeah.  There are already laws against assault.  I don't think the overwhelming majority of trans women have any desire to harass cis women.  Speaking for myself, if I go into a women's washroom, it's because my eyeballs are already floating - not for kicks.  And I worry about getting clocked and assaulted by some guy being a "hero."
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Only three, maybe four, sections even mention transgender.  Most is a conservative agenda I have no problem with.   In the sections that mention transgender, there are very few lines.  Those lines ARE problematic, in every case. Unequivocally.  I can't see some of them standing up in court.  In one case a recommended policy goes against a court decision, which strongly suggests the implementation of that policy would be stopped in court.    Anyone maintaining that this is written simply to support Trump, to support him becoming a dictator, to crush transgender people is feeding you a line.  Nor is it an attempt to erase transgender people.   People will have to decide if the overall goals are worth the few problematic statements.  Overall, I support it.  Of course, I have some reservations.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...