Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Transgender people now legally required to out themselves to employers


Guest ValerieD

Recommended Posts

Guest ValerieD

I'm suprised this went under the radar here. The Federal government just changed the requirements on the I-9 Employment Verification form. Now, instead of requesting "maiden name", they request "other names used", which requires transgender workers to disclose their old name. Even a legal name change cannot protect us now.

I discovered this while going through the job offer process with a company and I have a thread about that in the coming out forum looking for advice - please reply there if you have any, because I have a bunch of documents that I need to return to that company tomorrow!

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

You can run but you can't hide in today's world....

No surprise really, thanks for the heads up Valerie, appears they just broadening the scope. A lot of folks change their name for reasons other than marriage.

C -

Link to comment
Guest Sarah Michelle

Not trying to go around the rules but I never provide my former name if asked. My birth certificate shows my current name/sex and luckily the state I was born in seals the document. The only way someone can get it is by court order.

Link to comment

My childhood was in the sixties and seventies, this all smells like the attemps then, to put down all the civil unrest for everything of civil rights, war and generally directed at people that would not conform. I guess we take our turn at being the target minority. History going round and round, with a new face painted on the presentation. I have not lost faith in humanity, society? I'm not so sure anymore. Bob Ross never painted the boogie man, just happy little trees... Jody

Link to comment
Guest Jenni_S

There are many reasons people change their names, ours is only one. Like it or not, you did have your previous name. The background check that virtually every employer runs WILL turn it up, anyway. If you leave it out, you open yourself to a lot of questioning, and give the impression that you lie on government forms. And I've learned, never, ever lie, even a lie of omission, on a government form.

Link to comment
Guest toni_mi

This worries me. I'm only just starting to work things out. I currently live in a very conservative area, and I have plans to move to Seattle in 5 years. I'd like to transition as soon as I move, or soon after I arrive there, but this worries me. Once I fully transition, I don't want anyone to know about my other name because it's not me. How is this right? Won't this make it harder for those of us who haven't transitioned yet, or are in the middle of transitioning?

Link to comment
Guest ValerieD

Well, looks like I forgot to include the link I wanted to: http://www.immigration.bakerdonelson.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=viewContentUpdate&contentUpdateID=105&ContentID=489&CatID=49&SectionID=41

And yes, I'm not at all happy about having the old name (nor about being trans; simply being a woman isn't enough for me, I'm not sure how I'll be happy not being a cisgendered woman (I'm a perfectionist, and if I make a change, I like to break from the past and not even acknowledge there was a past; I don't like having to provide "legacy support" for my old male identity)).

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

The truth is that we are and always were the men and women we were born as far as gender identity but we have a medical and social history that will follow us. I am a man. Period as far as my self identity. . But I am also a transman as far as my history. I can no more leave that behind than that I was born in Texas and have blue eyes. I can and have moved to another place and can wear contacts to make my eyes another color but I was still born blue eyed in Texas and transgendered. It isn't a label I wear. Or will wear-just a fact of life. I have nothing to hide or deny because I am not ashamed that this birth defect occurred.

The need to hide who we are and go stealth is rapidly changing and I hope the day will come it doesn't matter. If it comes up fine but I see no need to bring it up. People seldom mention their birth defects to me in conversations and I don't often have reason to mention being blind in one eye or trans.

The current situation with violence and terrorism and the information age mean we are going to get caught in situations like this that are not aimed at us but at security primarily. Something I fear we are just going to have to accept whether we agree or like it or not. We are too few to block laws meant to protect employers and enhance security. Nor will it further our cause for equality to try. If we act like this is something to hide we send a message that it is wrong and shameful.

Johnny

Link to comment
  • Admin

What we really need here is two things;

First some education to potential employers on how to use our prior history and how to treat it.

Second, some realism on our part and a willingness to work with employers who may absolutely want to have us in their organization if we meet job related criteria.

For those of us 30 and above, we want decently paying careers but those careers depend on our having certain background skills and a verifiable work ethic.

<My male name> had thirty three years with an employer, and during that time he did certain things that became a matter of public record in very positive ways. I want even a part time job now, but I want it to be interesting even more than well paying, but to get the job I want, I must have the qualities I exhibited in my former job. My former job does not know me as Vicky, and the laudable public records cannot be changed to Vicky, since some of them are over twenty years old. My name change of course is a matter of public record. The fact I am able to supervise a team of professionals can only be verified in my old name. The fact that I had a salary over $$$$$$ and am worth a higher salary likewise relates to my male persona. I am happier to be me and "on the other side", but honoring who I was is good for any future I wish to pursue. I am skilled and experienced person, but my experience was as <My male name> and denying it is pretty darn silly, and puts me at >30 in a position of having to begin at the lowest and least skilled levels, and not taking any of the good I did in fact have into my future.

We do need to educate employers that we are providing this information openly to show them what we, as our current selves have experienced and learned. Our basic character too will be inquired about with former supervisors and colleagues, and lackluster, or sneaky and non committal answers can be used by the employer in their negative decision to hire us. We have the experience they are looking for we have and have had the high level of character they can count on, and when they get and use information on our PRIOR Real Life Experience, they need to consider us to be a continuation of a prior good, honest, skilled and personable person who, no matter what we deny, did exist, and did work and earn.

Link to comment
Guest Mia J

Sorry to hear about this. I am already in the work force and am in the process of fully coming out at work so this will not effect me until I change employers. I can see where it will cause issues with most trans folk who, understandably want to remain stealth.

Mia

Link to comment
  • Admin

When I applied for my volunteer position, I was required to list any "former names" on my application. They needed it to run a thorough background check, which I understand completely. The position works with the public, and with children.

I could have protested, or put DNA. In either case, I might have been denied this "job" that I wanted very much, either because I made a pest of myself or lied about my past. I did neither, and put my old name.

You know what happened? Nothing. Does someone in Admin now have a reasonable suspicion that I'm trans? Perhaps. Has it mattered? Not in the least.

I think we take our fear of being "discovered" too far, sometimes. If you want a particular job bad enough, you'll do what is required to get it. If not, then you can find a job where they don't ask you about your past. Those will be few and far between, I'm afraid. My advice is to stop worrying so much, and just live your life. There are no guarantees, but chances are you won't be humiliated for being honest on your job application.

HUGS

Carolyn Marie

Link to comment
Guest ValerieD

Since this thread (rather than my other one) has all the activity, I figured I'd post this here. This is my letter for acceptance of that job I mentioned; I'm hoping to send it out later tonight. Thoughts? (Mods feel free to move this to the other thread if you think that's appropriate)

I'm accepting the offer; attached are the signed documents, including a signature on the ethics policy to confirm concurrence. I plan to go to Watertown on some Monday to complete the drug screening.

Also: to clarify the "other names used" field on the I-9 form, I'm mentioning that I'm male to female transgendered. I thought it would be best to mention this now rather than leave it to the I-9 form for you to find out. I would appreciate it if my colleagues could get to know me as a woman rather than the transgendered employee.

Link to comment
Guest sophia.gentry58

This is a good topic, I've wondered, seldom, but wondered nonetheless whether making my transition will make it harder for me to obtain and or maintain employment. What I've concluded is the same conclusion I came to when dealing with my ethnicity; unless someone blatantly let it be known that I will not be hired, or am being fired because I am transgender, then it will be a complete waste of my life's energy to give in to anxiety over what otherwise cannot be known.

Sophia

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace." - Jimi Hendrix

Link to comment

I have just applied for a new job and I do not remember any questions about other names on the form that i filled out for the background check.

If they ask, I will give it to them because I am not ashamed of who I am or the man that I used to be because I made sure that he was a good man, the best that I could make him - now I am trying to be the best woman I can be.

Life is not always the way we want it, I would like to have been born female and rich but I missed on both counts.

Happiness is really all up to us so do not let putting and old name on a form stop you from being happy, just fill it out and forget it.

Love ya,

Sally

Link to comment
Guest Kelly-087

Since this thread (rather than my other one) has all the activity, I figured I'd post this here. This is my letter for acceptance of that job I mentioned; I'm hoping to send it out later tonight. Thoughts? (Mods feel free to move this to the other thread if you think that's appropriate)

I'm accepting the offer; attached are the signed documents, including a signature on the ethics policy to confirm concurrence. I plan to go to Watertown on some Monday to complete the drug screening.

Also: to clarify the "other names used" field on the I-9 form, I'm mentioning that I'm male to female transgendered. I thought it would be best to mention this now rather than leave it to the I-9 form for you to find out. I would appreciate it if my colleagues could get to know me as a woman rather than the transgendered employee.

Personally I'd write it. Since you kind of have to, and ask for confidentiality regarding the change in name.

That way at least you leave some room for legal recourse if things go un-realisticly wrong.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 55 Guests (See full list)

    • SimplyMadeloeine
    • MaybeRob
    • KathyLauren
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.8k
    • Total Posts
      770.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,107
    • Most Online
      8,356

    SimplyMadeloeine
    Newest Member
    SimplyMadeloeine
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. austin_4
      austin_4
      (17 years old)
    2. Britany_Relia
      Britany_Relia
      (39 years old)
    3. Emily S
      Emily S
      (67 years old)
    4. Hoof Arted
      Hoof Arted
      (22 years old)
    5. n3eeko
      n3eeko
  • Posts

    • kristinabee
      right handed  
    • Vidanjali
      That's awesome, Davie. Keep the faith!
    • Adrianna Danielle
      Yes,I hate that     Also finding out I might be father of a 24 year young lady.I had an one night stand with a woman off base when I was in the army.Called this afternoon and said I am possibly the father of her now 24 year old daughter.Told her I will agree with a paternity test that will be done.
    • Ivy
      Yeah.  I like Nebula, that was where I watched it.   I posted the YouTube cause I figured more people could see it.
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      We agree on most of this... and the church/state thing is kind of a tangent anyways. Oops. LOL   I think it has long been established that all different kinds of groups have access to public funds. In my opinion, either everybody has access or nobody does. I would prefer "nobody."   Relying on public funds gives the government the power to take it away, and puts that power in the hands of whatever group controls the government at the moment... the news article that is the topic of this thread shows a clear example of that happening.  Organizations trust government at their peril.
    • DonkeySocks
      Fantastic news! Thank you for updating us.
    • Davie
      More info on Abigail Thorne here: https://go.nebula.tv/philosophytube and, Dracula's ex-girlfriend, on Philosophy tube.   "The reason why Nebula is so cheap for what it is, is because there's no upper hierarchical group looking yo skim off the top. Imagine how much cheaper EVERYTHING could be if it was like that for every other service or product; if the money went straight to workers, not up a chain of command until it reached someone who did exactly "jack" to produce what's being sold.
    • Ivy
    • Ivy
      I'm aware that the young US ended up fighting a war with these people, and that phrase was not meant to address Church & state.  But somebody was willing to include it at the time.   I am also aware that your family arrangements would not go over well with most christian nationalists.  But that is kinda where I'm coming from on this.  I believe you and others of us with an unconventional lifestyle should be free to live as we desire - as long as we are not hurting anyone else.  And by "hurting" I don't mean only their feelings.   Using christianity to justify oppression is just wrong.  As is forced conversion, or forced conversion therapy.   Regarding public funds, LGBTQetc people have as much right to them as straight-cis folks.  I'm not arguing that queer people have more rights, just equal rights.
    • Davie
      Even better news:  It turns out for my sister it was cardio not stroke. She’s put on new blood thinner and sent home. False alarm! Yay.
    • JenniferB
      Things have changed since I've been on HRT for about 15 years. The consequence is I am not so concerned about how I present all the time.  I wear t-shirts a lot. I am pragmatic in how I shop. No, I don't want to look male, but will buy some male clothing because it fits. I am tall and built like a football linebacker, so buying women's clothes that fit can be difficult. For one I have no problem buying men's sneakers if they can pass as unisex. I wear size 12-13 women's shoes. And that can be hard to find. And, I don't like wearing slacks without pockets. I use pockets for work.    I've learned to be pragmatic. I dress up when I want to go out in public, and not so much at work. I do have a favorite blouse that accentuates the girls. And one blue striped blouse where I wear a cami top.
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      https://www.patheos.com/blogs/danthropology/2016/05/secularists-please-stop-quoting-the-treaty-of-tripoli/   ^^^ an interesting piece about the treaty, written by an atheist.   I totally understand why the Christian nationalist stuff makes people uncomfortable. For me, it is uncomfortable in a different way, as modern Christian nationalism is not nearly as "generic" as the views of the Founders.  Its specifically Evangelical.  I'm in a plural marriage, so definitely not approved of.    I believe the intent of the Founders was to uhold generic Christian ideas... "in God we trust" and "there's a God who created the world and He wrote ten commandments for us" sort of stuff.  Nothing beyond that, nothing specific enough to use against folks.
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      Free?!?!  That's insane.  I can understand perhaps mistaking somebody's well equipped garage as a business, but demanding free work is ridiculous.   My GF once remarked that while few things in life are free, butt-kickings are an exception. She offers those free-of-charge, to any who ask. A little charity helps the world go round 🤣
    • Ivy
      I had a CDL when I was working for the city.  But I let it go when I retired.  I couldn't justify paying so much just to drive myself around.
    • Ivy
      While I'm sure the "Founders" had the 30 years war, etc. on their minds, they didn't write the constitution as considering only Christian sects. The early colonists (I used the word) did mostly come from areas of "christian culture" but it's hard to reconcile some of their actions with what Christ himself taught.   Christians have a right to their beliefs, but there are a lot of American citizens that do not consider themselves "christian."  I have seen writings where the US was specifically said not to be a "Christian Nation". "The 1797 Treaty of Tripoli that sought to secure America from attacks by the so-called Barbary pirates who were Muslim made a point to say that the United States "is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion.""    It shouldn't be difficult to understand why the "Christian Nationalist" movement makes some of us uncomfortable.  
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...