Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

The Gay Marriage Debate


MaryEllen

Recommended Posts

Guest StrandedOutThere
I don't see any real point in starting a war here. All of you have it ingrained into your minds that you wish to change marriage. My conservative roots disagree and could fight for hours, but I don't think it could change your opinions. I also enjoy reading your posts because they are interesting and allow me to think about things. I still have not seen anything strong enough to shake the conservativeness out of me. I guess you could call it a transsexual stumbling block if you wish. I would challenge you to try and shake the conservativeness, but this isn't really the right thread for that.

Anyway, you know my opinion. I wouldn't call it a dissenting opinion since a lot of other people seem to agree with me.

Aww...I'm not trying to start a war. I just like debating.

Around here, I'd say your opinion is a bit counter to the majority. Either way, we'll just have to agree to disagree on this one.

As for shaking the conservativeness out of you, no I probably can't. Right now I'm pretty busy trying to shake the conservativeness out of my mom.

Link to comment
Guest Leah1026
I'm not trying to drag religion into this. I think there have been very few if any cultures in history to fully accept gays until recently. I also don't want to offend anyone, I just think this is a change in something great that has been preserved for thousands of years. Marriage is one of the few commonplace things to survive from that time. And this change would ruin a large part of what it was originally intended to be.

Religion is a personal lifestyle choice. Being born gay/lesbian is not.

Many of the same arguments being used against gays/lesbians today are the same arguments that have been used throughout our history against progress. Most notably the bible was used to:

Support slavery

Oppose the right to vote for blacks

Oppose the right to vote for women

Oppose inter-racial marriages

Oppose the Equal Rights Amendment

Link to comment
Guest Sheila

i think it's a matter of time. change comes slowly. people in general seem to resist change, especially if it makes them feel uncomfortable. the people that resist us find us not normal because we don't fit in to their way of thinking. it just seems to me that maybe they are the ones not normal because they are conditioned to think that way, at least that's how i see it, like they have a one tract mind. now i'm not trying to insult anybody, and i'm sorry if you feel that way but i'm just giving my opinion. i respect their views, i wish they would give me the same respect. i don't tell them how to live their lives, theirs by choice. i wish they would just let me live the life i was born into. and stranded out there, you educate well. you and leah1026 both seem to be very well imformed and experienced in these matters and i hold you both in the highest regard. i feel like i'm in good hands. thank you.

sheila

Link to comment
Guest KyleMicheal

Gay marriage = YES!

Attraction and love is normal in anyone. This can be changed a bit. Attraction can be towards the opposite sex or the same sex. You are BORN with it. You do not choose whether you are straight, gay, have 6 fingers, are blonde, are brunette, are male or female, or anything else for that matter.

Let's say that gayness was "normal" and straightness was "unnatural". Now, think about it. You opposed to gay marriage, think. Is it fair? No, it's not. You can't be with your love, ever.

Definitions change often, as well. Man and woman, you may think. Yeah. I respect that, but...

Medical definitions change often.

Slang definitions change often.

Normal definitions change often.

Law changes often.

Alcohol used to be illegal. Just because people thought it was a "bad thing", it was banned. What happened? Gangsters, scandal, and more crime. You could compare gay marriage to alcohol. Some people think it is evil, so it's banned. We would be better off with gay marriage. It won't hurt anyone. Plus, the lack of procreation can lead to a good thing: adoption of children who so desperately need care.

Children under care of homosexual parents can be more open about their little quirks. (Homosexuality, transsexuality, not fitting in, that strange deformity they have on their face)

On the subject of changing definition...who said marriage is strictly between a man and a woman? Even in the Catholic church, men had many wives. ONE man and ONE woman. I think not. The definition even changed.

To all of you brunettes wishing you were blonde, do you change it? Yes, you do. Maybe more men/women are driven to you or whatever. In essence, this is lying. You're brown haired. It may cause you pain later that he's into you because of the lie you have given him. You can never be close.

Now let's say the hair color analogy can be applied to homosexuality. Brunette = gay; blonde = straight

See, even if a homosexual went ahead and got a heterosexual marriage, it would never be true. It's lying.

Or maybe let's say your true love is trans. You can't get married because hir birth gender is the same as yours. Painful.

So, do you think gays should be denied rights of marriage? You decide.

Link to comment

I guess I'll never change. Oh yes, men have had multiple wives in history. They had multiple marriages. I don't think there's been a marriage ceremony where 1 man got married to 2 wives.

I have question for you all to answer. Some gays have gone through reparative therapy. I'm not asking about the effectiveness of the therapy or anything. But some gays have done it and have come out straight. So how does this work with gays being "born" gay if they can become straight through this therapy? Just wondering what your responses are.

Link to comment
  • Root Admin

Should anyone chose to enter this program voluntarily, I have no problem with that. I do have a problem with forcing someone into this program against their will. It is just plain WRONG WRONG WRONG! There have been too many suicides by people being forced into this program to justify it's existance. If this type of program works for you. That's fine. Go for it, but don't expect the rest of us to follow suit.

MaryEllen

Link to comment
Guest StrandedOutThere
I guess I'll never change. Oh yes, men have had multiple wives in history. They had multiple marriages. I don't think there's been a marriage ceremony where 1 man got married to 2 wives.

I have question for you all to answer. Some gays have gone through reparative therapy. I'm not asking about the effectiveness of the therapy or anything. But some gays have done it and have come out straight. So how does this work with gays being "born" gay if they can become straight through this therapy? Just wondering what your responses are.

There's a difference between coming out acting straight and actually being straight. I haven't seen any evidence that the therapy brings about any real changes. From what I've read, the long term effects aren't so good either.

On the other hand, I have seen evidence from studies using brain scans. There are structural differences in gay peoples' brains. In many cases, gay men's brains are more similar to the brains of straight women. There are also structural differences in gay women's brains when compared to straight women's brains. I guess that kinda suggests they might have been born that way.

Dude, what's your deal?

Link to comment

Well it's just my opinion. It comes from the way I'm raised. Church. Parents. Friends. All that stuff.

It's kinda off topic but it's strange how liberals call conservatives bigots and all that stuff and conservatives say the same things back to the liberals.

Anyway I didn't want to start a war or offend anyone here right now.

It also appears that I've been reported. Don't know who did that or what being reported entails.

Link to comment
Guest Zenda
I guess I'll never change. Oh yes, men have had multiple wives in history. They had multiple marriages. I don't think there's been a marriage ceremony where 1 man got married to 2 wives.

I have question for you all to answer. Some gays have gone through reparative therapy. I'm not asking about the effectiveness of the therapy or anything. But some gays have done it and have come out straight. So how does this work with gays being "born" gay if they can become straight through this therapy? Just wondering what your responses are.

Kia Ora BK,

:) Now I’m sure you are aware that some people call themselves ‘bi sexual’ or in my case bi-romantic-asexual [if I were to have a relationship with either a male or female, unlike the bi-‘sexual’, mine would be a ‘non’ sexual one]. Anyway what I would like to mentioned [and for you to ponder awhile before replying] regarding your comment on ‘homosexuals’ being cured through RT…

I have a friend whose been in a ‘same sex’ relationship for over twenty years, however she ‘still sees herself as ‘bi-sexual’ but she ‘chose’ to commit to a long term relationship with a female…

What if those who say that they were ‘cured’ by RT were just bi-sexuals who finally chose to commit to a female-[if males] relationship!!!…In many cases a person’s sexual orientation is not so clear cut as hetero-homo…Some going through transition their orientation may become fluid[questioning] and after they have fully transitioned they may have gone from a ‘heterosexual male to a heterosexual female or visa versa…Or their physical sexual identity changes but their orientation stayed the same ie, in a male body they were attracted to women=heterosexual and now as a female they are still attracted to females=homosexual.

Ones sexual orientation BK can be quite complex, a person could be a somewhat confused bi-sexual, whilst others might be asexual [having no interest in sex whatsoever] If you go by my friend's experience and by the way, she is a qualified psychotherapist who just so happens to have dealt with transsexual people in the UK…She is now in her early seventies, I’m sure she know herself by now…And BK she's got around sixty ‘life experience’ years more than you!!!

Same sex marriage… my vote would be yes…It's a no brainer...What right do I have to deny another person’s happiness especially when I don’t know them from a bar of soap[an old English saying] How would you feel if someone denied you the freedom to choose?…

Now if there was a vote to ban organised religion my vote would also be yes…However in time I believe evolution will eventually make it extinct ie, as a species we will grow out of it…Umm in the meantime I think I’ll become a follower of Bertrand Russell’s ‘celestial teapot’ …it makes more sense to me… BK you might like to look up 'celestial teapot' or Russell's teapot... maybe it will open your mind just a little.

BTW, I believe in miracles, but miracles for me are not of the supernatural kind, they are more when a person whose mind and eyes are clouded by ignorance suddenly see the light - seeing all people as equals and becomes more humane in their dealings with others...That's what I call a true miracle...And they are happening everyday...

Metta Jendar :)

Link to comment
Guest StrandedOutThere
Well it's just my opinion. It comes from the way I'm raised. Church. Parents. Friends. All that stuff.

It's kinda off topic but it's strange how liberals call conservatives bigots and all that stuff and conservatives say the same things back to the liberals.

Anyway I didn't want to start a war or offend anyone here right now.

It also appears that I've been reported. Don't know who did that or what being reported entails.

Perhaps make sure it really is YOUR opinion and not your parents' opinion. It's important to look at the facts yourself and make your own decisions. Don't get in the habit of just accepting what other people say. It's good to be critical. Be critical of what your parents say...be critical of what we are saying here. Form opinions based on reason.

Yes, I've heard liberals call conservatives bigots. I've suggested to my mother and step-father (both conservatives) that they both might be bigots. However, I've never heard anyone call liberals bigots. We get called "bleeding hearts" and "hippies". If anything, liberals get criticized for being too accepting. Whatever...

I don't know who reported you...wasn't me. I don't want you to go away. I like to argue.

Link to comment
Guest Drew
Well it's just my opinion. It comes from the way I'm raised. Church. Parents. Friends. All that stuff.

i agree with StrandedOutThere...make sure it's really your opinion....it very well may be and that's fine...everyone is entitled to their own opinion....however, i was raised in a very strict, religious family with a zero-tolerance policy towards anybody remotely queer and up until i was 13 or 14 i thought i was destined to burn in hell....i don't anymore

Link to comment
Guest sphere

Well I think all marriage should be illegal, so there. I don't understand the point of it personally, but to each his own.

Haha though seriously, yes, gay marriage should be allowed, or maybe I'm just a bit biased since I'm gay myself. Civil unions are stupid, people say it's the same thing but if it has a different name it's still separate. I don't care if it's been between a man and woman for however long, I have never lived back then so I don't really care what marriage was like back then. Nothing's wrong with a little change. The world needs change or else it gets boring and no one goes anywhere. It doesn't have to be a big deal really.

I kind of dislike how people get to vote on this issue. I think we should vote on if heterosexual marriage should be legal, too, in that case. It's no one else's business who gets married to who, it's a civil right, it should be allowed.

The therapy thing to "change" people from gay to straight I find kind of disgusting really. People are who they are and everyone, including themselves, need to accept that. That "therapy" is just another pressure for people to pretend they're straight and suffer accordingly.

Yes you are born gay. No you don't jump out of the womb saying "I LIKE MEN" (if you're male). But you don't jump out of there being the height you will be when you're 25, you don't have facial hair (if you're male), you don't have breasts (if you're female), you're not nearsighted, et cetera but you will eventually and there's not much that's going to stop any of that because it's in your DNA. So is your sexual orientation. There are animals who are gay, I highly doubt they have the brain capacity to even understand what that means, let alone decide.

As for the issue with children... that's sort of irrelevant. Marrying someone doesn't necessarily mean "now LET'S GO MAKE BABIES" ...well for some it might, which is another thing, people have different interpretations of what marriage should be, and I think we should respect each other's opinions and views and sexual orientations. If you don't like gay marriage, well you don't have to attend a gay marriage or get married to someone of the same sex. It doesn't effect anyone who chooses not to marry to the same sex, so I don't see why it should matter to them.

Oh I was talking about kids. Right, right. Some say that a female role (or male role for lesbian marriages) is needed to raise a kid. Does this mean single parents can't have kids either? And someone mentioned that the kids turned out no different than ones raised by straight parents. Yeah. That too.

My grandfather was gay and he married a woman and had six children and was in a very unhappy marriage. He lived a lie and cheated on his wife all the time but he was still gay. It messed him up, and in turn it messed up my dad and his siblings. Everyone suffers.

Link to comment
Guest Leah1026
I kind of dislike how people get to vote on this issue. I think we should vote on if heterosexual marriage should be legal, too, in that case. It's no one else's business who gets married to who, it's a civil right, it should be allowed.

Get a load of this video at Pam's House Blend. Jesse Ventura tells it like it is:

http://www.pamshouseblend.com/showDiary.do...20?diaryId=5532

Sometimes in our country the court DO need to force change. For example Brown vs. The Board of Education. If people were allowed to vote we would absolutely still have segregation (and slavery like Jesse said). Courts have often been used in the country as a way of forcing progress, for getting the country to do the right thing. Another example: would women have gotten the right to vote in 1920 (USA) if it was strictly up to a vote by men?

Marriage Equality is the right thing to do. The Declaration of Indeprendence says:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

Notice it doesn't say some people are more equal than others.

And for the record: I'm a Christian (Catholic) and straight, but I believe in the ideals as put forth in the Declaration of Independence.

Link to comment
Guest Sheila

i was forced to go to church every sunday and some weekdays too until i was sixteen. the churches brainwashing had no effect on me. i reject the church who won't except me for who i am. i follow my heart, not what someone tells me what is right or wrong. i consider myself a good person and i think i know the difference between right and wrong. if god made me this way, what gives people the right to tell me i'm wrong?

Link to comment

I find it amazing that a member of an anti-gay cure group would tell a homosexual that if he couldn't be converted that he was better off committing suicide. They all get the throwing stones part of the bible but not Jesus's message of "He who is without sin should cast the first stone". I don't get terrorists who kill thousands of people in God's name. Both groups are so eerily similar it is scary. The only difference is the choice of ammunition.

Laura

Link to comment
Guest Leah1026

Interesting video I saw today on another site:

I hope that cut and pasted correctly. Someone taking Faux (Fox) News to task on it's "fair and balanced" :rolleyes: reporting on marriage equality. Their "expert" is clueless.

Link to comment
Guest Leah1026

Another video! Okay a warning for anyone who knows a lot about politics. This video may give you whiplash!

The video is Bob Barr, the Libertarian candidate for president, apologizing for having authored the federal DOMA (Defense of Marriage Act) back in 1996. He now says he agree with the California Supreme Court ruling for marriage equality.

Link to comment
Guest Keiichi-kun
I personally don't really like gay marriage. The whole term seems to be a oxymoron to me because marriage is between a man and a woman. It always has. It's just being challenged now. Sorry, but I would have to vote no on it.

You are most certainly entitled to your opinion and I respect that but I'm gonna give my two cents on the subject. With marriage comes a lot of benefits. Not only tax benefits but some that could severely affect a couple. The first is when your partner dies and doesn't have a will. Who does all their stuff go to? If you two aren't married then it's their children, if they have no children their parents, ect. You won't get a thing unless they have a will saying so. Also what about children? A teacher of mine was saying he has a friend in a lesbian relationship and the two of them are raising a child together. His friend's partner is an alcoholic and she wants to break it off but she is scared to do so because their child is biologically her partner's. She's afraid that if she were to break it off she wouldn't get to keep this child she's been raising just because they cannot get married. To me that's why same-sex couples just be allowed to get married.

Hell, I'm getting to point that civil unions with the same rights as marriages will do for me. No one should be denied the right to marry another consenting adult.

Link to comment

When the author of the bill changes his mind others will too. Thanks for the clips, Leah. What Doma does is allow states to write discrimination into their state constitutions by a simple majority vote. Some are still in favor of DOMA, others favor a partial repeal and still others want to repeal it completely. The following article lists the positions of other presidential candidates. http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPolitics.asp?Pa...L20080527a.html . Obama favors a complete repeal, Clinton a partial repeal and McCain disagrees with both candidates. This article explains what a partial repeal means http://www.republicoft.com/2007/12/28/the-doma-test/ . The partial repeal sounds like a plan to keep constituents happy in an election year as they all remember the anti-gay vote that pushed Bush to the white house in 2004.

To me partial rights are still discrimination if all don't have the same rights. It's like throwing one group a bone. Discrimination shouldn't be written into the constitution. The bill is either right or it's wrong. Any other answer is political doublespeak. I do understand the value of compromise but in this case i think a firm stand needs to be taken one way or the other. Human Rights should not be negotiable.

Laura

Link to comment
Guest StrandedOutThere
Hey! I like Fox News. Bill O'Reilly is cool too.

Did you see that video on YouTube where he flipped out? The techno remix was hilarious.

Link to comment
Guest Keiichi-kun
Did you see that video on YouTube where he flipped out? The techno remix was hilarious.

I can't stand that guy <_< I love watching him on youtube just get myself all riled up. :P

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 81 Guests (See full list)

    • Lydia_R
    • Charlize
    • Mirrabooka
    • Ashley0616
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.8k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,038
    • Most Online
      8,356

    Justine76
    Newest Member
    Justine76
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. April Marie
      April Marie
    2. daniela...
      daniela...
      (59 years old)
    3. Emily May
      Emily May
    4. Felixr
      Felixr
      (20 years old)
    5. Leann
      Leann
      (56 years old)
  • Posts

    • KatieSC
      While it is encouraging that they have deemed that they cannot ban the treatment, the bigger question is what treatments they will cover as a result. Speaking as a transgender female, this is a difficult definition. A fair number of insurance plans already cover the basic vaginoplasty, however, for those of us who have a rather masculine appearing face, a heavy beard, a deep voice, and other defining characteristics, attaining a passing feminine appearance is difficult without gender-affirming facial feminization surgery, genital and facial electrolysis, speech therapy and if necessary, gender affirming voice surgery, as well as other body contouring procedures. I view all of these procedures as life-saving in the sense that blending in, and thus avoiding an assault can come down to looking and sounding like you are female. I think the transgender males have a bit more ease with blending in than we do. There will be disagreements as to what constitutes enough surgery to be your truest self. We all pretty much understand that our true gender is locked in our mind. The issue is what can we do to modify our bodies enough to get the congruence between what is in our head, and how we perceive ourselves in the world. Is some of it cosmetic? That is hard to say for sure. I have had insurance companies insist that facial electrolysis is purely cosmetic. Well, most women do not have an Abraham Lincoln beard coming through. Some insurance companies have insisted that speech/voice therapy, as well as voice surgery, are purely cosmetic. I scoured the cosmetic counters for any makeup that would enhance my voice. Being feminine and passing does not mean I get to look and sound like Fred Flintstone in a dress. That kind of weirds folks out, and sets us up to be ridiculed and assaulted in my estimation.   My one insurer told me that beyond the vaginoplasty that all of this was cosmetic. In an appeal hearing, I asked the group that if they had a 14 year old daughter who was in an accident that resulted in a large facial scar, would they want the child to receive the best care to remove the scar? Of course they would. I pointed out though, that while she may have the scar, she could live with it. I asked them if the removal of the disfiguring scar in a 14-year old would be difficult for the child when the other kids made fun of her. Of course, they all nodded their head. I explained to the group that for folks like us, it is no different. While it may be cosmetic to a point, these procedures are essential to our well-being, and not something we are doing to be on a YouTube channel.   Now some who are trans, or gender fluid, may not want to opt for the procedures. There are quite a few of us that do, but the cost is prohibitive. What also clouds the issue are the surgeons who operate out of large medical centers who participate in the large insurance pools. How many of our sisters and brothers have had to pony up some major dollars to a surgeon who is out of network? Good luck trying to get the surgery paid for by your insurer. They may pay you what they pay the surgeons in network, but you won't get that much in reimbursement. A fair number of insurance companies balk at speech and voice therapy, and many will not cover voice surgery. Then there is the issue of electrolysis. A day at the "spa" for electrolysis with anesthetics will run around 3,000 bucks or so, and you may need many repeat visits. Many of the insurers fail to pay for that as well. Just about none of the insurers will cover body contouring procedures such as a panniculectomy, or liposuction. When the insurance companies will just help us become our truest selves, then we will have progress with gender identity laws.   The one good thing that this decision does is preserve the primary care for transgender individuals. I have to wonder how Florida and the rest of the states who have banned having Medicaid cover transgender healthcare are going to act. This should be an interesting fight. When we have the ability to seek care and get what we need for our true needs, without any pre-judgements, then these court orders will mean something. A court order without parameters for the insurance companies is hollow.
    • Mirrabooka
      @April MarieI just noticed that it's your birthday today! Happy Birthday to you!!!!!! 🥳🎂🎁🎉❤️
    • Mirrabooka
      Morning y'all, fingers crossed for everyone who has stuff going on.   Welcome back to reality @April Marie, enjoy your improving weather!   Why is it that we humans always take too long to acclimatize to the changing seasons, especially when it gets colder like it is here? Maybe I'm just getting soft in my old age, lol.    
    • Heather Shay
    • Heather Shay
      Speculation , worst or best case, neither.
    • Heather Shay
    • Heather Shay
    • Heather Shay
    • Heather Shay
    • Heather Shay
      @RiyaHello and welcome. I also live in Ohio and it is a challenge but I applaud you for knowing pretty early on and becoming who you really are. Congratulations!
    • Heather Shay
      Do you feel safe in the country you now live in?
    • Heather Shay
      Oooooooooooooooops, I forgot yesterday.   I was thinking of a few bands who had a member invited who said no and went right into obscurity or left before the band got big.   1) Led Zeppelin -  origially wanted Terry Reid to be lead vocalist and he decided the stay solo. 2) Crosby, Stills & Nash - invited John Sebastian to join before Neil Young, Sebastian said no. 3) Signe Anderson quit as lead vocalist with Jefferson Airplane and they replaced her with Grace Slick.    
    • April Marie
      Good morning, everyone! We're back from a short vacation with friends to the mountains of NC. It was a fun time driving the twisty mountain roads.   Now it's back to reality of cutting grass, washing windows and putting in screens and putting out the porch furniture. Coming home to warmer weather than when we left is glorious.   Happy Anniversary @Willow!    I hope your family is feeling better @KymmieL - my wife and I shared a stomach virus several weeks ago that was horrid.   Hang in there @Birdie, it will all work out!!   Have a wonderful day, everyone!
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      I think many Christians end up with a false dichotomy.  If we didn't choose to be how we are, then something in our environment did it. Is going along with it a sin?  Maybe.  But if so, its one of those times where we mess something up no matter what we do.  Part of the imperfect nature of this fallen world is that there are times where we'll sin no matter what we do.  In a no-win scenario like that, we do the wisest thing possible with our free will. 
    • EasyE
      This is the crux of my anguish these many, many months (years!) and where I go back-and-forth with my own journey ... I was born a biological male. No denying that in my case. But I have a lot of internal feminine leanings and external ones, too. I prefer to wear women's clothes 100 percent of the time (if I could). I wish I had the female plumbing. I long for that badly sometimes. I don't know why or where that came from but no denying that either. I have started HRT because I like the idea of having a more feminine physical body and some of the "perks" that go with that. I just asked my doc to up my dose to the next level today!   So the big question I ask myself is: am I knowingly disobeying God, who likes order and made humans male and female, by taking these steps? This is my wife's take on things. "You are sinning. You know God made you a male biologically. Yet you are willfully pursuing transition to being something God didn't intend you to be regardless of what you feel inside, what your preferences are, etc."  I keep trying to tell her it's much more complex than that but sometimes I don't even know what I think...   This ties up in knots and makes me angry and makes me feel stuck!!! I don't want to disobey my Creator and Savior and yet I have this strong, strong leaning toward the feminine in many ways (that keeps getting stronger and refuses to go away no matter how much I have tried to stuff it away!!) ... It feels like misery no matter which path I take - if I "give in" to the feminine, which I have been doing a lot the past 12 months or so, am I endangering my soul? Am I creating scandal? Yet the thought of putting the feminine aside feels, at times, like death too (or is it just me being self-centered and unwilling to bend the knee to my Creator who would ask me to give this up as a testament to my love for him...   I don't know. I don't know. I don't know!! But sometimes I really really F***ing hate this quandary... 
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...