Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

U.s. Endorses U.n. Gay Rights Statement


Guest

Recommended Posts

U.S. Endorses U.N. Gay Rights Statement

Declaration, Rejected By Bush Administration, Aims To Decriminalize Homosexuality

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/03/18/...Home;topStories

"But 70 U.N. members outlaw homosexuality - and in several, homosexual acts can be punished by execution. More than 50 nations, including members of the Organization of the Islamic Conference, opposed the declaration."

What are your thoughts?

Laura

Link to comment
Guest julia_d

same as the catholic church.. horrible religion when given power

and all those drooling morons in the comments.. wow .. what an advertisement for "teh free usa"

I saw one good comment ..because I know that a UN declaration isn't worth the paper it is written on.. or we would be doing military stuff in Somalia.

"Religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God.

He owes account to none other for his faith or his worship.

The legislative powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions.

Legislature should 'make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,' thus building a wall of separation between church and state.

The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. But it does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods, or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg."

? Thomas Jefferson, 1802

so now.. should Obama be expected to FORCE the legislature to also overturn the prop8 results?

Link to comment
Guest Irielle

It's about time the US did this and I hope the rest of the world will join.

I could be wrong about this, but it seems to me that all the objections to homosexuality have their basis in religious beliefs. I can't think of any exceptions but perhaps someone else can?

I don't understand why we humans short-circuit our brains with superstitions and disregard the advances that have been made in science, philosophy, sociology, medicine and such when they are inconvenient to our religous belief systems.

I am confident that reason and sanity will prevail. Someday.

Link to comment
Guest mia 1

Well thank god oops thank the powers that be that the U.S. has elected a chief executive who thinks rationally and sees all people's gender/sexuality as non criminal including adultery and acts of bedroom privacy as non business of the ayatollahs, the mullahs, the Vatican,,or the chief Rabbi of Israel..notice the thread here all Abrahamic religions....

It is heart warming to see this coming from the U.S.A.'s leadership and maybe someday we will gain the respect of the allies that left us laughing at #43..and his brand of Tali ban Christianity

Link to comment
Guest michelle.butterfly

Hi Laura! (hugs)

I didn't find the actual statment to read but I think I'm for any resolutions of support for the rights of anyone to be free to be themselves without persecution or denial of civil or other liberties. This is the kind of thing I can get behind anyone on assuming it doesn't have something in it I don't know about.

I could be wrong about this, but it seems to me that all the objections to homosexuality have their basis in religious beliefs. I can't think of any exceptions but perhaps someone else can?

LOL... There is the main non-religious objection that I know of...

"Ewwwww! Gross!"

Much love,

Michelle

Link to comment
Guest SuperFlyGal
so now.. should Obama be expected to FORCE the legislature to also overturn the prop8 results?

Doubted.

Although I do believe most people voted for religious reasons, the original ban and not Prop 8 wasn't a religious law even though, as far as I'm concerned, it was religiously fueled.

Prop 8 was voted on because the CA Supreme Court viewed the original ban unconstitutional, however the CA voters decided not to repeal the ban. Although I am an adamant supporter of Gay Marriage, I dislike the Supreme Court getting involved after things are put to a vote. So I'm not sure if I'd vote the same as I did if the supreme court once again called the ban unconstitutional because I view it as the supreme court, 9 people, deciding what is and what isn't right for the entire state. Though this has helped many times in the past, there have also been situations where it has hurt and as far as I'm concerned it puts to much power into the hands of 9 people. Would you honestly want this same thing happening if the CA Supreme Court was filled with Right-Wing Religious Zealots? I definitely would not.

Sorry if this seems a bit cruel and I make room for the possibility that I am wrong, but this is how I view the matter.

Link to comment
Guest April63

Prop 8 isn't a ban. It defines marriage between a man and a woman. It says nothing about who can't get married.

Gay rights? The right to be gay? What are gay rights?

By gay rights, do we mean that we are trying to change things like marriage for everyone else? Force them to accept that marriage is between anyone? Do we really have to do so? Can't we be a little more tolerant of their ideas? I don't want to be the enemy here, but do we really need marriage certificates to be happy? Do we really need to make the rest of society change its definitions for us? Can't we be grateful for what has already been done? We're not going to be stoned to death for coming out. There's really a lot of things for us, why do we need to keep asking for more?

April

Link to comment
Guest Zabrak
Prop 8 isn't a ban. It defines marriage between a man and a woman. It says nothing about who can't get married.

Gay rights? The right to be gay? What are gay rights?

By gay rights, do we mean that we are trying to change things like marriage for everyone else? Force them to accept that marriage is between anyone? Do we really have to do so? Can't we be a little more tolerant of their ideas? I don't want to be the enemy here, but do we really need marriage certificates to be happy? Do we really need to make the rest of society change its definitions for us? Can't we be grateful for what has already been done? We're not going to be stoned to death for coming out. There's really a lot of things for us, why do we need to keep asking for more?

April

Because we are human beings and all human beings no matter whats between their legs should have the right to marry? Marry and get all the privileges from the goverment that straight couples get?

Or do you think straight couples should get all the privileges and we shouldn't just because both of us have somthing that dangles between our legs? or vice versa?

:P I'm not attacking either, just a question for you.

Link to comment
Guest April63

But all of us do have the right to marry. The issue is the definition of marriage. Do two men make a marriage? Two women? Or only a man and a woman? Or simply any two people? Should we force this definition on everyone else?

As for privileges, why don't we just try to change that, not the definition of marriage. Now that's a thought. Perhaps expand these privileges to civil unions? That already happened in California by the way. This way you don't get on people's toes.

April

Link to comment
Guest Zabrak
But all of us do have the right to marry. The issue is the definition of marriage. Do two men make a marriage? Two women? Or only a man and a woman? Or simply any two people? Should we force this definition on everyone else?

As for privileges, why don't we just try to change that, not the definition of marriage. Now that's a thought. Perhaps expand these privileges to civil unions? That already happened in California by the way. This way you don't get on people's toes.

April

Heres a question for you: should straight couples be able to force their definition on everyone else(as in only straight are allowed to marry)? you seem to have a problem with us 'forcing' our ideas on them but if its not fair for us to force gay marriage is it fair for them to force straight marriage on us? Think more about what you're saying - maybe you'll understand what I'm getting it. I'm trying to say if we don't want to 'step on anyones toes' then both straights and gays should have the same rights so neither can force anything on anyone.

Privlieges for couples shouldn't be withheld from gays by the government just because the church doesn't like the idea of gays. No religion should have government authority. Unless we still want to live back in time? Where religion use to state having slaves was OK and so it was. We grew past that as human beings and abolished slavery, so can the U.S grow past bigotry in the goverment againts gays marrying? Or should the U.S stay in the past?

By the way, you can see that I am simply taking your own argument and turning it around to both sides. Because most of what you say can be used on both sides.

To me, it doesn't effect where I live. In Canada anyone can marry who they please, gay or not. I'm just curious of this subject.

Link to comment
Guest SuperFlyGal
Heres a question for you: should straight couples be able to force their definition on everyone else(as in only straight are allowed to marry)? you seem to have a problem with us 'forcing' our ideas on them but if its not fair for us to force gay marriage is it fair for them to force straight marriage on us? Think more about what you're saying - maybe you'll understand what I'm getting it. I'm trying to say if we don't want to 'step on anyones toes' then both straights and gays should have the same rights so neither can force anything on anyone.

Privlieges for couples shouldn't be withheld from gays by the government just because the church doesn't like the idea of gays. No religion should have government authority. Unless we still want to live back in time? Where religion use to state having slaves was OK and so it was. We grew past that as human beings and abolished slavery, so can the U.S grow past bigotry in the goverment againts gays marrying? Or should the U.S stay in the past?

By the way, you can see that I am simply taking your own argument and turning it around to both sides. Because most of what you say can be used on both sides.

To me, it doesn't effect where I live. In Canada anyone can marry who they please, gay or not. I'm just curious of this subject.

CA and other states have made great strides in rights for Gay couples at least. I think that the Feds need to issue strict laws in accordance to Gay couple's rights in the least to make sure that there are visitation rights as well as power of attorney if anything unfortunate is to happen as well as obtaining their couple's property after death.

There was a case a long time ago....4-10 years somewhere in there. A woman's girlfriend who she'd been living with for 10+ years I believe, was severely injured and died. The dead woman's relatives who had shunned her and refused to accept her then came and took all the property, wouldn't let her partner come to the funeral, and left her without a single thing of the woman. It was on Oprah I believe, I was a bit young at the time so I don't remember it much..

Link to comment
Guest michelle.butterfly

Hi all! (big hugs)

Just to interject another viewpoint, perhaps the state shouldn't be involved in defining marriage at all? (Yes I'm still libertarian. :P) Let people make whatever agreements among themselves they like, defining what their rights and responsbilities to each other are and then we don't have to divide people into groups that feel they are getting their toes stepped on. Then you can call your contract to bind yourselves together a 'marriage contract' or a 'union contract' or a 'diddle contract' and no one has to feel like it's a battle.

Letting government have control over issues such as these is what *causes* there to be conflict between different groups of people.

Ok I'll shut up now.

Much love,

Michelle

P.S. Hahahahahha... ohhhh... ok sorry I hardly managed to say I would shut up with a straight face. :P

Link to comment
Guest April63

Oh Zabrak, let me tell you about the conservative mindset. In the conservative mind, everything is fine unless there is a good reason to change it. So the definition of marriage is seen as fine for most people. The definition is between a man and a woman. That's how it has been. So we are trying to change it to something else, not the other way around.

Giving everyone the privileges would be easier and simpler. Marriage originated in religion, which is where so much fuss comes from. Just add the privileges to civil unions and you'll get you want so much quicker.

I mostly agree with Michelle though. I don't really think the government needs to define marriage, but the problem is, there has to be order of some kind. The government has to say something.

April

Link to comment
Guest Kelly Ann

I really wonder why we don't ask the UN to move H.Q. to Brussels and let Europe support Hugo and Amadidadummy and their ilk support their racist causes...lets not forget Dafur, Somilia...ect ect, The UN...The MOUTH That ROARED...they HATE the U.S. of A. and we really haven't done anything too serious except...save the world from itself a couple of times...and now we can't help ourselves. I despair sometimes from this stuff...the USA is not and never has been a Colonial country...but there's a lot of folks that would like to impose their will on us and now when we're reeling, even China is screaming NOT to turn Socialist. Other than Radical Islam is there really any culture that abhors gender issues that has real humanity? Ok OK but the Facistists were whipped in WWII. The American Indians held this necessity for a person in high esteem, Middle-East Indians have a respectful place for us too, there's more as well in just about every humanistic culture because our lives really are precious...it's not that uncommon...now or in the past. I have a few Italian hand gestures and several words, of choice, for anyone that thinks otherwise :rolleyes: Kelly Ann

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   6 Members, 0 Anonymous, 68 Guests (See full list)

    • KathyLauren
    • SamC
    • Birdie
    • VickySGV
    • Ivy
    • Willow
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.8k
    • Total Posts
      770.2k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,103
    • Most Online
      8,356

    BUGFIEND
    Newest Member
    BUGFIEND
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Bobbijean
      Bobbijean
    2. Bryan
      Bryan
      (61 years old)
    3. jlw5ju
      jlw5ju
      (27 years old)
    4. ladykirabellum
      ladykirabellum
      (47 years old)
    5. Lizzie17
      Lizzie17
  • Posts

    • Ashley0616
    • ClaireBloom
      My avatar is from a T-shirt that I am just dying to buy.  Maybe soon....
    • Lydia_R
      I had some guy grab my butt on the ship.  I don't know how "real" it was, but I did not enjoy that at all.  Also did not enjoy the hazing I saw other people going through.  One person can only do so much to stop that when there are 10 people doing it.
    • Lydia_R
      Here is a legible copy (hopefully):    
    • Lydia_R
      I pulled this out of a stack of old military mementos yesterday.  I guess I didn't realize how cool this one was because I did so much of this kind of thing back then.    
    • Lydia_R
      This internet video thing is pretty amazing.  I'd call it Zoom, but there are other platforms out there.  I prefer Zoom over Teams because Zoom puts me and everyone else in the same picture.  I like seeing the whole group in one shot.  Teams of course is about having so many people that you can't get them in the shot, or is it?   Just saying that I have never met any of my counselors in person.  Doctors, of course I have and I am lucky there.  They are 3.5 miles from my house as is the main transgender surgery place in town.  I've been doing virtual visits with the medical doctors lately though.  It feels like once I became steady state, they don't need to interact with me physically that much.  I have enjoyed going into their office in my nice clothing.
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      I guess a lot depends on where you start and where you wanna end up.  For me, doing the "boy form" thing has come with disadvantages.  Smaller skeleton, thinner bones, and skinny/tiny everything.  I'll never be taken seriously.  I guess the advantage is that my way of blending in is just kind of confusing.  "Mommy, is that a boy or a girl?"    One of the biggest arguments for starting transition early in life is I think it gives a person a greater ability to pass.  My two MtF friends started early, and pass really well.  They never got to the larger bone structure, beard, deep voice stuff.  Me being intersex (which is more complicated) and not getting around to "boy form" until my 30's, my body size and features were pretty much set in stone.      You're lucky.  Some folks pay all that and more, even AFTER insurance.  One of my friends faced the choice last year - pay for her final year of college or pay for her meds.  She's taken a year off from college to work and save up money to finish.    My medical expenses have been more injury-related than therapy or medication   The state covered some of it with a fund for crime victims, insurance covered a lot, but there's ended up being a few thousand dollars spent out-of-pocket since 2022 to put me back together again.  I've never found a decent therapist, but my husband has a psych degree among other things, so I figure talking with him is almost as good.  I do have a good doctor, although I have to drive a long way to a big city to see her.  Mostly she takes a basic look at me, and writes another year's prescription.  Since I'm non-op and only using testosterone cream for a localized effect, its pretty simple stuff. 
    • Lydia_R
      I'm a tracker and I've paid for 100% of my transition costs out of pocket.  Counseling was a huge, huge part of my transition and well worth my money.  Not to be uppity about all of this.  I'm just sharing information I have because I have it and it may be useful for others.  Here is my analysis of my spending on transition over the last 2.5 years:   Medical Doctors and Blood Draws: $2,397 Counseling: $3,800 Medications (brand name): $2,702.85 Medications (generic): $485.39 Total: $9,385.24   I picked up on the internet early in transition that transition is a consumer activity.  I tend to agree with that.   This year (Jan - May 18th, 2024), I've spent: Medical Doctors: $102 Medications: $241.52 Total: $343.52   So I'm on a much more sustainable path with it.  I'm pretty happy with where I am with it, although I do still desire surgery and am nervous about how that will all unfold.  But my doctors have me on this steady state thing.  I could seek out other medications, but what I'm doing is good enough.  Oh, I'm missing something....  I did a bunch of electrolysis that didn't appear to have any effect.  I've always enjoyed shaving and I use pink shaving cream now (I've got some lipstick blond in me).  It's good enough.  Not sure if I'll do electro or laser in the future.  The need to shave my body has become less and less.  Before HRT, I was shaving my body weekly or even every 5 days.  Now it is more like 2-3 weeks.  Everyone's body hair is different.  My beard is very coarse and stiff while my body hair has been somewhat minimal and light.  It's nice to have smooth legs and not have to shave as much.   Counseling was $200/session.  I tried one or two counselors before I found one who resonated with where I really was.  When I was prescribed HRT, I didn't fill the prescription until 4 months later.  I had to take some time to decide that I really wanted to take on that lifetime financial commitment.  And of course the possibly negative health consequences too, but I think I was actually thinking more about the finances of it all.  Maybe 51%.   I did a lot of work to revitalize my career before jumping into medical transition.  I started counseling 3 months before I got the best paying job of my life.  The pressure of wanting to transition was so great that I couldn't wait any longer.  She was coming out.  Even though I had very little money, I splurged on some nice dresses and a full length mirror and then started counseling.  Sometimes you just have to move forward and hope for the best.  Other times it is better to wait and do some hard work.  The grace of it all..
    • Ivy
      And when the pressure is released it sucks in heat.  I had a regulator leaking and it was covered with ice.  It's how a heat pump works as well.   Why do they always pick names like this?  It's like the exact opposite of what it really is. I hate politics so much.  But I still have to follow it.
    • Lydia_R
      Wonderful!  This reminds me of a discussion I had with my brother a decade ago.  I said that things expand when they get hotter.  He said, no, they expand when they get colder.  And I had to think about that for a while.  The weird thing is that H20 is special in that when it reaches freezing, it expands.   The pressure makes the cold and then we see the condensation.
    • KatieSC
      I used to have a really good therapist, however, she does not accept health insurance reimbursement fees as they are too low. I had to pay 130 per session. When she decided to jack the rates to 185 per hour, I cut bait. Without a doubt, counseling is very helpful. What concerns me greatly is that we are a vulnerable population. Unfortunately, we can easily be targeted for some pretty high fees. How many of us have been in the situation where our healthcare provider, surgeons, or counselors, have required cash payments? We get jammed as well by the health insurance companies as they often will not pay for items that could be essential to our well-being. It is my contention that our chances of being targeted for violence, death, or harassment, go up when we cannot easily blend in with the female population.    For those of us that are MTF, some of us are blessed with more feminine features, and many of us are not. We get the whammy of a larger skeleton, bigger hands, bigger feet, a beard, a deep voice, and masculine face. It takes a lot for some of us to be able to blend in. My belief is that the better we blend in, the better chance we have of not being targeted. In this, electrolysis, facial feminizing/gender affirming facial surgery, voice/speech therapy with voice feminization/gender affirming voice surgery, and body contouring are all potentially lifesaving. Unfortunately, many of the insurance companies deem the procedures as cosmetic, and yet there is no cosmetic that fixes all of these issues.    If you pay your money, you can get anything you want in this world. The sad reality is that for us, many of these procedures would enhance our lives tremendously, yet we face ongoing battles with our very existence. Yeah, an empathetic therapist helps, but is it just the concept of reasonable empathy at a reasonable cost? When my therapist jacked her rates to 185 per hour, I said enough is enough. Your mileage may vary.
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      I don't think the temperature matters as much.  Think about how gases like CO2 are stored in cylinders, and they are basically the same in summer or winter.  Any gas becomes liquid under enough pressure.  What does matter is the strength of the pressure vessel.  If exposed to excess external heat, pressure increases and can burst a tank or a pipe.  Household propane tanks are often painted white or silver and have safety release valves, because sunlight can heat a tank enough to cause a significant increase in internal pressure, even though the contents remain liquid. 
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      It has been a long week, and I think this weekend is going to be pretty busy.  The high school is having their graduation later today.  Although we don't have any grads in our family this year, my husband is going because he's involved with the school.  And tonight there's the torchlight ceremony for the county cadets who are finishing their program, and the reading of assignments for the new seniors.  One of my stepkids will be a senior this year.  She's talented, and will be assigned a squad leader position.  My husband is really proud of her, and she's well-liked by her peers even though she's very quiet and serious.    I might get to go on a trip to Texas this week.  The storms that hit Houston caused a lot of electrical damage, so no doubt the utilities in that area will be ordering stuff from my husband's company.  When the big hurricane hit Florida in 2022, we made several trips there with badly-needed equipment, and the entire transportation department was involved in the first convoy.  When he travels, I usually want to go along, since 1-on-1 time is kind of rare for us. 
    • Mmindy
    • Lydia_R
      Maybe surface tension?   I was in a political debate yesterday and it got way too focused on social stuff and I just had to steer the conversation back to how natural gas transitions to a liquid under pressure.  One of the people I was debating had a career working in that field and it was a good opportunity to expose stuff like that.  He mentioned that it isn't just pressure, it is temperature too.  So then I mentioned how the lines are running underground and asked how that played a role in it.  He came back saying that natural gas is a liquid under pressure.  I guess I didn't get a straight answer on that, but it did move my thinking one step down the road.  Perhaps I should have been more direct with him and asked him at what temperature and pressure.  Is there a chart?   I feel people would be better off if they paid more attention to the objects in their environment instead of focusing on some of the things that we hear so much of in the news.  People are pretty clueless as to how much trigonometry plays a role in so many things in our society.  Even land surveyors don't really use it anymore because programmers locked it away in a function.  Much like how cascading style sheets (CSS) is a wrapper for math.  I wonder what former president Trump thinks about all of that?  He must have some knowledge of how his buildings are constructed, right?  There certainly is a part of me that thinks he is just putting on a show about all of this.  Perhaps I'm wrong though.  All kinds of people in the world.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...