Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

The Great Debate & the Trans Military Question


Carolyn Marie

Recommended Posts

  • Admin

I watched the entire prime time debate tonight. I won't bore you with my opinion or analysis, other than to say that it was entertaining.

However, one of the moderators, Megyn Kelly, asked Mike Huckabee for his opinion about the move to allow transgender folks to serve in the Armed Forces.

As with most questions, the candidate didn't answer the question directly. He suggested that it was not a good use of funds to pay for surgery for active duty trans folk, and then went off topic. At least he didn't say he was opposed to the policy. Huckabee was the only candidate who was asked that question. No other questions pertained to our community.

I am not implying that our issues should have taken on more importance. But it probably will come up again during the campaign.

Carolyn Marie

Link to comment
Guest Alexthecat

I did not see the debate but a top surgery takes 2 months to heal. If you take time off then there is plenty of time to recover. Bottom surgery however takes longer and should not happen when you are active duty.

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

I am amazed that we even came up at all and quite pleased that the very mention of trans* inclusion didn't allow for a storm of hate. Maybe that's because Trump didn't get the question. He seems to specialize in using hate and fear to his advantage.

I doubt this race has relevance. I think Bush is the chosen one.

Hugs,

Charlize

Link to comment
Guest DesiB

Many were pleased with Governor Kasich's response on same-sex marriage. He is willing to accept the court's ruling and beyond that declared that since he has unconditional love from God, he would also give the same to his children if they were gay. And he mentioned a recent attendance of a gay wedding. After his response, the audience cheered.

On the other hand, the audience cheered just as loudly after Governor Huckabee spoke against using the military for social experimentation and said it would not help increase military readiness to pay for sex-change surgeries.

Regarding the argument that bottom surgery should not take place during active duty because of recovery time. I think you should consider the fact that military women get pregnant on active duty on a regular basis. After my surgery, I was riding a bike within 2 months. And when I was in the Marine Corps, my MOS was ground radio repair--something I could have easily done one month after surgery.

Link to comment
  • Admin

On the other hand, the audience cheered just as loudly after Governor Huckabee spoke against using the military for social experimentation and said it would not help increase military readiness to pay for sex-change surgeries.

.

Thank you, Desi, for including the "social experimentation" quote. I had forgotten that bit, and it is important.

Carolyn Marie

Link to comment
Guest Seanna

I did not see the debate but a top surgery takes 2 months to heal. If you take time off then there is plenty of time to recover. Bottom surgery however takes longer and should not happen when you are active duty.

I couldn't disagree more. The military provides plenty other "elective" surgeries to improve quality of life, regardless of the down time. When I was in the Army, I had hip surgery. I was on convalescent leave (which is paid leave and doesn't count against your regular leave) for two months, then couldn't do normal PT for another 6 months or so. Obviously you wouldn't be able to go into the field for some time, but your con leave time would likely be shorter. I see absolutely no reason why any necessary surgery shouldn't be provided. Hell, they even give women breast augmentation.

Link to comment
Guest DesiB

Understood, Alex . . . and it's something to consider. But those relatively few (I say relatively few because all trans men do not want surgery at all, or even the same type, and if multiple procedures are needed they can be spaced out over time) such examples should not be used to restrict all trans individuals from openly serving, especially since so many already have had to endure so much suffering alone and unsupported while serving with honor.

We don't even know what the policy might be yet. Currently you can be discharged for simply admitting that you identify as trans, even if you aren't doing anything about it. That is no where near a policy of embracing full medical transition and having them pay for it! They may decide on something half way--who knows? But we know that dealing with medical issues is a part of life for which the military needs to be prepared, regardless of who is enlisted. And we already know that trans individuals have served in higher proportions than the rest of the population, so maybe it's time that ought to count for something.

Link to comment

Many were pleased with Governor Kasich's response on same-sex marriage. He is willing to accept the court's ruling and beyond that declared that since he has unconditional love from God, he would also give the same to his children if they were gay. And he mentioned a recent attendance of a gay wedding. After his response, the audience cheered.

On the other hand, the audience cheered just as loudly after Governor Huckabee spoke against using the military for social experimentation and said it would not help increase military readiness to pay for sex-change surgeries.

Regarding the argument that bottom surgery should not take place during active duty because of recovery time. I think you should consider the fact that military women get pregnant on active duty on a regular basis. After my surgery, I was riding a bike within 2 months. And when I was in the Marine Corps, my MOS was ground radio repair--something I could have easily done one month after surgery.

I thought Kasich came off well. Its the direction that the GOP is going to have to go to to be seen as more electable to the current generation.

As for Huckabee, I have to admit, I found it amusing how he said the military is for "killing people and breaking things".

Link to comment
  • Who's Online   7 Members, 0 Anonymous, 70 Guests (See full list)

    • Desert Fox
    • VickySGV
    • Abigail Genevieve
    • evy-emaciated
    • Ivy
    • AmandaJoy
    • MaryEllen
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.8k
    • Total Posts
      770.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,105
    • Most Online
      8,356

    evy-emaciated
    Newest Member
    evy-emaciated
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. austin_4
      austin_4
      (17 years old)
    2. Britany_Relia
      Britany_Relia
      (39 years old)
    3. Emily S
      Emily S
      (67 years old)
    4. Hoof Arted
      Hoof Arted
      (22 years old)
    5. n3eeko
      n3eeko
  • Posts

    • Adrianna Danielle
      Yes,I hate that     Also finding out I might be father of a 24 year young lady.I had an one night stand with a woman off base when I was in the army.Called this afternoon and said I am possibly the father of her now 24 year old daughter.Told her I will agree with a paternity test that will be done.
    • Ivy
      Yeah.  I like Nebula, that was where I watched it.   I posted the YouTube cause I figured more people could see it.
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      We agree on most of this... and the church/state thing is kind of a tangent anyways. Oops. LOL   I think it has long been established that all different kinds of groups have access to public funds. In my opinion, either everybody has access or nobody does. I would prefer "nobody."   Relying on public funds gives the government the power to take it away, and puts that power in the hands of whatever group controls the government at the moment... the news article that is the topic of this thread shows a clear example of that happening.  Organizations trust government at their peril.
    • DonkeySocks
      Fantastic news! Thank you for updating us.
    • Davie
      More info on Abigail Thorne here: https://go.nebula.tv/philosophytube and, Dracula's ex-girlfriend, on Philosophy tube.   "The reason why Nebula is so cheap for what it is, is because there's no upper hierarchical group looking yo skim off the top. Imagine how much cheaper EVERYTHING could be if it was like that for every other service or product; if the money went straight to workers, not up a chain of command until it reached someone who did exactly "jack" to produce what's being sold.
    • Ivy
    • Ivy
      I'm aware that the young US ended up fighting a war with these people, and that phrase was not meant to address Church & state.  But somebody was willing to include it at the time.   I am also aware that your family arrangements would not go over well with most christian nationalists.  But that is kinda where I'm coming from on this.  I believe you and others of us with an unconventional lifestyle should be free to live as we desire - as long as we are not hurting anyone else.  And by "hurting" I don't mean only their feelings.   Using christianity to justify oppression is just wrong.  As is forced conversion, or forced conversion therapy.   Regarding public funds, LGBTQetc people have as much right to them as straight-cis folks.  I'm not arguing that queer people have more rights, just equal rights.
    • Davie
      Even better news:  It turns out for my sister it was cardio not stroke. She’s put on new blood thinner and sent home. False alarm! Yay.
    • JenniferB
      Things have changed since I've been on HRT for about 15 years. The consequence is I am not so concerned about how I present all the time.  I wear t-shirts a lot. I am pragmatic in how I shop. No, I don't want to look male, but will buy some male clothing because it fits. I am tall and built like a football linebacker, so buying women's clothes that fit can be difficult. For one I have no problem buying men's sneakers if they can pass as unisex. I wear size 12-13 women's shoes. And that can be hard to find. And, I don't like wearing slacks without pockets. I use pockets for work.    I've learned to be pragmatic. I dress up when I want to go out in public, and not so much at work. I do have a favorite blouse that accentuates the girls. And one blue striped blouse where I wear a cami top.
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      https://www.patheos.com/blogs/danthropology/2016/05/secularists-please-stop-quoting-the-treaty-of-tripoli/   ^^^ an interesting piece about the treaty, written by an atheist.   I totally understand why the Christian nationalist stuff makes people uncomfortable. For me, it is uncomfortable in a different way, as modern Christian nationalism is not nearly as "generic" as the views of the Founders.  Its specifically Evangelical.  I'm in a plural marriage, so definitely not approved of.    I believe the intent of the Founders was to uhold generic Christian ideas... "in God we trust" and "there's a God who created the world and He wrote ten commandments for us" sort of stuff.  Nothing beyond that, nothing specific enough to use against folks.
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      Free?!?!  That's insane.  I can understand perhaps mistaking somebody's well equipped garage as a business, but demanding free work is ridiculous.   My GF once remarked that while few things in life are free, butt-kickings are an exception. She offers those free-of-charge, to any who ask. A little charity helps the world go round 🤣
    • Ivy
      I had a CDL when I was working for the city.  But I let it go when I retired.  I couldn't justify paying so much just to drive myself around.
    • Ivy
      While I'm sure the "Founders" had the 30 years war, etc. on their minds, they didn't write the constitution as considering only Christian sects. The early colonists (I used the word) did mostly come from areas of "christian culture" but it's hard to reconcile some of their actions with what Christ himself taught.   Christians have a right to their beliefs, but there are a lot of American citizens that do not consider themselves "christian."  I have seen writings where the US was specifically said not to be a "Christian Nation". "The 1797 Treaty of Tripoli that sought to secure America from attacks by the so-called Barbary pirates who were Muslim made a point to say that the United States "is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion.""    It shouldn't be difficult to understand why the "Christian Nationalist" movement makes some of us uncomfortable.  
    • EasyE
    • Adrianna Danielle
      She wanted it done now for free,I hate the Karen's whom are a pain in the butt
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...