Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Rev Franklin Graham hates gays trans


Bulldog1948

Recommended Posts

  • Forum Moderator

we all need to get out and vote or everything that we have gained can be lost. There are those who are waiting in the wings to legally attack all court decisions that have benefitted gays and trans.

Link to comment
  • Admin

I hadn't been planning to partake in any onslaughts, but I guess I've been drafted. Wouldn't it be nice if the good Reverend sought out a trans person or two to have a conversation; not a prayer meeting, not to proselytize, not to condemn, just to have a dialogue, and find out what we're all about. I don't think it would change his mind, but at least it would open it up just a crack to let some sunshine in. But he doesn't believe he needs to learn anything. God has told him all he needs to know. *sigh*

Carolyn Marie

Link to comment
  • Admin

The guy belongs in Carolyn's museum in Paleontology along with the other old fossils who's brains were stone a few million solar cycles ago. What, do tell, is even newsworthy about him??

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

Thanks Mike for the heads up, and I will be voting this year.

I noticed that link you provided in the post above is kept on the domain cnsnews.com, wut's this ?

Clicking on links from this domain, is like tuning in to the bigot channel on the Internet

It's really the propaganda arm of conservatives, and they are quite the anti women's reproductive rights, anti gay, anti trans, spin machine. .

Their self professed motto "The Right News. Right now."

See

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cybercast_News_Service

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/cnsnews/

Link to comment
Guest Kenna Dixon

My two cents' worth in the "Comments" section:

No, what's "ridiculous" is your misrepresentation of what it means to be transgender. Whether your ignorance of the subject is willful or not, couching it in terms of morality encourages your followers to marginalize and demonize a group of their fellow human beings who have done nothing whatsoever to warrant such treatment. I'm a lifelong Christian, and it pains me to say that despite all the good you may do in other areas, this is nothing short of reprehensible behavior.

Link to comment

I didn't wake up one day to decide I wanted to be a woman any more than he woke up one day to decide he wanted to be a self righteous fear mongering butt hole!

He is the one that has made a choice! He has chosen hated over Godliness. He has chosen his tools of decisiveness, infliction of immorral emotional pain, not to promote God's love, but to attempt to corruptly elevate himself.

The only evidence that can be seen in him that he only trusts in God, is his self appointment that he can play God, above all biology, science and compassion.

How much louder can he scream eradication?

Link to comment

Sigh...

This is what is wrong with evangelical christianity. And to think I supported his charity, Samaritans Purse, in a relief effort. And World Vision, another charity was trying to get a "religious exemption" for their discrimination. (I still sponsor a child, not her fault the organization needs a clue) And my former church, a Vineyard, is hosting a 4 part series on LGBT issues...hosted by a "former gay", who is sharing "recovery".

Like Gandi said, I love this Jesus, but not so much his people, for they are not much like Jesus. I am going to quit using the label christian and go with Christ follower.

But, there is some light- the Episcopalian church has been very accepting, even taking heat lately from the worldwide Anglican communion over their pro-LGBT stance. And Bishop Gene Robinson wrote this piece on welcoming trans folk:

https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/religion/report/2016/01/19/129101/transgender-welcome/

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

Thank you for sharing. That piece from Gene Robinson is so very affirming. Reading that one could easily be a Christian.

As a relate aside......I get a kick out of those who propose that this was founded as a "christian" country as if that somehow would stop inner strife. The understanding of any religious group varies from one extreme to the other. We see it in Islam, Christianity and Buddhism. Somehow the message of the founder is so often lost and a higher power is pushed aside for very sectarian reasons. Pity harmony doesn't seem to exist but perhaps that is simply the human condition. I can only try to live my life. Trying to control others is way beyond me and would only end in further difficulty. I'll never be queen of the forest and that is a good thing.

Hugs,

Charlize

Link to comment

Elvis swayed his hips, girls started to not need to wear a dress to go to a school dance and of all things showed their shoulders. This is the reason of Major moral decay they said, as they slaped their Son's on the shoulder when they saw them off to a (no win) war in the 60,s. I always thought (in this case) the moral decay started with the politicians of the time and not someone stepping out of the social norm. NOTE: I was proud of the soldiers though. I love Jesus and follow him for many reasons, one being, "For God so loved the world he gave his one and only son, that WHOEVER believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life" NIV. I say this not to get preachy but to point out the word "WHOEVER" gets so qualified by people claiming to lead for the Lord. To say, I just got one day and decided to be Sarah so I could walk in a woman's restroom and let my jollies get satisfied sounds like bearing false witness against me, and last l checked that's in the 10 commandments

Link to comment

Charlize, I think of it as someone trying to "butt in" in between or in place of the higher power. Trying to grab more power for themselves, in a scarcity worldview. And whoever wants to be queen of the forest is seriously deluded or a true goddess to commit to that level of sacrifice!

Sarah, I love it when people try to quote the "male and female God created them". I just say yes! It's not male or female...

One of my mentors just got this on his own the other day, and he came to class one day with that new realization. He thanked me for my opening up and talking,

Link to comment

And I got this today, it says it better than I can. From Richard Rohr's daily meditations

For much of Christian history we've severely limited people's in-depth experience of God by making religious faith largely into a set of mental abstractions. We split the mind from the body and both of them from the spirit. Many of us are now victims of not knowing how to receive, access, enjoy, suffer, and appreciate what can only be known in its wholeness. No wonder so many have left the church, doubt the truth of Christianity, become practical materialists inside the church (including many clergy) or agnostics and atheists outside the church (including many who are actual "believers"). I am not sure which is sadder. What they seem to affirm or seem to reject is too often not the real thing anyway. As wise Augustine said in the 4th century, "God has many that the church does not have; and the church has many that God does not have." Any who put body and spirit together are already "had" by God! They are privileged to "carry in their bodies the very brand marks of Jesus" (Galatians 6:17).

I for one am really diggin my newfound wholeness. Peace to all.

thanks for the thread Mike- If you're ever down to this part of the state...

Link to comment
I'm a Christian and hating anyone is not Christian in any way. Many TGLBQ people want nothing to do with church or the bible because of this evil vitriol. It is important that we fight for the rights we've so hard for.
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 81 Guests (See full list)

    • Lydia_R
    • Charlize
    • Mirrabooka
    • Ashley0616
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.8k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,038
    • Most Online
      8,356

    Justine76
    Newest Member
    Justine76
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. April Marie
      April Marie
    2. daniela...
      daniela...
      (59 years old)
    3. Emily May
      Emily May
    4. Felixr
      Felixr
      (20 years old)
    5. Leann
      Leann
      (56 years old)
  • Posts

    • KatieSC
      While it is encouraging that they have deemed that they cannot ban the treatment, the bigger question is what treatments they will cover as a result. Speaking as a transgender female, this is a difficult definition. A fair number of insurance plans already cover the basic vaginoplasty, however, for those of us who have a rather masculine appearing face, a heavy beard, a deep voice, and other defining characteristics, attaining a passing feminine appearance is difficult without gender-affirming facial feminization surgery, genital and facial electrolysis, speech therapy and if necessary, gender affirming voice surgery, as well as other body contouring procedures. I view all of these procedures as life-saving in the sense that blending in, and thus avoiding an assault can come down to looking and sounding like you are female. I think the transgender males have a bit more ease with blending in than we do. There will be disagreements as to what constitutes enough surgery to be your truest self. We all pretty much understand that our true gender is locked in our mind. The issue is what can we do to modify our bodies enough to get the congruence between what is in our head, and how we perceive ourselves in the world. Is some of it cosmetic? That is hard to say for sure. I have had insurance companies insist that facial electrolysis is purely cosmetic. Well, most women do not have an Abraham Lincoln beard coming through. Some insurance companies have insisted that speech/voice therapy, as well as voice surgery, are purely cosmetic. I scoured the cosmetic counters for any makeup that would enhance my voice. Being feminine and passing does not mean I get to look and sound like Fred Flintstone in a dress. That kind of weirds folks out, and sets us up to be ridiculed and assaulted in my estimation.   My one insurer told me that beyond the vaginoplasty that all of this was cosmetic. In an appeal hearing, I asked the group that if they had a 14 year old daughter who was in an accident that resulted in a large facial scar, would they want the child to receive the best care to remove the scar? Of course they would. I pointed out though, that while she may have the scar, she could live with it. I asked them if the removal of the disfiguring scar in a 14-year old would be difficult for the child when the other kids made fun of her. Of course, they all nodded their head. I explained to the group that for folks like us, it is no different. While it may be cosmetic to a point, these procedures are essential to our well-being, and not something we are doing to be on a YouTube channel.   Now some who are trans, or gender fluid, may not want to opt for the procedures. There are quite a few of us that do, but the cost is prohibitive. What also clouds the issue are the surgeons who operate out of large medical centers who participate in the large insurance pools. How many of our sisters and brothers have had to pony up some major dollars to a surgeon who is out of network? Good luck trying to get the surgery paid for by your insurer. They may pay you what they pay the surgeons in network, but you won't get that much in reimbursement. A fair number of insurance companies balk at speech and voice therapy, and many will not cover voice surgery. Then there is the issue of electrolysis. A day at the "spa" for electrolysis with anesthetics will run around 3,000 bucks or so, and you may need many repeat visits. Many of the insurers fail to pay for that as well. Just about none of the insurers will cover body contouring procedures such as a panniculectomy, or liposuction. When the insurance companies will just help us become our truest selves, then we will have progress with gender identity laws.   The one good thing that this decision does is preserve the primary care for transgender individuals. I have to wonder how Florida and the rest of the states who have banned having Medicaid cover transgender healthcare are going to act. This should be an interesting fight. When we have the ability to seek care and get what we need for our true needs, without any pre-judgements, then these court orders will mean something. A court order without parameters for the insurance companies is hollow.
    • Mirrabooka
      @April MarieI just noticed that it's your birthday today! Happy Birthday to you!!!!!! 🥳🎂🎁🎉❤️
    • Mirrabooka
      Morning y'all, fingers crossed for everyone who has stuff going on.   Welcome back to reality @April Marie, enjoy your improving weather!   Why is it that we humans always take too long to acclimatize to the changing seasons, especially when it gets colder like it is here? Maybe I'm just getting soft in my old age, lol.    
    • Heather Shay
    • Heather Shay
      Speculation , worst or best case, neither.
    • Heather Shay
    • Heather Shay
    • Heather Shay
    • Heather Shay
    • Heather Shay
      @RiyaHello and welcome. I also live in Ohio and it is a challenge but I applaud you for knowing pretty early on and becoming who you really are. Congratulations!
    • Heather Shay
      Do you feel safe in the country you now live in?
    • Heather Shay
      Oooooooooooooooops, I forgot yesterday.   I was thinking of a few bands who had a member invited who said no and went right into obscurity or left before the band got big.   1) Led Zeppelin -  origially wanted Terry Reid to be lead vocalist and he decided the stay solo. 2) Crosby, Stills & Nash - invited John Sebastian to join before Neil Young, Sebastian said no. 3) Signe Anderson quit as lead vocalist with Jefferson Airplane and they replaced her with Grace Slick.    
    • April Marie
      Good morning, everyone! We're back from a short vacation with friends to the mountains of NC. It was a fun time driving the twisty mountain roads.   Now it's back to reality of cutting grass, washing windows and putting in screens and putting out the porch furniture. Coming home to warmer weather than when we left is glorious.   Happy Anniversary @Willow!    I hope your family is feeling better @KymmieL - my wife and I shared a stomach virus several weeks ago that was horrid.   Hang in there @Birdie, it will all work out!!   Have a wonderful day, everyone!
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      I think many Christians end up with a false dichotomy.  If we didn't choose to be how we are, then something in our environment did it. Is going along with it a sin?  Maybe.  But if so, its one of those times where we mess something up no matter what we do.  Part of the imperfect nature of this fallen world is that there are times where we'll sin no matter what we do.  In a no-win scenario like that, we do the wisest thing possible with our free will. 
    • EasyE
      This is the crux of my anguish these many, many months (years!) and where I go back-and-forth with my own journey ... I was born a biological male. No denying that in my case. But I have a lot of internal feminine leanings and external ones, too. I prefer to wear women's clothes 100 percent of the time (if I could). I wish I had the female plumbing. I long for that badly sometimes. I don't know why or where that came from but no denying that either. I have started HRT because I like the idea of having a more feminine physical body and some of the "perks" that go with that. I just asked my doc to up my dose to the next level today!   So the big question I ask myself is: am I knowingly disobeying God, who likes order and made humans male and female, by taking these steps? This is my wife's take on things. "You are sinning. You know God made you a male biologically. Yet you are willfully pursuing transition to being something God didn't intend you to be regardless of what you feel inside, what your preferences are, etc."  I keep trying to tell her it's much more complex than that but sometimes I don't even know what I think...   This ties up in knots and makes me angry and makes me feel stuck!!! I don't want to disobey my Creator and Savior and yet I have this strong, strong leaning toward the feminine in many ways (that keeps getting stronger and refuses to go away no matter how much I have tried to stuff it away!!) ... It feels like misery no matter which path I take - if I "give in" to the feminine, which I have been doing a lot the past 12 months or so, am I endangering my soul? Am I creating scandal? Yet the thought of putting the feminine aside feels, at times, like death too (or is it just me being self-centered and unwilling to bend the knee to my Creator who would ask me to give this up as a testament to my love for him...   I don't know. I don't know. I don't know!! But sometimes I really really F***ing hate this quandary... 

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...