Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

2nd Letter Appointment


MarcieMarie12

Recommended Posts

So this Friday, I have a second letter appointment for GCS with the psychiatrist at Kaiser. The good thing is that she already has been in discussion with my regular GT. I was wondering what I should expect during this session. Also a bit nervous....

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

If your second letter appointment is like mine it was a simple matter of being honest during one appointment and a letter was written.  I worried but it was simply another step.

 

Hugs,

 

Charlize

Link to comment

So did they just ask questions or did they just say let me know why you want to go through with the surgery?

Link to comment

Well I had the second letter appointment, basically she had some questions (reviewing what I had told my regular GT) about my history or dysphoria. She did ask a few questions as to what I knew about GCS (quite a bit--from the internet, talking to other girls), if I had a time frame, if I had worked it out with my company, if I had somebody to help take care of me, and some other questions.

Overall I think it went well, not sure how I would react if she said no. However, I am pretty sure she will write me that second letter.

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

I have no doubt she will Marcie.  One more step.  By the end of the road we are pretty certain and i think that's a good thing and helps save us from future regrets as well as helping accept ourselves as the people we are.

 

Hugs,

 

Charlize

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

it's a long road for sure, they want to make sure you are ready and know the risks.

I have no doubt you'll do fine Marcie.

Hugs

Cyndi -

Link to comment

Is it normal for only one appointment needed? Also, wheni was searching for phsychiatrists for my HRT letter, there are so few that have experience and/or are interested in helping. 

Link to comment

It may be different if they were unfamiliar with my case--but as a Kaiser doctor she had my regular GT's notes---she also had access to my endo's notes as well.

Link to comment

You might be able to find an informed consent clinic. I know several girls that went that route, the did not seem to have the issues I had to work through before starting HRT though.

Link to comment

Forgot about them. There are some in Frisco when I get there, unless I can get the 'shrink' that wrote my HRT letter to work from one appointment again.

 

Thanks

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

I had a referral from my GT to a another GT she worked with and i presume they exchanged notes.  My surgeon Dr. McGinn required the two reviews before proceeding.  It was a nuisance at the time but i certainly understood the reason behind the extra trouble.  Each time i had the opportunity to think over my path and then discuss it i was better able to feel confident and if that had not been the case then i would want to be honest about that as well before life changing surgery.

Hugs,

 

Charlize

Link to comment
22 minutes ago, Charlize said:

I had a referral from my GT to a another GT she worked with and i presume they exchanged notes.  My surgeon Dr. McGinn required the two reviews before proceeding.  It was a nuisance at the time but i certainly understood the reason behind the extra trouble.  Each time i had the opportunity to think over my path and then discuss it i was better able to feel confident and if that had not been the case then i would want to be honest about that as well before life changing surgery.

Hugs,

 

Charlize

Yes, but I've also read people having misgivings just before and after, and that all cleared up for them. Cold feet, like marriage?

Link to comment
22 hours ago, Fiona said:

Is it normal for only one appointment needed? Also, wheni was searching for phsychiatrists for my HRT letter, there are so few that have experience and/or are interested in helping. 

From my understanding, the second letter does usually come from a one time only meeting. My therapist has already arranged for me to see a colleague in March to get my 2nd letter. If needed my surgeon will have me see someone when I get to Thailand. I think the second letter is just a check and balance to catch any big red flags.

Link to comment

That 2nd letter is a good check and balance.  It sure can be a nuisance or seem like one, but like others have said, it's really a good think to make sure that there were no red flags missed.  Or even subtle clues that one's regular therapist might have not picked up on. 

If it's a good, integrated health system it usually is just one visit because documentation/notes are readily available and there's usually pretty good communication between practitioners. It can be a little more difficult when you're in a loosely put together health system or using independent practitioners.  Sometimes then it can take a few visits depending on the level of communication between them and the availability of documentation (...which you'll most likely have to get from one and take to the other pre-appointment).

 

22 hours ago, Fiona said:

I mean I contacted many, and none had experience or weren't interested in dealing with it. 

There's a lot of reasons for this.  Probably one of the biggest is that there's extra training that's involved.  There's already a lot of annual continuing education requirements for practitioners as well as other healthcare givers, so adding on isn't always a welcome thing. 

Personal feelings also come into it.  Yes...we're supposed to be understanding, compassionate, nonjudgmental, empathetic and any other adjective belonging to that group.  However, not everyone is, nor do they keep their personal feelings and beliefs out of their daily practice. 

And then there's reimbursement.  Gold coins...

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 159 Guests (See full list)

    • Abigail Genevieve
    • MirandaB
    • Jet McCartney
    • MaryEllen
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.7k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,033
    • Most Online
      8,356

    ArtavikenGenderflui
    Newest Member
    ArtavikenGenderflui
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Adele Svetova
      Adele Svetova
      (25 years old)
    2. BROOKSGLASS
      BROOKSGLASS
      (34 years old)
    3. FinnyFinsterHH
      FinnyFinsterHH
      (16 years old)
    4. fool4luv
      fool4luv
      (26 years old)
    5. itsaddison
      itsaddison
      (20 years old)
  • Posts

    • Abigail Genevieve
      Over here muttering about "a new Jim Crow against a persecuted minority."    
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Rants are not a problem.  My favorite hobby! :)   What's out there is bad enough that I wonder why some people feel they need to embellish it.  Be alert.   Some of this will need to be fought in court if they try to implement it. If people are out to get me, paranoia is justified.  And this may not be the only document.   Abby
    • Ivy
      Not in so many words, therefore it's not there at all.  Excuse my paranoia. And the states passing laws against us are nothing to worry about either. Having to change my gender back to male (like in Florida) is reasonable.  I should just accept it, I mean I was born with a dk.  So that "F" is lie, and a fraud.  My delusions need to be dealt with for my own good.   I'm just frustrated these days.  Just a bit of a rant.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      You probably remember the Target PR fiasco.  I remember reading an account from a woman who shopped there.  She went into a stall and did her business, and someone came into the bathroom and began swinging stall doors open, and when she came to her stall, the woman peeked at her through the crack. "What are you doing?" "Checking for perverts." The writer was so stunned by the absurdity that she finished up ASAP and got out of there, while the other woman entered a stall and locked it, made sure it was locked, and locked it again. 
    • Adrianna Danielle
      Been a good day.Cleaned my closet of clothes that I do not wear anymore and do not fit me.It looks better now.Came down to my newest property beside mine,owner passed and I inherited it.There was a double wide there that was removed,it was in bad shape.It is the shop part I am keeping which I got the tools,shop equipment,benches,hoists and shelving too.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Nothing about eradicating TG folk. 
    • Ivy
      If 9 out of 10 parts are ok, that doesn't mean I need to accept the bad parts (that are aimed directly at me).  That seems suicidal.
    • Ivy
      True, most of it has nothing to do directly with us.  It's the parts that do that are the problem.   I see the  few problematic statements as being a big problem.  Just because a lot of it may be okay, doesn't change that. Even supposing the rest of it might be good for the country, it doesn't help me if I'm being "eradicated".  I suppose I should be good with that, because it's for the "greater good".  If me being gone would please a number of people, then it's my civic duty to disappear, and vote to implement that.
    • Ivy
      Yeah.  There are already laws against assault.  I don't think the overwhelming majority of trans women have any desire to harass cis women.  Speaking for myself, if I go into a women's washroom, it's because my eyeballs are already floating - not for kicks.  And I worry about getting clocked and assaulted by some guy being a "hero."
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Only three, maybe four, sections even mention transgender.  Most is a conservative agenda I have no problem with.   In the sections that mention transgender, there are very few lines.  Those lines ARE problematic, in every case. Unequivocally.  I can't see some of them standing up in court.  In one case a recommended policy goes against a court decision, which strongly suggests the implementation of that policy would be stopped in court.    Anyone maintaining that this is written simply to support Trump, to support him becoming a dictator, to crush transgender people is feeding you a line.  Nor is it an attempt to erase transgender people.   People will have to decide if the overall goals are worth the few problematic statements.  Overall, I support it.  Of course, I have some reservations.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      It is unfamiliar, therefore threatening.   For 90% or so of the population, gender id can be simply and quickly determined by a quick anatomical observation.  They have no understanding and cannot imagine what it would mean to have a body different from the id.  It is unimaginable.  Therefore, wrong.   So there is this strong headwind.   I haven't entered this discussion, but here is a script: A: I can't imagine what it must be to have TG. B: You're a man, right? A: Well, of course. "amused" B: Imagine you were required by law and custom to wear women's clothing all the time. A: It wouldn't happen. B: Okay, but for the sake of the argument... A: That would be disgusting.  I would be very uncomfortable. B: You have it.  That is what TG people go through all the time. 24-7-365. A: Really? B: And then they are told they are perverts for having those feelings.  The same you just described. A: I see. B: And someone comes along and tells you you need conversion therapy so you will be comfortable wearing women's clothing all the time. A: I think I would break his nose. B: You understand transgender folk better than you think.
    • EasyE
      I have found some people correlate TG = child predator ... just as some have correlated homosexual = child predator...    I am baffled by the TG = unsafe connection ... my wife tends to think this way, that this is all about sexual deviancy ... I try to ask how my preference for wearing frilly socks with embroidered flowers and a comfortable camisole under my lavender T-shirts is sexually deviant (or sexual anything) but I don't get very far... 
    • EasyE
      Best wishes to you as you take this step ... many blessings to you! 
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Not sure.  The perp is a minor.  The problem here is NOT transgender, the problem here is incompetent and criminal administration.  See https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/family-of-loudoun-co-student-sexually-assaulted-ineptitude-of-all-involved-is-staggering/3231725/ It is more than annoying that people think the problem here is TG and that other people think the solution is some stupid statewide law.  Like an appendectomy to deal with an ingrown toe nail.    Since Loudon, I recall a boy was asked not to use the girl's restroom at a high school by one of the girls.  He, overwhelming her with height and weight,  assaulted her, claiming he had a right to be there.   Later I think eight girls beat him severely in another girl's restroom.  Again the problem is not transgender, the problem is assaults in restrooms and common courtesy.  TG is used as a smokescreen and it seems to paralyze thought among administrators who do not want to do anything to provoke controversy.
    • VickySGV
      Time to get with your Primary Care doctor and be referred to a neurologist or an orthopedist.  It could be many things, too many for any of us here to guess at. 
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...