Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Chelsea Manning Pardoned


Charlize

Recommended Posts

  • Admin

Duck, cover and hold!!  It is probably the best thing that could have happened in the case going forward.  I have never seen significant proof that what she leaked did in fact lead to any harm other than embarrassment to some people.  I do not like what she did in regard to her job and I hope she fades into the sunset and does not try to became a Trans* movement heroine like another athletic type has done.

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

In light of everything we've since learned I too believe this is a good step forward.  And yes she should take this as an opportunity to fade into obscurity.

Jani

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

I am glad that Obama commuted her sentence before she killed herself at Leavenworth it's a bad place. You think basic is hard try doing time in Leavenworth.

Obama commuted her sentence he did not pardon her. Commute.  means .  {time served]. her time of seven years counts for the 35 she was sentenced to do,

Pardon means that her slate would have been wiped clean with nothing on her record.

yeah, I hope that she fades away, but I doubt it.

Mike

Link to comment

My feelings as a veteran and transgender are mixed.  Many cis-gendered and military will be angry which could affect her personal safety. Being in the background would be to her advantage Just as any person could commit crimes so could a few in our groups.  Certainly  she didn't endear transgender people to the public.

Despite that she is still transgender and is suicidal and will be welcome in our suicide prevention chat rooms and in these forums.  I would hope we'd extend our love and support to her if needed.

 

Laura

.

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

I am more bothered by General David Patreus divulging actual secrets about troop positions to his mistress and serving no time at all.  He just paid a fine which was well within his ability to pay.  Our justice system is not always fair or even handed in punishment.  I think Ms. Manning served enough time given all the circumstances of the case.    

 

Link to comment
11 hours ago, Jani423 said:

I am more bothered by General David Patreus divulging actual secrets about troop positions to his mistress and serving no time at all.  He just paid a fine which was well within his ability to pay.  Our justice system is not always fair or even handed in punishment.  I think Ms. Manning served enough time given all the circumstances of the case.   

Hhmmm....I certainly concur, at least w/ re: to the sentence about the justice system, in the afore-quoted post.  Manning received 35 years for espionage; Patraeus was fined; and, Mrs. Clinton's actions never even made it to a justice system indictment....Go figure.

W/ re: to Ms. Manning and any chance that she shows up in the forum or the chat-room, I cannot imagine that anyone here would forget their manners and engage in any mistreatment of said individual.

Just as an aside, I'm thinking that if Mr. Assange keeps his promise and allows himself to be voluntarily extradited to the United States....I'm certain from the perspective of the outgoing POTUS, it would be considered a good trade (i.e., freeing Manning to get Assange).

Link to comment

I'm with Laura on this one, as a veteran I have mixed feelings on issues such as these.

Chelsea Manning broke her oath of service, but she blew the lid off of a situation where our troops were very close to committing war crimes (or did they? can't remember...)

The thing about whistleblowers is that they are walking a fine line. On the one hand you have betrayed the oath or trust that you were given, but on the other hand they are bringing to light something that could be an overstepping by our government.

I think that there is a double standard in the system. One standard for those at the bottom and another standard for those at the top. They try to pretend that it doesn't exist, but we can all see it when we step back and look. I believe in consequences for actions, be it good or bad. I believe that if you break your oath or break a trust put in you, you should have a fitting punishment. But I also believe that it should be a standard, equal punishment between those low or high. And if anything, those who are high should expect a greater punishment because more is expected of them.

I think that Chelsea Manning should have had a bit more time behind bars, but at the same time I don't think she deserved 35 years. I think that Patreus skated out with a slap on the wrist and that he should have served time. I think that the Clinton's are the definition of what is wrong with the system and that technically they can't be brought up on charges, but where there is smoke, there is fire. And I think Snowden is a weasel of little man who couldn't own up to his actions and instead went running to our adversaries. Of all these recent examples of people who broke oaths or broke trust, I think Chelsea is the only one who actually paid her dues. Everyone else either used their influence, money, privilege, or ran from their responsibility.

Link to comment

I am on the fence with it personally, while she was bound by an oath not to disclose "vital information" on the other hand the vast majority of intel she leaked  also breaks laws of international warfare and many are considered  war crimes in which she is also legally obligated to report or risk being aparty too. But report does not mean leak to a news outlet. From my understanding though, she did try to go at it via proper channels and was shut down. Whilste blowers are often times dealt the harshest punishments to deter any would be future do gooders from doing the same. It is why sexual abuse runs rampant in our armed services. It's why men and women usually ignore sexual harassment in the work place and why even good police officers may ignore crimes committed by fellow officers.

Link to comment

Sad thing is, Patreaus, and Hillary violated and could have received jail time for mishandling classified or higher clearance information. What did they get? Double standard anyone? That she spent 7 years in prison is enough punishment.

 

 

Link to comment
  • Who's Online   6 Members, 0 Anonymous, 189 Guests (See full list)

    • Birdie
    • Pip
    • Abigail Genevieve
    • Carolyn Marie
    • RaineOnYourParade
    • AllieJ
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.7k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,033
    • Most Online
      8,356

    ArtavikenGenderflui
    Newest Member
    ArtavikenGenderflui
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. afraid of self
      afraid of self
    2. Chaidoesart
      Chaidoesart
      (14 years old)
    3. Faith57
      Faith57
    4. Joyce Ann
      Joyce Ann
      (70 years old)
    5. Kelly21121
      Kelly21121
      (56 years old)
  • Posts

    • Abigail Genevieve
      For one thing, the practice of putting into office wholly unqualified people simply because of racial, sexual or national characteristics.  It is no accident that Karine is a Haitian immigrant, Black and lesbian.  Kamala Harris is a Black female. Pete Buttigieg is gay.  Often you find that Biden explicitly stated that this is why he hired them, not because of competence, but because they checked so many boxes on his little list.  It makes a mockery of people and is a disservice to the US. 
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I am not sure why people are in favor of unaccountable agencies with bloated budgets and wasteful spending. 
    • Abigail Genevieve
      What about it?
    • SydneyAngel
      Hey girl  I had a problem like you happen to me also. In my first year of estrogen I had a period where my level were good then they got really bad where my testosterone spike high.  I felt like you with all that disforia coming hard. Our bodies need time to adjust. The process is a real pain in the beginning. It levels out eventually and you don't even think about it. Hang in there hugs 
    • Ivy
      Biden's woke agenda?
    • KatieSC
      I wonder if there will be law enforcement procedural shows coming this fall. I can imagine Law and Order: Genital Crimes Unit, or perhaps, FBI: Domestic Genitalia. Then again, maybe they will dedicate a CSI program about the dedicated members of the Oklahoma State Police Genital Screening Unit. Good to know that those Oklahomans have their priorities squared away.
    • KatieSC
      Protections? Well, when they mandate that some who is transgender can get facial and genital electrolysis paid as it is essential to affirming care, or when they mandate and pay for facial feminization surgery, speech therapy/voice affirmation surgery, I will believe that the order is effective. One of biggest hurdles for many transgender individuals is the cost of care. I remember when my one insurance company tried to say that my speech therapy and voice surgery were "cosmetic". I remember when they blocked paying for my facial surgery. I remember the fight I had to get electrolysis. These procedures could save someone's life if the procedures help the individual successfully transition, and are no longer misgendered. 
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I don't think it should be.  Nor do I see Project 2025 as pushing Christian nationalism.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      The agencies are supposed to work for him.  The problem, as conservatives found out in Trump 1, was they will ignore the president and do their own thing.  The agencies are supposed to be under his control.   Congress delegated some of its law making authority to the agencies, which is another problem.   The bloated federal government needs to be trimmed.  Dept Education is worthless - test scores have dropped since it was instituted in the Carter administration consistently, and it is currently implementing Biden's woke agenda more than doing anything else.
    • FinnyFinsterHH
      I hope to eventually wear a suit for dance but don't know what exactly to look for. I feel like jumpsuit is safe option but I have been interested in wearing button up and formal pants. Is there a certain brand i should look for or sites I should look at for tips? My mom is not exactly keen on me wearing too masc clothing like suits just yet but is okay with jumpsuits. Also is there hair styling tips availible, my hair looks like image below. I might be able to get shorter haircut like pixie but am not sure yet.  
    • MaeBe
      It’s never been about him, but he is the Presidential nominee for the Presidency that starts in…2025. I don’t see a lot of conflation that this is a “Trump doctrine”, it a doctrine that benefits him surely, but it is a plan to instill crony governance and enact very Christian conservative (if not purely Christian nationalist) “order” on the country. If you don’t see this as the Right doubling down on Big G government, I don’t know what to tell them. Getting rid of agencies and giving the authority directly to the Executive isn’t shrinking government. It’s consolidation power. 
    • MaeBe
      It is the made up ideology they believe trans people are pushing on the world, those “poor young girls who are being coerced into believing they are men” and the “perverts who put on dresses and think they’re girls”. The anti-LGBTQ+ movement came up with the term. Being trans = you believe in trans ideology/transgenderism, supporting trans people = the same.   In the end anyone that acts on or thinks gender is anything but what is in your pants is a “transgenderist”, why not make it a word if it’s not, there is no real grey area. Unless you acknowledge there is transgenderism, but use your knowledge to “correct it”.  So I guess there could be transgenderist conversion “therapists”.  Face it, we deface the America they want. Land of the Free and Home of the Brave? I think being out and queer is pretty brave. And freedom shouldn’t just be for those who push a narrow “Christian ideology” as the “true” governing model.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Over here muttering about "a new Jim Crow against a persecuted minority."    
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Rants are not a problem.  My favorite hobby! :)   What's out there is bad enough that I wonder why some people feel they need to embellish it.  Be alert.   Some of this will need to be fought in court if they try to implement it. If people are out to get me, paranoia is justified.  And this may not be the only document.   Abby
    • Ivy
      Not in so many words, therefore it's not there at all.  Excuse my paranoia. And the states passing laws against us are nothing to worry about either. Having to change my gender back to male (like in Florida) is reasonable.  I should just accept it, I mean I was born with a dk.  So that "F" is lie, and a fraud.  My delusions need to be dealt with for my own good.   I'm just frustrated these days.  Just a bit of a rant.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...