Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Trump Admin Backs Idaho Trans Athlete Sports Ban


Carolyn Marie

Recommended Posts

  • Admin

Well, we have seen the SCOTUS find against his positions twice this past week,  we may have a run of luck on this one that way.

Link to comment

I don't think the situation is entirely fair to cisgender women, but I don't think simply excluding transgender women is right either. I think they should attempt some kind of balance. I don't know the right way to do this, but some suggestions are:

 

  • Duplicate awards, so that if a transgender woman wins first place and a cisgender woman wins second, both would be given first place awards.
  • Create a handicap for transgender athletes, so if it is a race, the cisgender athletes get a head start, or transgender athletes have to run further, or transgender athletes scores are multiplied by a certain factor.
  • Schools and colleges should run sports leagues that do not give awards (in addition to the ones that do). This would give both transgender and cisgender the opportunity to simply have fun for those not interested in being competitive. Also, it would give cisgender athletes who can't make the team a chance to play.
2 hours ago, Suzanne1 said:

I will pose a question to all of us mtf's.  If you had, by the grace of God, been born a genetic female-----how would you feel about competing against individuals who were born genetic-male, w/ all the physical advantages given to that sex?  [And remember, administration of female-sex hormones will not cancel out all those inherent/innate advantages.]

 

I guess  if one is only competing for the fun, enjoyment, character-building camaraderie of sports-----maybe that's be okay.  But, how about genetic females losing out on perks of wining athletic competitions?  Losing  badly needed scholarships, first-string starting positions on team rosters, lesser-pay/-contracts/-endorsements for those who might have been good enough to make sports a career?  It would likely hurt very badly, and that pain would come out exactly as it has for the girls & women who have lost competitions to mtf trans-folks.

 

Sometimes I think our transgender population can be very insensitive, in such situations.  Our behavior in such situations reminds me greatly of the old expression about wanting to eat the cake, but still have it too.

 

Suffice to say, once again, I support the President in his backing of the ban of which this thread addresses.

 

Once again, I'll make a pitch for trans-athletes competing in there own divisions/leagues/etc.

Athletic leagues specifically for transgender women could work nationally or at decent sized universities, but most high schools and small colleges probably don't have enough transgender women to create a league.


I agree that transgender women should think about what this must be like for cisgender athletes, but I think that should go both ways. Cisgender people should think about how we must feel too. Some transgender people can be insensitive, but I don't think the transgender population in general is. One example of a transgender woman critical of transgender women in sports is https://secondtypewoman.info/sports.htm Also, there are insensitive people in every group, and plenty of cisgender people are insensitive towards transgender people as well.


In addition, I think people should think about other advantages and disadvantages in sports. What about cisgender people who are shorter than most people of the same sex? If it's hard for them to compete, is that fair? Should we have leagues for other shorter athletes? How do you draw the line between an unfair advantage for an athlete that should still be allowed vs. should not be allowed?

 

Link to comment
  • Admin

For those who say that it is inherently unfair when MtF athletes compete against cis female athletes, I just want to point out that in those states where such competitions are allowed, cis-athletes have won more victories than their trans competitors.  But when that happens, it isn't "news;" it becomes news when the trans athletes win.  The female runner who's case is in the news recently was beaten by her cis-female counterpart in several races before and after the trans athlete's lone victory.  But hardly anyone mentions that, because it's inconvenient and doesn't fit the preferred narrative.

 

Another thing I'd like to point out is that some cis-women and girls are stronger or taller than others, by wide margins.  No one ever says, "lets disqualify that girl because she is 8 inches taller than other girls her age and has a huge advantage when playing basketball."

 

It's complicated and there are valid arguments on both sides, but the arguments tend to get very emotional.  I found this article which I think does a better job than most of laying out the science, the facts and the arguments on both sides.

 

https://sportsscientists.com/2019/03/on-transgender-athletes-and-performance-advantages/

 

Carolyn Marie

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

I just noticed this post and I agree that - do to no fault of our own - testosterone does give mtf's an unfair advantage in most athletic events for women. It's like steroids in baseball a few years back or Lance Armstrong in bike thingy - I think it's unfair that some athletes can use drugs to enhance their ability including the big T (intentional or nt).

 

Link to comment
  • Admin

Show me the numbers, show me the numbers.  I do not see the numbers. 

 

As a parable! My grandson's special music conservatory Assistant Program Director, told  the story where a very privileged parent got upset that their kid was not First Chair in a concert, and had actually been notified the child would not be in the program the following year.  She was asked how often the kid even took the the violin out of the case to practice at home and how much time was spent.  She actually said the kid did not practice, but was so bright and talented  and the school refused to see it and give them the honor they were due.  It was a terrible shame that all those other students with less talent got the spots, even without the talent she knew her child had. Why didn't mom make the kid practice?  She knew the brat was so talented she did not need to have them do things to earn the honor.. (My grandson practices about 2 hours at home plus the two at school.)

 

The same holds true with sports, if you are trained and made to push yourself to practice.  A coach I know has Trans athletes female athletes in her coaching job and has observed that Cis female athletes push themselves harder alongside her Trans trainees that she saw them push before.  The Cis girls do run and excel even themselves meanwhile the Trans girls who try as hard are not a serious threat above forth place.   The biggest advantage a Trans girl may have is that boys are pushed into sports and kept from things Cis girls have instead of the sports. 

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

Thank you Vicky. I read what you said, "listened with an open mind"  (something really lacking in today's world where people talk at each other - but that's another subject for another time). 

 

Your parable and especially your insight the coaches and athletes has changed my mind. I never thought about it that way and I totally agree with what you posit in your analysis.

 

Is it really still okay to be logical (I wasn't sure if that is allowed now that I've come out).

 

Shay

Link to comment
  • Admin
1 hour ago, Shay said:

 

Is it really still okay to be logical (I wasn't sure if that is allowed now that I've come out)

 

As long as logic doesn't get in the way of our "girl sense" of being warm and caring humans it is fine.

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

thank you......phew.....I was worried there for a moment...

 

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 155 Guests (See full list)

    • SydneyAngel
    • Ivy
    • Abigail Genevieve
    • Monique Fish
    • Susie
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.7k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,033
    • Most Online
      8,356

    ArtavikenGenderflui
    Newest Member
    ArtavikenGenderflui
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. afraid of self
      afraid of self
    2. Chaidoesart
      Chaidoesart
      (14 years old)
    3. Faith57
      Faith57
    4. Joyce Ann
      Joyce Ann
      (70 years old)
    5. Kelly21121
      Kelly21121
      (56 years old)
  • Posts

    • Ivy
      Biden's woke agenda?
    • KatieSC
      I wonder if there will be law enforcement procedural shows coming this fall. I can imagine Law and Order: Genital Crimes Unit, or perhaps, FBI: Domestic Genitalia. Then again, maybe they will dedicate a CSI program about the dedicated members of the Oklahoma State Police Genital Screening Unit. Good to know that those Oklahomans have their priorities squared away.
    • KatieSC
      Protections? Well, when they mandate that some who is transgender can get facial and genital electrolysis paid as it is essential to affirming care, or when they mandate and pay for facial feminization surgery, speech therapy/voice affirmation surgery, I will believe that the order is effective. One of biggest hurdles for many transgender individuals is the cost of care. I remember when my one insurance company tried to say that my speech therapy and voice surgery were "cosmetic". I remember when they blocked paying for my facial surgery. I remember the fight I had to get electrolysis. These procedures could save someone's life if the procedures help the individual successfully transition, and are no longer misgendered. 
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I don't think it should be.  Nor do I see Project 2025 as pushing Christian nationalism.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      The agencies are supposed to work for him.  The problem, as conservatives found out in Trump 1, was they will ignore the president and do their own thing.  The agencies are supposed to be under his control.   Congress delegated some of its law making authority to the agencies, which is another problem.   The bloated federal government needs to be trimmed.  Dept Education is worthless - test scores have dropped since it was instituted in the Carter administration consistently, and it is currently implementing Biden's woke agenda more than doing anything else.
    • FinnyFinsterHH
      I hope to eventually wear a suit for dance but don't know what exactly to look for. I feel like jumpsuit is safe option but I have been interested in wearing button up and formal pants. Is there a certain brand i should look for or sites I should look at for tips? My mom is not exactly keen on me wearing too masc clothing like suits just yet but is okay with jumpsuits. Also is there hair styling tips availible, my hair looks like image below. I might be able to get shorter haircut like pixie but am not sure yet.  
    • MaeBe
      It’s never been about him, but he is the Presidential nominee for the Presidency that starts in…2025. I don’t see a lot of conflation that this is a “Trump doctrine”, it a doctrine that benefits him surely, but it is a plan to instill crony governance and enact very Christian conservative (if not purely Christian nationalist) “order” on the country. If you don’t see this as the Right doubling down on Big G government, I don’t know what to tell them. Getting rid of agencies and giving the authority directly to the Executive isn’t shrinking government. It’s consolidation power. 
    • MaeBe
      It is the made up ideology they believe trans people are pushing on the world, those “poor young girls who are being coerced into believing they are men” and the “perverts who put on dresses and think they’re girls”. The anti-LGBTQ+ movement came up with the term. Being trans = you believe in trans ideology/transgenderism, supporting trans people = the same.   In the end anyone that acts on or thinks gender is anything but what is in your pants is a “transgenderist”, why not make it a word if it’s not, there is no real grey area. Unless you acknowledge there is transgenderism, but use your knowledge to “correct it”.  So I guess there could be transgenderist conversion “therapists”.  Face it, we deface the America they want. Land of the Free and Home of the Brave? I think being out and queer is pretty brave. And freedom shouldn’t just be for those who push a narrow “Christian ideology” as the “true” governing model.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Over here muttering about "a new Jim Crow against a persecuted minority."    
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Rants are not a problem.  My favorite hobby! :)   What's out there is bad enough that I wonder why some people feel they need to embellish it.  Be alert.   Some of this will need to be fought in court if they try to implement it. If people are out to get me, paranoia is justified.  And this may not be the only document.   Abby
    • Ivy
      Not in so many words, therefore it's not there at all.  Excuse my paranoia. And the states passing laws against us are nothing to worry about either. Having to change my gender back to male (like in Florida) is reasonable.  I should just accept it, I mean I was born with a dk.  So that "F" is lie, and a fraud.  My delusions need to be dealt with for my own good.   I'm just frustrated these days.  Just a bit of a rant.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      You probably remember the Target PR fiasco.  I remember reading an account from a woman who shopped there.  She went into a stall and did her business, and someone came into the bathroom and began swinging stall doors open, and when she came to her stall, the woman peeked at her through the crack. "What are you doing?" "Checking for perverts." The writer was so stunned by the absurdity that she finished up ASAP and got out of there, while the other woman entered a stall and locked it, made sure it was locked, and locked it again. 
    • Adrianna Danielle
      Been a good day.Cleaned my closet of clothes that I do not wear anymore and do not fit me.It looks better now.Came down to my newest property beside mine,owner passed and I inherited it.There was a double wide there that was removed,it was in bad shape.It is the shop part I am keeping which I got the tools,shop equipment,benches,hoists and shelving too.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Nothing about eradicating TG folk. 
    • Ivy
      If 9 out of 10 parts are ok, that doesn't mean I need to accept the bad parts (that are aimed directly at me).  That seems suicidal.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...