Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Electrolysis Soon


Robin.C

Recommended Posts

Thanks @Audrey.  The place I talked about is a 2 hour drive so a consultation isn't out of line.  My family always joked I was part native american because of my lack of facial hair.  It's only in the last 10 years or so that I started growing chest hair.  I know a CIS woman with more than I have.

Link to comment
  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Robin.C

    17

  • Audrey

    12

  • Jani

    8

  • Ann W

    6

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

On 12/18/2020 at 12:45 PM, Bri2020 said:

 It sometimes sucks being a redhead.  Our hair shafts are the thickest of all the hair colors and we process pain differently (and resistant to pain numbing/anesthesia ). Combined it can be tough on hair removal some days.  

Also, laser doesn't work well enough on red hair, which means it is unlikely laser can reduce the hours of electrolysis needed, making red hair a quadruple whammy.

Link to comment

I had an conversation with my electrologist during my recent appointment on Monday that told me I need a new one.

 

She was telling me that with my facial hair / beard being so dense and the hair is so thick

1 -  that I was not a good candidate for Electrolysis since hair is white

2 - that since I am not dark skinned as in African American by her meaning and I take to mean complexion.

3 - that I would be a good candidate to get laser done first to get rid of all the dark hair.

My facial hair is snow white but I can only see the odd dark hair follicle (I am 71 after all). 

 

She went on to explain as well that electrolysis is not permanent hair removal, she has not had success in the 3 years she has been practicing. Hmmm

 

I had prepared for my appointment by using an EMLA cream (over the counter) on the area to be treated and had it covered with with saran wrap when I went in. She removed the wrap and proceeded to start her work. When done she showed me her accomplishment. She did outside the treated area. I told her such. All she said was "Oh".

 

Too many red flags here for my liking so time to find a new Electrolysis.

A word of advice - Do your homework. - Get recommendations from others if you can. - Ask questions of the Operator.

 

Seasons Greetings to All 

Big Canadian Hug all around

 

JoniSteph

Link to comment

@JoniSteph Just, wow. I'm so sorry to hear this. I'm really puzzled by the comments your electrologist was making. Especially the ones about white hair and that it's not permanent. Those seem more true of laser and not electrolysis. I'm getting a sense that she didn't want to work with you but couldn't outright say it that way, because it's like she was talking herself out of a job. Transphobic, perhaps? Not sure.

 

I hope you find another electrologist soon. I'll be cheering for you! I feel blessed to have discovered mine. As soon as I found out that they have many trans women clients, and the affirming atmosphere during my initial appointment - I knew it was the right place. Just a little worried that the area she treated a week and a half ago still looks a little more red than I'd like. Not sure if that's normal or if i should be concerned?

 

Love,

~Audrey.

Link to comment

@Audrey  I had been to her before - she does my eyebrows and did electrolysis once before Covid had landed. She had a much different attitude then, than she did on Monday. I was truly shocked from the things that she was saying for sure.

I don't know what has happened if she does not want to work with me or not. She eve recommended another shop that does laser and electrolysis as well. Haha. I even asked if she was trying to lose a customer.

 

She definitely has lost one for sure.

 

Big Canadian Hug

JoniSteph

 

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

Yikes, @JoniSteph, that is definitely weird.  Time to find another one for sure.  I guess Moncton is big enough to have more than one?  I hope so.

 

I am lucky that the one-and-only electrologist here is good.

Link to comment

Don't mean to hijack your thread @Robin.C as the point I was trying to make, was for anyone looking to do any form of hair removal is to do your research on the shop and the operator themselves.

 

And, @KathyLaurenyes I am lucky to have many shops claiming to do electrolysis, however, some will not work on men let alone TG people as I have found out. The search goes on.

 

Seasons Greetings to All

 

Big Canadian Hug

JoniSteph

Link to comment

@JoniSteph
you don't need to worry. I'm hlad people are sharing experiences and tips. I'm wondering what has happened to mine. No contact for a couple of months. Not sure what to think.

I've been looking at options interstate (Sydney) and going for a whole day appointment, means saving up a heap of monies but might be a better option once COVID is better controlled.

Merry Christmas and/or Holidays depending on your flavour. Happy Festivus for the Rest of Us !?

Hugs

Robin

Link to comment

That's a bummer @Robin.C.  The most promising electrolygist around here seems to have disappeared.  She was the only one doing galvanic.  The other two are ok, but they're shut down by the state for now.  I hope you can continue soon without too much hassle.

 

I wonder if they're going to get hit when they reopen with a flood of trans ladies who discovered themselves during the shut downs.  ?

Link to comment
5 hours ago, Ann W said:

I wonder if they're going to get hit when they reopen with a flood of trans ladies who discovered themselves during the shut downs.  ?

This made me smile! I know I fully embraced myself during the pandemic even though I knew for years before that.

 

Sorry to hear about the continued frustrations getting started Ann. Galvanic is quite hard to find. Almost everyone seems to favor thermolysis or blend here in NYC. At my next appointment, I'm going to pick my electrologist's brain a bit more about the differences and her experience working with other trans women on their facial hair. Will share what I learn!

 

Love,

~Audrey.

Link to comment
  • 1 month later...

So I had an electrolysis (thermolysis) session about a week and a half ago now. For some reason, this time the healing has been much much slower. The redness and scabbing are still quite apparent, and I'm quite worried about long-term scarring actually and have resisted scratching and picking as much as I can. But it is worrisome. My electrologist did mention she made an adjustment to her technique and perhaps my skin and hair reacting to that. I have another session next Monday but I'm tempted to push it back a wee or two if I haven't healed from the last one.

 

Also - when i asked about the differences in approaches, my electrologist said that galvanic more rarely practiced in her experience, and when she was training, thermolysis was favored over galvanic. She also shared terms of the results for what I'm seeking with removing my facial hair, she feels that thermolysis works just as well.

 

Love,

~Audrey.

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator
2 hours ago, Audrey said:

Also - when i asked about the differences in approaches, my electrologist said that galvanic more rarely practiced in her experience, and when she was training, thermolysis was favored over galvanic. She also shared terms of the results for what I'm seeking with removing my facial hair, she feels that thermolysis works just as well.

 

Definitely talk to her about it. The two techniques might be equivalent in general, but you clearly aren't tolerating the new treatment very well. We're all different after all. Different skin types need to be romanced differently for best results.

 

Or at least a supplemental cream or something. Yikes!

 

Hugs!

Link to comment

From the little reading and watching Thermolysis is easier for less experienced operators to get right and faster, which is why it probably favoured during training.

The level of current does affect the reddness and scabbing, although everyone is different, lots of scabbing is a worry (cuurent too high, too much done in one area at at time ?).

 

My news my electrolygist has surfaced and made contact. Yippee.

Sadly my car broke down after New Years, so until that's fixed i can't get down to her part of the city.

Hopefully i will be mobile next week and we can start scheduling again.

 

It's been quite freaky to see hairs growing in the area she treated. Completely normal but still freaky ?

 

Stay safe everyone.

 

Oh nearly forgot I've got some Numbit cream to help with the ouchies, so I'm looking forward to that. And will report its effectiveness.  On the lack of ouchies not the ouchies ?

 

Sorry I've been quiet on here, I'm back at work and it's ramping up after the Christmas break.

 

Hugs

Robin

Link to comment

My person uses a "blend". The newer/more expensive machines can do that apparently.  I've never had a scab form.  I can feel the area is "bumpy" and a bit inflamed but never a "burn" or scab.  This was the worst it ever got and this was 90 minutes of work just on the upper lip. pic 1 is right after session, pic 2 is next day.  usually in a couple days I can't notice it unless there is a really cold wind blowing and it is a bit more sensitive to the wind chill.

Screen Shot 2021-01-27 at 4.33.07 PM.png

Screen Shot 2021-01-27 at 4.35.35 PM.png

Link to comment

Thanks everyone for commenting - @Bri2020 seeing your pictures is leading me to believe that my electrologist is doing it completely wrong. Nine days after the session on Jan. 18, your skin looks dramatically different from mine if that's the "worst" it ever was. Mine is so red and has several scabs that are slow to heal, and I have no underlying reason that I should be slow to heal especially since the first sessions didn't go like this. I'm including a pic of the affected area. Above was treated about 3-4 weeks ago, below is untreated and about 24 hours from my last shave. I try to soothe areas the electrologist treats afterwards with witch hazel, aloe vera, and calamine per the electrologist's suggestion. I will be calling them tomorrow and possibly reconsidering my entire hair removal approach before it's too late.

 

Love,

~Audrey.

 

IMG_1910.jpg

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

@Audrey You might ask if they have changed the setting on the machine.  Too strong and it can cause excessive redness and scaring.  Also do they used (IFRC) "shielded" needles?  They are coated except at the end where the current comes out, hence not damaging outer layers of skin.  

Link to comment

Hi everyone, an update... I spoke with my electrologist a bit ago, she called me on her day off (!) after I expressed concern about the healing from my last session. She mentioned that she has to use gold instruments on my face, because I have a contact allergy to nickel. Gold is a better conductor of heat, and so the impact on my skin is greater as a result. She also said she had to increase the settings during the last session to get better release on the hair follicles she worked on, since she wasn't getting a good release. I postponed my next appointment for two weeks to allow for more healing. I'm happy they were so responsive to my worries and hopeful that the next treatment won't be as bad.

 

Love,

~Audrey.

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

I like that she's so responsive and aware of the problem for your future visits. May they bring you less (preferably no) dermal distress.

 

Hugs!

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

Excellent news.  I sensed it had to do with the type of needle and heat level.  My electrologist and I have talked about this over the years as she worked to find the best product and settings for my skin and hair.

 

I hope your next treatment goes well.  

Jani

Link to comment

I’ve had redness and swelling on my upper lip and chin lasting for a few days from my thermolysis treatments. My lady turned up the machine to 6 last time and I could hear and feel the “zap”. Ouch. 
 

I hope your future treatments are more bearable. I know that after 5 hours of treatment the results are noticeable.

 

Good luck ?

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

@Audrey sounds like a very caring Electrologist - I'm happy for you. My Electrologist is about the only one in a town of - don't like the term but you get the idea - rednecks - and she has been so supportive of me and luckily my face has reacted well to treatments. 

Link to comment

Yea, that level of skin damage doesn't look right.  I'm glad she is going to try something new.  Also, I like to use a hydrocortisone cream for a few days to reduce inflammation but you have more than just that, those look more like skin damage from the heat.  Keep us posted.  I'm about to reduce the frequency of my treatments to let insurance catch up. If I'm patient then I just have to pay $15 copay but they only authorize 5 hours at a time then I have to wait weeks for another re-authorization. I've been paying out of pocket for those visits and the DC area is very expensive.  I'm up to about 50 hours of treatments and pleased with the progress. Shaving is SO much easier now.

Link to comment

Thank you everyone for your comments and support! I'm blessed that my electrologist is so involved. It's so important to have providers supportive of us and affirming of our goals. Today, the redness is a little better than yesterday, and my skin absolutely loves the calamine lotion, which is helping reduce the itchiness too. I did expose the irritated area to the cold wind more than I should have this morning so I should be more mindful. Next electrolysis session will be on Feb. 15 if my healing progresses better from here. I would hate to abandon electrolysis for laser, as I feel laser won't do the job with too many greys and whites in my facial hair.

 

Love,

~Audrey.

Link to comment

I have been to the large volume folks near Chicago 5 times now. The first time, which was 33 hours of work on my face in 2 days, my face had some spots like your picture, Audrey. I sent them pictures and emails about it. The second time, and for all the others, there was no blistering or oozing at all. Still lots of swelling the second time, since it was after all something like 27 hours of work on my face. But no oozing. I went to work, in front of customers, the day after my 3rd session, and it was no issue at all. I am going back for my 6 session in Feb.

 

The reason I chose large volume was that being full time already I was unable to let the hairs grow for enough days for the technician to be happy with the length. Almost, I would have to let it grow for 3 days before seeing the electrologist, which mean essentially, every week I was "down" for 3 days. (Yes, I did everything backwards and should have done the electrolysis 30 years ago!) With large volume, I let it grow 1 week before, and it is long enough for them to work. The only issue is traveling TO Chicago the day before with lots of hair. Oh well. One bad day...

 

How do the rest of you deal with having to grow out the hair? Or were you just smarter than me, and you are working this out before going full time?

 

Katie

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

@KatieP If I could have come up with a good reason 20-30 years ago I would have done it.  

 

I just carefully planned my week so my down days (I called them In-Days) didn't interfere too much with life.   Ha! Yeah right.  

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   6 Members, 0 Anonymous, 163 Guests (See full list)

    • Carolyn Marie
    • Abigail Genevieve
    • RaineOnYourParade
    • MaeBe
    • Ivy
    • awkward-yet-sweet
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,029
    • Most Online
      8,356

    Selkimur
    Newest Member
    Selkimur
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Anyatimenow
      Anyatimenow
      (23 years old)
    2. Aria00
      Aria00
    3. Ava B.
      Ava B.
      (24 years old)
    4. Claire Heshi
      Claire Heshi
    5. CrystalMatthews0426
      CrystalMatthews0426
      (41 years old)
  • Posts

    • MaeBe
      1.  I think there are some legitimate concern.   2. Thoroughly discussing this will consume many threads.   3. I disagree partially with @MaeBe but there is partial agreement.   4. The context includes what is happening in society that the authors are observing.  It is not an isolated document.   The observation is through a certain lens, because people do things differently doesn't mean they're doing it wrong. Honestly, a lot of the conservative rhetoric is morphing desires of people to be treated with respect and social equity to be tantamount to the absolution of the family, heterosexuality, etc. Also, being quiet and trying to blend in doesn't change anything. Show me a social change that benefits a minority or marginalized group that didn't need to be loud.   5. Trump, if elected, is as likely to spend his energies going after political opponents as he is to implementing something like this.   Trump will appoint people to do this, like Roger Severino (who was appointed before, who has a record of anti-LGBTQ+ actions), he need not do anything beyond this. His people are ready to push this agenda forward. While the conservative right rails about bureaucracy, they intend to weaponize it. There is no question. They don't want to simplify government, they simply want to fire everyone and bring in conservative "warriors" (their rhetoric). Does America survive 4 year cycles of purge/cronyism?   6. I reject critical theory, which is based on Marxism.  Marxism has never worked and never will.  Critical theory has problems which would need time to go into, which I do not have.   OK, but this seems like every other time CRT comes up with conservatives...completely out of the blue. I think it's reference is mostly just to spark outrage from the base. Definitely food thought for a different thread, though.   7. There are groups who have declared war on the nuclear family as problematically patriarchal, and a lot of other terms. They are easy to find on the internet.  This document is reacting to that (see #4 above).   What is the war on the nuclear family? I searched online and couldn't find much other than reasons why people aren't getting married as much or having kids (that wasn't a propaganda from Heritage or opinions pieces from the right that paint with really broad strokes). Easy things to see: the upward mobility and agency of women, the massive cost of rearing children, general negative attitudes about the future, male insecurity, etc. None of this equates to a war on the nuclear family, but I guess if you look at it as "men should be breadwinners and women must get married for financial support and extend the male family line (and to promote "National Greatness") I could see the decline of marriage as a sign of the collapse of a titled system and, if I was a beneficiary of that system or believe that to NOT be tilted, be aggrieved.   8.  Much of this would have to be legislated, and this is a policy documented.  Implementation would  be most likely different, but that does not mean criticism is unwarranted.   "It might be different if you just give it a chance", unlike all the other legislation that's out there targeting LGBTQ+ from the right, these are going to be different? First it will be trans rights, then it will be gay marriage, and then what? Women's suffrage?   I get it, we may have different compasses, but it's not hard to see that there's no place for queer people in the conservative worldview. There seems to be a consistent insistence that "America was and is no longer Great", as if the 1950s were the pinnacle of society, completely ignoring how great America still is and can continue to be--without having to regress society to the low standards of its patriarchal yesteryears.    
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      Cadillac parts are pretty expensive, so repairing them costs more.  But they don't seem to break down more than other makes.  Lots of Lincoln models use Ford cars as a base, so you can get parts that aren't much more expensive.    My family has had good luck with "Panther platform" cars.  Ford Crown Victoria, Mercury Marquis, Lincoln Towncar or Continental.  4.6 V8 and 5.0 V8.  Reasonable fuel economy, and fairly durable.  Our county sheriff's office was running Chargers and SUV's for a while, but has gone back to older Crown Victorias for ease of maintenance.  GF rebuilds them here.  But they are getting more scarce, since the newest ones were made in 2011.    1992-1997 years were different than the later years.  1998-2001 they did some changes, and apparently the best years are 2003 to 2011.  Check Craigslist, and also government auctions.  GF has gotten a lot of them at auction, and they can be had in rough-but-running shape for around $1,000.  Ones in great shape can be found in the $5,000+ range.  Good for 200,000 miles without significant rebuilding.  Go through engine and transmission and electrical systems, and they go half a million.    Some Chrysler models are OK.  The 300 mostly has the same engines as the Charger and Challenger, so parts availability is pretty good.  But they tend to get timing issues.  The older Chrysler Sebring convertibles were pretty reliable, sometimes going 200,000 miles without tons of problems, although after that they were pretty much worn out. 
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I think I have read everything the Southern Baptists have to say on transgender, and it helped convince me they are dead wrong on these issues.  They can be nice people.  I would never join an SBC church.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      You come across as a thoughtful, sweet, interesting and pleasant person.    There are parts of this country, and more so the world, where evangelicals experience a great deal of finger wagging.
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      It has been an interesting experience being in a marriage in a Christian faith community, yet being intersex/trans.  I stay pretty quiet, and most have kind of accepted that I'm just the strange, harmless exception.  "Oh, that's just Jen.  Jen is...different."  I define success as being a person most folks just overlook. 
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      Well, I live in an area with a lot of Southern Baptists, Evangelicals, etc...  We've experienced our share of finger-wagging, as the "standard interpretation" of Scripture in the USA is that the Bible only approves of "one man, one woman" marriage.  My faith community is mostly accepted here, but that has taken time and effort.  It can be tough at times to continue to engage with culture and the broader population, and avoid the temptation to huddle up behind walls like a cult.    Tolerance only goes so far.  At one point, my husband was asked to run for sheriff.  He declined, partly because an elected official with four wives would have a REALLY tough time.  (Of course, making way less than his current salary wasn't an option either). 
    • Abigail Genevieve
      My bone structure is far more female than male.  I can't throw like a guy, which has been observed by guys numerous times, and moving like a woman is more natural.  It just is.  I'm not going out of my way to act in a fem. way, as you say, but I am letting go of some of the 'I am not going to move like that because I am a guy' stuff I have defensively developed.  The other breaks through anyway - there were numerous looks from people at work when I would use gestures that are forbidden to men, or say something spontaneously no guy would ever say.   At one point, maybe a year or more ago, I said it was unfair for people to think they were dealing with a man when they were actually dealing with a woman.    Girl here.  'What is a woman' is a topic for another day.
    • Willow
      Mom, I’m home!  What’s for lunch?   Leftover pizza .   ok.    Not exactly our conversation but there is truth in the answer.     @KymmieLsorry you are sick. Feel better soon.   Girl mode, boy mode no mode, not us. Nothing functional for either of us.   anyone here have or had a 10 year old (plus or minus) Caddy, Lincoln or Chrysler?  How was it?  Lots of repairs?  Comfortable seats? Anything positive or negative about it?  I need to replace my 2004 Ford Explorer Eddie Bauer, it’s eating $100 dollar bills and needs a couple of thousand dollars worth of work and that doesn’t even fix the check engine code.  Obviously, it isn’t worth putting that kind of money into a 20 year old car with a 174 thousand miles.   Willow
    • Ashley0616
      Oversized pink shirt, pink and black sports bra
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I think you mean the worst possible interpretation of 2025 situation.  Keep in mind that there are those who will distort and downright lie about anything coming from conservatives - I have seen it time and time again.  It's one of the reasons I want to read the thing slowly and carefully.  They want you to be very, very afraid. 
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Here is where the expectation is that the stereotypical evangelical comes in finger wagging, disapproving and condemning.    Not gonna do that.   You have to work these things out.  Transgender issues put a whole different spin on everything and God understands what we are going through. I have enough trouble over here.  :)
    • Ivy
      You do you. You seem to be in a safe place if we end up with a 2025 situation.  But a lot of us are not.
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      Well, my marriage is different.  I'm actually part of a multi-partner marriage.  Like you see in the Book of Genesis.  My husband has four wives...and me.  I was kind of an accident, as our community sets the "reasonable maximum" at four wives, but that's a long story.  Plural marriage is approved in my faith community, with the exception of spiritual leaders, as described in 1 Timothy 3.  We believe that anything that isn't specifically prohibited is permitted.    The purpose of marriage is for people to work together, demonstrate the love of God, and to have children.  My faith believes in exponential reproduction - big families with lots of kids, both as a blessing and with the intention of using the size of our population for political ends.  Being intersex/trans and unable to bear children, I wouldn't have been a good candidate to be somebody's only spouse (the majority of our community tends toward traditional couple marriage).  Since my husband has other partners, I don't have to worry about the childbearing aspect, and I help out with raising our family's kids.  I'm a "bonus parent."    I'm not 100% open about my intersex/trans nature, although my community's leaders are aware of me.  Being transgender isn't condemned, but it is seen as a health problem derived from an imperfect, fallen world and an environment polluted with chemicals.  Since I'm married, I have a safe place to be, and I can live how I need to live.    I firmly believe the advice given in 1 Corinthians 7.  We don't totally own our bodies.  God gets a say, as I believe He created us to be male or female, not something outside the binary.  I don't think that transition without discussion with partners is OK....again, we don't totally own ourselves.  When I started to figure myself out, that was actually the main thing on my mind - will my partners accept me?  How will my position in the family change?  Since my partners don't really have a problem with the mild version of transition that I wanted to do, it has all been good. 
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      Indeed.  While it seems like the majority of LGBTQ+ folks vote for Democrat candidates, not everybody drinks the Kool-Aid.  I'm a registered Independent, since I vote for individuals rather than party.  One of my trans friends is very pro-Trump - wears her MAGA hat and everything.  I find it interesting to see the reactions she gets... folks aren't always as tolerant as they claim to be.  Even on this forum, you get some real flak from Democrat voters....many will insist that the California way is the only way.    In my opinion, "Project 2025" isn't the real problem.  Check out UN "Agenda 2030."   
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      While Biden may be more friendly to trans folks, I'm not a single-issue voter.  I just can't choose a Democrat candidate, as I believe their actions will destroy my community and way of life.  Biden just announced that he wants to significantly increase capital gains taxes.  Maybe he intends to "tax the rich" but that is going to affect everything from land sales to grocery prices to the cost of electricity and even folks' retirement savings, as most companies make a large amount of their profits through investing in the market.  It is absolute lunacy to think that increased cost or reduced profits won't be passed on to the rest of us.  Things are going to get way worse at this rate.    Mostly, I vote in elections for state and local issues, as the national government is about as pleasant as a Porta-Potty in July.  So, either I'll do a write-in vote for president, or I'll check the box for Trump.  Anything but Biden.     
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...