Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Not Just Trans That Will Be Targeted


Ashley0616

Recommended Posts

I don't know, I think Trump is just baiting Noem, Lake, and Stefanik, by looking at Abbott. I can see Trump telling them to have a steel cage match...

 

Oh what wonderful things await us in 8 months or so

Link to comment
8 minutes ago, KatieSC said:

I don't know, I think Trump is just baiting Noem, Lake, and Stefanik, by looking at Abbott. I can see Trump telling them to have a steel cage match...

 

Oh what wonderful things await us in 8 months or so

You aren't kidding. Hopefully he'll be indicted and won't be eligible to be a presidential candidate. 

Link to comment

Yeah, but the fix appears to be in with the supremo court. The Constitutional amendment has been on the books for over 100 years, but never needed to be used for a presidential candidate until now. The states were following that amendment, and not dreaming up a new and unknown law. The SC does not seem to get that...I wonder why...

 

The other issue all by itself is that so many of the politicians fail to realize there is supposed to be a constitutionally mandated separation of church and state to alleviate religious persecution. Yeah...they seem to have forgotten that too. 

 

The checks and balances appear gone. 

Link to comment
51 minutes ago, Ashley0616 said:

Hopefully he'll be indicted and won't be eligible to be a presidential candidate.

I think they're afraid of his cult and the potential violence.  

I hope I'm wrong, but I expect the trials will be delayed enough for him to run.  Then if he wins, there won't be any trials……    Well, probably for a few Democrats there will.

Link to comment
9 hours ago, Ivy said:

I think they're afraid of his cult and the potential violence.  

I hope I'm wrong, but I expect the trials will be delayed enough for him to run.  Then if he wins, there won't be any trials……    Well, probably for a few Democrats there will.

 

I truly doubt all of this.  I was surprised when he won in 2016, against everything stacked against him.  Things were stacked better in 2020.... he doesn't have a chance in 2024 no matter how many votes he gets.  I'm pretty sure they'll jail him for something before the election, which is why Nikki Haley is staying in.  She's hoping to win by default even though she's not popular.  I wonder if she knows something for SURE that the rest of us don't?  Since she spent time at the UN, I smell a rat. 

 

And no, there won't be ANY trials for Democrats.  Which is unfortunate.  Remember Trump's promise to prosecute Hillary?  He should have, and he broke that promise immediately.  FAIL.  These people who "represent" us are essentially a class above the law. 

Link to comment

There is no way Trump will be locked up before the election.  Even if he is convicted, he'll appeal.  (assuming there is even a trial by then)

Having said that, Haley could be staying in on the off chance that he is.

 

I'm not a fan of Clinton at all, but I don't think there was actually enough evidence to convict her of anything.

 

As for Trump winning, he doesn't actually need a majority of the votes as long as he can win the right states.  And that is certainly a possibility.  I suppose this is a strength or weakness of the republic - depending on how you look at it.

 

As for trans folks (which I consider myself one of) the Republicans have said in so many words that they want us eradicated… I mean, yeah.  I personally believe Democrat support is lukewarm at best when it comes down to it.  They will throw us under the bus, if necessary.

 

We already know the "conservative" game plan (2025).  Thinking they won't actually do it is wishful thinking.  But sure, it can't happen here./s

Link to comment

This will be a crazy year. I suspect that if there is a really close vote, that we will hear a non-stop chorus of "stolen election", "fake news", etc., followed by another call that could make January 6th, 2021 look mild. Especially if the R candidate winds up never being held accountable for any of his actions, and if the SC backs him, the game changes for us dramatically. If there is an R super-majority nationally, the game is over. That is what worries me most. Every freedom and shred of acceptance could go right out the window. Yes, some states will attempt to be safe havens, but what if the anti-trans laws go national? You have to admire the coordination of the R states, as well as the ability of the leading R candidate to use every delaying tactic under the sun in order to skate by. I saw an article talking about the joke that Bill Maher said about the lawyers helping Trump. He was referring to the SC justices. The funny part is that it would not be that farfetched if one of the justices, or multiple justices, were advising Trump of every nuance that could delay his trials. Imagine rolling along knowing the outcome before hand. It would certainly explain how discombobulated things are going.

Link to comment
12 hours ago, awkward-yet-sweet said:

Remember Trump's promise to prosecute Hillary?  He should have, and he broke that promise immediately.  FAIL.

And effectively did the exact same thing; screwing around with classified data. So pots and kettles. LOCK HIM UP! LOCK HIM UP! LOCK HIM UP! Right?

Link to comment
7 hours ago, Ivy said:

There is no way Trump will be locked up before the election.  Even if he is convicted, he'll appeal.  (assuming there is even a trial by then)

Having said that, Haley could be staying in on the off chance that he is.

 

I'm not a fan of Clinton at all, but I don't think there was actually enough evidence to convict her of anything.

 

As for Trump winning, he doesn't actually need a majority of the votes as long as he can win the right states.  And that is certainly a possibility.  I suppose this is a strength or weakness of the republic - depending on how you look at it.

 

Generally, appeals are done when somebody is already in prison.  Trump can appeal all he wants, but once convicted he'll be a felon, and that makes him ineligible for office.  I expect to see a trial or two done racetrack-style specifically to make that happen.  Probably with a conviction around September or October. 

 

No matter what Trump has done (or been rumored to have done), one thing is so far removed from believability that it can't even be made up.... there's no "Trump body trail."  Inconvenient people disappear around the Clintons, and they're basically above investigation for murders as well as anything else.  There's one set of rules for some people, and another set of rules for others. 

 

 

5 hours ago, MaeBe said:

And effectively did the exact same thing; screwing around with classified data. So pots and kettles. LOCK HIM UP! LOCK HIM UP! LOCK HIM UP! Right?

 

Not quite the same, as Hillary was shoveling classified documents into the hands of foreign nations.  Treason, technically.  Trump just stuck things in his bathroom and closets.  One is a capital crime, the other is a dubious felony.  And then of course we have Biden with his son hip-deep in Ukraine, and now we're funneling billions into Ukraine to prop up that regime.  Clinton/Obama/Biden just have better connections to cover up their stuff. 

 

Lets face it, we haven't had a president for 50 years who didn't make the USA look like a banana republic. 🙄

 

Link to comment
5 hours ago, awkward-yet-sweet said:

Not quite the same, as Hillary was shoveling classified documents into the hands of foreign nations.

Facts please. There are legitimate reports that Trump was showing off classified documents.

"It details a July 2021 meeting in Bedminster in which he boasted about having held onto a classified document prepared by the military about a potential attack on another country.

“Secret. This is secret information. Look, look at this,” the indictment quotes him as saying, citing an audio recording. He also said he could have declassified the document but “Now I can’t, you know, but this is still a secret,” according to the indictment."

 

Also, Hillary had no classified documents in her email.

 

"After all this time and misreporting in the media, once again we need a reminder that, in fact, the FBI found that not one of Hillary Clinton’s 33,000 emails they reviewed contained any recognizable classified information marking."

 

5 hours ago, awkward-yet-sweet said:

Lets face it, we haven't had a president for 50 years who didn't make the USA look like a banana republic.

Political scientists disagree.

 

Link to comment
  • Admin

All right, folks, once again the thread has gotten wildly off topic.  In addition, there is a whole bunch of conspiracy-theory stuff being bandied about, and y'all know how I feel about that.  So let's get back to the topic at-hand, or we'll shut this one down.  Thank you.

 

Sincerely,

 

The Management

Link to comment
  • Admin

I agree with @Carolyn Marie as another one of the manager here.  Lets get this one back on track if there is one. 

Link to comment
8 minutes ago, VickySGV said:

on track if there is one. 

Pretty sure the only track here is.... "if the establishment media says it, its gotta be true." 

Link to comment
  • Admin

OK, that does it!!

Link to comment
  • VickySGV locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 177 Guests (See full list)

    • Susie
    • Kait
    • Stefi
    • Birdie
    • April Marie
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.8k
    • Total Posts
      769.8k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,081
    • Most Online
      8,356

    brightmom
    Newest Member
    brightmom
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Ben1868
      Ben1868
      (22 years old)
    2. Charity
      Charity
      (41 years old)
    3. EagerBeaver
      EagerBeaver
    4. Nagato
      Nagato
      (33 years old)
    5. Star
      Star
      (44 years old)
  • Posts

    • VickySGV
      My condolences to the people of WA.  A huge warning about that type of politician though, those who broadcast the Anti-Trans message rarely if ever attend to any important legislative issues to benefit their constituency.  They are mostly single trick dogs, whose trick is to empty their food bowl and whine for more food.
    • Ivy
      This stuff seems to be the major talking point for "conservatives" these days.  Just shows that they don't know what they're talking about, and don't particularly care.
    • Jani
      You are both beautiful.  Have fun.
    • Willow
    • Mirrabooka
      Mother's Day, so I thought I'd do the right thing and cook. So, we got Chinese takeaway! 😆   Actually, we planned it days ago, just thinking that tonight we would treat ourselves. Complete with a lovely bottle of Cab Sav.
    • Mirrabooka
      Exactly.   A plain old "Good morning" should always suffice, for example, whether the recipient expects a gender specific greeting or not.
    • Ladypcnj
      Hi awkward yet sweet, yeah, I tried dumping her but my current health insurance keeps directing me back to her as my primary, yet there are other doctors to choose from, but they are far away.
    • Ladypcnj
      Hi Birdie, I can relate to that.
    • Mirrabooka
    • Mirrabooka
      This sort of stuff makes my blood boil. A prospective state politician has gained approval from his party's state council to run in their state election next year.   He once stated that the + part of LGBTQIA+ is where pedophiles are categorized.   For clarity, in Australia the Liberal party is our main conservative party. They have lurched further to the right over the past 10 years or so. Our main progressive, union backed party is Labor.   WA Liberal party approves Dr Thomas Brough, candidate who linked LGBTQIA+ community with paedophiles - ABC News
    • Willow
      Happy Mother’s Day    I have to be at church earlier than normal for a mic check.  I have been going over what I am to say, both silently reading and reading it aloud.  My concern is that my voice will freeze as it sometimes does.     I felt I was honored very highly yesterday by my minister and supporter on my journey.  He and another minister are Standing together to become the next co-moderators of the Presbyterian Church (USA).  They included me to receive an advance copy of their initial submission.  I was one of only 6 people listed on the email to receive this.  Later this week it will go out to all the voting commissioners that will be in Salt Lake City for the meeting.  I have asked to be allowed to attend the meeting to support him and Rev CeeCee Armstrong, whom he is standing with.    We’ll time to get ready .   Willow
    • Mirrabooka
      Nup. Not an option. You need to keep going and keep us all in the loop, and we need to keep seeing your beautiful smile!   Party, schmarty. I'm 61 and haven't had a birthday party since I was 30. Even that was just a crummy meal at the pub with a few friends who we have since lost contact with. Don't sweat it.
    • Mirrabooka
      On behalf of everyone reading your entries here @Sally Stone, THANK YOU for creating such an informative thread. But there is one thing you might have neglected to say at the end, and that is, "And they all lived happily ever after!" ❤️   Reno sounds like a pretty good place to call home. I understand the attraction of living in a place that is not too big but not too small.   I look forward to reading your subsequent posts about specific aspects of your journey.
    • Betty K
      Hi and welcome. A few things...   1. You're right, you can't trust your friends w/r/t the question of passing. How would they even know if you pass or not? My sister used to do the same thing, telling me that no-one knew I was trans and that to her I just looked like a cis woman. I still don't know if she was serious or just trying to make me feel good, but I learned to not listen to her on that topic.   2. Buuuut, having said that, I thought I looked good, and I think that is all she was really trying to tell me, that she liked how I looked as a woman. Maybe this is obvious, but I feel it gets overlooked: passing and looking good are not the same thing, not even remotely. Your friends (I presume) are trying to tell you that you look good as you are.   3. Having said all that, I think non-passing transmascs have a harder time than us non-passing transfemmes. All I have to do to get gendered correctly 95% of the time is wear a dress and makeup and only a few seriously ignorant folks and diehard transphobes misgender me. For you, it's much harder to find signifiers powerful enough to send the same message.   So in short, I don't have any answers, except that you're right, it sucks, and I hope the situation improves over time. But passing isn't everything. Maybe you're right, and in a less conservative state it wouldn't happen so often, because you'd have more people like you surrounding you. I know that where I chose to live while transitioning has been a big part of making the process a positive experience. I'd hate to be in Texas atm.
    • Mirrabooka
      Thank you, ladies.   At the time I went from euphoric (my normal state) to not euphoric in an instant, and the lingering thought was one of self-doubt, manifesting itself with the unsolved question that maybe I never really felt like I had the soul of a woman, I just thought I did. I know I'm not the only one to ever feel this way. All part of the ride on this roller coaster I guess.   Yep, and yep. Makes sense now.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...