Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Finding a Way Forward for Conservative and Charismatic Evangelicals


Abigail Genevieve

Recommended Posts

Many transgender people are in these circles.  Leelah Alcorn was one.  The only way forward she found was suicide. I am in these circles, accepting conservative, charismatic evangelicalism while also accepting my own experiences, which I seem to be describing in nauseating detail elsewhere here.  Part of my journey is dealing with those unfamiliar with science who tread into ground that is actually science and not theology, those who interpret Scripture according to preconception, and those who have no idea at all what it means to deal with transgender issues, assuming it is purely a matter of sin and repentance.  When you have a hammer, everything is a nail.  My friends are among these folk, and I intend to remain friends with them.  I need to sharpen my skills here. 

 

I would like to see the Kobiyashi Maru demolished, where either you accept your transgender identity and reject evangelicalism, or you accept evangelicalism and try with all your might to escape being transgender.  I think you can be both transgender and conservative evangelical, despite strong denial both by many, some forced out of churches because they were transgender, others insisting transgender is demonic, sin, or whatever. 

 

"God does not make mistakes."

 

Therefore, it is said, you cannot be transgender.  But due to the Fall, there are birth defects, diseases and all manner of things wrong with the world and our bodies.  We can expect to find things not in perfect order.

 

"God does not make mistakes."  But He made you.  Read Psalm 139.  It does not say He screwed up making you.  He made you transgender.

 

"Male and female he made them" - in Genesis.  That word "and" is a waw in Hebrew.  It can mean 'and' or 'or'.  It is not He made them male, and others He made female. People make it out to be that that is what is says.  That is NOT what it says.  It could be he made some that were male-and-female.  Intersex people.  The phrase has a wide range.

 

My point in this post is not to exhaustively discuss this subject, because that would take a while.  I detest some of what passes for theology concerning this by those who came into it with a preconceived notion of what it means. 

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator
1 hour ago, Abby Gen said:

"God does not make mistakes."

Abby,

 

I agree with you on so many points. It's hard for my Christian conservative family and friends to hear that I am transgender. I point out the same things you pointed out here in this post and the others who have posted similar things in the Christian threads. It's as it they (my family) refuse to look at historical and scientific facts that transgender folks have existed from the beginning of time.

 

I am transgender and Christian.

 

Mindy🌈🐛🏳️‍⚧️🦋

Link to comment
13 minutes ago, Mmindy said:

Abby,

 

I agree with you on so many points. It's hard for my Christian conservative family and friends to hear that I am transgender. I point out the same things you pointed out here in this post and the others who have posted similar things in the Christian threads. It's as it they (my family) refuse to look at historical and scientific facts that transgender folks have existed from the beginning of time.

 

I am transgender and Christian.

 

Mindy🌈🐛🏳️‍⚧️🦋

I've gotten really angry at times when I have read someone's presentation on transgender and how to counsel transgender people "out of their sin" who clearly has never actually encountered a transgender person in their life.  I know why - I personally am very, very careful whom I reveal myself to.  The individual considered expert on this at my church maintains that all transgender "feelings" are due to early childhood trauma.  No, I have not approached them on this. Nor will I.

 

 OTOH Mark Yarhouse is superb. Preston Sprinkle has enormous common sense on this issue.  There are a few others standing against the common consensus among conservative evangelicals.  Conservative evangelicals look at acknowledging transgender people as having legitimate problems as sliding into liberalism, sin and the hand of the devil. Hard to argue with the emotional commitment.

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Abby Gen said:

The individual considered expert on this at my church maintains that all transgender "feelings" are due to early childhood trauma.

This is my wife all the way ... she is convinced that I like to wear women's clothing because of some things that happened to me when I was in elementary school. I try to tell her that I associate my enchantment with women's clothing due to all POSITIVE experiences when I was little...

 

1 hour ago, Mmindy said:

I am transgender and Christian.

I am transgender, Christian and Catholic. Oh boy ;-)

 

3 hours ago, Abby Gen said:

"Male and female he made them" - in Genesis. 

There is a lot of beautiful theology here. God needs male AND female to express his image to the cosmos. We all have value in his eyes, and each of us is a unique icon of God's glory (though we are all marred by the Fall and our sin).

 

I wonder, though, how folks who read this section of Scripture automatically make the jump to discrediting transgender experience. "He made them male and female, and therefore you, a biological male, aren't allowed to be enchanted by the feminine, wear pink underwear or even think about buying a skirt from the women's section." Huh?

 

I feel like my enchantment with the feminine is giving God credit for creating something so amazing and beautiful that it takes my breath away!! I don't know if that makes sense but I desperately am trying to honor God and treat women and all things feminine with the utmost respect and dignity (something I did not do in my younger days, which I am ashamed of)...

Link to comment
13 minutes ago, EasyE said:

This is my wife all the way ... she is convinced that I like to wear women's clothing because of some things that happened to me when I was in elementary school. I try to tell her that I associate my enchantment with women's clothing due to all POSITIVE experiences when I was little...

I have read all the "reasons" why transgender people have this "problem" - whether sin or abuse.  I had stuff happen to me early, in elementary school, junior high, high school and college, when it starting turning into extreme ostracism and hostility instead of other stuff.  And other stuff.  I check all the boxes for trauma and have worked through it.  I've got a weird anatomy.  Still, here I am. 

 

I am wondering if she has a better solution.  Maybe

She: you need counseling.

You: I got professional counseling.

She: and what did they say?

You: I am transgender. This is fine.

She: You need a different counselor, one who agrees with me.

You: professional counselors do not agree with you.

Glare.

Link to comment
33 minutes ago, EasyE said:

This is my wife all the way ... she is convinced that I like to wear women's clothing because of some things that happened to me when I was in elementary school. I try to tell her that I associate my enchantment with women's clothing due to all POSITIVE experiences when I was little...

I realized I was overly dismissive on one point, and that is that you should see if there is any truth in this by fully exploring it, maybe with help.  You can tell her you checked later, or it is resolved, and at that point either it is resolved and it goes away (not likely IMHO) or it is still there, and you ask her for #2, which you then work through, and so forth.  I am all in favor of getting those comorbid issues worked through.  Anyone who grows up in the wrong gender will have them.  I have worked through a large number of them, as I think I have probably said too many times, and it helps.  If you tell her that is not the issue she will conclude you are in denial or something and the standstill continues with her.

Link to comment
  • Admin

One part of me says to stay out of this, since I am an Episcopalian which many many conservatives think is the epitome of Hell bound liberalism, but I did grow up through early college in a very conservative church environment. 

 

One of my earliest areas of questioning actually began in about 6th grade Sunday School where a teacher defined God's traits as being Omniscient (all knowing), Omnipotent (all powerful) and Omnipresent (always present) and then over the next few years I was told: what G could not know, what G could not do, and where G could never be, ever , in a person's life

 

In the primary definition G is powerful enough to create a Trans Person*, G also knows that we are G's children and siblings of Jesus, and finally that G very much through power and knowledge of us can always be present in our lives.  The tidy and efficient "fall from grace" is actually not a curse, but a calling to us to get off our duffs and partner with G in cleaning up the problems with human health, hunger and other parts of well being which can include learning from science in all the medical fields. In my Bible, between the OT and NT is a group of books called The Apocrypha, and one of those books actually speaks of wisdom that G keeps trying to lead us to by calling Physicians and Pharmacists to aid us and be partners with G for our care and improved lives.  

 

*I love the hymn All Things Bright And Beautiful and the stanza that goes "All things bright and beautiful, all creatures great and small, all things wise and wonderful, the Lord God made them all!"

Link to comment
9 hours ago, VickySGV said:

One part of me says to stay out of this, since I am an Episcopalian which many many conservatives think is the epitome of Hell bound liberalism, but I did grow up through early college in a very conservative church environment. 

 

 

 

*I love the hymn All Things Bright And Beautiful and the stanza that goes "All things bright and beautiful, all creatures great and small, all things wise and wonderful, the Lord God made them all!"

I will say this: I suggest that the part of your post I deleted could do better on another thread and contains a lot of material that would tempt me to hijack this thread in favor of that.  Too much coffee in my system or something. :)

 

One of the saddest things in the church is the division between liberals and conservatives, one favoring social action, the other personal salvation.  Both are needed, and reconciliation is, as well.  So I will state that I do not think the Episcopal church is the epitome of Hell bound liberalism.  That does not mean I agree with them, but neither will I "other" Episcopalians or other liberals.

 

I love that hymn as well.

Link to comment
  • 3 weeks later...

I absolutely disagree with the idea that God makes people to be transgender.  Genesis 1:27 says that God made people - male and female He created them.  Plural.  As in...people generally.  Also notice that God creates animals according to their kinds, and that Creation was orderly.  I don't find the "both/or/and" interpretation to be consistent with God's personality as described in Scripture.  God doesn't seem to operate with ambiguity.  It feels like using "lawyer language" to find something that isn't there. 

 

I do not believe that God made me as I am...intersex/trans, unable to reproduce naturally, and with wacky plumbing inside me that by some miracle manages to still work.  I believe that while God gives the soul, our biological life has been an ongoing natural process after Creation, something which He chooses not to control.  Yes, God is omniscient, omnipotent, omnipresent, and all that.  But He voluntarily limits Himself in our world in this time.  He doesn't make everything or fix everything... cancer and war and such are proof of that.  If you believe in God creating people intentionally to be transgender, then you might also believe God intentionally creating some kids as disabled, or some to be stillborn. 

 

I believe the path forward for Christians is to recognize and accept the effects of Original Sin upon all creation. There's a difference between God avoiding involvement/manipulation and actively creating a situation.  God doesn't make mistakes...but at this point, there are a lot of things that God simply doesn't make at all.  I don't believe He is as detached from Creation as the Deist "watchmaker analogy," but I don't believe He is controlling every little detail either.  There's a balance, sort of.  Disagree if you want - people have debated the issue of control, free will, and creation for centuries....it will continue to be discussed until the end of time.

 

I'm not sure if I was supposed to be a boy or a girl.  I guess when I get to the afterlife, I'll find out.  Because all the crap that happens here due to original sin and a broken system will be fixed.  The world will be set right, and I believe we'll all be either male or female as God originally wanted.  Some of us might be surprised at what that looks like.  As for me, I'll be happy with either.  I just want to fit in my body. 

 

 

Link to comment
1 hour ago, awkward-yet-sweet said:

I absolutely disagree with the idea that God makes people to be transgender.  Genesis 1:27 says that God made people - male and female He created them.  Plural.  As in...people generally.  Also notice that God creates animals according to their kinds, and that Creation was orderly.  I don't find the "both/or/and" interpretation to be consistent with God's personality as described in Scripture.  God doesn't seem to operate with ambiguity.  It feels like using "lawyer language" to find something that isn't there. 

 

I do not believe that God made me as I am...intersex/trans, unable to reproduce naturally, and with wacky plumbing inside me that by some miracle manages to still work.  I believe that while God gives the soul, our biological life has been an ongoing natural process after Creation, something which He chooses not to control.  Yes, God is omniscient, omnipotent, omnipresent, and all that.  But He voluntarily limits Himself in our world in this time.  He doesn't make everything or fix everything... cancer and war and such are proof of that.  If you believe in God creating people intentionally to be transgender, then you might also believe God intentionally creating some kids as disabled, or some to be stillborn. 

 

I believe the path forward for Christians is to recognize and accept the effects of Original Sin upon all creation. There's a difference between God avoiding involvement/manipulation and actively creating a situation.  God doesn't make mistakes...but at this point, there are a lot of things that God simply doesn't make at all.  I don't believe He is as detached from Creation as the Deist "watchmaker analogy," but I don't believe He is controlling every little detail either.  There's a balance, sort of.  Disagree if you want - people have debated the issue of control, free will, and creation for centuries....it will continue to be discussed until the end of time.

 

I'm not sure if I was supposed to be a boy or a girl.  I guess when I get to the afterlife, I'll find out.  Because all the crap that happens here due to original sin and a broken system will be fixed.  The world will be set right, and I believe we'll all be either male or female as God originally wanted.  Some of us might be surprised at what that looks like.  As for me, I'll be happy with either.  I just want to fit in my body. 

 

 

God is not the author of evil.  The world is fallen - one of the few things everyone agrees on is that not everything is right with this world.  There is agency that can act contrary to His will.  And there is the promise that He will work all things for good for those who love Him, who are called according to His purpose.  Rom 8:28. 

 

Beyond that, I don't know.  Sometimes I say He made me transgender and sometimes I say it is the result of the fall. In either case the truth is governed by my previous paragraph.

Link to comment
8 hours ago, awkward-yet-sweet said:

I absolutely disagree with the idea that God makes people to be transgender.  Genesis 1:27 says that God made people - male and female He created them.  Plural.  As in...people generally.  Also notice that God creates animals according to their kinds, and that Creation was orderly.  I don't find the "both/or/and" interpretation to be consistent with God's personality as described in Scripture.  God doesn't seem to operate with ambiguity.  It feels like using "lawyer language" to find something that isn't there. 

 

I do not believe that God made me as I am...intersex/trans, unable to reproduce naturally, and with wacky plumbing inside me that by some miracle manages to still work.  I believe that while God gives the soul, our biological life has been an ongoing natural process after Creation, something which He chooses not to control.  Yes, God is omniscient, omnipotent, omnipresent, and all that.  But He voluntarily limits Himself in our world in this time.  He doesn't make everything or fix everything... cancer and war and such are proof of that.  If you believe in God creating people intentionally to be transgender, then you might also believe God intentionally creating some kids as disabled, or some to be stillborn. 

 

I believe the path forward for Christians is to recognize and accept the effects of Original Sin upon all creation. There's a difference between God avoiding involvement/manipulation and actively creating a situation.  God doesn't make mistakes...but at this point, there are a lot of things that God simply doesn't make at all.  I don't believe He is as detached from Creation as the Deist "watchmaker analogy," but I don't believe He is controlling every little detail either.  There's a balance, sort of.  Disagree if you want - people have debated the issue of control, free will, and creation for centuries....it will continue to be discussed until the end of time.

 

I'm not sure if I was supposed to be a boy or a girl.  I guess when I get to the afterlife, I'll find out.  Because all the crap that happens here due to original sin and a broken system will be fixed.  The world will be set right, and I believe we'll all be either male or female as God originally wanted.  Some of us might be surprised at what that looks like.  As for me, I'll be happy with either.  I just want to fit in my body. 

 

 

This is the crux of my anguish these many, many months (years!) and where I go back-and-forth with my own journey ... I was born a biological male. No denying that in my case. But I have a lot of internal feminine leanings and external ones, too. I prefer to wear women's clothes 100 percent of the time (if I could). I wish I had the female plumbing. I long for that badly sometimes. I don't know why or where that came from but no denying that either. I have started HRT because I like the idea of having a more feminine physical body and some of the "perks" that go with that. I just asked my doc to up my dose to the next level today!

 

So the big question I ask myself is: am I knowingly disobeying God, who likes order and made humans male and female, by taking these steps? This is my wife's take on things. "You are sinning. You know God made you a male biologically. Yet you are willfully pursuing transition to being something God didn't intend you to be regardless of what you feel inside, what your preferences are, etc."  I keep trying to tell her it's much more complex than that but sometimes I don't even know what I think...

 

This ties up in knots and makes me angry and makes me feel stuck!!! I don't want to disobey my Creator and Savior and yet I have this strong, strong leaning toward the feminine in many ways (that keeps getting stronger and refuses to go away no matter how much I have tried to stuff it away!!) ... It feels like misery no matter which path I take - if I "give in" to the feminine, which I have been doing a lot the past 12 months or so, am I endangering my soul? Am I creating scandal? Yet the thought of putting the feminine aside feels, at times, like death too (or is it just me being self-centered and unwilling to bend the knee to my Creator who would ask me to give this up as a testament to my love for him...

 

I don't know. I don't know. I don't know!! But sometimes I really really F***ing hate this quandary... 

Link to comment
23 minutes ago, EasyE said:

So the big question I ask myself is: am I knowingly disobeying God, who likes order and made humans male and female, by taking these steps? This is my wife's take on things. "You are sinning. You know God made you a male biologically. Yet you are willfully pursuing transition to being something God didn't intend you to be regardless of what you feel inside, what your preferences are, etc." 

 

I think many Christians end up with a false dichotomy.  If we didn't choose to be how we are, then something in our environment did it. Is going along with it a sin?  Maybe.  But if so, its one of those times where we mess something up no matter what we do.  Part of the imperfect nature of this fallen world is that there are times where we'll sin no matter what we do.  In a no-win scenario like that, we do the wisest thing possible with our free will. 

Link to comment

I think the grace and lace letters are terrific.  I put a link in one thread; when I have time I will post it here.

 

I have the same struggle at times.  I have dug into the theology on anti-trans, for want of a better word, and every time I have come away more convinced that they don't know what they are talking about.  Excellent theologians do not necessarily make great plumbers, or something like that. Yet many listen to them on this, because they are good at theology. So they must be good plumbers.

Link to comment
On 4/8/2024 at 1:17 AM, VickySGV said:

One part of me says to stay out of this…

Yeah…  As an exvangelical in my case.

Guess I'll listen to that part of me this time.

Link to comment

One FB post from an old friend who lives 250 miles away and has no idea of any of this, and a news article this morning about someone with multiple mental problems  assert that transgender people are controlled by demons.

 

Me not happy.  Can't reason with some people.

Link to comment
13 minutes ago, Abigail Genevieve said:

transgender people are controlled by demons.

image.thumb.png.685ad133e3cfa08ba03b564aed9086a3.png

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   8 Members, 0 Anonymous, 107 Guests (See full list)

    • RaineOnYourParade
    • Timi
    • Karen Carey
    • Mmindy
    • Betty K
    • Ivy
    • Petra Jane
    • VickySGV
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.8k
    • Total Posts
      770.5k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,115
    • Most Online
      8,356

    Tiffany Cross
    Newest Member
    Tiffany Cross
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alex Blitzen
      Alex Blitzen
    2. ARK
      ARK
      (37 years old)
    3. Beverley50
      Beverley50
      (58 years old)
    4. Em
      Em
    5. Jlandry1970
      Jlandry1970
  • Posts

    • VickySGV
      I for one am actually pleased with how this one played out.  Local issues need to remain local and I am not on the States Rights bandwagon for all cases.  The facts of the matter did not constitute a case or controversy since the plaintiffs did not show actual or immediately impending harm to their children.  Now if the parents can show that the child had developed some type of sleep and eating disorder because they were in a bathroom with a Trans child or are involved in self harm over the idea (which is probably the parent's doing and not the school) then there might be something of a case or controversy for the court to take up.   I have six text books on U.S. Constitutional Law grinning down evilly at me that all say the SCOTUS should avoid this type of case, and shows where they have done it consistently for a couple of centuries. 
    • Ladypcnj
      When I was a kid growing up, I was considered the baby sibling of the family. I was often the last to know of everything, and since I wasn't old enough just yet to stay home by myself, I had to tagged along with my family members who drove their cars, this included going to church. I never knew other religions existed; all I knew was about the teachings of Christianity. It's easy to join a church, but what if things aren't what it appears to be than what is preached? Strange things began going on at the church in which group leaders didn't want the news media to know about it, such as an almost drowning during a baptizing among other things. The preacher/minister began to sense I wanted out of the cult. Followers that was nice to me in the beginning, was now talking behind my back, not encouraging me to find another church that I would feel more spiritually connected to.     
    • Ivy
      An option to opt out is one thing, but removing the content entirely (for everyone) is something different.  I don't think it's beneficial to isolate one's kids from the broader culture since they are going to have to live in it eventually.  If something about it bothers you, you need to explain why.  Pretending it doesn't exist is a disservice to them.   In my (and my ex's) more conservative past, we considered homeschooling.  But we also realized our kids had to live in the broader culture and needed the socialization. Two of my adult children do homeschool now.  I have mixed feelings about that. Another of them is a public school teacher.   I personally would prefer that scarce resources not be diverted from public education.  The current move against public education bothers me.  For many kids it's all they have. 
    • April Marie
      Looking in the mirror brings joy.   The woman smiles back at me.
    • Charlize
      Perhaps a bit of light might exist if i look at this as a further verification that simply disliking the existence of a school's policy is not a reason to sue.  The rights of these parents or their children are not harmed.  They simply cannot dictate policy because of dubious beliefs.   Hugs,   Charlize
    • Mmindy
      Life has its twist, and who knows what the future holds. She may only want to know your family and medical history’s long term chronic health history. Then again she may become your biggest supporter in your current life situation.   I am an optimist. So much so that if you put me in a room full of puppy poo, I’m going to look for the puppies.    Hugs and best wishes,   Mindy🌈🐛🏳️‍⚧️🦋
    • Charlize
      Managing a support group takes a great deal of work.  When i found this site there were ,to my knowledge, only 2 sites that supported anyone whose gender was out of the "norm".  I had searched before and only found porn.  i'd almost given up. I hope that you are finding what you need here.   Hugs,   Charlize
    • RaineOnYourParade
      This also isn't necessarily trans-positive in itself. They're just saying the case doesn't have strong enough ground to sue because the plaintiff didn't bring enough evidence to court. Basically, that could mean that, rather than not wanting to do the case, they feel that there is insufficient information given to do so. By leaving the suit be, it also leaves no precedent for future cases to be built off of. This just leaves holes for court to get messier in the future. Precedent is essential in all types of cases. Giving a ruling, one way or another, would be pretty essential to building cases of the same nature in the future. By letting this go, they aren't really supporting trans people -- they're just dismissing the issue all together, which, in reality, doesn't help either side of it. 
    • RaineOnYourParade
      I don't personally agree with people opting out of LGBT education, but I suppose it would depend on the context it was taught in. Parents do have the right to opt their children out of sex ed and such for various reasons, so if it was taught in line with sex ed (which would make sense, as those classes also cover puberty as well as sometimes relationship health, so it would be about in-line with how heterosexual students are taught about their own types of relationships), I would understand them then being able to opt out. Similarly, parents often have options to opt their child out of reading books with "disturbing" content, so if the novels chosen for LGBT discussion have a large focus on homophobia/etc., an opt-out option might be made available due to the intensity of the content rather than the content itself. I've seen these for books like To Kill a Mockingbird and All-American Boys that discuss racism in-depth, as some parents might not be comfortable with their child/teenager reading intense content. I disagree with the choices to opt-out of reading these books since I think they're important, but I do understand why they're provided.   So, I think whether an opt-out option would be provided for these topics would depend on the way that they were presented. I didn't see anything in the article saying where the topics were being presented (though correct me if I'm wrong). Are they being talked about in sex ed or in content that may be considered disturbing? In that case, it wouldn't necessarily be LGBT-phobic legislation, per se -- It's about in line with what is in line for dozens of topics. 
    • Birdie
      I feel much better after a nice nap, breakfast, and a cup of tea.    I go to see a specialist today at the hospital, so I won't be at the day-centre till this afternoon. ☺️
    • RaineOnYourParade
      G'morning! Green tea for my morning beverage. My mom made me eat breakfast so I could take a pill... and now I feel sick, thanks to my weird stomach .-.   Stomach issues aside, I signed up for a story gift exchange a little while ago and just got in the story with four minutes to spare! Liiiiittle close for comfort, but, hey, it's in!   We're at that point in the school year where we aren't doing much. AP testing is done for my history class, so we're watching a WWII film rn (Dunkirk). My college course is already over as well (the semester ends earlier), so I've really only got two classes to worry about, and one of those is an art class. Lowest stress I've had all year.
    • Heather Shay
      Another Hidden Treasure I heard for the first time today. Well written, wonderful vocals and nice instrumental work throughot and even covered two Dalton and Dubarri songs.  
    • Ladypcnj
      I noticed that there is not too many online intersex support groups?  
    • Lydia_R
    • Heather Shay
      Which emotion seems to be the strongest in your life and is it good or bad?
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...