Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Project 2025


Abigail Genevieve

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, Abigail Genevieve said:

It is not Trump centered.

Nope.  He is merely a tool for them to get a foot in the door.  Any other "conservative" president would be fine - on the off chance he doesn't actually run.

Trump's "policies" change with his whims.  Look how he's trying to back peddle on abortion.  The only thing he stands for is himself.

Link to comment
  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Abigail Genevieve

    27

  • Ivy

    12

  • MaeBe

    7

  • awkward-yet-sweet

    4

1 hour ago, Ivy said:

Nope.  He is merely a tool for them to get a foot in the door.  Any other "conservative" president would be fine - on the off chance he doesn't actually run.

Trump's "policies" change with his whims.  Look how he's trying to back peddle on abortion.  The only thing he stands for is himself.

I think there is some truth in this.  They intend to implement Project 2025, whether or not he spends his energies persecuting the Democrats who have been persecuting him (in his view, a debatable point) and does nothing else.

 

I have seen numerous accusations that the document is about "Trumpism", whatever that is, and is merely a vehicle for him to become dictator.  From what I have read so far, that is the same sort of truth as the Steele Dossier, denying the validity of a certain laptop, Schiff's non-existence evidence of collaboration and a host of other things, many directly from Biden, that are simply not true.

 

I will continue reading it. 

Link to comment

I'm hoping to read the next section today.  Many of the reforms they are calling for are good, such as expediting the military procurement process, and have nothing to do with transgender issues.

Link to comment

Only three, maybe four, sections even mention transgender.  Most is a conservative agenda I have no problem with.

 

In the sections that mention transgender, there are very few lines.  Those lines ARE problematic, in every case. Unequivocally.  I can't see some of them standing up in court.  In one case a recommended policy goes against a court decision, which strongly suggests the implementation of that policy would be stopped in court. 

 

Anyone maintaining that this is written simply to support Trump, to support him becoming a dictator, to crush transgender people is feeding you a line.  Nor is it an attempt to erase transgender people.

 

People will have to decide if the overall goals are worth the few problematic statements.  Overall, I support it.  Of course, I have some reservations.

Link to comment
31 minutes ago, Abigail Genevieve said:

Only three, maybe four, sections even mention transgender.  Most is a conservative agenda I have no problem with.

 

In the sections that mention transgender, there are very few lines.  Those lines ARE problematic, in every case. Unequivocally.

True, most of it has nothing to do directly with us.  It's the parts that do that are the problem.

 

34 minutes ago, Abigail Genevieve said:

People will have to decide if the overall goals are worth the few problematic statements.

I see the  few problematic statements as being a big problem.  Just because a lot of it may be okay, doesn't change that.

Even supposing the rest of it might be good for the country, it doesn't help me if I'm being "eradicated".  I suppose I should be good with that, because it's for the "greater good".  If me being gone would please a number of people, then it's my civic duty to disappear, and vote to implement that.

Link to comment

If 9 out of 10 parts are ok, that doesn't mean I need to accept the bad parts (that are aimed directly at me).  That seems suicidal.

Link to comment
13 minutes ago, Ivy said:

If 9 out of 10 parts are ok, that doesn't mean I need to accept the bad parts (that are aimed directly at me).  That seems suicidal.

Nothing about eradicating TG folk. 

Link to comment
7 minutes ago, Abigail Genevieve said:

Nothing about eradicating TG folk

Not in so many words, therefore it's not there at all.  Excuse my paranoia.

And the states passing laws against us are nothing to worry about either.

Having to change my gender back to male (like in Florida) is reasonable.  I should just accept it, I mean I was born with a dk.  So that "F" is lie, and a fraud.  My delusions need to be dealt with for my own good.

 

I'm just frustrated these days.  Just a bit of a rant.

Link to comment
7 minutes ago, Ivy said:

Not in so many words, therefore it's not there at all.  Excuse my paranoia.

And the states passing laws against us are nothing to worry about either.

Having to change my gender back to male (like in Florida) is reasonable.  I should just accept it, I mean I was born with a dk.  So that "F" is lie, and a fraud.  My delusions need to be dealt with for my own good.

 

I'm just frustrated these days.  Just a bit of a rant.

Rants are not a problem.  My favorite hobby! :)

 

What's out there is bad enough that I wonder why some people feel they need to embellish it.  Be alert.

 

Some of this will need to be fought in court if they try to implement it. If people are out to get me, paranoia is justified.  And this may not be the only document.

 

Abby

Link to comment

Over here muttering about "a new Jim Crow against a persecuted minority."

 

 

Link to comment

It is the made up ideology they believe trans people are pushing on the world, those “poor young girls who are being coerced into believing they are men” and the “perverts who put on dresses and think they’re girls”. The anti-LGBTQ+ movement came up with the term. Being trans = you believe in trans ideology/transgenderism, supporting trans people = the same.

 

In the end anyone that acts on or thinks gender is anything but what is in your pants is a “transgenderist”, why not make it a word if it’s not, there is no real grey area. Unless you acknowledge there is transgenderism, but use your knowledge to “correct it”.  So I guess there could be transgenderist conversion “therapists”. 

Face it, we deface the America they want. Land of the Free and Home of the Brave? I think being out and queer is pretty brave. And freedom shouldn’t just be for those who push a narrow “Christian ideology” as the “true” governing model.

Link to comment
4 hours ago, Abigail Genevieve said:

Anyone maintaining that this is written simply to support Trump, to support him becoming a dictator, to crush transgender people is feeding you a line.  Nor is it an attempt to erase transgender people.

It’s never been about him, but he is the Presidential nominee for the Presidency that starts in…2025. I don’t see a lot of conflation that this is a “Trump doctrine”, it a doctrine that benefits him surely, but it is a plan to instill crony governance and enact very Christian conservative (if not purely Christian nationalist) “order” on the country. If you don’t see this as the Right doubling down on Big G government, I don’t know what to tell them. Getting rid of agencies and giving the authority directly to the Executive isn’t shrinking government. It’s consolidation power. 

Link to comment
3 minutes ago, MaeBe said:

 Getting rid of agencies and giving the authority directly to the Executive isn’t shrinking government. It’s consolidation power. 

The agencies are supposed to work for him.  The problem, as conservatives found out in Trump 1, was they will ignore the president and do their own thing.  The agencies are supposed to be under his control.

 

Congress delegated some of its law making authority to the agencies, which is another problem.

 

The bloated federal government needs to be trimmed.  Dept Education is worthless - test scores have dropped since it was instituted in the Carter administration consistently, and it is currently implementing Biden's woke agenda more than doing anything else.

Link to comment
17 minutes ago, MaeBe said:

And freedom shouldn’t just be for those who push a narrow “Christian ideology” as the “true” governing model.

I don't think it should be.  Nor do I see Project 2025 as pushing Christian nationalism.

Link to comment
55 minutes ago, Ivy said:

Biden's woke agenda?

What about it?

Link to comment

I am not sure why people are in favor of unaccountable agencies with bloated budgets and wasteful spending. 

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Ivy said:

Biden's woke agenda?

For one thing, the practice of putting into office wholly unqualified people simply because of racial, sexual or national characteristics.  It is no accident that Karine is a Haitian immigrant, Black and lesbian.  Kamala Harris is a Black female. Pete Buttigieg is gay.  Often you find that Biden explicitly stated that this is why he hired them, not because of competence, but because they checked so many boxes on his little list.  It makes a mockery of people and is a disservice to the US. 

Link to comment

Let’s stick to cite-able fact. Most of my posts have been directly in relation to LGBTQ+ rights as it pertains to P2025 and I have drawn direct links between people, their quotes, and their agenda. I have made reference to the cronyism that P2025 would entail as well, by gutting, not cutting, broad swathes of government and replacing it with “conservative warriors” (I can get you the direct quote, but rest assured it’s a quote). All this does is constantly force the cogs to be refitted, not their movement. To say that agencies have directly defied a President is a bit much, the EPA did what Trump told them to do at the direct harm to the environment, the department of agriculture did the same by enacting the administrations forced move to KC which decimated the USDA
 

 

54 minutes ago, Abigail Genevieve said:

It makes a mockery of people and is a disservice to the US. 

How about Betsy DeVoss for Education? Or Bannon for anything? What about the revolving Chief of Staff position that Trump couldn’t stay filled? Or the Postmaster General, who did much to make the USPS worse?

 

Let’s not mix politics with racism, sexism, or any other ism. Because Trump made mainly white, male, appointments—many of them not, arguably, people fit for service—or unwilling to commit to term. I can argue this because, again, he’s up for election and will do what he did before (and more of the same, his words).

 

Please delineate how the selected diversity appointments have negatively affected the US, other than being black, women, or queer? Representation matters and America benefits when its people are inspired and empowered.

Link to comment

Our government is huge and could, and probably should, be streamlined.

But we are living in 2024, and not the late 18th century.  The founders did provide for updating the Sacred Constitution.  And it has been done on occasion.

 

There is a lot going on, and I don't want to be a single issue voter.  But I feel that it is being forced on me as a matter of my survival.

Link to comment
15 minutes ago, Abigail Genevieve said:

This suggests some of the problematic policies would be unenforceable if implementation were attempted. 

 

https://www.erininthemorning.com/p/4th-circuit-gender-identity-is-a?publication_id=994764&post_id=144139815&isFreemail=true&r=rebf4&triedRedirect=true

 

That's a Circuit (Circus) court ruling.  Which is essentially temporary.  Most everything right now is temporary, as the Supreme Court hasn't gotten around to dealing with all the various trans-related issues from the last few years.  I really, really wish they would just bite the bullet and do their thing.  It would save us from the constant tug-of-war. "The sky is falling!".... "No it isn't.".... "But there's crap coming down."....."It landed east of here"  Whether it ends up being good or bad, I wish they'd just lance the boil and let us either have a tyranny we can fight against or a republic we don't mind living in.  Mediocrity is irritating.

Link to comment
9 minutes ago, awkward-yet-sweet said:

 

That's a Circuit (Circus) court ruling.  Which is essentially temporary.  Most everything right now is temporary, as the Supreme Court hasn't gotten around to dealing with all the various trans-related issues from the last few years.  I really, really wish they would just bite the bullet and do their thing.  It would save us from the constant tug-of-war. "The sky is falling!".... "No it isn't.".... "But there's crap coming down."....."It landed east of here"  Whether it ends up being good or bad, I wish they'd just lance the boil and let us either have a tyranny we can fight against or a republic we don't mind living in.  Mediocrity is irritating.

I fenced my posting of the link.  Yep.

Link to comment
4 hours ago, Abigail Genevieve said:

This suggests some of the problematic policies would be unenforceable if implementation were attempted. 

 

https://www.erininthemorning.com/p/4th-circuit-gender-identity-is-a?publication_id=994764&post_id=144139815&isFreemail=true&r=rebf4&triedRedirect=true

Or they could live and let live and not clog the courts with games of roulette? To absolve the attempt based on a perceived chance of success is gambling in another guise.

 

Sure, it could all be marketing to gin up the base, but we see it constantly getting pushed at the local, State, and Federal levels. Don’t we want lawmakers focused on issues of import? Maybe we’re a distraction, but that means we become social targets. If we’re really just a side show game to them, they obviously don’t give a damn what the repercussions are for us; we’re just lambs for slaughter. So why support people or adjacent policies that do that to us? Why believe these jaguars won’t eat your face when they tell you that, if they can, they will?

Link to comment
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 92 Guests (See full list)

    • Birdie
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.8k
    • Total Posts
      770.5k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,115
    • Most Online
      8,356

    Tiffany Cross
    Newest Member
    Tiffany Cross
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alex Blitzen
      Alex Blitzen
    2. ARK
      ARK
      (37 years old)
    3. Beverley50
      Beverley50
      (58 years old)
    4. Em
      Em
    5. Jlandry1970
      Jlandry1970
  • Posts

    • Birdie
      Frustrating day yesterday.....   It seems the centre had used the "lack of enough prep time", and "you must get a full shower to be able to attend" to basically get their way. It is what it is, because I basically have no defence.   I did mention that female participants are scheduled with enough time for their hair and makeup, but their response was of course, "you are not female."   I can either abide by the rules or leave the program.    I did file a complaint yesterday about years of excruciating pain I endured in my leg that their doctor accused me of "inventing" because I "didn't have anything wrong with it." And how after vascular surgery the horrible pain has finally departed.  How it is absolutely absurd that medical professionals can minimise someone's pain like it doesn't exist.    Their reply, "well, at least your were finally seen by a specialist and taken care of."   The meeting did not go well!   So starting today I have two options. Either cut my hair off or wear it in a ponytail. I shall go with the ponytail. I will also let my hair grow until it reaches my hips, and I told them that as well. As long as it's in a ponytail at will be acceptable. 
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      I disagree with this...I don't think it is good news to tell parents they can't opt their kids out of sex/gender instruction at ages they feel are inappropriate, or that violate their faith.    However, perhaps some good will come out of this.  I hope it totally destabilizes public education, or at least yields robust state voucher programs so parents who can't afford to homeschool can send their kids elsewhere.  It might even encourage some folks to move to areas where they fit better.  One of my husband's friends lives in Montgomery County, and has two kids in the school system there.  They've been talking about leaving, long before this, for multiple reasons.  
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      Its after midnight, so... good morning?   Looks like no traveling for me this week.  Some of the expected orders from Houston never materialized, so there are fewer shipments going out.  Instead of having to help out with transport, my husband gets to stay home.  Not that I'll miss Texas, but I was looking forward to some road time.  Oh well. 
    • Carolyn Marie
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      If the Supreme Court isn't taking on this case or many others, I would guess that it isn't as "conservative" as many folks fear.    However, I wonder if the reality is worse.  I'd prefer a ruling either way, just to settle this stuff so we know where we stand.  By leaving things relatively undecided, they're prolonging social upheaval....we're being used as a distraction.
    • Carolyn Marie
      https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/20/politics/supreme-court-transgender-montgomery-county-maryland/index.html     Carolyn Marie
    • MaeBe
      They may feel disappointed or aggrieved, but that's on them. It's on society really.   In the end, who should really care other than you and the higher power(s) you believe in? I haven't been a willful volunteer at all in my adult life (if ever), I surely did so as a youth but can you consider that willful if you're required to? Since allowing this part of me to shine I have been more active in the community, volunteering and participating in society in ways I never did before. Perhaps you'll feel the same when you allow yourself to.   My wife and my kids all see me and how I've changed. I haven't hidden it away from them, but I realize I may have lucked out with their general acceptance. Where the struggle comes is from my internal fight with putting it out in the world. "What are your pronouns? Have you changed your name?" are all asked of me and it feels like a lot when I just want to be me, but I understand where it comes from. That is why I resolved to register as my nickname and use She/Her at the HRC conference, because I owe it to myself to have permission to embody who am I. Now it's just finding a new job as this person that I am and not the person I thought I was--not eschewing the past, but realizing that there's no reason to feel that that was a better me.   It wasn't.
    • EasyE
      Bingo for me!!. In some ways I wish it were more cut and dry. Like some folks on here who knew when they were 2 years old that they were a girl (and everyone else around them knew too). I don't have that. I do have a fascination & enchantment with the feminine that started very young. It is both something I am attracted to (like tonight at Target I couldn't keep my eyes off all the beautiful females in my midst) and something I aspire to be and connect with at a deep level.    For me, there has always been a drive to express this feminine dimension outwardly through clothing. I can see that thread from all the way back when I was a kid. I have always wanted to wear girls/women's underwear. And I have always pushed the boundaries of wanting to wear girl stuff under my clothes, though I've known that if I ever got caught (in high school, on my swim team, by my wife!) there would be hell to pay...   This drive continued through college, into adulthood, into marriage (even though I thought that would solve it because I could finally be intimate with a woman and it not be a "sin")... I always felt such shame about this part of me until about two years ago I finally started asking myself, "what is so wrong with this?" Once I gave myself permission to explore this further, and with the help of a therapist who for the first time validated my experience instead of shaming me, my "egg cracked" and the embers were fanned into a wildfire (sorry about all the mixed metaphors, lol)...    Now I have a whole closet and drawers full of women's clothes (many of which I only wear when I am alone), I am separated from my wife, my kids have an inkling of my feminine side but not much more than that, and I am two months into "covert" HRT wondering when/if there will come a day of reckoning when it becomes obvious what I am doing...    I guess deep down I just feel like a misfit and that my life could have been/could be so much more impactful and that I am a giant disappointment to everyone around me... 
    • Lydia_R
      I made the pumpkin pie this morning.  I like getting older and getting better at making this pie crust.  I've never purchased a pre-made pie crust.  I make 3-4 pies a year.  Mostly pumpkin pies, but apple and blackberry when those come into season.  For about 15 years, I was buying about 2 medium carving pumpkins a year and cooking/pureeing them and putting them in 2c measurements into the freezer.  I started getting lazy a few years ago and am just doing cans of pumpkin now.    
    • Lydia_R
      "Children growing up, old friends growing older.  Freeze this moment a little bit longer.  Make each sensation a little bit stronger." -Neil Peart   Dead bat x2
    • Ladypcnj
      My parents didn't show me my birth certificate until I started going to school, in the meantime until that happened,   I was mostly seen wearing boys' clothes, but my mannerisms mostly female without the use of hormones. My parents thought I was going through as phase, until one day things took a physical turn in my puberty years, which resulted in a family car ride to the hospital emergency. I had my share examinations, treating doctors could not come up a diagnosis what was happening to me. I would soon discover I was born with a hidden variation or undescended, which could had been ovaries inside. Things got to the point which resulted in surgery, I didn't know about. I asked for my surgical medical records, but access denied. So, I live with a surgical scar, and take medication.  
    • kristinabee
      It's something John Green said somewhat recently referring to the Emily Dickenson poem "Hope Is the Thing With Feathers." The poems first stanza reads   “Hope is the thing with feathers - That perches in the soul - And sings the tune without the words - And never stops - at all -"   It's a beautiful and helpful poem, but what was life changing for me was what John Green said in relation to the poem. "Emily Dickenson doesn't say that one never stops hearing the song of hope, only that it doesn't stop playing... The song of hope is still singing. And I know you can't hear it, but one day soon you will."
    • Ladypcnj
      another link that helped me: Intersex Support and Advocacy Groups Around the World (interactadvocates.org)
    • Ladypcnj
      I like shopping for fashion clothes, finding something nobody else is wearing 
    • Adrianna Danielle
      Going to have a paternity test done tommorrow.Having someone come up and get a sample from me.I remember having unprotected sex with her.Her daughter,she seen a picture of me going to adjust well her supposed dad is now a woman
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...