Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Transgender Movement At A Crossroads: Poll On Hrc


Guest

Peace with HRC?  

32 members have voted

  1. 1. Should The Transgender Community make peace with HRC?

    • Yes
      13
    • No
      10
    • Undecided
      9
  2. 2. Should the Transgender Community go it alone and drop the "T" from LGB?

    • Yes
      11
    • No
      17
    • Undecided
      4
  3. 3. Should the Transgender Community accept financial or other help from HRC?

    • Yes
      14
    • No
      6
    • Undecided
      12


Recommended Posts

Here's an interesting article and opinion about the TRansgender Communities fight against HRC http://www.baywindows.com/index.php?ch=col...3=&id=54944 that should spark a debate. Some say we should go it alone without them. Others say we should stick together. There are several articles about this in the Transgender news on the site. http://www.lauras-playground.com/trans_news.htm

Intrestingly my email is pretty much evenly split when it comes to the Transgender Community making peace with HRC. What do you think?

Laura

Link to comment
Guest Leah1026

I think the HRC can not be trusted period. They clearly don't get the implications of what they've done (unnecessarily split the community over a flawed bill that will NEVER see the light of day with Bush in the White House) At last count we had over 300 organizations that supported us. The HRC stands alone and IMO should be shunned for throwing us under the bus.

I am still VERY, VERY angry at the HRC, Barney Frank and Nancy Pelosi over this whole fiasco.

:angry::angry::angry::angry::angry::angry: X infinity (well almost)

Three cheers for Rep Tammy Baldwin for standing up for us.

Link to comment
  • 2 weeks later...
Guest savagedm

what happened? I have been busy with my nose up my industrializing nations term projects so domestic news has not really been much of a concern for me haha

Link to comment
Guest Leah1026
what happened? I have been busy with my nose up my industrializing nations term projects so domestic news has not really been much of a concern for me haha

Looooonnnnggggg story.

1969: Stonewall Rebellion. This is the beginning of the modern gay/lesbian movement. But guess who started it all? Trans people, but that inconvenient truth is lost on many today.

1970's: First attempt at getting an ENDA (Employment Non Discrimination Act) passed. We were the first casualties of this effort and thrown under the bus.

Late 70's: We (MtF's) become vilified by Janice Raymond and other radical feminists.

80's: A bad time for us period.

Early 90's: We start to re-organize and start assimilating back into the community, which adds the letter T, as in GBLT.

1994: The second betrayal. As a new effort is being made to create a new version ENDA, gets who gets thrown under the bus again?

Late 90's-early 00's: We reorganize again. The internet allows us to do this like never before. We make ourselves heard!

Jan 2007: After intense lobbying we are included in the new proposed ENDA legislation. We are promised that we will stick together no matter what. We give lots of time and money to the effort and we testify before Congress.

Setp 26, 2007: Black Wednesday. In the days before ENDA will finally be formally introduced rumors fly that we're going to be thrown under the bus again. In the spring Rep Barney Frank (openly gay) had been made the chief sponsor of our bill. He had a history of transphobia, but people thought he was more educated now. WRONG. He announces that we are to be thrown under the bus AGAIN. His plan is to split ENDA in two (a gay part and a trans part) and submit both bills separately. He is immediately denounced by us and over 300 GBLT oprganization nationwide. Because of the ruckus the vote is delayed, but ultimately the spilt is formalized (2 separate bills). It's clear that Rep Frank and Rep Pelosi don't care about us, they just want to pass something as resume fodder. The new gay only ENDA is filled with loopholes that will make it ineffective, but our opponents won't be swayed. The fact that the bill will never be signed by Bush doesn't sway them either. It was a HUGE mess that was totally ignored by the press. It makes me sooooo angry.

More here:

http://blog.glad.org/2007/10/weakened-enda...s-no-sense.html

http://www.unitedenda.org/

ENDA Blog starts here:

http://endablog.wordpress.com/2007/10/page/9/

To sum up: It was an incredibly intense and disappointing chapter in GBLT history. We were betrayed by some allies and politicians. So much happened in those couple months it's almost impossible to document it all. The question now is how damaged is the community (GBLT) and can we get it together for a new push in 2009?

Link to comment
Guest savagedm

Well then we should just abandon them and take our own movement up. If others want to join us then they are welcome, but those that do not want us can go kick rocks.

Link to comment
  • 2 months later...
Guest Keri

It is unfortunate that during the limited time I have been going over the political movement for LBGT, and also the various organizations out there.... seems alot like the "T" gets merely lip service. Even my union's national "GLBT" group, which is supposed to be my advocate for possibly coming out, simply either does not understand 'T" or just doesn't want to deal with it - I was referred to HRC's site for their "coming out" brochure! Sad fact is if you're gay or lesbian, you're better off than being TG.... we're definitely the unwanted children.

Link to comment
  • 3 months later...
Guest RubyShana
It is unfortunate that during the limited time I have been going over the political movement for LBGT, and also the various organizations out there.... seems alot like the "T" gets merely lip service. Even my union's national "GLBT" group, which is supposed to be my advocate for possibly coming out, simply either does not understand 'T" or just doesn't want to deal with it - I was referred to HRC's site for their "coming out" brochure! Sad fact is if you're gay or lesbian, you're better off than being TG.... we're definitely the unwanted children.

QFT, Sister....qft....I found it was alot easier to come out as a "gay man" than a "straight woman in a mans body"....Gotta love labels, eh?

(QFT = Quoted for truth....I knew someone would ask so I just beat ya to the mark hehe :P)

Link to comment
  • 3 months later...
Guest Zoharstoi
Looooonnnnggggg story.

1969: Stonewall Rebellion. This is the beginning of the modern gay/lesbian movement. But guess who started it all? Trans people, but that inconvenient truth is lost on many today.

1970's: First attempt at getting an ENDA (Employment Non Discrimination Act) passed. We were the first casualties of this effort and thrown under the bus.

Late 70's: We (MtF's) become vilified by Janice Raymond and other radical feminists.

80's: A bad time for us period.

Early 90's: We start to re-organize and start assimilating back into the community, which adds the letter T, as in GBLT.

1994: The second betrayal. As a new effort is being made to create a new version ENDA, gets who gets thrown under the bus again?

Late 90's-early 00's: We reorganize again. The internet allows us to do this like never before. We make ourselves heard!

Jan 2007: After intense lobbying we are included in the new proposed ENDA legislation. We are promised that we will stick together no matter what. We give lots of time and money to the effort and we testify before Congress.

Setp 26, 2007: Black Wednesday. In the days before ENDA will finally be formally introduced rumors fly that we're going to be thrown under the bus again. In the spring Rep Barney Frank (openly gay) had been made the chief sponsor of our bill. He had a history of transphobia, but people thought he was more educated now. WRONG. He announces that we are to be thrown under the bus AGAIN. His plan is to split ENDA in two (a gay part and a trans part) and submit both bills separately. He is immediately denounced by us and over 300 GBLT oprganization nationwide. Because of the ruckus the vote is delayed, but ultimately the spilt is formalized (2 separate bills). It's clear that Rep Frank and Rep Pelosi don't care about us, they just want to pass something as resume fodder. The new gay only ENDA is filled with loopholes that will make it ineffective, but our opponents won't be swayed. The fact that the bill will never be signed by Bush doesn't sway them either. It was a HUGE mess that was totally ignored by the press. It makes me sooooo angry.

More here:

http://blog.glad.org/2007/10/weakened-enda...s-no-sense.html

http://www.unitedenda.org/

ENDA Blog starts here:

http://endablog.wordpress.com/2007/10/page/9/

To sum up: It was an incredibly intense and disappointing chapter in GBLT history. We were betrayed by some allies and politicians. So much happened in those couple months it's almost impossible to document it all. The question now is how damaged is the community (GBLT) and can we get it together for a new push in 2009?

:mellow: I have One Question, What group stands to gain from the split? I have read stories in New England paper's on third

parties starting "stuff" for some sort of gain.

I am new here and alway's ask WHY! :mellow:

Link to comment

I am extremely non-political, I avoid confrontations and politics as we know it is nothing but.

One of the problems that I see for being more accepted as a medical condition rather than a lifestyle choice is the fact that we are in the GBLT! For the uniformed this reinforces the idea that it is a choice and that it is directly linked to having sex as a different gender - after all the other three letters are all based on sexual preference - not gender!

While I can see that being part of a much larger group can be helpful in applying leverage, it seems that whenever it seems that we might cost them anything - we're gone anyway! Maybe we should be on our own, I haven't seen a lot of help from anybody else anyway!

But remember, I've been living with my head buried in the sand for my entire life!

Link to comment

In the beginning I felt unity was the way to go. That there was "strength in numbers". And there is strength in numbers I'm just not sure that our numbers are strengthing our cause anymore. Especially when , not only are we not getting any of the "group" benefits offered the rest of the letters -LGB- but we're actually being misused in some instances by oppenents of the LGB to justify continuing discriminaton against them while simultaneously undermining our own hope of being recognized as a part of the population battling a medical issue not an orientation issue and seeking legislation and seeking to be recognized for that not "sex and relationships".

I additonally realize the greatest obstacle we actually face is the mainstream fear of us transitioning successfully. To them it means the possibility of getting too close to "one of us" without knowing it and for them that is just a "horror". I think the greatest aid to any of us with this regard will be to give them opportunities to actually know/see us without it being for any "sensational" or controversial reason. Until transpeople aren't doing something "odd" for the gender they are living as I don't see the multitudes being ready to "open their arms in understanding." And I'm sorry but all the "deviating outside of the binary" and "abolishing the binary" etc. that some peeps want to do is not going to cut it if you want these people to buy what you're selling because (and I think some people overlook this) the gender that some people want to "rewrite" and "deconstruct" is already being lived in by a whoooole bunch of folks who like it just the way it is and don't want to be one of what it is they want to "make being a man be" or "make being a woman be". And honestly who are you to change someone else's gender's definition?

Link to comment
Guest Kelly Ann

Politics has plenty of very apt descriptions...Mark Twain and Will Rodgers were masters at it. Evan is, as per the usual, spot on in his assessment. Leah is immersed and more than versed with this issue. There's LOTS that smells about politics...and then leaves a bad taste afterwards that no amount of brushing or air sanitizer will remove. I will profess a bit of political ignorance here but isn't it really about persuasion? Politics that is...If there is a tendancy for the 'T' to be run over by the Freedom Bus as the GLB Community goes down the highway like a band of gypsies, are they perhaps under-estimating the intellectual and financial clout of this aspect? Barney Frank is one of the more adept politicians I have ever witnessed at the mystical art of talking out of both sides of the mouth while saying nothing. Sad but true it would probably be wiser to reinforce just how much more effective the GLB is when it has the 'T' added.

Link to comment
  • 10 months later...
Guest Syamantaka

As a group, there is strength in numbers. To go it alone is suicide, especially in todays

techno glass house. I think stronger ties to the global community should be made keep

up with new developments and I say this as a 15yr net junkie, Strides should be taken to

get some protection from the U.N. as a Global Community.

Link to comment
Guest Joanna Phipps

The idea of the UN is good but for the most part it is a paper tiger, it is good about passing resolutions but it has no powers of enforcement so countries can do as they wish.

To go it alone I agree is near on suicide but since the other parts of the glbT movement insist on giving us the left overs then we may need to think of something. One of the first things we need to do is get some accurate numbers as to how many of us there are the stats I have found are all over the map. Unless we can nail it down to something a politician can wrap his/her mind around then we dont stand a chance.

How many of us are there?

what is it we as a group want?

what is the best way to get it?

should we start at the state and local level and work up?

Here at Laura's we are international in scope and have a very active user base, this might give us something to work from but I dont know. The only thing the organs of state understand is numbers, how many of you are there and can you help me get elected.

Link to comment
Guest Elizabeth K

Yikes these old topics keep coming up!

The GLBT community in New Orleans has been cautioned to keep the "T" in their fight for rights or we will not support them. They have reluctantly agreed.

Apparently it has to be a GLBT by GLBT local group battle. There is a tendancy to sacrifice us to appease politicians, and the excuse is they will come back later and fight for us. DON"T ACCEPT THAT!

Lizzy

Link to comment
Guest Charlene_Leona

I was working with an advocacy group named PROMO here in Missouri, on one of our trips to the state capital to educate our state legislators I wanted to bring up the fact the for the Transgendered it was a medical condition and nothing else. I was told not to do this by the state director of PROMO that wasn't how they wanted to handle us. When I realized this I basically went on my own the rest of that trip and did things my way and have not worked with PROMO since. I will not stand with those who push us to the back or onto the floor to be walked on by the world it's night fair or right.

Charlene Leona

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   8 Members, 0 Anonymous, 124 Guests (See full list)

    • Mmindy
    • Petra Jane
    • MaryEllen
    • Wicked juggalo
    • MaeBe
    • Abigail Genevieve
    • SamC
    • April Marie
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,029
    • Most Online
      8,356

    Selkimur
    Newest Member
    Selkimur
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Anyatimenow
      Anyatimenow
      (23 years old)
    2. Aria00
      Aria00
    3. Ava B.
      Ava B.
      (24 years old)
    4. Claire Heshi
      Claire Heshi
    5. CrystalMatthews0426
      CrystalMatthews0426
      (41 years old)
  • Posts

    • Ivy
      Got a new Granddaughter this morning.  Mother and child (and father) are doing fine. This makes 7 granddaughters and one grandson.  I have 2 sons and 6 daughters myself.  And then I  switched teams.  I think this stuff runs in the family. Another hard day for the patriarchy.
    • Ivy
      Like @MaeBe pointed out, Trump won't do these things personally.  I doubt that he actually gives a rat's a$$ himself.  But he is the foot in the door for the others.   I don't really see this.  Personally, I am all in favor of "traditional" families.  I raised my own kids this way and it can work fine.  But I think we need to allow for other variations as well.   One thing working against this now is how hard it is for a single breadwinner to support a family.  Many people (I know some) would prefer "traditional" if they could actually afford it.  Like I mentioned, we raised our family with this model, but we were always right at the poverty level.   I was a "conservative evangelical" for most of my life, actually.  So I do understand this.  Admittedly, I no longer consider myself one. I have family members still in this camp.  Some tolerate me, one actually rejects me.  I assure you the rejection is on her side, not mine.  But, I understand she believes what she is doing is right - 'sa pity though. I mean no insult toward anyone on this forum.  You're free to disagree with me.  Many people do.   This is a pretty complex one.  Socialism takes many forms, many of which we accept without even realizing it.  "Classism" does exist, for what it's worth.  Always has, probably always will.  But I don't feel like that is a subject for this forum.   As for the election, it's shaping up to be another one of those "hold your nose" deals.
    • Ivy
      Just some exerts regarding subjects of interest to me.
    • Ivy
      Yeah.  In my early teens I trained myself out of a few things that I now wish I hadn't.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I was thinking in particular of BLM, who years ago had a 'What We Believe' section that sounded like they were at war with the nuclear family.   I tried to find it. Nope.  Of interest https://www.politifact.com/article/2020/aug/28/ask-politifact-does-black-lives-matter-aim-destroy/   My time is limited and I will try to answer as I can.
    • Ivy
      Well, I suppose it is possible that they don't actually plan on doing what they say.  I'm not too sure I want to take that chance.  But I kinda expect to find out.  Yet, perhaps you're right and it's all just talk.  And anyway, my state GOP is giving me enough to worry about anyway. I remember a time when being "woke" just meant you were paying attention.  Now it means you are the antichrist. I just don't want the government "protecting" me from my personal "delusions."
    • MaeBe
      1.  I think there are some legitimate concern.   2. Thoroughly discussing this will consume many threads.   3. I disagree partially with @MaeBe but there is partial agreement.   4. The context includes what is happening in society that the authors are observing.  It is not an isolated document.   The observation is through a certain lens, because people do things differently doesn't mean they're doing it wrong. Honestly, a lot of the conservative rhetoric is morphing desires of people to be treated with respect and social equity to be tantamount to the absolution of the family, heterosexuality, etc. Also, being quiet and trying to blend in doesn't change anything. Show me a social change that benefits a minority or marginalized group that didn't need to be loud.   5. Trump, if elected, is as likely to spend his energies going after political opponents as he is to implementing something like this.   Trump will appoint people to do this, like Roger Severino (who was appointed before, who has a record of anti-LGBTQ+ actions), he need not do anything beyond this. His people are ready to push this agenda forward. While the conservative right rails about bureaucracy, they intend to weaponize it. There is no question. They don't want to simplify government, they simply want to fire everyone and bring in conservative "warriors" (their rhetoric). Does America survive 4 year cycles of purge/cronyism?   6. I reject critical theory, which is based on Marxism.  Marxism has never worked and never will.  Critical theory has problems which would need time to go into, which I do not have.   OK, but this seems like every other time CRT comes up with conservatives...completely out of the blue. I think it's reference is mostly just to spark outrage from the base. Definitely food thought for a different thread, though.   7. There are groups who have declared war on the nuclear family as problematically patriarchal, and a lot of other terms. They are easy to find on the internet.  This document is reacting to that (see #4 above).   What is the war on the nuclear family? I searched online and couldn't find much other than reasons why people aren't getting married as much or having kids (that wasn't a propaganda from Heritage or opinions pieces from the right that paint with really broad strokes). Easy things to see: the upward mobility and agency of women, the massive cost of rearing children, general negative attitudes about the future, male insecurity, etc. None of this equates to a war on the nuclear family, but I guess if you look at it as "men should be breadwinners and women must get married for financial support and extend the male family line (and to promote "National Greatness") I could see the decline of marriage as a sign of the collapse of a titled system and, if I was a beneficiary of that system or believe that to NOT be tilted, be aggrieved.   8.  Much of this would have to be legislated, and this is a policy documented.  Implementation would  be most likely different, but that does not mean criticism is unwarranted.   "It might be different if you just give it a chance", unlike all the other legislation that's out there targeting LGBTQ+ from the right, these are going to be different? First it will be trans rights, then it will be gay marriage, and then what? Women's suffrage?   I get it, we may have different compasses, but it's not hard to see that there's no place for queer people in the conservative worldview. There seems to be a consistent insistence that "America was and is no longer Great", as if the 1950s were the pinnacle of society, completely ignoring how great America still is and can continue to be--without having to regress society to the low standards of its patriarchal yesteryears.    
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      Cadillac parts are pretty expensive, so repairing them costs more.  But they don't seem to break down more than other makes.  Lots of Lincoln models use Ford cars as a base, so you can get parts that aren't much more expensive.    My family has had good luck with "Panther platform" cars.  Ford Crown Victoria, Mercury Marquis, Lincoln Towncar or Continental.  4.6 V8 and 5.0 V8.  Reasonable fuel economy, and fairly durable.  Our county sheriff's office was running Chargers and SUV's for a while, but has gone back to older Crown Victorias for ease of maintenance.  GF rebuilds them here.  But they are getting more scarce, since the newest ones were made in 2011.    1992-1997 years were different than the later years.  1998-2001 they did some changes, and apparently the best years are 2003 to 2011.  Check Craigslist, and also government auctions.  GF has gotten a lot of them at auction, and they can be had in rough-but-running shape for around $1,000.  Ones in great shape can be found in the $5,000+ range.  Good for 200,000 miles without significant rebuilding.  Go through engine and transmission and electrical systems, and they go half a million.    Some Chrysler models are OK.  The 300 mostly has the same engines as the Charger and Challenger, so parts availability is pretty good.  But they tend to get timing issues.  The older Chrysler Sebring convertibles were pretty reliable, sometimes going 200,000 miles without tons of problems, although after that they were pretty much worn out. 
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I think I have read everything the Southern Baptists have to say on transgender, and it helped convince me they are dead wrong on these issues.  They can be nice people.  I would never join an SBC church.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      You come across as a thoughtful, sweet, interesting and pleasant person.    There are parts of this country, and more so the world, where evangelicals experience a great deal of finger wagging.
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      It has been an interesting experience being in a marriage in a Christian faith community, yet being intersex/trans.  I stay pretty quiet, and most have kind of accepted that I'm just the strange, harmless exception.  "Oh, that's just Jen.  Jen is...different."  I define success as being a person most folks just overlook. 
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      Well, I live in an area with a lot of Southern Baptists, Evangelicals, etc...  We've experienced our share of finger-wagging, as the "standard interpretation" of Scripture in the USA is that the Bible only approves of "one man, one woman" marriage.  My faith community is mostly accepted here, but that has taken time and effort.  It can be tough at times to continue to engage with culture and the broader population, and avoid the temptation to huddle up behind walls like a cult.    Tolerance only goes so far.  At one point, my husband was asked to run for sheriff.  He declined, partly because an elected official with four wives would have a REALLY tough time.  (Of course, making way less than his current salary wasn't an option either). 
    • Abigail Genevieve
      My bone structure is far more female than male.  I can't throw like a guy, which has been observed by guys numerous times, and moving like a woman is more natural.  It just is.  I'm not going out of my way to act in a fem. way, as you say, but I am letting go of some of the 'I am not going to move like that because I am a guy' stuff I have defensively developed.  The other breaks through anyway - there were numerous looks from people at work when I would use gestures that are forbidden to men, or say something spontaneously no guy would ever say.   At one point, maybe a year or more ago, I said it was unfair for people to think they were dealing with a man when they were actually dealing with a woman.    Girl here.  'What is a woman' is a topic for another day.
    • Willow
      Mom, I’m home!  What’s for lunch?   Leftover pizza .   ok.    Not exactly our conversation but there is truth in the answer.     @KymmieLsorry you are sick. Feel better soon.   Girl mode, boy mode no mode, not us. Nothing functional for either of us.   anyone here have or had a 10 year old (plus or minus) Caddy, Lincoln or Chrysler?  How was it?  Lots of repairs?  Comfortable seats? Anything positive or negative about it?  I need to replace my 2004 Ford Explorer Eddie Bauer, it’s eating $100 dollar bills and needs a couple of thousand dollars worth of work and that doesn’t even fix the check engine code.  Obviously, it isn’t worth putting that kind of money into a 20 year old car with a 174 thousand miles.   Willow
    • Ashley0616
      Oversized pink shirt, pink and black sports bra
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...