Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Are We Really Ts And Not Cd


Guest JoAnnDallas

Recommended Posts

Guest JoAnnDallas

I have always wondered if the average CDer is not really a Part-Time TS. The common diffintion of a CD is a Male that wears female clothing or a Female that wears Male clothing. In this day and age, woman can openly Crossdress and no one cares. That is a woman can Crossdress, wear from inside out, male clothing, but still looks female, reconized as female, but everyone knows her clothing is male clothing. Society accepts this. On the other hand, if a Male Crossdresses, wears from inside out, female clothing, but still looks male, reconized as male, but everyone knows his clothing is female clothing, then Society regards this male a FREAK and/or PERVERTED. The only way this male can wear from inside out, female clothing, is to look female (wig and makeup) and be reconized as female. Then society accepts him as a female. Thus in reality, for a man to crossdress, he has to assume the role of a TS and not a CD. So I believe most Male-to-Female Crossdressers are Part-Time Transsexuals. I only know of a few men that do correctly Crossdress. One is "Butterfly Bill". He wears dresses and skirt/blouses, goes out, but has a beard, mustash, and no makeup or wig. Also there are forums dedicated to "Men in Skirts", but for the majority of male-to-female CDer, we are in reality Part-Time TS's.

Link to comment
Guest Evan_J

Hmmm. I dunno about that. Of course it could be considered that way (or any way really) by anyone, for me being a CD or TS is determined by whats goin on with the person ie what it is they are fulfilling to themselves.

Therefore, while a male dressing in womens attire might be pressured socially to "run the gamut" of female presentation in order to not be harassed its just that then, he's only presenting the entire female appearance because of external pressure. Has nothing to do with his need to be fulfilled in being female. And so I would not call him TS because he has no need/desire to transform what he is. -even by just using clothing.

I do however think it gives him an insight as to what a TS person might encounter from the mainstream critics.

Just mah view :)

Link to comment

I hope this doesn't sound bad, but men who crossdress will usually have very different motivations to, say, women who wear trousers and shirts. The crossdressers I know in real life seem to do it for several reasons: to express their femininity for a short period of time, to rebel against social norms, or just for a thrill.

I'm not sure if I'd call crossdressers part-time transsexuals... that sounds like a bit of an oxymoron to me. I've always understood the term "transsexual" to mean someone who's gender identity doesn't match their biological sex, and they desire to transition physically and live full-time as their preferred gender.

Just my 10 cents. I guess it all comes down to how we identify ourselves. :)

Link to comment

Keira, I agree. I like to wear a bra ,breast forms,and high heels. Anything beyond this is to look female and blend in. If I could go out wearing boobs and heels I would be happy.

Link to comment
I have always wondered if the average CDer is not really a Part-Time TS. The common diffintion of a CD is a Male that wears female clothing or a Female that wears Male clothing. In this day and age, woman can openly Crossdress and no one cares. That is a woman can Crossdress, wear from inside out, male clothing, but still looks female, reconized as female, but everyone knows her clothing is male clothing. Society accepts this. On the other hand, if a Male Crossdresses, wears from inside out, female clothing, but still looks male, reconized as male, but everyone knows his clothing is female clothing, then Society regards this male a FREAK and/or PERVERTED. The only way this male can wear from inside out, female clothing, is to look female (wig and makeup) and be reconized as female. Then society accepts him as a female. Thus in reality, for a man to crossdress, he has to assume the role of a TS and not a CD. So I believe most Male-to-Female Crossdressers are Part-Time Transsexuals. I only know of a few men that do correctly Crossdress. One is "Butterfly Bill". He wears dresses and skirt/blouses, goes out, but has a beard, mustash, and no makeup or wig. Also there are forums dedicated to "Men in Skirts", but for the majority of male-to-female CDer, we are in reality Part-Time TS's.

Kia Ora JoannD,

Good food for thought topic…

:rolleyes: Umm…The theory goes[well my theory that is] the ‘transsexual-female’[M2F] has a ‘female’ psychogender identity-a long the lines of a genetic female…’Men’ on the other hand who have the desire to wear the clothing of and behave in the way of the opposite sex are ‘gyne-co-mimic’-having a strong desire to mimic the female-The term gyno-co-mimic applies to both the heterosexual crossdressing male and the ‘gay’ drag queen-Because they both still identify as ‘males’ in the psychogender sense…

However in saying all that… Most if not all people who have suffered from ‘Benjamin’s Syndrome’ have at some stage in their lives ‘crossdressed’…It’s only when one goes 24/7 that the ‘crossdressing’[in the eyes of an ‘understanding’ society-and themselves ] stops…

Some more food for thought for those 'transsexual' people who have affirmed their gender 24/7…Prior to doing this…. were you a crossdresser? Think about this carefully…I know I was…

Metta Jendar :)

Link to comment
Some more food for thought for those 'transsexual' people who have affirmed their gender 24/7…Prior to doing this…. were you a crossdresser? Think about this carefully…I know I was…

I suppose I might have been a "crossdresser" when I used to wear boy's clothes. Now I wear the clothing appropriate to my gender. :P

Link to comment
Guest nightfly

I suppose you could make a case for it, but you'd really have to examine the reasons for the crossdressing, then the person themselves, and decide if they 'fit'. I've read a ton of material over the years, and have found: 1. That I have male thought patterns and behaviors (other than how I feel I should dress, obviously), 2. My speech patterns are male (fact, solution based rather than just continuous chat for bonding's sake), 3. I'm turned on by females, and turned off by males; in any given environment, my eyes wander towards females, not males. Over the years, I've experienced plenty of erections while just seeing a smokin' hot female just walking by; never had that happen with a male. Of course you could always say that only indicates what I'm attracted to, not my own sexual identity, but other than wanting to 'feel pretty' all the time, the rest of my life is more typically male. I tried being more like a female, but couldn't. It didn't feel right.

In my early teens, I thought I was a transexual, but the life of a typical female didn't really fit me well. Yes, most of my friendships were with females, not males, but I didn't behave as they did. The endless discussions over seemingly nothing at all, or rehashing the same subject over and over, or examining other people's as well as my own relationships to the point of exhaustion just wasn't something I could stand to do more than for a few minutes, while my girlfriends seemed to delve into it at every single opportunity. I have no desire to have children. Sex, yes; raising kids, no. I don't find babies 'cute', just annoying. I have no 'nesting' behaviors.

If you read the book 'The Biology of Love' by Peter Perper, you will learn about many male and female specific behaviors that are 'bred' into us genetically; I don't seem to display female ones. Likewise, Barbara and Alan Pease wrote a series of books on the differences in male and female thought patterns and speech, which can give us a better understanding of which 'way' we tend to think.

Of course, I've written all this after spending the afternoon cleaning up the house wearing a wig, heels and a maids uniform, and feeling perfectly appropriate doing so, so take it all with a grain of salt.

Link to comment
Guest JoAnnDallas

WOW…great reponses…….Here is my 2 cent worth.

A woman that crossdresses does it as a fashion statement. She may be wearing male clothing, but she is still a woman. She is NOT trying to be or emulate a Man. On the other hand a man that crossdresses is not only making a fashion statement but IS trying to be a woman and/or IS emulating a woman. A Male-to-Female Transsexual IS not only making a fashion statement, but IS trying to become a woman in all respects. I would say when a male crossdresser is closeted, they are more like the woman that crossdress. When the same male closeted crossdresser decides to exit their closet and go out into the world dressed as a woman, then she becomes more like the Transsexual if she want to be able to function without being hasseled. A man who goes out in public dressed in femware but still presents as a male WILL not be accepted like the woman that goes out into public dressed in maleware and presents as a female. One thing to remember is ALL Transsexuals were Crossdressers at first, but not all Crossdressers become Transsexuals.

In MY conclusion:

1. A woman that crossdress is not the same as man that crossdresses. She does it as a fashion statement and is NOT trying to be or emulate a Man.

2. A man that crossdress that goes out in public as a woman CAN be similar to a Transsexual. Thus could be classified as a “Part time TS”

3. A Transsexual that goes 24/7 is no longer a crossdresser but IS a woman.

Link to comment

I see it as a woman can "crossdress" because society has accepted men's clothes to be worn on a woman. so most of a woman's crossdressing can be still considered normal. not necessarily a fashion statement but just a fashion style. for men, society just hasn't caught up yet. I mean, a man in a skirt big deal. the Egyptians did it. the Scots did/do it. I suppose the woman rights stuff helped women get accepted in men's clothes but the men have had not big movement in which they wore womens clothes. this makes skirts, dresses, and panties purely womens clothes in most of society. bras are a little different since a man has no reason to wear one. so wearing a bra can make a guy look weird since he really has no purpose in wearing one unless he just likes the feeling. this generally makes him a pervert in society, but from society's view, why does he need to wear it?

castiana

Link to comment
Guest Jack Solomon

Cross-dressers generally cross-dress because it is enjoyable/satisfying to some need or they put on the female role for short periods of time. Many cross-dressers do so either in the privacy of their own home and/or they go out in a female role for short periods of time in their female persona. I can see how one might label this 'part-time TS', but really I would call it more 'part-time presentation as a woman' or something similar to that effect. Cross-dressers generally have no desire to transition and are otherwise comfortable to live their lives as men. Their gender is male. I think it is important not to confuse the two, especially when explaining to nontrans people the difference. The typical cross-dresser most definately is not a transsexual woman and is not trying to be.

And while a transsexual may start out privately 'cross-dressing' before they pursue transitioning, this is usually for a variety of reasons - such as safety, fear, confusion/uncertainty about what they are feeling, having not realized they are transsexual, etc. Transsexuals are still at their core a different gender even before transitioning, and generally have different reasons to 'cross-dress' (in the eyes of society)/wear the clothes appropriate for their female gender than male cross-dressers do.

Female cross-dressing is typically more invisible but there are variations of female cross-dressers. The most visible are drag kings or other gender-bender types. A female cross-dressing to put on the role of a male is usually not acknowledged by society, the male putting on the role of the female is visible and is seen as 'deviant'. Male-appearing clothes worn as a fashion choice for females is not the same as cross-dressing - there is no intent to cross-dress there and the clothes more often than not are still perceived as appropriate or even femininized attire because a female body is wearing them. I could see how it could be said that females do not cross-dress because they are accepted wearing traditionally male clothes but this also means that there is a certain invisibility in their cross-dressing actions. However, there have been females who have been 'cross-dressed' while attacked for being (perceived as) lesbians, so the non-visibility of female cross-dressing does not always stand. There will always be hate in this world for those perceived by someone out there as deviant from the norm.

Solomon

Link to comment
  • Root Admin
Many cross-dressers do so either in the privacy of their own home and/or they go out in a female role for short periods of time in their female persona.

Cross-dressers generally have no desire to transition and are otherwise comfortable to live their lives as men. Their gender is male.

I can fully agree and identify with Jack's comments. I do so in private, have no desire to become a woman, but because for various reasons I'm unlikely ever to be together with a woman, and no, I'm not Gay and know this really lovely woman whom I would love to be with for the rest of our lives, CD'ing is the only way I'll get near female clothes. It is a real unwinding time for me, de-stresses me so much and lets me retain, at least some of, my sanity some days!

Link to comment
Guest Evan_J

I am so sorry to blow this theory, but NEVER has me wearing male clothing been "acceptable'. No strangers thought it was cute, nor did they take it for "fashion". What I did have happen was I got verbally assailed by some women walking on the street who hollered across so that they could be heard that they "knew what something like me was" and "I'm teaching my son too so that when he sees one of you he knows what to do", on another occasion almost ended up in a brawl in a mall parking lot again by a group of people and thankfully the cops drove by. have been dismissed from several jobs because I was "poorly" dressed instead of saying what it actually was that I was male dressed, and basically live in city currently where I watch my back 24/7 because of this supposed "acceptable fashion". Maybe I'm just on mars or its the 3 feet antennaes growing out of my forehead thats ticking folks the heck off..

Link to comment

Kia Ora Joann D,

[Perhaps your post title is a little misleading]

:rolleyes: Would this be a more appropriate way to descript what you mean by ‘part-time’ transsexual;

A heterosexual crossdresser[male psycho-gendered-like yourself-I take it you still see yourself as male] is ‘mimicking’ the transsexual behaviour in order to look and behave more ‘woman’-like when out in public… [a ‘trans-co-mimic-gyne-co-mimic’-a somewhat long drawn out word I know! but I’m sure you understand what I mean]…Loosely put I guess that WOULD make you a ‘part time’ transsexual…in the ‘mimic’ sense…

If you think about it…It’s an impossibility for a person diagnosed ‘transsexual’ to be part time…It’s hardwired in our brains –you are either transsexual or you are not there’s no in between…

Your analogy does not quite fit with the ‘textbook’ definition of ‘transsexual’ ...But people have a right to see things the way they choose…

Joann, I might not agree with your analogy but hey…how one see themselves is entirely up to them…And as long as they’re happy and content who really gives a !!!!!

“Have a nice day anyway!!!”

What differentiates a transsexual from a 'contented' crossdresser is their 'psychogender' identity...

Metta Jendar :)

Link to comment
Guest JoAnnDallas

Jendar wrote:

If you think about it…It’s an impossibility for a person diagnosed ‘transsexual’ to be part time…It’s hardwired in our brains –you are either transsexual or you are not there’s no in between…

I have been crossdressing since I was 8-9 yrs old. I have tried to be all male, purged many times, but kept coming back to crossdressing. I feel that a crossdressers brain is also HARD WIRED too. Otherwise, we could just stop and that would be the end of it. It is hard to really put labels on all this. I would say the only label that fits both CD and TS is TG. We are all Transgendered.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   9 Members, 0 Anonymous, 177 Guests (See full list)

    • Abigail Genevieve
    • KatieSC
    • Ashley0616
    • Ivy
    • Karen Carey
    • LucyF
    • SamC
    • Mmindy
    • April Marie
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,029
    • Most Online
      8,356

    Selkimur
    Newest Member
    Selkimur
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Anyatimenow
      Anyatimenow
      (23 years old)
    2. Aria00
      Aria00
    3. Ava B.
      Ava B.
      (24 years old)
    4. Claire Heshi
      Claire Heshi
    5. CrystalMatthews0426
      CrystalMatthews0426
      (41 years old)
  • Posts

    • LucyF
      I've got Spironolactone 100mg and Evorel 50mcg Patches (2 a week) going up to 100mg after 4 weeks 
    • Ivy
      Got a new Granddaughter this morning.  Mother and child (and father) are doing fine. This makes 7 granddaughters and one grandson.  I have 2 sons and 6 daughters myself.  And then I  switched teams.  I think this stuff runs in the family. Another hard day for the patriarchy.
    • Ivy
      Like @MaeBe pointed out, Trump won't do these things personally.  I doubt that he actually gives a rat's a$$ himself.  But he is the foot in the door for the others.   I don't really see this.  Personally, I am all in favor of "traditional" families.  I raised my own kids this way and it can work fine.  But I think we need to allow for other variations as well.   One thing working against this now is how hard it is for a single breadwinner to support a family.  Many people (I know some) would prefer "traditional" if they could actually afford it.  Like I mentioned, we raised our family with this model, but we were always right at the poverty level.   I was a "conservative evangelical" for most of my life, actually.  So I do understand this.  Admittedly, I no longer consider myself one. I have family members still in this camp.  Some tolerate me, one actually rejects me.  I assure you the rejection is on her side, not mine.  But, I understand she believes what she is doing is right - 'sa pity though. I mean no insult toward anyone on this forum.  You're free to disagree with me.  Many people do.   This is a pretty complex one.  Socialism takes many forms, many of which we accept without even realizing it.  "Classism" does exist, for what it's worth.  Always has, probably always will.  But I don't feel like that is a subject for this forum.   As for the election, it's shaping up to be another one of those "hold your nose" deals.
    • Ivy
      Just some exerts regarding subjects of interest to me.
    • Ivy
      Yeah.  In my early teens I trained myself out of a few things that I now wish I hadn't.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I was thinking in particular of BLM, who years ago had a 'What We Believe' section that sounded like they were at war with the nuclear family.   I tried to find it. Nope.  Of interest https://www.politifact.com/article/2020/aug/28/ask-politifact-does-black-lives-matter-aim-destroy/   My time is limited and I will try to answer as I can.
    • Ivy
      Well, I suppose it is possible that they don't actually plan on doing what they say.  I'm not too sure I want to take that chance.  But I kinda expect to find out.  Yet, perhaps you're right and it's all just talk.  And anyway, my state GOP is giving me enough to worry about anyway. I remember a time when being "woke" just meant you were paying attention.  Now it means you are the antichrist. I just don't want the government "protecting" me from my personal "delusions."
    • MaeBe
      1.  I think there are some legitimate concern.   2. Thoroughly discussing this will consume many threads.   3. I disagree partially with @MaeBe but there is partial agreement.   4. The context includes what is happening in society that the authors are observing.  It is not an isolated document.   The observation is through a certain lens, because people do things differently doesn't mean they're doing it wrong. Honestly, a lot of the conservative rhetoric is morphing desires of people to be treated with respect and social equity to be tantamount to the absolution of the family, heterosexuality, etc. Also, being quiet and trying to blend in doesn't change anything. Show me a social change that benefits a minority or marginalized group that didn't need to be loud.   5. Trump, if elected, is as likely to spend his energies going after political opponents as he is to implementing something like this.   Trump will appoint people to do this, like Roger Severino (who was appointed before, who has a record of anti-LGBTQ+ actions), he need not do anything beyond this. His people are ready to push this agenda forward. While the conservative right rails about bureaucracy, they intend to weaponize it. There is no question. They don't want to simplify government, they simply want to fire everyone and bring in conservative "warriors" (their rhetoric). Does America survive 4 year cycles of purge/cronyism?   6. I reject critical theory, which is based on Marxism.  Marxism has never worked and never will.  Critical theory has problems which would need time to go into, which I do not have.   OK, but this seems like every other time CRT comes up with conservatives...completely out of the blue. I think it's reference is mostly just to spark outrage from the base. Definitely food thought for a different thread, though.   7. There are groups who have declared war on the nuclear family as problematically patriarchal, and a lot of other terms. They are easy to find on the internet.  This document is reacting to that (see #4 above).   What is the war on the nuclear family? I searched online and couldn't find much other than reasons why people aren't getting married as much or having kids (that wasn't a propaganda from Heritage or opinions pieces from the right that paint with really broad strokes). Easy things to see: the upward mobility and agency of women, the massive cost of rearing children, general negative attitudes about the future, male insecurity, etc. None of this equates to a war on the nuclear family, but I guess if you look at it as "men should be breadwinners and women must get married for financial support and extend the male family line (and to promote "National Greatness") I could see the decline of marriage as a sign of the collapse of a titled system and, if I was a beneficiary of that system or believe that to NOT be tilted, be aggrieved.   8.  Much of this would have to be legislated, and this is a policy documented.  Implementation would  be most likely different, but that does not mean criticism is unwarranted.   "It might be different if you just give it a chance", unlike all the other legislation that's out there targeting LGBTQ+ from the right, these are going to be different? First it will be trans rights, then it will be gay marriage, and then what? Women's suffrage?   I get it, we may have different compasses, but it's not hard to see that there's no place for queer people in the conservative worldview. There seems to be a consistent insistence that "America was and is no longer Great", as if the 1950s were the pinnacle of society, completely ignoring how great America still is and can continue to be--without having to regress society to the low standards of its patriarchal yesteryears.    
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      Cadillac parts are pretty expensive, so repairing them costs more.  But they don't seem to break down more than other makes.  Lots of Lincoln models use Ford cars as a base, so you can get parts that aren't much more expensive.    My family has had good luck with "Panther platform" cars.  Ford Crown Victoria, Mercury Marquis, Lincoln Towncar or Continental.  4.6 V8 and 5.0 V8.  Reasonable fuel economy, and fairly durable.  Our county sheriff's office was running Chargers and SUV's for a while, but has gone back to older Crown Victorias for ease of maintenance.  GF rebuilds them here.  But they are getting more scarce, since the newest ones were made in 2011.    1992-1997 years were different than the later years.  1998-2001 they did some changes, and apparently the best years are 2003 to 2011.  Check Craigslist, and also government auctions.  GF has gotten a lot of them at auction, and they can be had in rough-but-running shape for around $1,000.  Ones in great shape can be found in the $5,000+ range.  Good for 200,000 miles without significant rebuilding.  Go through engine and transmission and electrical systems, and they go half a million.    Some Chrysler models are OK.  The 300 mostly has the same engines as the Charger and Challenger, so parts availability is pretty good.  But they tend to get timing issues.  The older Chrysler Sebring convertibles were pretty reliable, sometimes going 200,000 miles without tons of problems, although after that they were pretty much worn out. 
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I think I have read everything the Southern Baptists have to say on transgender, and it helped convince me they are dead wrong on these issues.  They can be nice people.  I would never join an SBC church.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      You come across as a thoughtful, sweet, interesting and pleasant person.    There are parts of this country, and more so the world, where evangelicals experience a great deal of finger wagging.
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      It has been an interesting experience being in a marriage in a Christian faith community, yet being intersex/trans.  I stay pretty quiet, and most have kind of accepted that I'm just the strange, harmless exception.  "Oh, that's just Jen.  Jen is...different."  I define success as being a person most folks just overlook. 
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      Well, I live in an area with a lot of Southern Baptists, Evangelicals, etc...  We've experienced our share of finger-wagging, as the "standard interpretation" of Scripture in the USA is that the Bible only approves of "one man, one woman" marriage.  My faith community is mostly accepted here, but that has taken time and effort.  It can be tough at times to continue to engage with culture and the broader population, and avoid the temptation to huddle up behind walls like a cult.    Tolerance only goes so far.  At one point, my husband was asked to run for sheriff.  He declined, partly because an elected official with four wives would have a REALLY tough time.  (Of course, making way less than his current salary wasn't an option either). 
    • Abigail Genevieve
      My bone structure is far more female than male.  I can't throw like a guy, which has been observed by guys numerous times, and moving like a woman is more natural.  It just is.  I'm not going out of my way to act in a fem. way, as you say, but I am letting go of some of the 'I am not going to move like that because I am a guy' stuff I have defensively developed.  The other breaks through anyway - there were numerous looks from people at work when I would use gestures that are forbidden to men, or say something spontaneously no guy would ever say.   At one point, maybe a year or more ago, I said it was unfair for people to think they were dealing with a man when they were actually dealing with a woman.    Girl here.  'What is a woman' is a topic for another day.
    • Willow
      Mom, I’m home!  What’s for lunch?   Leftover pizza .   ok.    Not exactly our conversation but there is truth in the answer.     @KymmieLsorry you are sick. Feel better soon.   Girl mode, boy mode no mode, not us. Nothing functional for either of us.   anyone here have or had a 10 year old (plus or minus) Caddy, Lincoln or Chrysler?  How was it?  Lots of repairs?  Comfortable seats? Anything positive or negative about it?  I need to replace my 2004 Ford Explorer Eddie Bauer, it’s eating $100 dollar bills and needs a couple of thousand dollars worth of work and that doesn’t even fix the check engine code.  Obviously, it isn’t worth putting that kind of money into a 20 year old car with a 174 thousand miles.   Willow
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...