Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

The Gay Marriage Debate


MaryEllen

Recommended Posts

Guest StrandedOutThere
I don't see any real point in starting a war here. All of you have it ingrained into your minds that you wish to change marriage. My conservative roots disagree and could fight for hours, but I don't think it could change your opinions. I also enjoy reading your posts because they are interesting and allow me to think about things. I still have not seen anything strong enough to shake the conservativeness out of me. I guess you could call it a transsexual stumbling block if you wish. I would challenge you to try and shake the conservativeness, but this isn't really the right thread for that.

Anyway, you know my opinion. I wouldn't call it a dissenting opinion since a lot of other people seem to agree with me.

Aww...I'm not trying to start a war. I just like debating.

Around here, I'd say your opinion is a bit counter to the majority. Either way, we'll just have to agree to disagree on this one.

As for shaking the conservativeness out of you, no I probably can't. Right now I'm pretty busy trying to shake the conservativeness out of my mom.

Link to comment
Guest Leah1026
I'm not trying to drag religion into this. I think there have been very few if any cultures in history to fully accept gays until recently. I also don't want to offend anyone, I just think this is a change in something great that has been preserved for thousands of years. Marriage is one of the few commonplace things to survive from that time. And this change would ruin a large part of what it was originally intended to be.

Religion is a personal lifestyle choice. Being born gay/lesbian is not.

Many of the same arguments being used against gays/lesbians today are the same arguments that have been used throughout our history against progress. Most notably the bible was used to:

Support slavery

Oppose the right to vote for blacks

Oppose the right to vote for women

Oppose inter-racial marriages

Oppose the Equal Rights Amendment

Link to comment
Guest Sheila

i think it's a matter of time. change comes slowly. people in general seem to resist change, especially if it makes them feel uncomfortable. the people that resist us find us not normal because we don't fit in to their way of thinking. it just seems to me that maybe they are the ones not normal because they are conditioned to think that way, at least that's how i see it, like they have a one tract mind. now i'm not trying to insult anybody, and i'm sorry if you feel that way but i'm just giving my opinion. i respect their views, i wish they would give me the same respect. i don't tell them how to live their lives, theirs by choice. i wish they would just let me live the life i was born into. and stranded out there, you educate well. you and leah1026 both seem to be very well imformed and experienced in these matters and i hold you both in the highest regard. i feel like i'm in good hands. thank you.

sheila

Link to comment
Guest KyleMicheal

Gay marriage = YES!

Attraction and love is normal in anyone. This can be changed a bit. Attraction can be towards the opposite sex or the same sex. You are BORN with it. You do not choose whether you are straight, gay, have 6 fingers, are blonde, are brunette, are male or female, or anything else for that matter.

Let's say that gayness was "normal" and straightness was "unnatural". Now, think about it. You opposed to gay marriage, think. Is it fair? No, it's not. You can't be with your love, ever.

Definitions change often, as well. Man and woman, you may think. Yeah. I respect that, but...

Medical definitions change often.

Slang definitions change often.

Normal definitions change often.

Law changes often.

Alcohol used to be illegal. Just because people thought it was a "bad thing", it was banned. What happened? Gangsters, scandal, and more crime. You could compare gay marriage to alcohol. Some people think it is evil, so it's banned. We would be better off with gay marriage. It won't hurt anyone. Plus, the lack of procreation can lead to a good thing: adoption of children who so desperately need care.

Children under care of homosexual parents can be more open about their little quirks. (Homosexuality, transsexuality, not fitting in, that strange deformity they have on their face)

On the subject of changing definition...who said marriage is strictly between a man and a woman? Even in the Catholic church, men had many wives. ONE man and ONE woman. I think not. The definition even changed.

To all of you brunettes wishing you were blonde, do you change it? Yes, you do. Maybe more men/women are driven to you or whatever. In essence, this is lying. You're brown haired. It may cause you pain later that he's into you because of the lie you have given him. You can never be close.

Now let's say the hair color analogy can be applied to homosexuality. Brunette = gay; blonde = straight

See, even if a homosexual went ahead and got a heterosexual marriage, it would never be true. It's lying.

Or maybe let's say your true love is trans. You can't get married because hir birth gender is the same as yours. Painful.

So, do you think gays should be denied rights of marriage? You decide.

Link to comment

I guess I'll never change. Oh yes, men have had multiple wives in history. They had multiple marriages. I don't think there's been a marriage ceremony where 1 man got married to 2 wives.

I have question for you all to answer. Some gays have gone through reparative therapy. I'm not asking about the effectiveness of the therapy or anything. But some gays have done it and have come out straight. So how does this work with gays being "born" gay if they can become straight through this therapy? Just wondering what your responses are.

Link to comment
  • Root Admin

Should anyone chose to enter this program voluntarily, I have no problem with that. I do have a problem with forcing someone into this program against their will. It is just plain WRONG WRONG WRONG! There have been too many suicides by people being forced into this program to justify it's existance. If this type of program works for you. That's fine. Go for it, but don't expect the rest of us to follow suit.

MaryEllen

Link to comment
Guest StrandedOutThere
I guess I'll never change. Oh yes, men have had multiple wives in history. They had multiple marriages. I don't think there's been a marriage ceremony where 1 man got married to 2 wives.

I have question for you all to answer. Some gays have gone through reparative therapy. I'm not asking about the effectiveness of the therapy or anything. But some gays have done it and have come out straight. So how does this work with gays being "born" gay if they can become straight through this therapy? Just wondering what your responses are.

There's a difference between coming out acting straight and actually being straight. I haven't seen any evidence that the therapy brings about any real changes. From what I've read, the long term effects aren't so good either.

On the other hand, I have seen evidence from studies using brain scans. There are structural differences in gay peoples' brains. In many cases, gay men's brains are more similar to the brains of straight women. There are also structural differences in gay women's brains when compared to straight women's brains. I guess that kinda suggests they might have been born that way.

Dude, what's your deal?

Link to comment

Well it's just my opinion. It comes from the way I'm raised. Church. Parents. Friends. All that stuff.

It's kinda off topic but it's strange how liberals call conservatives bigots and all that stuff and conservatives say the same things back to the liberals.

Anyway I didn't want to start a war or offend anyone here right now.

It also appears that I've been reported. Don't know who did that or what being reported entails.

Link to comment
Guest Zenda
I guess I'll never change. Oh yes, men have had multiple wives in history. They had multiple marriages. I don't think there's been a marriage ceremony where 1 man got married to 2 wives.

I have question for you all to answer. Some gays have gone through reparative therapy. I'm not asking about the effectiveness of the therapy or anything. But some gays have done it and have come out straight. So how does this work with gays being "born" gay if they can become straight through this therapy? Just wondering what your responses are.

Kia Ora BK,

:) Now I’m sure you are aware that some people call themselves ‘bi sexual’ or in my case bi-romantic-asexual [if I were to have a relationship with either a male or female, unlike the bi-‘sexual’, mine would be a ‘non’ sexual one]. Anyway what I would like to mentioned [and for you to ponder awhile before replying] regarding your comment on ‘homosexuals’ being cured through RT…

I have a friend whose been in a ‘same sex’ relationship for over twenty years, however she ‘still sees herself as ‘bi-sexual’ but she ‘chose’ to commit to a long term relationship with a female…

What if those who say that they were ‘cured’ by RT were just bi-sexuals who finally chose to commit to a female-[if males] relationship!!!…In many cases a person’s sexual orientation is not so clear cut as hetero-homo…Some going through transition their orientation may become fluid[questioning] and after they have fully transitioned they may have gone from a ‘heterosexual male to a heterosexual female or visa versa…Or their physical sexual identity changes but their orientation stayed the same ie, in a male body they were attracted to women=heterosexual and now as a female they are still attracted to females=homosexual.

Ones sexual orientation BK can be quite complex, a person could be a somewhat confused bi-sexual, whilst others might be asexual [having no interest in sex whatsoever] If you go by my friend's experience and by the way, she is a qualified psychotherapist who just so happens to have dealt with transsexual people in the UK…She is now in her early seventies, I’m sure she know herself by now…And BK she's got around sixty ‘life experience’ years more than you!!!

Same sex marriage… my vote would be yes…It's a no brainer...What right do I have to deny another person’s happiness especially when I don’t know them from a bar of soap[an old English saying] How would you feel if someone denied you the freedom to choose?…

Now if there was a vote to ban organised religion my vote would also be yes…However in time I believe evolution will eventually make it extinct ie, as a species we will grow out of it…Umm in the meantime I think I’ll become a follower of Bertrand Russell’s ‘celestial teapot’ …it makes more sense to me… BK you might like to look up 'celestial teapot' or Russell's teapot... maybe it will open your mind just a little.

BTW, I believe in miracles, but miracles for me are not of the supernatural kind, they are more when a person whose mind and eyes are clouded by ignorance suddenly see the light - seeing all people as equals and becomes more humane in their dealings with others...That's what I call a true miracle...And they are happening everyday...

Metta Jendar :)

Link to comment
Guest StrandedOutThere
Well it's just my opinion. It comes from the way I'm raised. Church. Parents. Friends. All that stuff.

It's kinda off topic but it's strange how liberals call conservatives bigots and all that stuff and conservatives say the same things back to the liberals.

Anyway I didn't want to start a war or offend anyone here right now.

It also appears that I've been reported. Don't know who did that or what being reported entails.

Perhaps make sure it really is YOUR opinion and not your parents' opinion. It's important to look at the facts yourself and make your own decisions. Don't get in the habit of just accepting what other people say. It's good to be critical. Be critical of what your parents say...be critical of what we are saying here. Form opinions based on reason.

Yes, I've heard liberals call conservatives bigots. I've suggested to my mother and step-father (both conservatives) that they both might be bigots. However, I've never heard anyone call liberals bigots. We get called "bleeding hearts" and "hippies". If anything, liberals get criticized for being too accepting. Whatever...

I don't know who reported you...wasn't me. I don't want you to go away. I like to argue.

Link to comment
Guest Drew
Well it's just my opinion. It comes from the way I'm raised. Church. Parents. Friends. All that stuff.

i agree with StrandedOutThere...make sure it's really your opinion....it very well may be and that's fine...everyone is entitled to their own opinion....however, i was raised in a very strict, religious family with a zero-tolerance policy towards anybody remotely queer and up until i was 13 or 14 i thought i was destined to burn in hell....i don't anymore

Link to comment
Guest sphere

Well I think all marriage should be illegal, so there. I don't understand the point of it personally, but to each his own.

Haha though seriously, yes, gay marriage should be allowed, or maybe I'm just a bit biased since I'm gay myself. Civil unions are stupid, people say it's the same thing but if it has a different name it's still separate. I don't care if it's been between a man and woman for however long, I have never lived back then so I don't really care what marriage was like back then. Nothing's wrong with a little change. The world needs change or else it gets boring and no one goes anywhere. It doesn't have to be a big deal really.

I kind of dislike how people get to vote on this issue. I think we should vote on if heterosexual marriage should be legal, too, in that case. It's no one else's business who gets married to who, it's a civil right, it should be allowed.

The therapy thing to "change" people from gay to straight I find kind of disgusting really. People are who they are and everyone, including themselves, need to accept that. That "therapy" is just another pressure for people to pretend they're straight and suffer accordingly.

Yes you are born gay. No you don't jump out of the womb saying "I LIKE MEN" (if you're male). But you don't jump out of there being the height you will be when you're 25, you don't have facial hair (if you're male), you don't have breasts (if you're female), you're not nearsighted, et cetera but you will eventually and there's not much that's going to stop any of that because it's in your DNA. So is your sexual orientation. There are animals who are gay, I highly doubt they have the brain capacity to even understand what that means, let alone decide.

As for the issue with children... that's sort of irrelevant. Marrying someone doesn't necessarily mean "now LET'S GO MAKE BABIES" ...well for some it might, which is another thing, people have different interpretations of what marriage should be, and I think we should respect each other's opinions and views and sexual orientations. If you don't like gay marriage, well you don't have to attend a gay marriage or get married to someone of the same sex. It doesn't effect anyone who chooses not to marry to the same sex, so I don't see why it should matter to them.

Oh I was talking about kids. Right, right. Some say that a female role (or male role for lesbian marriages) is needed to raise a kid. Does this mean single parents can't have kids either? And someone mentioned that the kids turned out no different than ones raised by straight parents. Yeah. That too.

My grandfather was gay and he married a woman and had six children and was in a very unhappy marriage. He lived a lie and cheated on his wife all the time but he was still gay. It messed him up, and in turn it messed up my dad and his siblings. Everyone suffers.

Link to comment
Guest Leah1026
I kind of dislike how people get to vote on this issue. I think we should vote on if heterosexual marriage should be legal, too, in that case. It's no one else's business who gets married to who, it's a civil right, it should be allowed.

Get a load of this video at Pam's House Blend. Jesse Ventura tells it like it is:

http://www.pamshouseblend.com/showDiary.do...20?diaryId=5532

Sometimes in our country the court DO need to force change. For example Brown vs. The Board of Education. If people were allowed to vote we would absolutely still have segregation (and slavery like Jesse said). Courts have often been used in the country as a way of forcing progress, for getting the country to do the right thing. Another example: would women have gotten the right to vote in 1920 (USA) if it was strictly up to a vote by men?

Marriage Equality is the right thing to do. The Declaration of Indeprendence says:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

Notice it doesn't say some people are more equal than others.

And for the record: I'm a Christian (Catholic) and straight, but I believe in the ideals as put forth in the Declaration of Independence.

Link to comment
Guest Sheila

i was forced to go to church every sunday and some weekdays too until i was sixteen. the churches brainwashing had no effect on me. i reject the church who won't except me for who i am. i follow my heart, not what someone tells me what is right or wrong. i consider myself a good person and i think i know the difference between right and wrong. if god made me this way, what gives people the right to tell me i'm wrong?

Link to comment

I find it amazing that a member of an anti-gay cure group would tell a homosexual that if he couldn't be converted that he was better off committing suicide. They all get the throwing stones part of the bible but not Jesus's message of "He who is without sin should cast the first stone". I don't get terrorists who kill thousands of people in God's name. Both groups are so eerily similar it is scary. The only difference is the choice of ammunition.

Laura

Link to comment
Guest Leah1026

Interesting video I saw today on another site:

I hope that cut and pasted correctly. Someone taking Faux (Fox) News to task on it's "fair and balanced" :rolleyes: reporting on marriage equality. Their "expert" is clueless.

Link to comment
Guest Leah1026

Another video! Okay a warning for anyone who knows a lot about politics. This video may give you whiplash!

The video is Bob Barr, the Libertarian candidate for president, apologizing for having authored the federal DOMA (Defense of Marriage Act) back in 1996. He now says he agree with the California Supreme Court ruling for marriage equality.

Link to comment
Guest Keiichi-kun
I personally don't really like gay marriage. The whole term seems to be a oxymoron to me because marriage is between a man and a woman. It always has. It's just being challenged now. Sorry, but I would have to vote no on it.

You are most certainly entitled to your opinion and I respect that but I'm gonna give my two cents on the subject. With marriage comes a lot of benefits. Not only tax benefits but some that could severely affect a couple. The first is when your partner dies and doesn't have a will. Who does all their stuff go to? If you two aren't married then it's their children, if they have no children their parents, ect. You won't get a thing unless they have a will saying so. Also what about children? A teacher of mine was saying he has a friend in a lesbian relationship and the two of them are raising a child together. His friend's partner is an alcoholic and she wants to break it off but she is scared to do so because their child is biologically her partner's. She's afraid that if she were to break it off she wouldn't get to keep this child she's been raising just because they cannot get married. To me that's why same-sex couples just be allowed to get married.

Hell, I'm getting to point that civil unions with the same rights as marriages will do for me. No one should be denied the right to marry another consenting adult.

Link to comment

When the author of the bill changes his mind others will too. Thanks for the clips, Leah. What Doma does is allow states to write discrimination into their state constitutions by a simple majority vote. Some are still in favor of DOMA, others favor a partial repeal and still others want to repeal it completely. The following article lists the positions of other presidential candidates. http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPolitics.asp?Pa...L20080527a.html . Obama favors a complete repeal, Clinton a partial repeal and McCain disagrees with both candidates. This article explains what a partial repeal means http://www.republicoft.com/2007/12/28/the-doma-test/ . The partial repeal sounds like a plan to keep constituents happy in an election year as they all remember the anti-gay vote that pushed Bush to the white house in 2004.

To me partial rights are still discrimination if all don't have the same rights. It's like throwing one group a bone. Discrimination shouldn't be written into the constitution. The bill is either right or it's wrong. Any other answer is political doublespeak. I do understand the value of compromise but in this case i think a firm stand needs to be taken one way or the other. Human Rights should not be negotiable.

Laura

Link to comment
Guest StrandedOutThere
Hey! I like Fox News. Bill O'Reilly is cool too.

Did you see that video on YouTube where he flipped out? The techno remix was hilarious.

Link to comment
Guest Keiichi-kun
Did you see that video on YouTube where he flipped out? The techno remix was hilarious.

I can't stand that guy <_< I love watching him on youtube just get myself all riled up. :P

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   8 Members, 0 Anonymous, 195 Guests (See full list)

    • MaryEllen
    • SamC
    • Mmindy
    • MaeBe
    • Ivy
    • Jordyn1215225
    • Ashley0616
    • Abigail Genevieve
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,029
    • Most Online
      8,356

    Selkimur
    Newest Member
    Selkimur
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Anyatimenow
      Anyatimenow
      (23 years old)
    2. Aria00
      Aria00
    3. Ava B.
      Ava B.
      (24 years old)
    4. Claire Heshi
      Claire Heshi
    5. CrystalMatthews0426
      CrystalMatthews0426
      (41 years old)
  • Posts

    • Mmindy
      Congratulations to the mom and family @Ivy on the addition of another child.   Hugs,   Mindy🌈🐛🏳️‍⚧️🦋
    • MaeBe
      Congrats to you and yours!
    • Ashley0616
      YAY! Congratulations on a granddaughter!
    • Ashley0616
      I recommend CarComplaints.com | Car Problems, Car Complaints, & Repair/Recall Information. A lot of good information
    • LucyF
      I've got Spironolactone ___mg and Evorel ___mcg Patches (2 a week) going up to ___mg after 4 weeks 
    • Ivy
      Got a new Granddaughter this morning.  Mother and child (and father) are doing fine. This makes 7 granddaughters and one grandson.  I have 2 sons and 6 daughters myself.  And then I  switched teams.  I think this stuff runs in the family. Another hard day for the patriarchy.
    • Ivy
      Like @MaeBe pointed out, Trump won't do these things personally.  I doubt that he actually gives a rat's a$$ himself.  But he is the foot in the door for the others.   I don't really see this.  Personally, I am all in favor of "traditional" families.  I raised my own kids this way and it can work fine.  But I think we need to allow for other variations as well.   One thing working against this now is how hard it is for a single breadwinner to support a family.  Many people (I know some) would prefer "traditional" if they could actually afford it.  Like I mentioned, we raised our family with this model, but we were always right at the poverty level.   I was a "conservative evangelical" for most of my life, actually.  So I do understand this.  Admittedly, I no longer consider myself one. I have family members still in this camp.  Some tolerate me, one actually rejects me.  I assure you the rejection is on her side, not mine.  But, I understand she believes what she is doing is right - 'sa pity though. I mean no insult toward anyone on this forum.  You're free to disagree with me.  Many people do.   This is a pretty complex one.  Socialism takes many forms, many of which we accept without even realizing it.  "Classism" does exist, for what it's worth.  Always has, probably always will.  But I don't feel like that is a subject for this forum.   As for the election, it's shaping up to be another one of those "hold your nose" deals.
    • Ivy
      Just some exerts regarding subjects of interest to me.
    • Ivy
      Yeah.  In my early teens I trained myself out of a few things that I now wish I hadn't.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I was thinking in particular of BLM, who years ago had a 'What We Believe' section that sounded like they were at war with the nuclear family.   I tried to find it. Nope.  Of interest https://www.politifact.com/article/2020/aug/28/ask-politifact-does-black-lives-matter-aim-destroy/   My time is limited and I will try to answer as I can.
    • Ivy
      Well, I suppose it is possible that they don't actually plan on doing what they say.  I'm not too sure I want to take that chance.  But I kinda expect to find out.  Yet, perhaps you're right and it's all just talk.  And anyway, my state GOP is giving me enough to worry about anyway. I remember a time when being "woke" just meant you were paying attention.  Now it means you are the antichrist. I just don't want the government "protecting" me from my personal "delusions."
    • MaeBe
      1.  I think there are some legitimate concern.   2. Thoroughly discussing this will consume many threads.   3. I disagree partially with @MaeBe but there is partial agreement.   4. The context includes what is happening in society that the authors are observing.  It is not an isolated document.   The observation is through a certain lens, because people do things differently doesn't mean they're doing it wrong. Honestly, a lot of the conservative rhetoric is morphing desires of people to be treated with respect and social equity to be tantamount to the absolution of the family, heterosexuality, etc. Also, being quiet and trying to blend in doesn't change anything. Show me a social change that benefits a minority or marginalized group that didn't need to be loud.   5. Trump, if elected, is as likely to spend his energies going after political opponents as he is to implementing something like this.   Trump will appoint people to do this, like Roger Severino (who was appointed before, who has a record of anti-LGBTQ+ actions), he need not do anything beyond this. His people are ready to push this agenda forward. While the conservative right rails about bureaucracy, they intend to weaponize it. There is no question. They don't want to simplify government, they simply want to fire everyone and bring in conservative "warriors" (their rhetoric). Does America survive 4 year cycles of purge/cronyism?   6. I reject critical theory, which is based on Marxism.  Marxism has never worked and never will.  Critical theory has problems which would need time to go into, which I do not have.   OK, but this seems like every other time CRT comes up with conservatives...completely out of the blue. I think it's reference is mostly just to spark outrage from the base. Definitely food thought for a different thread, though.   7. There are groups who have declared war on the nuclear family as problematically patriarchal, and a lot of other terms. They are easy to find on the internet.  This document is reacting to that (see #4 above).   What is the war on the nuclear family? I searched online and couldn't find much other than reasons why people aren't getting married as much or having kids (that wasn't a propaganda from Heritage or opinions pieces from the right that paint with really broad strokes). Easy things to see: the upward mobility and agency of women, the massive cost of rearing children, general negative attitudes about the future, male insecurity, etc. None of this equates to a war on the nuclear family, but I guess if you look at it as "men should be breadwinners and women must get married for financial support and extend the male family line (and to promote "National Greatness") I could see the decline of marriage as a sign of the collapse of a titled system and, if I was a beneficiary of that system or believe that to NOT be tilted, be aggrieved.   8.  Much of this would have to be legislated, and this is a policy documented.  Implementation would  be most likely different, but that does not mean criticism is unwarranted.   "It might be different if you just give it a chance", unlike all the other legislation that's out there targeting LGBTQ+ from the right, these are going to be different? First it will be trans rights, then it will be gay marriage, and then what? Women's suffrage?   I get it, we may have different compasses, but it's not hard to see that there's no place for queer people in the conservative worldview. There seems to be a consistent insistence that "America was and is no longer Great", as if the 1950s were the pinnacle of society, completely ignoring how great America still is and can continue to be--without having to regress society to the low standards of its patriarchal yesteryears.    
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      Cadillac parts are pretty expensive, so repairing them costs more.  But they don't seem to break down more than other makes.  Lots of Lincoln models use Ford cars as a base, so you can get parts that aren't much more expensive.    My family has had good luck with "Panther platform" cars.  Ford Crown Victoria, Mercury Marquis, Lincoln Towncar or Continental.  4.6 V8 and 5.0 V8.  Reasonable fuel economy, and fairly durable.  Our county sheriff's office was running Chargers and SUV's for a while, but has gone back to older Crown Victorias for ease of maintenance.  GF rebuilds them here.  But they are getting more scarce, since the newest ones were made in 2011.    1992-1997 years were different than the later years.  1998-2001 they did some changes, and apparently the best years are 2003 to 2011.  Check Craigslist, and also government auctions.  GF has gotten a lot of them at auction, and they can be had in rough-but-running shape for around $1,000.  Ones in great shape can be found in the $5,000+ range.  Good for 200,000 miles without significant rebuilding.  Go through engine and transmission and electrical systems, and they go half a million.    Some Chrysler models are OK.  The 300 mostly has the same engines as the Charger and Challenger, so parts availability is pretty good.  But they tend to get timing issues.  The older Chrysler Sebring convertibles were pretty reliable, sometimes going 200,000 miles without tons of problems, although after that they were pretty much worn out. 
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I think I have read everything the Southern Baptists have to say on transgender, and it helped convince me they are dead wrong on these issues.  They can be nice people.  I would never join an SBC church.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      You come across as a thoughtful, sweet, interesting and pleasant person.    There are parts of this country, and more so the world, where evangelicals experience a great deal of finger wagging.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...