Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Transgender People Banned From Military By Trump!!


Guest Angelgrlsue

Recommended Posts

  • Forum Moderator

I only skimmed through this but it seems the official broadcast medium is Twitter :?

What happened to democratic process, or is it just a case of the press winding people up as usual!

Tracy

 

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

This is unfortunately real!  While i have never had a desire to serve in the military there are many who do for various reasons.  The cost of our medical care is a poor excuse.  Trump spends more of our money than that traveling to his golf outings.   Well at least we won't have to register or get drafted?

 

Hugs,

 

Charlize

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

All hail the commander in tweet. What a cowardly way to tell brave Americans already serving in our military you are no longer welcome. He gets off on tweeting and watching the world react, how evil....

Link to comment

I'm starting to wonder what is going to happen first. The Orange Clown gets impeached or the Orange Clown gets assassinated because he keeps making someone's life more and more miserable?

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

I'm glad your feeling better.  These things do hurt my feeling of self worth.  

You are not alone in your feelings.  

 

Hugs,

 

Charlize

Link to comment

I'm confident that this is a bump in the road. It's just like what happened with Civil Rights and Gay Rights. Some jerk(s) come along after the conversation gets started and try to derail the whole thing with their bigotry. This is why I'm all about being public. I feel like we are hitting tip over. It's time to push forward harder than ever now. I refuse to go back into the closet!

Just remember, nobody can make us feel small unless we let them! Go watch Wonder Woman and get inspired! ;)

Love and Light!!

Link to comment
  • Admin

Lots of analysis today, and opinions from law school types, military types and political types.  What seems clear is that nothing about this is clear, despite Trump's seeming definitive pronouncement.  The military wasn't on board with this, and the latest I heard is that they are currently saying that currently serving and out service members are not going to be forced out.

The problem is that the only person who gave this any thought is Trump, and we all know how little he actually does of that on any given subject.  So its best to just wait and see what the follow-up is, what the military brass says in a week or two.  Even the ACLU isn't going to do anything until and unless they see an actual written policy.

Bottom line is, this is not the time to panic.

Carolyn Marie

Link to comment
  • Admin
2 hours ago, Carolyn Marie said:

Bottom line is, this is not the time to panic.

Panic, NO. but indignation and frustration are up there for consideration.  Having Twitter block him is high in the national interest to be sure.

 

Link to comment
12 hours ago, Cindy Truheart said:

I'm starting to wonder what is going to happen first. The Orange Clown gets impeached or the Orange Clown gets assassinated because he keeps making someone's life more and more miserable?

I wonder if there is going to be a massive boycottt of the trump brand. 

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

Costs?  I've read the military spent $84M on viagra last year.  And the Military Bands cost $437M.  I think $2.4M to $8.4M estimated cost is a bargain.

Jani

Link to comment
Guest KatherineR

The cost argument is ridiculous. Discharging a qualified person to save a few thousand dollars for HRT only makes sense to a financial genius like Trump. Many in the military have had one to two or more years of training costing hundreds of thousands of dollars. By the time I reached my ship the navy had paid for four years at a private university, six months of classroom training in Florida, six months of practical training at a nuclear reactor in Idaho, and three months of submarine training in Connecticut. 

Link to comment

Here is an interesting read from politico. 

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/07/26/trump-transgender-military-ban-behind-the-scenes-240990

In the end it appears that members in the house were upset at paying for "the surgery" and were about to loose a house vote on it and went to trump. Trump in turn just said he would ban transgender troops.

Link to comment
Guest JaneShannon

Sorry, I have to be a bit of a dissenter on this, or present a different point of view.

The only question worth considering to me is "how will this affect readiness?" 

If inclusion of trans peoples will negatively impact the ability of the military to fight and win the nation's wars we are not needed.  If trans-people will not negatively impact readiness then we should not be excluded. There are two important sides to military service.  Wanting to serve, and being fit to serve.  Being fit to serve means that when called upon the Service Member is ready to deploy and fight.  Military service is not about what you want, but about what the nation needs.  Remember JFK, "ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country."

So does taking on a Service Member who will, or does, require medical interventions degrade readiness?

The answer is...it depends.

If you are an otherwise healthy person who requires an inhaler to control asthma you will probably be medically disqualified.  

Here is another example.  If a recruit is a healthy, genetic female, who has the potential to become pregnant she can join.  Remember readiness, once she becomes pregnant she will be non-deployable for year or more.  Yet the military regularly accepts genetic females knowing pregnancy could (and usually does) happen.  So future impacts on military readiness do not bar people from military service.

I would think if a trans person is medically stable there should be no reason not to be accepted to military service.  I doubt a cis-gendered person on HRT would be disqualified.  Further, the military would then fund this person's medications, and monitor the impacts of those medications.  

Sorry, this got long.  As I work through this, I do not see how a healthy transgender person would negatively impact readiness. Therefore, identification as transgender alone should not bar someone from military service.

Link to comment
15 hours ago, KatherineR said:

The cost argument is ridiculous.

Katherine - this is so true.  Isn't it amazing how much training goes into readiness.  Just like private industry, so many times the we loose sight of how much $$$ goes into recruiting, training, and orienting good people.  Investing in good people...not just good men, or good women, but good people, always pays off.  If you're a good leader, in the end all you want is a well-trained, capable, dedicated person.  Doesn't matter if there's a twig and berries or a Gucci purse down there as long as you have the above.

 

7 hours ago, JaneShannon said:

The only question worth considering to me is "how will this affect readiness?" 

Jane, this is also interesting to consider.  My Marine friend ended up with a medical discharge due to a simple blood disorder that he developed 10 years in.  The basic treatment was daily iron.  Because of this, it was determined that it would be too difficult to provide consistently in the field affecting his readiness so he was deemed undeployable and given a medical discharge.  Crushed him!  How readiness and if someone is deployable sometimes sees like a rather subjective thing.    

Link to comment
On 7/28/2017 at 8:41 AM, Briana said:

Jane, this is also interesting to consider.  My Marine friend ended up with a medical discharge due to a simple blood disorder that he developed 10 years in.  The basic treatment was daily iron.  Because of this, it was determined that it would be too difficult to provide consistently in the field affecting his readiness so he was deemed undeployable and given a medical discharge.  Crushed him!  How readiness and if someone is deployable sometimes sees like a rather subjective thing.    

Another factor that they consider for readiness is the impact of someone not getting their medication when deployed. In the case of your friend and in the case of a friend of mine who was also discharged and fought it all the way to the top, not getting their medications means that it could kill them. That is what they look at, and in our case, if we don't get our HRT it would totally suck, but we won't die from it!

Love and Light!

Link to comment
  • Admin
5 hours ago, Cindy Truheart said:

, if we don't get our HRT it would totally suck, but we won't die from it!

Nailed that one!!

Link to comment
21 hours ago, Cindy Truheart said:

 if we don't get our HRT it would totally suck, but we won't die from it!

Love and Light!

Not directly, but it can lead to us not taking care of ourselves, depression, and a whole host of other bad behaviors because some of us just won't care anymore. 

 

Link to comment
1 hour ago, MarcieMarie12 said:

Not directly, but it can lead to us not taking care of ourselves, depression, and a whole host of other bad behaviors because some of us just won't care anymore. 

 

But from the military's view, it's not life threatening, therefore it can't be the basis for denial of service. They don't have a leg to stand on for denying transgender people the right to serve in the military. That is what I'm saying here. Not getting HRT would eventually be a problem for us, but knowing that we can go back on it as soon as the situation we're in is  resolved would be enough for most soldiers. We are talking about extreme circumstances here, it's a war time situation kind of thing, and it isn't like you are being forced to de-transition, you would still require people to use the right pronouns and be able to be yourself.

Link to comment

Cindy, and the military is wrong in that regard. They do not see the forest for the trees. Now in an emergency/combat situation you always make do with what you have. Barring WWWII I don't see getting soldiers their prescription to be a problem unless they are located in some remote outpost in hostile territory. 

Link to comment

trump is nothing more than a bully and  roll on to the next election  hopefully he be booted out of office soon and he most likely behave like a spoilt child about it  but goodness know what mess he will do in the mean time 

 

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

Welcome Alexx.  It's lovely to see that positive thought coming from your side of the pond.  Being from the USA i must say that i'm embarrassed (and more than a bit horrified) that  he ever became our president.

 

Hugs,

 

Charlize

Link to comment

ID be embarrassed too if he was ruining my country the way he is  hillary would have been better She wouldnt have done anything like what he has done 

She also would have done something about the death camps in Russia that are killing lgbt  people which hasnt been in the mainstream news at all  Trump would do nothing about this sorry to be all doom and gloom  but the guy needs kicked out  by impeachment or by election 

 

All LGBT people who want jobs in the military and who are fit to be there should be allowed jobs  this is very 1960's  when stonewall and lgbt rights was non existent  . that why i think things like lgbt pride  and Trans pride are important and more awaresness of the issues for LGBT people We are stronger together 

 

sorry for the rant 

(((((( hugs for all )))) 

Alex 

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 170 Guests (See full list)

    • MaryEllen
    • MaybeRob
    • SamC
    • MaeBe
    • Ashley0616
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,025
    • Most Online
      8,356

    JamesyGreen
    Newest Member
    JamesyGreen
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Anyatimenow
      Anyatimenow
      (23 years old)
    2. Aria00
      Aria00
    3. Ava B.
      Ava B.
      (24 years old)
    4. Claire Heshi
      Claire Heshi
    5. CrystalMatthews0426
      CrystalMatthews0426
      (41 years old)
  • Posts

    • KymmieL
      Hey, everyone. my life is going down the tubes. at least I think. So, today. A customer called about his car, I told him that the oil change was done. The parts to fix the check engine light are ordered. He can come and get it. For the weekend if he wants. Customer says I didn't want an oil change. it was check the engine light and check for an oil leak. Checking the work order says oil change. The boss wrote the vehicle up. checking with the customer on services wanted.   Being that I wrote down the appointment in the book. and clearly states oil leak. She is complaining because she can't read my small ish writing. It seems she read oil and assumed it as an oil change. It seems like she is blaming me.  She wound up going home because she was too upset. She is stressing about an eye problem she has, she has to get eye surgery it seems she has a tear in her eye.    I feel that I am short for this job. because of the BS they are blaming me on. Plus I am still upset about the trust issue. If either one of the bosses start their Shite tomorrow. I am walking out.    
    • Davie
    • Abigail Genevieve
      "I love you so much,"  Lois said.  They met in the driveway. "I could not live without you." "Neither could I." "What are we going to do?" "Find another counselor?" "No. I think we need to solve this ourselves." "Do you think we can?" "I don't know.  But what I know is that I don't want to go through that again.  I think we have to hope we can find a solution." "Otherwise, despair." "Yeah.   Truce?" "Okay,  truce." And they hugged.   "When we know what we want we can figure out how to get there."   That began six years of angry battles, with Odie insisted he could dress as he pleased and Lois insisting it did not please her at all.  He told her she was not going to control him and she replied that she still had rights as a wife to a husband. Neither was willing to give in, neither was willing to quit, and their heated arguments ended in hugs and more.   They went to a Crossdressers' Club, where they hoped to meet other couples with the same problems, the same conflicts, and the same answers, if anyone had any.  It took them four tries before they settled on a group that they were both willing to participate in.  This was four couples their own age, each with a cross dressing husband and a wife who was dealing with it.  They met monthly.  It was led by a 'mediator' who wanted people to express how they felt about the situation.  Odie and Lois, as newcomers, got the floor, and the meeting was finally dismissed at 1:30 in the morning - it was supposed to be over at 10 - and everyone knew how they felt about the situation.   There was silence in the car on the way home.   "We aren't the only ones dealing with this." Odie finally said.   "Who would have thought that?  You are right."   "Somebody out there has a solution." "I hope you are right."   "I hope in hope, not in despair."   "That's my Odie."    
    • Abigail Genevieve
      The counseling session was heated, if you could call it a counseling session.  Sometimes Lois felt he was on Odie's side, and sometimes on hers.  When he was on her side, Odie got defensive. She found herself being defensive when it seemed they were ganging up on each other.   "This is not working," Lois said angrily, and walked out.  "Never again. I want my husband back. Dr. Smith you are complicit in this."   "What?" said Odie.   The counselor looked at him.  "You will have to learn some listening skills."   "That is it? Listening skills?  You just destroyed my marriage, and you told me I need to learn listening skills?"   Dr. Smith said calmly,"I think you both need to cool off."   Odie looked at him and walked out, saying "And you call yourself a counselor."   "Wait a minute."   "No."
    • Ashley0616
      Just a comfortable gray sweater dress and some sneakers. Nothing special today. 
    • VickySGV
      I do still carry a Swiss Army knife along with my car keys.  
    • Timi
      Jeans and a white sweater. And cute white sneakers. Delivering balloons to a bunch of restaurants supporting our LGBT Community Center fundraiser today!
    • April Marie
      Congratulations to you!!!This is so wonderful!!
    • missyjo
      I've no desire to present androgynous..nothing wrong with it but I am a girl n wish to present as a girl. shrugs, if androgynous works fir others good. always happy someone finds a solution or happiness    today black jeans  black wedges..purple camisole under white n black polka dot blouse half open   soft smile to all 
    • MaeBe
      I have read some of it, mostly in areas specifically targeted at the LGBTQ+ peoples.   You also have to take into account what and who is behind the words, not just the words themselves. Together that creates context, right? Let's take some examples, under the Department of Health & Human Services section:   "Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of “gender identity” and bases a person’s worth on his or her race, sex, or other identities. This destructive dogma, under the guise of “equity,” threatens American’s fundamental liberties as well as the health and well-being of children and adults alike."   or   "Families comprised of a married mother, father, and their children are the foundation of a well-ordered nation and healthy society. Unfortunately, family policies and programs under President Biden’s HHS are fraught with agenda items focusing on “LGBTQ+ equity,” subsidizing single-motherhood, disincentivizing work, and penalizing marriage. These policies should be repealed and replaced by policies that support the formation of stable, married, nuclear families."   From a wording perspective, who doesn't want to protect the health and well-being of Americans or think that families aren't good for America? But let's take a look at the author, Roger Severino. He's well-quoted to be against LGBTQ+ anything, has standard christian nationalist views, supports conversion therapy, etc.   So when he uses words like "threatens the health and well-being of children and adults alike" it's not about actual health, it's about enforcing cis-gendered ideology because he (and the rest of the Heritage Foundation) believe LGBTQ+ people and communities are harmful. Or when he invokes the family through the lens of, let's just say dog whistles including the "penalization of marriage" (how and where?!), he idealizes families involving marriage of a "biological male to a biological female" and associates LGBTQ+ family equity as something unhealthy.   Who are the radical actors? Who is telling people to be trans, gay, or queer in general? No one. The idea that there can be any sort of equity between LGBTQ+ people and "normal" cis people is abhorrent to the author, so the loaded language of radical/destructive/guise/threaten are used. Families that he believes are "good" are stable/well-ordered/healthy, specifically married/nuclear ones.   Start looking into intersectionality of oppression of non-privileged groups and how that affects the concept of the family and you will understand that these platitudes are thinly veiled wrappers for christian nationalist ideology.   What's wrong with equity for queer families, to allow them full rights as parents, who are bringing up smart and able children? Or single mothers who are working three jobs to get food on plates?
    • Ashley0616
      Well yesterday didn't work like I wanted to. I met a guy and started talking and he was wanting to be in a relationship. I asked my kids on how they thought of me dating a man and they said gross and said no. I guess it's time to look for women. I think that is going to be harder. Oh well I guess.  
    • Ashley0616
      I don't have anything in my dress pocket
    • Carolyn Marie
      This topic reminds me of the lyrics to the Beatles song, "A Little Help From My Friends."   "What do you see when you turn out the lights?"   "I can't tell you but I know it's mine."   Carolyn Marie
    • Abigail Genevieve
      @Ivy have you read the actual document?   Has anyone else out there read it?
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I am reading the Project 2025 document https://www.project2025.org/policy/   This will take some time.  I read the forward and I want to read it again later.   I read some criticism of it outside here and I will be looking for it in the light of what has been posted here and there.  Some of the criticism is bosh.   @MaeBe have you read the actual document?
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...