Jump to content
Ravin

Brief explanation of the new DSM-V and forthcoming ICD-11 diagnostic codes

Recommended Posts

Carolyn Marie

Ravin, one has to register for an account to view the article.

 

Carolyn Marie

Share this post


Link to post
Briana

The article is fairly brief.  Following is the text:

 

Hi. I am Dr Jack Drescher, clinical professor of psychiatry at Columbia University in New York City and Distinguished Life Fellow of the American Psychiatric Association. I am here to talk a bit about my work on the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), which came out in 2013, and the International Classification of Diseases, 11th edition (ICD-11), which is scheduled for publication in 2018.

 

I was a member of the DSM-5 workgroup on sexual and gender-identity disorders. That committee was charged with revising what the DSM-IV called sexual and gender-identity disorders. My particular sub-workgroup, which focused specifically on gender-identity disorders, was asked to reconcile calls to remove the diagnosis from the DSM because of its stigmatizing nature, similar to the removal of homosexuality as a diagnosis from the DSM-II in 1973.

 

Our workgroup concluded, however, that removal of the diagnosis could be quite problematic because in order to access services, you need a diagnosis. We were caught between access to care and the stigma associated with a psychiatric diagnosis. Stigma is not reason enough to remove a mental disorder diagnosis if one needs one.

 

We decided that we could not simply remove sexual and gender-identity disorders from the manual. Some suggested that we classify it with a V-code. As many of you know, V-codes are used for conditions that are not psychiatric disorders but may come to the attention of a mental health professional. But these conditions are not reimbursable by most insurance companies or by many national healthcare systems, and are not seen as requiring reimbursement. Thus, we could not classify it with a V-code. Instead, we decided to retain the diagnosis but make some changes that would reduce stigma.

Small, Meaningful Changes

 

One way to reduce stigma was to remove the word "disorder." We changed the name from gender-identity disorder to gender dysphoria. Gender dysphoria was a preexisting term in the literature. Many people who work in this area are aware of the term, and many people who opposed having a gender-identity disorder diagnosis were happy with the name change.

 

We also tried to narrow the diagnostic criteria, with the idea that you do not want to give people a diagnosis when they do not want one, and to reduce the number of false positives. We made the diagnostic criteria a bit stricter than in the DSM-IV.

 

Suppose a person with gender dysphoria undergoes treatment and has a legal name change. That person is no longer gender dysphoric. Does that mean that they do not have a diagnosis? True, they do not have symptoms of gender dysphoria, but they would have symptoms if they had not received the treatment. We introduced the notion of a post-transition specifier to the diagnostic manual. A person who has had treatment, who is not dysphoric but used to be dysphoric, can still have a diagnosis code. This was how we solved that problem in the DSM.

 

In addition, we removed the specifier for sexual orientation. There was a time when it mattered, for some reason, whether a person's sexual orientation was involved in making the decision to transition. For example, in the middle of the 20th century, if you were born a man, assigned male at birth, and you were attracted to women but you believed yourself to be a woman and wanted to undergo a transition, you could not tell the doctors that you were attracted to women. The doctors were only involved in making heterosexuals at the end of the treatment. They were not going to make any lesbians or gay men by transitioning people who, at the end, would be attracted to the same gender. That is not the case in terms of how clinicians practice today, but that was the case then. Thus, we removed the sexual orientation specifier because it is irrelevant to clinical work. Those were some of the DSM changes.

 

We also made a slight change at the international level. The World Health Organization's ICD-11 will come out in 2018. There was more flexibility in the ICD compared with the DSM, where a diagnosis is either in or out. The ICD includes all diagnoses, psychiatric and medical. The recommendation, which has been followed, is that the new diagnosis, called gender incongruence, will be moved from the mental disorder section to another chapter, called "Conditions Related to Sexual Health." This allows countries that have national healthcare systems to have a diagnosis code, to continue to provide care for people, and to reduce the stigma of a mental disorder.

 

Transgender people are a highly stigmatized patient population. This is one way to reduce the stigma. In reality, we do not know what causes transgender presentations. We do not know whether it is psychological or medical, just as we do not know why people are cisgender (non-transgender). The change offers a new diagnosis: gender incongruence.

 

Thanks for listening to me. This is Dr Jack Drescher.

Share this post


Link to post
Charlize

Thank you for posting that Ravin and thanks for the copy Briana.  They certainly sounds like positive changes.

 

Hugs,

 

Charlize

Share this post


Link to post
Jani

Thank you.  This is a very good explanation from one of the authors. 

 

Jani  

Share this post


Link to post
Kenna Dixon

Yet the chattering bigots will still insist that the term "disorder" was removed only in response to intense pressure put upon the medical community by the "LGBT mafia".

Share this post


Link to post
Dev

Just call me Dona Corleone. ;) 

Share this post


Link to post
MaryMary

slightly related to this topic is the fact that people who have mental health problems deserve to be treated with repect and deserve to be able to take care of their health. What always gets to me is that when people say that : " transgender persons are mentally ill" what they are really saying is " I don't care if someone have mental health issues, they are faulty, we need to keep an eye on them and put them in an asylum"

 

I understand that being transgender and / or  having dyphoria is called a disorder and should really be called a "condition" (at least that's the word in french). It makes no sense to call it an "illness". But those who have such illness are often wonderfull people who deserves the help from society.

 

What need to change is that those bigots need to have more empathy. I know that in the united states there's a big religious debate around the topic but I still can't believe that some people can twist a religion soooo much that they use it to attack someone and make their life miserable when is supposed to teach to spread love towards other human beings.

 

I think "the stigma" is a larger topic then just the transgender community. I don't understand why mentally ill people are stigmatized and why atypical people are also stigmatized?

 

We fall right in the middle of all of this..... sadly.

Share this post


Link to post
Jani

Mary, I couldn't agree more with your post.  The stigma that is associated around mental health has held back many from getting the care they need.   And I do see that some religious communities are sorely lacking in empathy.  This is sad.

 

Jani

Share this post


Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 12 Guests (See full list)

    • ProfessorSnowflake
  • Posts

    • Kirsten
      See I am not ready for this. But I did it anyways. And now here it is. And what now?! I went outside of my ok circle. 🤢🤮
    • Kirsten
      Ok so I don’t know if this is good or bad but I just came clean with one of my friends. He was not prepared. Neither was I. But there it was. Vomit. All over the place. I couldn’t help it. He is a very close friend and one that I hoped would last thru this journey. But his wife and my wife are friends. Good friends. And now I may have crossed lines. Not intentionally. Ugh. Didn’t think that till just now. What did I do. Ugh. Well I was happy like 10 minutes ago. This stinks. It’s so hard to think of my wife right now. Should’ve like an hour ago. I suck.  You know I thought about erasing this like every second I bet till I post it. But gees this was stupid. I may be beyond excited about this but my love isn’t. And I just threw her under the bus. Omg. I suck. Well at least I know I suck. This took 2 hours to write too. 😔
    • RikkiWilson
      So this was about 9 years ago now. I used the tri top binder from underworks (no idea if that is still one they sell) and I used another pullover one from another site I can't recall the name of a couple years later. I liked both. I'm non binary (though I was FTM back then though). It felt correct to be flat. I actually may even buy a new binder soon.    Have you read up on safety precautions with binders?    ~Rikki
    • RikkiWilson
      Kayden is a nice name.   ~Rikki
    • RikkiWilson
      You have to do what's best for you ultimately. My suggestion would be to bring up the topic of trans people without having the focus be on you to test the waters. To see what her thoughts are on trans people. Depending on her response, then talk to her about your own personal feelings about trying to figure out what your own gender is. It can take a long time to figure everything out if you're not able to explore. So I hope things go well for you.    ~Rikki 
    • VickySGV
      Better to be an influence, than "under the influence" to be sure.  Both are good choices because of their work in the public eye.  
    • RikkiWilson
      Welcome to Trans Pulse Hendrix   ~Rikki
    • RikkiWilson
      Hello Gwen. Welcome to Trans Pulse.    ~Rikki
    • Naotoplays
      I realized that I hadn't posted in here yet. I'm Gwen, a 21 year old Trans-female from NY. I am not very good at introductions.
    • Carolyn Marie
      Welcome to Trans Pulse, Hendrix.  It's nice to meet you.  I like collecting rocks (and fossils) when I can, too.  Please look around the forums, ask questions, comment in threads, and have fun!   HUGS   Carolyn Marie
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. BraxtonLee
      BraxtonLee
      (20 years old)
    2. shelly_koleva83
      shelly_koleva83
      (35 years old)
  • Upcoming Events

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      65,199
    • Total Posts
      590,048
×