-
Who's Online 7 Members, 0 Anonymous, 177 Guests (See full list)
- FinnyFinsterHH
- KathyLauren
- Abigail Genevieve
- Ivy
- Ashley0616
- awkward-yet-sweet
- April Marie
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics80.7k
-
Total Posts768.7k
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Total Members12,033
-
Most Online8,356
Newest Member
ArtavikenGenderflui
Joined -
-
Today's Birthdays
-
afraid of self -
Chaidoesart
(14 years old) -
Faith57 -
Joyce Ann
(70 years old) -
Kelly21121
(56 years old)
-
-
Posts
-
By Abigail Genevieve · Posted
I don't think it should be. Nor do I see Project 2025 as pushing Christian nationalism. -
By Abigail Genevieve · Posted
The agencies are supposed to work for him. The problem, as conservatives found out in Trump 1, was they will ignore the president and do their own thing. The agencies are supposed to be under his control. Congress delegated some of its law making authority to the agencies, which is another problem. The bloated federal government needs to be trimmed. Dept Education is worthless - test scores have dropped since it was instituted in the Carter administration consistently, and it is currently implementing Biden's woke agenda more than doing anything else. -
By FinnyFinsterHH · Posted
I hope to eventually wear a suit for dance but don't know what exactly to look for. I feel like jumpsuit is safe option but I have been interested in wearing button up and formal pants. Is there a certain brand i should look for or sites I should look at for tips? My mom is not exactly keen on me wearing too masc clothing like suits just yet but is okay with jumpsuits. Also is there hair styling tips availible, my hair looks like image below. I might be able to get shorter haircut like pixie but am not sure yet. -
By MaeBe · Posted
It’s never been about him, but he is the Presidential nominee for the Presidency that starts in…2025. I don’t see a lot of conflation that this is a “Trump doctrine”, it a doctrine that benefits him surely, but it is a plan to instill crony governance and enact very Christian conservative (if not purely Christian nationalist) “order” on the country. If you don’t see this as the Right doubling down on Big G government, I don’t know what to tell them. Getting rid of agencies and giving the authority directly to the Executive isn’t shrinking government. It’s consolidation power. -
By MaeBe · Posted
It is the made up ideology they believe trans people are pushing on the world, those “poor young girls who are being coerced into believing they are men” and the “perverts who put on dresses and think they’re girls”. The anti-LGBTQ+ movement came up with the term. Being trans = you believe in trans ideology/transgenderism, supporting trans people = the same. In the end anyone that acts on or thinks gender is anything but what is in your pants is a “transgenderist”, why not make it a word if it’s not, there is no real grey area. Unless you acknowledge there is transgenderism, but use your knowledge to “correct it”. So I guess there could be transgenderist conversion “therapists”. Face it, we deface the America they want. Land of the Free and Home of the Brave? I think being out and queer is pretty brave. And freedom shouldn’t just be for those who push a narrow “Christian ideology” as the “true” governing model. -
By Abigail Genevieve · Posted
Over here muttering about "a new Jim Crow against a persecuted minority." -
By Abigail Genevieve · Posted
Rants are not a problem. My favorite hobby! :) What's out there is bad enough that I wonder why some people feel they need to embellish it. Be alert. Some of this will need to be fought in court if they try to implement it. If people are out to get me, paranoia is justified. And this may not be the only document. Abby -
By Ivy · Posted
Not in so many words, therefore it's not there at all. Excuse my paranoia. And the states passing laws against us are nothing to worry about either. Having to change my gender back to male (like in Florida) is reasonable. I should just accept it, I mean I was born with a dk. So that "F" is lie, and a fraud. My delusions need to be dealt with for my own good. I'm just frustrated these days. Just a bit of a rant. -
By Abigail Genevieve · Posted
You probably remember the Target PR fiasco. I remember reading an account from a woman who shopped there. She went into a stall and did her business, and someone came into the bathroom and began swinging stall doors open, and when she came to her stall, the woman peeked at her through the crack. "What are you doing?" "Checking for perverts." The writer was so stunned by the absurdity that she finished up ASAP and got out of there, while the other woman entered a stall and locked it, made sure it was locked, and locked it again. -
By Adrianna Danielle · Posted
Been a good day.Cleaned my closet of clothes that I do not wear anymore and do not fit me.It looks better now.Came down to my newest property beside mine,owner passed and I inherited it.There was a double wide there that was removed,it was in bad shape.It is the shop part I am keeping which I got the tools,shop equipment,benches,hoists and shelving too. -
-
By Ivy · Posted
If 9 out of 10 parts are ok, that doesn't mean I need to accept the bad parts (that are aimed directly at me). That seems suicidal. -
By Ivy · Posted
True, most of it has nothing to do directly with us. It's the parts that do that are the problem. I see the few problematic statements as being a big problem. Just because a lot of it may be okay, doesn't change that. Even supposing the rest of it might be good for the country, it doesn't help me if I'm being "eradicated". I suppose I should be good with that, because it's for the "greater good". If me being gone would please a number of people, then it's my civic duty to disappear, and vote to implement that. -
By Ivy · Posted
Yeah. There are already laws against assault. I don't think the overwhelming majority of trans women have any desire to harass cis women. Speaking for myself, if I go into a women's washroom, it's because my eyeballs are already floating - not for kicks. And I worry about getting clocked and assaulted by some guy being a "hero." -
By Abigail Genevieve · Posted
Only three, maybe four, sections even mention transgender. Most is a conservative agenda I have no problem with. In the sections that mention transgender, there are very few lines. Those lines ARE problematic, in every case. Unequivocally. I can't see some of them standing up in court. In one case a recommended policy goes against a court decision, which strongly suggests the implementation of that policy would be stopped in court. Anyone maintaining that this is written simply to support Trump, to support him becoming a dictator, to crush transgender people is feeding you a line. Nor is it an attempt to erase transgender people. People will have to decide if the overall goals are worth the few problematic statements. Overall, I support it. Of course, I have some reservations.
-
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now