Different Types Of Mtf Srs

[Guest Nelly]

Hello,

some days ago I saw a documentation about Ladyboys in Thailand. One girl was shown on her way to SRS. The doctor explane a bit of his technic and it was different to the technic I know. So I google a bit and found his webside with some explanation.

http://www.supornclinic.com/restricted/SRS...torolabiaplasty

The regular way I know is penil skin invertion. The skin is turned inside out and is used for the vagina. In his case, he will use the penil skin to form the small labias. The scrotum is used for the vagina. On his side it is also possible to see some results. Up to know what I saw in the web, the result for the labias are great. What I do not like is the vagina part. It sometimes look like an inverted scrotum.

He also said that after more than 2000 SRS he had done, that the technic is proved and the result is as close as possible to a real bio vagina. But this is also said about the penil invertion. Also he said only one surgery is needed.

Does anybody know more about this technic?

Greetings

Nelly

[Guest AmyB]

I've heard nothing but good reports about Suporn, not least because of the sensitivity and depth he achieves, as well as the visual results. Could you explain about the vagina looking like a scrotum? I can't figure out how you mean?

His technique produces a sensate labia minora as well as sensate clitoris and he doesn't waste any sensitive donor tissue. Other note worthy things are that pre-surgery genital electrolysis is not required because he removes the hair follicles in theater. I did find another reputable Thai surgeon who used a scrotal technique that was very similar to Suporn's but the other chap used a two stage procedure which I'd rather avoid if I can get the same results in one procedure. I can't remember his name offhand. I think the general consensus is that a purely penile inversion technique is considered outdated now.

FWIW, Suporn is currently top of my list of SRS surgeons. If I had to select today where I'll be going in a couple of years time it'll be to him.

There's quite a few recommendations for him on the web, here's one girl's experience of visiting Suporn.

[Guest Nelly]

Could you explain about the vagina looking like a scrotum? I can't figure out how you mean?

I will try to explain.

If you compare a natural vagina with a build up after this technic, the main difference is seen at the perineum area. A bio woman has a soft fold free area. In some cases the scrotum seems to big and that will cause folds if the skin of the scrotum enters the vaginal opening. You can compare it with a sleeve of a pullover that is turned inside out by 50% and you are holding the end close with your hand. Than you have to much fabric at one spot.

I know a picture in the web that shows it very good, but as we know, now pictures of this area here are allowed.

Greetings

Nelly

[Sally]

The only information that I have about his technique that is at all negative is that in order to achieve the depth that he does the skin grafts are very thin and sometimes tear in the early days of dilation.

However, he is considered to be one of the leaders in the field.

I know that he is one of the ones that I was considering if I cannot afford to do it a little closer to home - I have never fit too well on airplanes and the thought of making that flight back from Thailand after such extensive surgery is not pleasant - I didn't enjoy it much the last time and I was just on a vacation.

Love ya,

Sally

[Guest Leah1026]

Dr Suporn gets great depth with his technique, but it comes at a cost: Recovery from his technique is about twice as long and more difficult than other surgeons. I'm not putting him down, I just want you to be aware of the facts.