Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Red Cross New Gender Of Birth Rule


Monica_Jennifer

Recommended Posts

A FTM who is also a Gender Therapist on the sites Gender_Therapist list and whom communicates with me often asked that I post this to the Forums here at Lauras-Playground for him as he is not a member of the forums here and did not have time to learn how to join and post. He wishes folks to be warned of a new policy that the red cross now has over blood donations. He however wishes I not list his name and as you read on to see his text in quotes you will see his reasons why. I will post his text after I sign my name to this header.

Monica_Jennifer

-=== The Dr's Text ===-

"I went to the Red Cross on Friday to donate blood for the Haiti crisis. I'd given once before almost a year earlier. I went in with the card they'd already issued to me assuming it would be easy. They ask some medical questions in an interview. Among the first several was "what is your gender?" followed up next by "what gender were you born?"

--

I decided not to continue the process because I did not want that information in a national Red Cross data base. They were unable to accept the blood donation without having that question answered into their computer system so I left. The staff was very kind but helpless to do anything about the new question that has been added to the protocol. In fact, the supervisor said I was not the first person with whom they'd had this situation.

--

Just thought I'd save some others the grief of having to deal with the issue. Sad that they won't get the blood that they need right now but I just am not willing to have more data like that out in the ether when I have no idea who has access or when they might change the rules and give that data to other companies, etc."

-=== End of the Dr's Text ===-

Link to comment
Guest ~Brenda~

Hi Monica,

For the Red Cross to ask one's gender in the first place makes no sense, let alone indentified gender vs biological gender. Blood type is essentially genderless from a blood processing point of view. When blood is taken to be used in medicine, it is broken down into it's basic components, and then combined with other donors. By the time a patient recieves a blood transfusion, they are not receiving blood from a single donor. It is in only unusual cases that whole blood from a single donor is given.

Puzzling?

Brenda

Link to comment

My partner is FtM and until December was donating plasma twice a week, he is not on T or had any surgeries but he informed the doctor at the center that sometime in the future he was going to transition, they immediately banned him from giving plasma on the grounds of intent.

Paula

Link to comment
Hi Monica,

For the Red Cross to ask one's gender in the first place makes no sense, let alone indentified gender vs biological gender. Blood type is essentially genderless from a blood processing point of view. When blood is taken to be used in medicine, it is broken down into it's basic components, and then combined with other donors. By the time a patient recieves a blood transfusion, they are not receiving blood from a single donor. It is in only unusual cases that whole blood from a single donor is given.

Puzzling?

Brenda

Bernii / Brenda :

All that aside .. 5 years ago when I gave blood for the one and only time to the red cross .. I was forced to use a gender test on the blood .. with a vial that has a liquid that will make male blood float near top and female blood settle to a lower level in vial. It tests the iron content. Anyhow when a few drops of blood were dropped in it from a pin prick to my finger .. at first they danced at top and then went right to bottom. That test proves two things that yes I spent some time under influence of testosterone in my life but now due to HRT have female blood in my veins with a higher iron content. The higher iron content is caused in the case of MTF by the fact that HRT makes our system mimic a normal females replacement factor for what she bleeds out monthly. But, since we dont have a uterus, we dont bleed it out. So our iron content is normally higher than even a gg or a gm has. It's a weird thing but they feel they need to indicate that on blood what the gender of doner was. In my case I was ok with the test as it got me listed as Female in their database back then .. but I wont donate again for two reasons : 1.) I did not like the weak feeling that donating gave me .. I actually got sick to my stomache the evening I donated 5 years ago. 2.) the questions the doc got asked are also now asked in Connecticut where I live and like him I dont wish to indicate birth gender which in my case was intersexxed. I was operated on at a week old and raised male before I got to start HRT 14 years ago. So yeah I dont wish to indicate my origins in a national database thats like the doc said could later get shared by some change in rules or laws. It's no one elses business what my origins are except for where I choose to tell of it.

Monica_Jennifer

Link to comment
Guest ~Brenda~

Scary stuff Monica :unsure:

Makes me worried about the true motive behind those questions that the blood bank is asking. I may sound paranoid, but I wonder who decided that the Red Cross should ask such questions, and why did they think it was a good idea.

I totally agree with you hon that no one should ever give out gender information like that to anyone but trusted people (defintely not to strangers!)

Anyway, I thank you for pointing this out. I hope that no one accidently falls into this trap and answers the questions only to be outed by people who do not understand.

HUGS

Brenda

Link to comment

Paula,

The exact same thing happened to me. I donated 2 times per week for some extra pocket money. In April when I started HRT I told them the drugs I was taking. Foolishly I said I am trans and I am in the transition process. I was immediately banned. The reason, "It is the risk that you will have sex with another man." Never mind that when I started my review i was asked about my wife and family. I had written the company and have yet to hear a reply.

Janis

Link to comment
Guest Kaitlyn88

Well if the reason is really because they assume our blood is diseased because we probably had sex with a man that is stupid. I haven't had sex since 2008 and I've only been attracted to women. I'm lesbian. Even the trans people that have had sex with a man who cares so have straight women. The men having sex with trans women are the same ones having it with straight girls because gay men aren't interested in us. Maybe like 20 years ago mostly gay men had it but now it's mostly straight people anyways.

I would just not tell them. It's none of their business, doesn't effect anything and I know I don't have diseases. Plus my blood is even O negative and in high demand. If they asked if I was born a woman I would say yes. As far as I'm concerned I was, I may have been born XXY so technically I was born physically neither and mentally female. I've never considered myself male even when I played the part. So it's not lying to me. Also it's helping people get blood that need it so the way I see it, it is the right thing to do. Don't let their discriminatory practices keep you from helping people.

If there was some problem or risk with giving someone XXY blood then of course I would tell them. Chromosomes don't matter though and their only reasoning is that I might have had sex with a man with HIV. Not for any reasoning other then the wrong stereotype that we are high risk sex addicts in the gay community. Like I said I'm lesbian too but that still doesn't keep them from using that stereotype. I would just find the question so offensive and unreasonable.

Link to comment
Guest NatalieRene
Paula,

The exact same thing happened to me. I donated 2 times per week for some extra pocket money. In April when I started HRT I told them the drugs I was taking. Foolishly I said I am trans and I am in the transition process. I was immediately banned. The reason, "It is the risk that you will have sex with another man." Never mind that when I started my review i was asked about my wife and family. I had written the company and have yet to hear a reply.

Janis

So a future risk that has nothing to do with the present is enough for them to ban someone from donating blood. I guess beggars can be choosers. Thats what happens when politics is involved.

Link to comment
Guest Amanda joan

The last time I gave blood they told me that I may be at risk for mad cow disease. I was like what the heck are you talking about. They said that since I was in Europe in 1986 that I could be a carrier. Then I told them that the only thing I bought off the ship was beer. It is so crazy. We are all human beings. Blood is blood, especially when you need a transfusion. I have had sex with and man and so has my ex-Wife. So which one of us is in better health? I guess she is because she was born a woman physically. That makes no sense at all. But we are talking about the Red Cross they have made allot of boneheaded decisions in the pass, so I guess nothing has changed there.

Peace & Love Amanda

Link to comment
Guest SusanKG

I used to be a regular donor, but the medication for my high blood pressure disqualified me from giving, so I don't face this issue. I hope I can still get blood! My first reaction is "blood is blood, what's the difference?" but I suspect it does make a difference in typing bio male vs. bio female blood, not some sort of find-the-trannys campaign. Come to think of it, if bio female blood IS different, maybe I should get a complete transfusion! :rolleyes: Any medical background people out there with some scientific answer?

SusanKG

Link to comment

Gender should be irrelevant when it comes to transfusing blood. When I was trained up on how to do a battlefield transfusion it was never brought up that there were differences in male to female blood making cross gender transfusions contraindicated. The procedure in that type of environment is very risky and obviously only used as a last resort, but of all the risks I was taught about it gender never came up.

From what I've read above the only difference between genders when it comes to blood is females have a higher iron content. If that's the only difference then there's no reason a female can't receive a transfusion originating from a male and vice versa.

Karin

Link to comment
Guest Sunshine
When blood is taken to be used in medicine, it is broken down into it's basic components, and then combined with other donors. By the time a patient recieves a blood transfusion, they are not receiving blood from a single donor. It is in only unusual cases that whole blood from a single donor is given.

As a Hematologist for 6 years, working in blood banking for 2 years, I see where you might have gotten that impression though.

Red blood cells are VERY closely tracked. Though at one time, there were a few places that pooled blood donations, even China has stopped the practice (there was an HIV epidemic started because of it which they still deny causing). In the 90's, here in the US a huge amount of the frozen blood pool had to be destroyed because it had been pooled and could not be traced back to individual donors.

Plasma is still pooled, but anything with cells in it (red cells, platelets) are traced VERY closely.

In addition, there are more blood types than the ABO, and RH +/- that most people know about. Off the top of my head I can think of about 20-30. A couple of these other blood groups are gender specific.

The danger is from the possibility that a person that has received a blood product once, may develop antibodies which could cause a bad reaction to a second exposure to blood of the same type. (Nobody talks much about it, but it can also cause a higher risk of miscarriages).

There is no hidden agenda in asking the questions. They just want to make sure that when an individual develops a reaction to one or more types of blood, they have a better chance of finding a good match.

Sometimes it is REALLY hard to find a match for someone that has received a lot of transfusions in the past. How ironic would it be if not listing your birth gender put someone's life at risk?

Ignorance can kill sometimes.

This is not an instance of conspiracy, it is just complicated immunology that takes a while to explain. Most phlebotomists (the people drawing the blood) are not taught all of this in detail. They don't need to know it in order to take blood.

My immunology books are in storage, or I would look up the gender blood groups and post them. Also, I think there was something specific with regard to Epstein Barr Virus issues involving gender as well, but it has been more than 10 years since I read the article.

I hope this clears up some confusion.

Love & Light,

HM2 Sunshine (ex USN)

Link to comment
Guest Donna Jean

No one has brought up the fact yet that one antiandorgen that many of us MTF's take is Finistride (sp?).

It's something that pregnant women CANNOT have in there bloodstream...

It even says on the bottle for them not to even handle it!

....considered unadvisable if women of pregnancy age are in the household; this is because finasteride, even in small concentrations, can cause birth defects in a developing male fetus. The birth defects involve the development of male genitalia (no such effects have been noted in developing female fetuses). On most product inserts, it will be mentioned that the dust or crumbs from broken Proscar tablets should be kept away from pregnant women.

So here is one real reason to be cautious!

HUGGS!

Donna Jean

Link to comment
Guest Ryles_D

Needing to know what medication (including HRT) we're on- I can understand. If there are sex-specific things that HRT doesn't change, then I can understand needing to know that. But if a person hasn't transitioned at all/isn't on HRT, then why does it matter?!

Like Paula's partner- banned on the grounds of intent? Intent to what? I'm sure if they made it clear he'd need to tell them before he started on T, he would have done so, but in the mean time that's blood & plasma that someone could use. And Janis- banned on the grounds of "clearly you're just a confused, oversexed homo"? That is offensive.

Link to comment
Guest Donna Jean

I totally agree with you, Hon............

And the sadder part of the whole thing is that we're trying to help out with our donations and giving our very lifeblood..

Yes..

And Janis- banned on the grounds of "clearly you're just a confused, oversexed homo"? That is offensive.

That IS offensive...VERY!

You make good points, Hon...real good....

Thanks...

Donna Jean

Link to comment
So a future risk that has nothing to do with the present is enough for them to ban someone from donating blood

In my case yes it is. I was told by the doctor and a company rep that "even though you are in a monogamous relationship and your medication does not preclude you, bbecause of your lifestyle choice you are considered a high risk donor. For that reason we must permanatly prohibit you from donation."

Then stop calling me asking for my O neg. Do not bother my family either since they have my crossdresser cooties.

Janis

Link to comment
Guest i is Sam :-)

I guess they could be valid reasons for wanting to know. If you presented as male for instance but had previously given birth I believe your blood contains traces of certain anti bodies and things. I don't know if that actually affects a transfusion but I guess they have to be care.

The sex with a man thing is beyond pathetic, even if you are a gay man having sex with another gay man, there is no increased risk of anything, the increased risk comes from a risky lifestyle, drug use, unprotected sex, statistically gay people make a larger section of that group, but any specific individual isn't any more or less likely to be carring a disease just because of their orientation.

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator
As a Hematologist for 6 years, working in blood banking for 2 years, I see where you might have gotten that impression though.

Red blood cells are VERY closely tracked. Though at one time, there were a few places that pooled blood donations, even China has stopped the practice (there was an HIV epidemic started because of it which they still deny causing). In the 90's, here in the US a huge amount of the frozen blood pool had to be destroyed because it had been pooled and could not be traced back to individual donors.

Plasma is still pooled, but anything with cells in it (red cells, platelets) are traced VERY closely.

In addition, there are more blood types than the ABO, and RH +/- that most people know about. Off the top of my head I can think of about 20-30. A couple of these other blood groups are gender specific.

The danger is from the possibility that a person that has received a blood product once, may develop antibodies which could cause a bad reaction to a second exposure to blood of the same type. (Nobody talks much about it, but it can also cause a higher risk of miscarriages).

There is no hidden agenda in asking the questions. They just want to make sure that when an individual develops a reaction to one or more types of blood, they have a better chance of finding a good match.

Sometimes it is REALLY hard to find a match for someone that has received a lot of transfusions in the past. How ironic would it be if not listing your birth gender put someone's life at risk?

Ignorance can kill sometimes.

This is not an instance of conspiracy, it is just complicated immunology that takes a while to explain. Most phlebotomists (the people drawing the blood) are not taught all of this in detail. They don't need to know it in order to take blood.

My immunology books are in storage, or I would look up the gender blood groups and post them. Also, I think there was something specific with regard to Epstein Barr Virus issues involving gender as well, but it has been more than 10 years since I read the article.

I hope this clears up some confusion.

Love & Light,

HM2 Sunshine (ex USN)

Thank you for the more indepth explanation. I had no idea that the transfusion thing was so complicated. The Red Cross needs to add a short explanation on their forms. That way the prospective donors would know exactly why they were not allowed to donate instead a a "get lost you weirdo" attitude.

Mike

Link to comment
Guest TheAetherealMeadow
In my case yes it is. I was told by the doctor and a company rep that "even though you are in a monogamous relationship and your medication does not preclude you, bbecause of your lifestyle choice you are considered a high risk donor. For that reason we must permanatly prohibit you from donation."

Then stop calling me asking for my O neg. Do not bother my family either since they have my crossdresser cooties.

Janis

Wow... :o That's an outrage! Not only is the law that bars MSMs (men who have sex with men) from donating blood ridiculous, but the fact that the doctor not only denied your gender identity by considering you a man, but also the fact that (s)he assumed that just because you are trans you must also be sexually promiscuous is beyond prejudiced. This really shows the unfortunate amount of homophobia and transphobia that still exists in healthcare.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 151 Guests (See full list)

    • kristinabee
    • Karen Carey
    • Betty K
    • JessicaMW
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      769.3k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,057
    • Most Online
      8,356

    Aleksandria
    Newest Member
    Aleksandria
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Conner_Sent_By_Cyberlife
      Conner_Sent_By_Cyberlife
      (22 years old)
    2. CtN1p
      CtN1p
    3. heyim_finn
      heyim_finn
      (21 years old)
    4. Jayn
      Jayn
    5. joni_girl_1988
      joni_girl_1988
      (51 years old)
  • Posts

    • Ladypcnj
      Thanks Sally Stone
    • KymmieL
      Thanks, Mindy. It has been so far. Tomorrow, work some more on the wife's grand monkey. Got the right side of the hood primed, just need to do a little more work on the left then I can prime it. Then a 600grit wet sand.   I promised the wife we would take out the bike this weekend.   Kymmie
    • JessicaMW
      During my last visit with my psychologist (who has agreed to provide required letters of recommendation along with a colleague to provide the second) we discussed the shift towards my wife's acceptance. It was a long discussion but one point I mentioned was how much the two of us sitting down and watching this documentary helped:  The Kings | A transgender love story (2017)
    • Betty K
      Oops, I did not mean to post that comment yet! I was going to also say, having read a mountain of commentary on the Review, I think Julia Serano’s response (linked by Vicky above) is the most accurate and thorough. You can also read a non-paywalled version at Substack: https://juliaserano.substack.com/p/the-cass-review-wpath-files-and-the   To me the three key areas in which the review is deficient are:   1. As has already been said here, its views on social transition;   2. Its attempts to give credence to the “ROGD” theory (without ever actually mentioning ROGD because presumably a canny editor knows that would be too transparently transphobic);   3. To me, most crucially, its claims about trans youth and suicide, which are dealt with summarily in about five pages and do not stand up to any deeper scrutiny.    I will be writing about each of these issues in isolation over the next few weeks and appearing on a radio show and podcast to discuss them late in the month. I will post links to these on TP later if anyone is interested.   All that said, I actually think it’s dangerous for us to respond with outright vitriol and condemnation to the review since, like any effective piece of disinformation, it does actually contain some factually based and even helpful recommendations. The Tavistock Gender Identity Service really was underfunded and understaffed and certain staff were not adequately trained. Trans kids really were funnelled away from mental-health support once they started gender-affirming care too. So yes, more investment in youth psychology services would help, as would a less centralised model of care, more training in treatment of trans kids, and more research.   One last thing for now: beware the claim that Cass ignored 98% of studies. That’s not strictly true. She seems to have taken other studies into account but leaned heavily on the 2% that met her standards. Nor does she ever claim that only randomised controlled trials are good enough evidence to justify the use of blockers for kids; just as with ROGD, she strongly suggests this, but is too canny to say it, because she knows such trials would be impossible. For now, I think the best response to this comes from the Trans Safety Network: “[…] we believe there to be systemic biases in the ways that the review prioritises speculative and hearsay evidence to advance its own recommendations while using highly stringent evidence standards to exclude empirical and observational data on actual patients. “ (https://transsafety.network/posts/tsn-statement-on-cass-final-report/)   To me, the scariest aspect of all this is that, if it follows Cass’s recommendations, the NHS will very likely follow Finland’s recent model of trans care, which seems to amount to a prolonged form of conversion therapy. I can’t find the link right now, which is probably lucky for anyone reading this, but I bawled my guts out reading the testimonies of kids who had been mistreated by that system. Truly horrific. To me, at least from my Australian perspective, the Cass Review is the most frightening development in trans rights in recent years. To me, the safe care of trans kids is THE number one issue in politics atm.   Ruth Pierce has a good summary of responses from trans folk and their allies sk far: https://ruthpearce.net/2024/04/16/whats-wrong-with-the-cass-review-a-round-up-of-commentary-and-evidence/    
    • Sally Stone
      Welcome to the wide, wild world of transgender, M.A.  It can definitively be overwhelming, but everyone here is amazing, so no doubt you'll get bunches of wonderful support. I think you'll be happy you found us.   
    • Sally Stone
      @Ladypcnj  This is so true.  I think all of us here have had a post or two that didn't get a response.  Sometimes, it's as simple as adding to your original to post for a clearer explanation, or re-reading what you wrote originally, and rephrasing it.  But don't despair, we aren't ignoring you.   Hugs,   Sally 
    • Willow
      So, we left for lunch in our Taos, talked and went to the dealer and came home with the Cadillac.  
    • Betty K
      I have just finished reading the Cass Review, all 380-odd pages of it, and am totally open to questions including via DM if anyone wants more information on it
    • Abigail Genevieve
      What season are you?  If you don't know, look around on the internet. Or ask a girl friend..  Maybe someone here is even a color consultant?   And there are guides on figure-flattering clothes for all shapes that you should look into.    Abby
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      Just know that your kids will probably turn out OK, in spite of the chaos.  One of my partners was widowed in her very early 30s, left with 3 kids.  They're teens now, and one graduated a year ago and is working, but still living at home.  A few bumps in the road, but the three are turning into responsible young adults.  It is amazing how resilient kids can be.  They should be able to handle your changes as well.
    • Adrianna Danielle
      Had my time with my 2 long friends I was in the Army with.We went through the photo books and talked memories.They also found about the guy that bullied and sexually assaulted me.He is in prison,sexually assaulted and raped 2 women off base.Doing a 40 year sentence for this and was dishonorable discharged
    • Cindy Lee
      I've been transitioning now for eight months but have been wearing women's clothing for 2+ years. I am over weight and approaching my 72nd birthday. I have purchase my solid color clothing online and recently graduated to 'V' neck tops. I have been hesitant to get anything more girly due to family issues, though with my hair style I am able to totally pass when dressed in a skirt and blouse.   About two  months ago I finally went and got my nails done (which I truly which I had done long ago) though not red nor pink (again family issues). To date I don't think I am having problems with being trans unlike others seem to have. The biggest problem I am having is with my clothing. Any suggestions my girl friends might have would be greatly appreciated.   Cindy
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      Umm.... if a post is ignored, live with it?   My stuff gets ignored sometimes, and its OK.  My life is different, and may seem kind of wacky to others.  Some folks just can't relate, or if I'm needing advice they just don't have it.  Diversity is like that sometimes.  If your post gets missed, don't take it personally.  Also, stuff that is new on weekends seems to get ignored more, since most folks are busy with family or other stuff during that time.  Overall, I think people here are pretty helpful. 
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      I'd really love a professional stove.  There's actually one I want at Lowes, but its like $6k.  I've got plenty of money, the issue is that I'm not the queen (king?) of my den.  Or even of the kitchen.  My partner (husband's wife #1) owns that territory, and she's very attached to what she's got.  One of our stoves has 6 burners and a large oven, the other has 4 burners and a regular household sized oven.  And of course, there's always the wood-burning equipment.    Today was interesting.  We had the first campaign fundraiser for our sheriff and my sister.  My sister is running to be constable of our township.  Pretty sure she'll win, as her opponent is an old dude who is mostly running on "Don't elect a woman for a man's job"    What's weird is our sheriff is running as a Democrat, but he's conservative.  And his Republican opponent sounds like a leftist.  Welcome to Upside-down-ville   And of course all the kids got the chance to sit in a sheriff's car, and play with the lights.   We had a barbecue lunch and a dessert auction.  I baked three apple pies for it, and I was shocked that they sold for $20 each, since my cooking isn't that great.  My partner made her famous "Chocotorta."  It's like a chocolate layer cake with cream cheese, sweetened condensed milk, and it tastes amazing.  Usually we have it for Christmas and other really special occasions.  Two guys got into a bid war, and it sold for $175!!!    Yep, this is politics in the South.  Barbecue, pies, and police cars.  A great way to spend a Saturday
    • Davie
      Yes. That report is part of a conspiracy to torture and murder trans people. It is a lie. It is evil.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...