Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Are We Actually Just Being Used?


Guest Jessica22450

Recommended Posts

Guest Jessica22450

Hello, the reason I bring this up is because regardless of political views, I think what i'm seeing behind the "Yes we're being heard!" chanting, that more and more each day, we're nothing more than a political pawn, something that lately it's the left-wing, but the right isn't fully innocent, but I feel they have done what they've done what they've done in D.C. not to help us but so they can go back to the electorate and say "See we actually did something, what do you think the other side would've done?". And it isn't just the slimy politicians, The Media is also guilty of playing these political games, take the recent event at the mall "The Rally to restore Sanity" a.k.a 10.02.10, what was that about? to me another political game, civil rights groups were there, but, only jobs, unions, etc. were mentioned, I ask you please examine this, whether you're Liberal, conservative, or Libertarian, what is really going on, and are we really being heard? or is it just a political fight for bragging rights? Thank you.

Link to comment
Guest April63

Sadly much of today's politics is just a popularity game with a lot of money involved. American political parties are a joke (unfortunately). My philosophy is just to try and vote for the right thing, but along with it you get a bunch of junk and votes for the wrong thing.

Link to comment
Guest KimberlyF

Both sides play their base and do as little as possible to keep them coming back. Bush held the abortion carrot for years and with both houses there was no movement. In 2009 with the biggest margins in my lifetime there was zero real talks by the Dems over DADT. Now last week a few bite the bullet for the tough vote and the rest won't have to even officially vote for it. Why no talk of the nuclear option and limiting the opposition party? Cause this isn't about controlling billions like HC. We tried...shucks!

My view that one parties members are better than the other could be slightly tainted by the fact I live in a city that never goes R and I work on a union job loaded with racist masogynistic homophobes who do nothing but badmouth how evil Chaney was. Their dictionaries don't have irony in them. Oh and Muslims spread bedbugs.

We need to dissolve the two party good old boy system and have candidates run on what they and not their party stands for.

Kim

Link to comment
Guest TracieV3

Hello, the reason I bring this up is because regardless of political views, I think what i'm seeing behind the "Yes we're being heard!" chanting, that more and more each day, we're nothing more than a political pawn, something that lately it's the left-wing, but the right isn't fully innocent, but I feel they have done what they've done what they've done in D.C. not to help us but so they can go back to the electorate and say "See we actually did something, what do you think the other side would've done?". And it isn't just the slimy politicians, The Media is also guilty of playing these political games, take the recent event at the mall "The Rally to restore Sanity" a.k.a 10.02.10, what was that about? to me another political game, civil rights groups were there, but, only jobs, unions, etc. were mentioned, I ask you please examine this, whether you're Liberal, conservative, or Libertarian, what is really going on, and are we really being heard? or is it just a political fight for bragging rights? Thank you.

I am coming out of lurking to answer you question Jessica.

The sad fact is that yes, those in D.C. whom claim to be in support of GLBT issues are only paying lip-service to transgendered people. The latest example is the abandonment of democrats this year on amending "Hate Crime" laws to protect transgendered people.

It is worse when you realize that most groups in this country, from all across the political spectrum are being used by those in government. And no one in these groups are getting anything in return.

This is one of the major reason you will find why the "Tea Party" is an anti-incumbent movement. The people from all walks of life are peed off at being used and abused by those in power, those in government.

Right now, neither party in power supports transgendered people.

Sometimes we have to step back, to a look at the situation of whole forest, and wait for the opportunity act.

Link to comment
  • 3 weeks later...
Guest Melisiris

The tea-party is not a grassroots movement it is funded and founded by the Koch brothers(multi billionaires out of the oil industry) and penis Army(republican) and friends to secure their special interest money. Those people in power(well they already have some power but giving them more power) will be worse than anything you can ever imagine. So support the lesser evil, support the democrats.(I can't vote, I am not an american citizen, but i know what i would do))

Link to comment
Guest ChloëC

Where I live slightly in the country on a fairly popular dirt road, I have two political signs in my front yard which is right at the top of a hill. One for a Democrat, one for a Republican. I'm sure anyone passing thinks I must be crazy for not supporting the one party or the other. I think I'm one of few actual intelligent voters because I actually look at the voting records, I read the candidate's stances on issues. I actually talk to the candidates when I can.

But, yes, we are being used, because we aren't a significant voting block yet. When upwards of 40% of the voting public can support a dead person or a convicted criminal, because that's what the losing candidate in a two party system can almost assuredly get, we're in big trouble. And that includes all small groups like us.

Another reality is that in looking at all the public figures, there really isn't a single one today that looks fit to be President. The Republican party was practically destroyed in the last election. If someone wanted to destroy the Democratic party, well, our current leader couldn't have done a much better job. I'm not happy with our current leadership, and I am extremely fearful for what may happen with anyone else.

The Tea Party really is for getting rid of all taxes. Really. That is their ultimate goal. By doing that, Federal Government will disappear, and the big corporations will be able to do just as please with no one stopping them. The appeal to the 'little man/woman', by those who control the Tea Party is just as phony as the appeal to the 'little man/woman' by either major party. It's about power, control, and money. And we as tg have little...or none.

As rich as the rich currently are, they want to get richer, and unfortunately that will happen by making us poorer.

I'm in the interview process for a job right now, with a very big US company, and after the first interview, I understand completely what it's all about. They are creating a new structure with lower pay and benefits than what they are currently giving their employees. It would appear if this new structure is successful, it will jeopardize a large number of current jobs. I'm not happy about it, personally. I suppose I could take my principles and march right out and over the unemployment office, but that won't pay a lot of bills, and anyway when the Republicans take office, those allowances will dry up, with no new jobs in sight.

Hugs

Chloë

Link to comment
  • 2 weeks later...
  • Forum Moderator

We need to dissolve the two party good old boy system and have candidates run on what they and not their party stands for.

Kim

No kidding !! The 2 party system is the problem. However it's so entrenched it will never go away in my lifetime, I'm afraid.

Cindy (libertarian hippie chick) -

Link to comment
Guest Donna Jean

"penis Army", hehe, this is one of the few occasions the censoring on this site makes it worse, it makes a normal first name into penis.

And sometimes it just makes it "sing".....LOL

Donna Jean

Link to comment

No kidding !! The 2 party system is the problem. However it's so entrenched it will never go away in my lifetime, I'm afraid.

Cindy (libertarian hippie chick) -

Not necessarily, Cindy...

Just look at the UK. For decades the Conservatists and the Labour Party, had been taking turns ruling the country and acting on behalf of "her Majesty, the Queen". And yet, now for the first time in decades, there is a cabinet formed out of two parties: the Conservatists, and the Liberal Democrats. (Or 'LibDem', for short)

Because, with the last elections, neither of the big parties had enough seats in the Commons for a sufficient majority.

Oh, and by the way: Nick Clegg, the head of LibDem, is of Dutch descent.

Love,

Tiaria (your bread-and-peanut butter socialist)

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

Not necessarily, Cindy...

Just look at the UK. For decades the Conservatists and the Labour Party, had been taking turns ruling the country and acting on behalf of "her Majesty, the Queen". And yet, now for the first time in decades, there is a cabinet formed out of two parties: the Conservatists, and the Liberal Democrats. (Or 'LibDem', for short)

Because, with the last elections, neither of the big parties had enough seats in the Commons for a sufficient majority.

Oh, and by the way: Nick Clegg, the head of LibDem, is of Dutch descent.

Love,

Tiaria (your bread-and-peanut butter socialist)

Yes Tiaria, I realize the power two opposing forces. I think in the case of the US the time is ripe for a 3rd force to balance out things a bit more. 2 parties just seems limited in what it can accomplish and is really not representative. There was a time in US politics when 3 parties were quite viable, however that was long in the past.

BTW have been to UK and Netherlands, very nice to visit there.

Peace for earth (maybe, there is hope).

Cindy -

Link to comment

It doesn't really matter why they do what they do. If we can get them to support our cause in any way that's fine with me.

If we say "we'll reelect you next term if you do this.", are we not the ones pulling the strings?

Link to comment

Yes Tiaria, I realize the power two opposing forces. I think in the case of the US the time is ripe for a 3rd force to balance out things a bit more. 2 parties just seems limited in what it can accomplish and is really not representative. There was a time in US politics when 3 parties were quite viable, however that was long in the past.

BTW have been to UK and Netherlands, very nice to visit there.

Peace for earth (maybe, there is hope).

Cindy -

Even 'worse', here, Cindy...

Our house of representatives has (last time I checked) 250 seats, with (darm, lost count) about ten parties dividing it. Every election there are about 18 parties on the billet, since we have a low treshhold for electability.

I have never seen a single party in charge. Compromise, every four years. And such cabinets have direct accountability to the House of Represetatives.

A few months ago, there was a fierce debate on LGBT rights, including being able to change your legal gender without sterilization. That is, without SRS.

Don't remember the outcome, though.

Oh, and Cindy? You're welcome to drop by, again, any time ;)

Tiaria

Link to comment
  • 2 weeks later...
Guest TracieV3

The tea-party is not a grassroots movement it is funded and founded by the Koch brothers(multi billionaires out of the oil industry) and penis Army(republican) and friends to secure their special interest money. Those people in power(well they already have some power but giving them more power) will be worse than anything you can ever imagine. So support the lesser evil, support the democrats.(I can't vote, I am not an american citizen, but i know what i would do))

The democrat party is using us. I go into details below, and I offer some ideas for solutions to help us.

Now, I would think people here would know better than to make broad, generaized statements. Soros, a billionaire as well, has his hands in almost every political group on the democrat side. By your standards there are no grassroots in this nation, just puppet organizations for special interest groups.

We both no that is not true.

Has anyone here actually tried to approach the Tea Parties group in a polite manner?

And attacking the republicans in one overgeneralize statement is counterproductive. There are several issues that can be used to bridge transgender issues to reach out to republicans. Start with the basically. For example, the Pink Pistols, a gay pro-gun ownership organization, and work for there. Jobs would also be another issue to work with.

Obamacare is going to make it harder me and others to pay for HRT. It pushes back my plans for years, given obamacare creates higher taxes, and more government bureaucracy between me and my doctors. And if those in D.C, IN BOTH PARTIES, are any example, obamacare will do it's best to prevent transsexuals from getting the medical care we need.

I have read some of obamacare's thousands of pages, that is more than the people in D.C. whom voted for it did. The bill is all about limiting medical access and resources for everyone except the politicians think

Communism, fascism, islam and a number of other systems are very anti-trans anything to the point of torture and execution. At least in a capitalist system we have a chance to make the money to afford to transition ourselves. That is not going to be the case in the communist system this nation is becoming.

Transgender people have been towing the line for the democrat party for decades with only crumbs to show for results. It is not working. We as a people need to start playing all the angles we can. Not just supporting one party. We need to find inroads to politically support individuals from all parties. Now, if you have a better idea, I am listening.

And if you are wonder, I have been on the receiving end of a lot of abuse from both government and religion, and those in government are far more sadistic. I have received bigotry from all sides. I am a capitalist anarchist.

I don't like the democrat party for bigotry I have personally received from their members. As far as a lot of democrats are concerned, because I was born south of the mason-dixie line, white skin, physically born male, as far as the democrat members I have personal met are concerned, I am a born dump bigot that hates non-whites and women (which I don't), and that if those democrat members had their way, I would either spend the rest of my life in prison, or executed by government because of the circumstances of my birth.

A few years ago, I told my parts I was a transsexual, there VERY conservative, and they told me that they would love me no matter what.

So, I highly suggest not to burn bridges until you at least try to cross them.

Link to comment

Where I live slightly in the country on a fairly popular dirt road, I have two political signs in my front yard which is right at the top of a hill. One for a Democrat, one for a Republican. I'm sure anyone passing thinks I must be crazy for not supporting the one party or the other. I think I'm one of few actual intelligent voters because I actually look at the voting records, I read the candidate's stances on issues. I actually talk to the candidates when I can.

But, yes, we are being used, because we aren't a significant voting block yet. When upwards of 40% of the voting public can support a dead person or a convicted criminal, because that's what the losing candidate in a two party system can almost assuredly get, we're in big trouble. And that includes all small groups like us.

Another reality is that in looking at all the public figures, there really isn't a single one today that looks fit to be President. The Republican party was practically destroyed in the last election. If someone wanted to destroy the Democratic party, well, our current leader couldn't have done a much better job. I'm not happy with our current leadership, and I am extremely fearful for what may happen with anyone else.

The Tea Party really is for getting rid of all taxes. Really. That is their ultimate goal. By doing that, Federal Government will disappear, and the big corporations will be able to do just as please with no one stopping them. The appeal to the 'little man/woman', by those who control the Tea Party is just as phony as the appeal to the 'little man/woman' by either major party. It's about power, control, and money. And we as tg have little...or none.

As rich as the rich currently are, they want to get richer, and unfortunately that will happen by making us poorer.

I'm in the interview process for a job right now, with a very big US company, and after the first interview, I understand completely what it's all about. They are creating a new structure with lower pay and benefits than what they are currently giving their employees. It would appear if this new structure is successful, it will jeopardize a large number of current jobs. I'm not happy about it, personally. I suppose I could take my principles and march right out and over the unemployment office, but that won't pay a lot of bills, and anyway when the Republicans take office, those allowances will dry up, with no new jobs in sight.

Hugs

Chloë

Chloe, you brought up an interesting point. Many people do not do their homework on the candidates. I have moved away from the political parties years ago. It's up to us as citizens to speak for ourselves. I am part of an organization that gets no government funding or corporate backing. It's working to create an independent media that speaks to the concerns of every day citizen.

There are many organizations that won't support because they're nothing more than money making scams. If I mentioned a few, I would probably get crucified but it's the truth. I have said that transgender people need to speak for themselves. I'm at the point in my life where I want to make a difference in someone's life. I don't have time for semantics and politics.

Gennne

:)

Link to comment
  • 2 weeks later...

"penis Army", hehe, this is one of the few occasions the censoring on this site makes it worse, it makes a normal first name into penis.

And in this case correctly so..what is former V.P Cheney's first name?...how appropriate can we get.....both the first names apply, for Army and Cheney,and what a dumb derivative of Richard,unless you think of Richard III , then the name applies,...

The censor has it right....biggrin.gif

Link to comment
Guest stranger

I think that the U.S. electorate isn't getting served so much as "serviced," so we genderly-interesting people aren't alone...

Basically, we would ALL like good jobs, good healthcare, and expanding opportunities. Even those Americans who hate us want that.

I think the whole social agenda thing was a distraction from that, and if you said to a bunch of American bigots: "Would you vote in politicians who locked up the LGBT people if it meant those same politicians also sent your jobs overseas?" the answer would be "NO!"

Even people who don't like us don't hate us that much.

The funny thing is? they voted for anti-GLBT politicians, we are still slowly advancing, and their jobs got shipped overseas anyway. They got played.

How many years have people been organizing against the right to choose? And abortions are still mostly legal?

Because they got played, too.

The politicians are mostly a force for stagnation...sometimes that's good, sometimes that's bad. They take our money, our energy, brains, effort, ambition, and suck them up like a giant vacuum cleaner.

That having been said, I'll still vote for democrats, because I'd rather be disappointed than appalled. But Big Money controls the most important thing of all-who we are allowed to vote for.

Count me as one peasant who finds that revolting.

Link to comment
Guest TracieV3

I think that the U.S. electorate isn't getting served so much as "serviced," so we genderly-interesting people aren't alone...

Basically, we would ALL like good jobs, good healthcare, and expanding opportunities. Even those Americans who hate us want that.

I think the whole social agenda thing was a distraction from that, and if you said to a bunch of American bigots: "Would you vote in politicians who locked up the LGBT people if it meant those same politicians also sent your jobs overseas?" the answer would be "NO!"

Even people who don't like us don't hate us that much.

The funny thing is? they voted for anti-GLBT politicians, we are still slowly advancing, and their jobs got shipped overseas anyway. They got played.

How many years have people been organizing against the right to choose? And abortions are still mostly legal?

Because they got played, too.

The politicians are mostly a force for stagnation...sometimes that's good, sometimes that's bad. They take our money, our energy, brains, effort, ambition, and suck them up like a giant vacuum cleaner.

That having been said, I'll still vote for democrats, because I'd rather be disappointed than appalled. But Big Money controls the most important thing of all-who we are allowed to vote for.

Count me as one peasant who finds that revolting.

You understand part of it. You forget that bigotry knows no single ideology.

They don't vote so much as for anti-GLBT politicians, as they voted against anti-conservative politicians that are bigots towards them conservatives.

There are those on both sides that would gladly kill everyone that disagree with them. There is hatred on all sides.

Not recognizing the hatred on the side you are on makes your position even harder.

People in general do not knowingly vote for those that they think will slit their throats.

Link to comment

You understand part of it. You forget that bigotry knows no single ideology.

They don't vote so much as for anti-GLBT politicians, as they voted against anti-conservative politicians that are bigots towards them conservatives.

There are those on both sides that would gladly kill everyone that disagree with them. There is hatred on all sides.

Not recognizing the hatred on the side you are on makes your position even harder.

People in general do not knowingly vote for those that they think will slit their throats.

Basically, they all just keep throwing mud pies at each other, and nothing changes...

Link to comment
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 117 Guests (See full list)

    • Betty K
    • Ivy
    • VickySGV
    • April Marie
    • Maddee
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      769.3k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,058
    • Most Online
      8,356

    Aleksandria
    Newest Member
    Aleksandria
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Conner_Sent_By_Cyberlife
      Conner_Sent_By_Cyberlife
      (22 years old)
    2. CtN1p
      CtN1p
    3. heyim_finn
      heyim_finn
      (21 years old)
    4. Jayn
      Jayn
    5. joni_girl_1988
      joni_girl_1988
      (51 years old)
  • Posts

    • Betty K
      Yes, essentially. As Julia Serano says, they view trans outcomes as intrinsically worse than cis outcomes. 
    • Jani
      I used to but now its just lip gloss every now and then, in a subdued tone.
    • Ivy
      Yeah, a lot of times I don't really have anything to add to the conversation. There are some threads I seldom post on.
    • Ivy
      I have seen some things about this.  As I remember it was not very trans-friendly. The people doing these things seem to minimize the positive aspects of transition, and maximize the potential problems. Basically, make it as difficult as possible (without outright banning it) to discourage anyone from doing it.
    • Willow
      Good morning    woke up to some light rain this morning.  Maybe I should run out with a giant umbrella to cover the car.   Ha ha ha.     I’ve had really nice cars before but never something like this.     @KymmieL I hope you got to go on your ride. Back when I had my Harley we went out for a ride almost every weekend. We would head either SW down the Shenandoah Valley or Skyline Drive which danced along the tops of the Mountains or we would head west into West Virginia and just travel along until it was time to find our way home.   occasionally I wish I still had a bike but I usually quickly for get that. The only thing I ever wanted as a young person that I never had was a late 50s vette.      
    • April Marie
      I admit to wearing make-up. Actually, I'll admit to enjoying wearing make-up. For me, it's been part of learning about myself as a woman and finding a style and look that reflects my personality.    Sometimes, it will just be a bit of mascara and a touch of lipstick. But, most often I wear foundation with setting powder, gel eyeliner, mascara, a little blush on my cheek line and lipstick. I also use an eyebrow pencil to darken my brows a bit.  Infrequently, I will add some eye shadow.   Most of my make-up is from Mary Kay although my lipsticks or from various manufacturers and eyeliners are mostly Maybelline. My wife purchases most of her make-up from Mary Kay and so we order together from our local representative. Of course, I don't have much brand experience but I'm happy with the Mary Kay products and find myself transitioning almost entirely to their line of make-up.
    • KathyLauren
      I did early on, out of necessity.  Regardless of how close you shave, beard shadow shows through.  I just used a bit of foundation, setting powder and blush.    I didn't use much eye makeup.  I started out with a bit of eye liner, but I thought it gave me a "trying too hard" look.  So I mostly didn't use any.   With covid and masking, I stopped using makeup altogether.  Why bother when no one can see your face and the mask smears the makeup anyway?   When restrictions were lifted, I didn't go back to wearing makeup.  My face feminized quite nicely over the first few years of HRT.  I'll never be pretty, but I look more female than male.  (Or I like to tell myself that anyway.)  With several years of electrolysis, and with what facial hair remains turning white, I don't have much beard shadow, so there is nothing to cover up.
    • Heather Shay
    • Heather Shay
      Do you use make-up? If so, why and what  types?
    • Heather Shay
      Pride is primarily about yourself, even when it is not you who did something that you are proud about. You can also be proud of something someone else did, who you associate with, such as your children or your favorite football team. People can feel proud of their culture, their family name, or their appearance, none of which require them to actively contribute to the praiseworthy thing1. However, the opinions of others are of crucial importance, as best demonstrated when you purposefully do something that other people praise. Pride is a social emotion, and to feel proud, you need other people’s (real or imagined) confirmation that you have a reason to feel that way. Because of this, other people can also ‘be in your head’ and prevent you from feeling pride. Namely, what is praiseworthy is subjective. Things that may be considered good in a certain (cultural) group may not be praiseworthy in another (e.g., if you grew up in a family that greatly values academics, your athletic abilities may not evoke much praise). Moreover, what is praiseworthy is relative (e.g., if you are a good runner in an athletically average school, you may regularly feel proud about your times; but if you move to a school with highly competent athletes, these same times may seem unremarkable to you). Thus, the more exclusive your quality is in your surroundings, the prouder you feel. Pride has recognizable features. Although its static facial expression (typically a smile or laugh) does not clearly distinguish it from other positive emotions, it typically results in a bodily posture, gestures, and behavior that are clearly recognizable: lifting your chin, looking people in the eye, walking confidently, or in extreme cases, raising arms above your head. In a way, you try to make yourself larger and more noticeable, as if to say: ‘look at me!’ You may also exhibit more perseverance in your activities2. People generally find it very pleasant to experience pride, as it elevates our feeling of social self-worth and status3. At the same time, many social groups, religions, and cultures (especially those that are highly collectivistic, such as the East Asian or African culture) believe that pride needs to be checked. Unchecked pride leads to arrogance and misplaced feelings of superiority (‘letting something get to your head’, ‘hubris comes before the fall’), and social groups typically do not tolerate members feeling like they are superior or deserve special treatment.  
    • Heather Shay
    • Heather Shay
    • Heather Shay
    • April Marie
      Thank you @missyjo! You do wonders for my ego.   It turns out that pastel colors were the "thing" at Kentucky Derby Day so my dress was perfect. I went with white 5" heeled sandals and a wide-brimmed fuscia hat. Dinner and Mint Juleps added to the fun of watching the (recorded) festivities and races.   Perhaps, we'll repeat it for the Preakness in 2 weeks.   Right now it's just blue striped sleep shorts with pink flowers, a pink t-shirt and flip flops. I can't tell you how much wearing  sleep-rated breast forms at night has done to quell my dysphoria. 
    • April Marie
      I can still rock 5" heels.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...