Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Personal Hair Removal Machines


Guest oogie292

Recommended Posts

Guest oogie292

I have heard of people buying their own electrology or lazer machines and I just wanted others opinions. I have heard of things like the elight and the No!No but I really wanted personal reviews. Although I dont want to know about epilators. Too painful!

Link to comment
Guest Robin Winter

I have heard of people buying their own electrology or lazer machines and I just wanted others opinions. I have heard of things like the elight and the No!No but I really wanted personal reviews. Although I dont want to know about epilators. Too painful!

You know, I never bothered to look into it, because I always assumed the machines were ridiculously expensive, but I just did a little browsing and they're actually quite affordable. I might have to do a little more research, the possibility is a little intriguing.

If you're looking into a personal machine though, I wouldn't bother with the laser equipment. It's not going to be permanent. Even professional laser treatments aren't technically permanent hair removal. If you go this route, go with the electrolysis system, just make sure you practice in non visible areas for a while before moving to your face, because the risk of scarring is very real, whether you use the probe type or not.

Thanks for inspiring me to look into this. Maybe I'll get good at it and I can help out some of the local girls lol. It offends me that permanent hair removal is so bloody expensive.

Link to comment
Guest Elizabeth K

Weird - I almost forgot this. I made my own electrolysis machine (not recommended) and it worked! But I would not use it on my face because of the fear of scars. I did remove a lot of hair on my knuckles and toes. It was permanent - but... I got scared and stopped - and it took so much time.

well...

HRT did the same thing 20 years later, without the risk.

I donno - would that be the same risk with the 'home' personal electrolysis machines? Scaring?

Lizzy

Link to comment
Guest Robin Winter

Weird - I almost forgot this. I made my own electrolysis machine (not recommended) and it worked! But I would not use it on my face because of the fear of scars. I did remove a lot of hair on my knuckles and toes. It was permanent - but... I got scared and stopped - and it took so much time.

well...

HRT did the same thing 20 years later, without the risk.

I donno - would that be the same risk with the 'home' personal electrolysis machines? Scaring?

Lizzy

There is risk of scarring, but the Vector machine doesn't use a needle, and if you follow their advice the risk is minimal. I'm very seriously considering this. I think the pain would be more than worth it, and I'd just practice for a while somewhere other than my face to make sure I know what settings to use for my hair etc. Honestly, hair removal costs have really been depressing me and I've been scared that it might hold me back for a long time, but this kind of gives me a bit of hope. $200.00 for the machine plus the cost of gel and electrode resupply. Sounds a heck of a lot better than $100.00 an hour :D

Link to comment
Guest Elizabeth K

Sally has one of the machines that uses the gel, no needles. I asked if she would talk on that.

My machine I used had a needle. It would 'bubble' the hair follicle, and that was how you knew it worked. I used Sally's machine, but with the electrified tweezers option. It seemed to work somewhat, but it is so time consuming!

Lizzy

Link to comment

There is a machine called Forever Free and it is said to use radio waves - it does not hurt and it does work but the drawbacks are the time consumtion if using the electric tweeers (one minute on each hair) or the expense if you are using the pads, one inch square and you can use one three times (three minutes at a time).

The machine is about $99 and the pads run around thirty for a pack of 18.

It seemed to work when I was patient enough to use it - I will probably start up again because the dark hairs are almost gone and this works on any color.

Love ya,

Sally

Link to comment
Guest Robin Winter

There is a machine called Forever Free and it is said to use radio waves - it does not hurt and it does work but the drawbacks are the time consumtion if using the electric tweeers (one minute on each hair) or the expense if you are using the pads, one inch square and you can use one three times (three minutes at a time).

The machine is about $99 and the pads run around thirty for a pack of 18.

It seemed to work when I was patient enough to use it - I will probably start up again because the dark hairs are almost gone and this works on any color.

Love ya,

Sally

The vector works on exactly the same principle as professional equipment, and uses the same level of electrical current, just without the needle. It can take anywhere from 7 to 35 seconds per hair, depending on the setting you use, and is supposed to be "almost" painless. It's $200. I think I might just get one.

Link to comment
Guest Elizabeth K

The answer can be controversial. Your mileage may vary (YMMV) is applicable here.

My experience - which may not be typical, is the HRT causes body hair (except the beard, underarm and pubic hair) to virtually disappear, which then is replaced by a 'peach fuzz' covering. It took about two years for me.

The controversial part is the other three areas seems to have had hair growth drastically slowed. I pull my facial hair out with tweezers as it is very sparse. I once did this daily (the facial hair) now once a week. The hair is about a third of what it was two years ago. I will still have electrolysis, will probably need it to be perfectly smooth, but its not a big deal anymore. I already had electrolysis on my eyebrows and mustache areas.

The part about 'white' or 'light' hair, only seems to be a concern if you chose LASER.

I hope this helps.

Lizzy

oh oh oh

Sounds a heck of a lot better than $100.00 an hour

The cost is half that.

Link to comment
Guest Robin Winter

The answer can be controversial. Your mileage may vary (YMMV) is applicable here.

My experience - which may not be typical, is the HRT causes body hair (except the beard, underarm and pubic hair) to virtually disappear, which then is replaced by a 'peach fuzz' covering. It took about two years for me.

The controversial part is the other three areas seems to have had hair growth drastically slowed. I pull my facial hair out with tweezers as it is very sparse. I once did this daily (the facial hair) now once a week. The hair is about a third of what it was two years ago. I will still have electrolysis, will probably need it to be perfectly smooth, but its not a big deal anymore. I already had electrolysis on my eyebrows and mustache areas.

The part about 'white' or 'light' hair, only seems to be a concern if you chose LASER.

I hope this helps.

Lizzy

oh oh oh

Sounds a heck of a lot better than $100.00 an hour

The cost is half that.

I'm told it varies from 60-100 per hour. I haven't actually asked at any of the local places yet. There are only about 3 different ones in my area, if memory serves. In any case, it's a LOT of money, particularly when it takes something like weekly sessions for over a year to clear your face.

Link to comment
  • 2 weeks later...

WARNING, WARNING, DANGER WILL ROBINSON!!! I STRONGLY RECCOMEND AGAINST HOME ELCTROLYSIS!!!

I bought the vector home electrolysis system in 06 to supplement my laser treatments. First of all Laser did not work at all for me. Within a month after my 10th treatment all my hair was back, thick as ever. This might play a role as to the resilience of my body hair but topical treatments do not work for me.

I was out of work, and couldn't find it because of my thick facial hair. With nothing better to do I spent whole days using this machine. Divide the area of which my facial hair covers into 4 sections and I could do 1/4th of the total area it covered in 8 to 10 hours. Sometimes a little more. I did this for 4 months. Also did my knuckles, hands, and feet.

It did not work. The only lasting effect is that my face is extremely sensitive and shaving is excruciating. Also my facial hair grows in black as night, except on my moustace area it grows in thick, coarse blonde/white. It was black prior to using this machine.

The gel, even when used in a tiny drop will spread over a small area and the whole area will get zapped. I used setting 4 to 6. Anything else was just too painful even for the short amount of time they say and I was trying to prevent scarring, yet my whole face got covered in burn marks and it looked almost like bad acne scars. It healed okay but the redness lasted almost 2 years and when I shaved it looked scarred and bright red so I couldn't even shave to have no facial hair and if I did I had to use LOTS of make up to cover not only the hair but the redness. Five years later and I think my face has pretty much recovered but now I don't know how my skin will react to professional electrolysis. I wasted so much time and money on this and my experiences were horrible with no results. Not to mention I could clear my face in 4 days and by the 7th it was ready to be done again. News hairs start to grow in within 2 days, at least for me they did. I was off HRT at this time though.

I believe it even says on Wikipedia under electrolysis that the galvanized tweezer method does not work.

Don't allow yourself to be fooled. I would wait for someone to post who has used the tweezers and had success before I made a final decision. Also the pads are a scam and definitely do not work.

Don't try to take "the easy way" out. Go to a professional and do it right and safely. You only get one face and it is not worth it to risk causing scarring.

If you do use it, go slow, be safe, and try clearing a small patch to test.

Link to comment
Guest Robin Winter

WARNING, WARNING, DANGER WILL ROBINSON!!! I STRONGLY RECCOMEND AGAINST HOME ELCTROLYSIS!!!

I bought the vector home electrolysis system in 06 to supplement my laser treatments. First of all Laser did not work at all for me. Within a month after my 10th treatment all my hair was back, thick as ever. This might play a role as to the resilience of my body hair but topical treatments do not work for me.

I was out of work, and couldn't find it because of my thick facial hair. With nothing better to do I spent whole days using this machine. Divide the area of which my facial hair covers into 4 sections and I could do 1/4th of the total area it covered in 8 to 10 hours. Sometimes a little more. I did this for 4 months. Also did my knuckles, hands, and feet.

It did not work. The only lasting effect is that my face is extremely sensitive and shaving is excruciating. Also my facial hair grows in black as night, except on my moustace area it grows in thick, coarse blonde/white. It was black prior to using this machine.

The gel, even when used in a tiny drop will spread over a small area and the whole area will get zapped. I used setting 4 to 6. Anything else was just too painful even for the short amount of time they say and I was trying to prevent scarring, yet my whole face got covered in burn marks and it looked almost like bad acne scars. It healed okay but the redness lasted almost 2 years and when I shaved it looked scarred and bright red so I couldn't even shave to have no facial hair and if I did I had to use LOTS of make up to cover not only the hair but the redness. Five years later and I think my face has pretty much recovered but now I don't know how my skin will react to professional electrolysis. I wasted so much time and money on this and my experiences were horrible with no results. Not to mention I could clear my face in 4 days and by the 7th it was ready to be done again. News hairs start to grow in within 2 days, at least for me they did. I was off HRT at this time though.

I believe it even says on Wikipedia under electrolysis that the galvanized tweezer method does not work.

Don't allow yourself to be fooled. I would wait for someone to post who has used the tweezers and had success before I made a final decision. Also the pads are a scam and definitely do not work.

Don't try to take "the easy way" out. Go to a professional and do it right and safely. You only get one face and it is not worth it to risk causing scarring.

If you do use it, go slow, be safe, and try clearing a small patch to test.

Everyone has different skin and different hair. The company that makes the vector makes no secret of that fact, and they don't claim perfect results for everyone. It does work for many people, when used correctly. I've read user reviews on many sites and forums, and the majority were more than satisfied with the results, though like you, many had no success or were dissatisfied with the process. The galvanized tweezer method will not work without the aid of a conductive material, as the hairs are not themselves conductive, but that's what the gel is for, and the science behind it is sound.

Certainly, anyone would do well to consider carefully before going this route, but it shouldn't be discounted entirely. As long as one is fully aware of the risks and prepared to take suitable precautions, it's a viable option.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   7 Members, 0 Anonymous, 177 Guests (See full list)

    • Carolyn Marie
    • Abigail Genevieve
    • RaineOnYourParade
    • MaeBe
    • Ivy
    • awkward-yet-sweet
    • Selkimur
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,029
    • Most Online
      8,356

    Selkimur
    Newest Member
    Selkimur
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Anyatimenow
      Anyatimenow
      (23 years old)
    2. Aria00
      Aria00
    3. Ava B.
      Ava B.
      (24 years old)
    4. Claire Heshi
      Claire Heshi
    5. CrystalMatthews0426
      CrystalMatthews0426
      (41 years old)
  • Posts

    • MaeBe
      1.  I think there are some legitimate concern.   2. Thoroughly discussing this will consume many threads.   3. I disagree partially with @MaeBe but there is partial agreement.   4. The context includes what is happening in society that the authors are observing.  It is not an isolated document.   The observation is through a certain lens, because people do things differently doesn't mean they're doing it wrong. Honestly, a lot of the conservative rhetoric is morphing desires of people to be treated with respect and social equity to be tantamount to the absolution of the family, heterosexuality, etc. Also, being quiet and trying to blend in doesn't change anything. Show me a social change that benefits a minority or marginalized group that didn't need to be loud.   5. Trump, if elected, is as likely to spend his energies going after political opponents as he is to implementing something like this.   Trump will appoint people to do this, like Roger Severino (who was appointed before, who has a record of anti-LGBTQ+ actions), he need not do anything beyond this. His people are ready to push this agenda forward. While the conservative right rails about bureaucracy, they intend to weaponize it. There is no question. They don't want to simplify government, they simply want to fire everyone and bring in conservative "warriors" (their rhetoric). Does America survive 4 year cycles of purge/cronyism?   6. I reject critical theory, which is based on Marxism.  Marxism has never worked and never will.  Critical theory has problems which would need time to go into, which I do not have.   OK, but this seems like every other time CRT comes up with conservatives...completely out of the blue. I think it's reference is mostly just to spark outrage from the base. Definitely food thought for a different thread, though.   7. There are groups who have declared war on the nuclear family as problematically patriarchal, and a lot of other terms. They are easy to find on the internet.  This document is reacting to that (see #4 above).   What is the war on the nuclear family? I searched online and couldn't find much other than reasons why people aren't getting married as much or having kids (that wasn't a propaganda from Heritage or opinions pieces from the right that paint with really broad strokes). Easy things to see: the upward mobility and agency of women, the massive cost of rearing children, general negative attitudes about the future, male insecurity, etc. None of this equates to a war on the nuclear family, but I guess if you look at it as "men should be breadwinners and women must get married for financial support and extend the male family line (and to promote "National Greatness") I could see the decline of marriage as a sign of the collapse of a titled system and, if I was a beneficiary of that system or believe that to NOT be tilted, be aggrieved.   8.  Much of this would have to be legislated, and this is a policy documented.  Implementation would  be most likely different, but that does not mean criticism is unwarranted.   "It might be different if you just give it a chance", unlike all the other legislation that's out there targeting LGBTQ+ from the right, these are going to be different? First it will be trans rights, then it will be gay marriage, and then what? Women's suffrage?   I get it, we may have different compasses, but it's not hard to see that there's no place for queer people in the conservative worldview. There seems to be a consistent insistence that "America was and is no longer Great", as if the 1950s were the pinnacle of society, completely ignoring how great America still is and can continue to be--without having to regress society to the low standards of its patriarchal yesteryears.    
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      Cadillac parts are pretty expensive, so repairing them costs more.  But they don't seem to break down more than other makes.  Lots of Lincoln models use Ford cars as a base, so you can get parts that aren't much more expensive.    My family has had good luck with "Panther platform" cars.  Ford Crown Victoria, Mercury Marquis, Lincoln Towncar or Continental.  4.6 V8 and 5.0 V8.  Reasonable fuel economy, and fairly durable.  Our county sheriff's office was running Chargers and SUV's for a while, but has gone back to older Crown Victorias for ease of maintenance.  GF rebuilds them here.  But they are getting more scarce, since the newest ones were made in 2011.    1992-1997 years were different than the later years.  1998-2001 they did some changes, and apparently the best years are 2003 to 2011.  Check Craigslist, and also government auctions.  GF has gotten a lot of them at auction, and they can be had in rough-but-running shape for around $1,000.  Ones in great shape can be found in the $5,000+ range.  Good for 200,000 miles without significant rebuilding.  Go through engine and transmission and electrical systems, and they go half a million.    Some Chrysler models are OK.  The 300 mostly has the same engines as the Charger and Challenger, so parts availability is pretty good.  But they tend to get timing issues.  The older Chrysler Sebring convertibles were pretty reliable, sometimes going 200,000 miles without tons of problems, although after that they were pretty much worn out. 
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I think I have read everything the Southern Baptists have to say on transgender, and it helped convince me they are dead wrong on these issues.  They can be nice people.  I would never join an SBC church.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      You come across as a thoughtful, sweet, interesting and pleasant person.    There are parts of this country, and more so the world, where evangelicals experience a great deal of finger wagging.
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      It has been an interesting experience being in a marriage in a Christian faith community, yet being intersex/trans.  I stay pretty quiet, and most have kind of accepted that I'm just the strange, harmless exception.  "Oh, that's just Jen.  Jen is...different."  I define success as being a person most folks just overlook. 
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      Well, I live in an area with a lot of Southern Baptists, Evangelicals, etc...  We've experienced our share of finger-wagging, as the "standard interpretation" of Scripture in the USA is that the Bible only approves of "one man, one woman" marriage.  My faith community is mostly accepted here, but that has taken time and effort.  It can be tough at times to continue to engage with culture and the broader population, and avoid the temptation to huddle up behind walls like a cult.    Tolerance only goes so far.  At one point, my husband was asked to run for sheriff.  He declined, partly because an elected official with four wives would have a REALLY tough time.  (Of course, making way less than his current salary wasn't an option either). 
    • Abigail Genevieve
      My bone structure is far more female than male.  I can't throw like a guy, which has been observed by guys numerous times, and moving like a woman is more natural.  It just is.  I'm not going out of my way to act in a fem. way, as you say, but I am letting go of some of the 'I am not going to move like that because I am a guy' stuff I have defensively developed.  The other breaks through anyway - there were numerous looks from people at work when I would use gestures that are forbidden to men, or say something spontaneously no guy would ever say.   At one point, maybe a year or more ago, I said it was unfair for people to think they were dealing with a man when they were actually dealing with a woman.    Girl here.  'What is a woman' is a topic for another day.
    • Willow
      Mom, I’m home!  What’s for lunch?   Leftover pizza .   ok.    Not exactly our conversation but there is truth in the answer.     @KymmieLsorry you are sick. Feel better soon.   Girl mode, boy mode no mode, not us. Nothing functional for either of us.   anyone here have or had a 10 year old (plus or minus) Caddy, Lincoln or Chrysler?  How was it?  Lots of repairs?  Comfortable seats? Anything positive or negative about it?  I need to replace my 2004 Ford Explorer Eddie Bauer, it’s eating $100 dollar bills and needs a couple of thousand dollars worth of work and that doesn’t even fix the check engine code.  Obviously, it isn’t worth putting that kind of money into a 20 year old car with a 174 thousand miles.   Willow
    • Ashley0616
      Oversized pink shirt, pink and black sports bra
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I think you mean the worst possible interpretation of 2025 situation.  Keep in mind that there are those who will distort and downright lie about anything coming from conservatives - I have seen it time and time again.  It's one of the reasons I want to read the thing slowly and carefully.  They want you to be very, very afraid. 
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Here is where the expectation is that the stereotypical evangelical comes in finger wagging, disapproving and condemning.    Not gonna do that.   You have to work these things out.  Transgender issues put a whole different spin on everything and God understands what we are going through. I have enough trouble over here.  :)
    • Ivy
      You do you. You seem to be in a safe place if we end up with a 2025 situation.  But a lot of us are not.
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      Well, my marriage is different.  I'm actually part of a multi-partner marriage.  Like you see in the Book of Genesis.  My husband has four wives...and me.  I was kind of an accident, as our community sets the "reasonable maximum" at four wives, but that's a long story.  Plural marriage is approved in my faith community, with the exception of spiritual leaders, as described in 1 Timothy 3.  We believe that anything that isn't specifically prohibited is permitted.    The purpose of marriage is for people to work together, demonstrate the love of God, and to have children.  My faith believes in exponential reproduction - big families with lots of kids, both as a blessing and with the intention of using the size of our population for political ends.  Being intersex/trans and unable to bear children, I wouldn't have been a good candidate to be somebody's only spouse (the majority of our community tends toward traditional couple marriage).  Since my husband has other partners, I don't have to worry about the childbearing aspect, and I help out with raising our family's kids.  I'm a "bonus parent."    I'm not 100% open about my intersex/trans nature, although my community's leaders are aware of me.  Being transgender isn't condemned, but it is seen as a health problem derived from an imperfect, fallen world and an environment polluted with chemicals.  Since I'm married, I have a safe place to be, and I can live how I need to live.    I firmly believe the advice given in 1 Corinthians 7.  We don't totally own our bodies.  God gets a say, as I believe He created us to be male or female, not something outside the binary.  I don't think that transition without discussion with partners is OK....again, we don't totally own ourselves.  When I started to figure myself out, that was actually the main thing on my mind - will my partners accept me?  How will my position in the family change?  Since my partners don't really have a problem with the mild version of transition that I wanted to do, it has all been good. 
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      Indeed.  While it seems like the majority of LGBTQ+ folks vote for Democrat candidates, not everybody drinks the Kool-Aid.  I'm a registered Independent, since I vote for individuals rather than party.  One of my trans friends is very pro-Trump - wears her MAGA hat and everything.  I find it interesting to see the reactions she gets... folks aren't always as tolerant as they claim to be.  Even on this forum, you get some real flak from Democrat voters....many will insist that the California way is the only way.    In my opinion, "Project 2025" isn't the real problem.  Check out UN "Agenda 2030."   
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      While Biden may be more friendly to trans folks, I'm not a single-issue voter.  I just can't choose a Democrat candidate, as I believe their actions will destroy my community and way of life.  Biden just announced that he wants to significantly increase capital gains taxes.  Maybe he intends to "tax the rich" but that is going to affect everything from land sales to grocery prices to the cost of electricity and even folks' retirement savings, as most companies make a large amount of their profits through investing in the market.  It is absolute lunacy to think that increased cost or reduced profits won't be passed on to the rest of us.  Things are going to get way worse at this rate.    Mostly, I vote in elections for state and local issues, as the national government is about as pleasant as a Porta-Potty in July.  So, either I'll do a write-in vote for president, or I'll check the box for Trump.  Anything but Biden.     

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...