Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

SRS questions?


Guest Nova Maria

Recommended Posts

Guest Nova Maria

So, I was reading, and this article says that Neo-Vaginas don't self lubricate. Is that true? If so, isn't intimacy a bit...difficult?

Also, I'm having a hard time finding reliable info on SRS. Do ya'll know of any good resources I could look into?

Thx! Love you all

:wub: Nova

Link to comment
Guest Leah1026

So, I was reading, and this article says that Neo-Vaginas don't self lubricate. Is that true? If so, isn't intimacy a bit...difficult?

Also, I'm having a hard time finding reliable info on SRS. Do ya'll know of any good resources I could look into?

Over about a two year period after surgey the donor tissue adapts to it's new location and function. After healing our vaginas DO produce some natural lubrication. However, in most cases not quite enough for intercourse. But, as you may have noticed, Walmart and other stores sell tons of lube. Somebody besides us is buying it, so we are not alone.

Best sources of information are online support forums, surgical blogs and from friends.

Link to comment

For information on SRS try the surgeons web sites.

US Surgeons:

http://www.drchristinemcginn.com/ Dr. Mcginn

http://marcibowers.com/ Dr. Bowers

http://www.thetransgendercenter.com/ Dr. Leis

http://www.tmeltzer.com/ Dr. Melzer

http://www.grsmontreal.com/ Dr. Brassard

Thailand Surgeons:

http://www.supornclinic.com/ Dr. Suporn

http://www.chet-plasticsurgery.com/ Dr. Chettawut

http://phuket-plasticsurgery.com/ Dr. Sanguan

http://www.mdtnguyen.com/ Dr. Nguyen

Paula

Link to comment

So, I was reading, and this article says that Neo-Vaginas don't self lubricate. Is that true? If so, isn't intimacy a bit...difficult?

Yes that is generally accurate, and yes difficult unless one uses some over the counter lube product as already mentioned.

There is a colon section procedure that uses part of your colon that self lubs (all the time). I don't know if the lube from that is sufficient for intercourse. The inference is that it is, but I can't say I recall anyone saying they can. It is a far more invasive procedure.

Dr. Bowers told me mine will self lubricate.

I wasn't aware that Marci does a colon section procedure.

I know she uses some mucosa from urethra, but the amount of secretions there seem to be far to little. It may technically qualify as lubrication, but seems like it would hardly enough for dialating or intercourse.

If Marci is doing something revolutionary there, and you are able to dialate and have intercourse with just your natural lubrication please be sure to let us know. Even if it is a colon section this would be cool as I haven't heard any first hand result positive or negative about that procedure.

Link to comment
Guest Leah1026

Dr. Bowers told me mine will self lubricate.

I wasn't aware that Marci does a colon section procedure.

I know she uses some mucosa from urethra, but the amount of secretions there seem to be far to little. It may technically qualify as lubrication, but seems like it would hardly enough for dialating or intercourse.

If Marci is doing something revolutionary there, and you are able to dialate and have intercourse with just your natural lubrication please be sure to let us know. Even if it is a colon section this would be cool as I haven't heard any first hand result positive or negative about that procedure.

Marci does NOT do colon segment SRS. You are under-estimating the donor tissues ability to adapt to it's new location and function. We DO get some natural lubrication. Not as much as other women, but we do have some. In addition some of us get more than others. You also seem to forget that many natal women need extra lube as well.

Colon segment SRS may be self-lubricating, but that surgery has other downsides that make penile inversion a better choice IMO.

Link to comment
Marci does NOT do colon segment SRS

That is what I thought

You are under-estimating the donor tissues ability to adapt to it's new location and function. We DO get some natural lubrication. Not as much as other women, but we do have some. In addition some of us get more than others. You also seem to forget that many natal women need extra lube as well.

I don't believe I am under-estimating anything nor forgetting natal women may need extra lube.

The relevent point (discounting a colon section procecure) is that the amount of natural lubrication most likely won't be enough for intercourse and that some sort of articial lubricant will be needed.

Colon segment SRS may be self-lubricating, but that surgery has other downsides that make penile inversion a better choice IMO.

I wouldn't advocate colon section either.

Link to comment

You also seem to forget that many natal women need extra lube as well.

Exactly. Many women need added lube, hence the advent of KY!

Colon segment SRS may be self-lubricating, but that surgery has other downsides that make penile inversion a better choice IMO.

Having your vagina smell like DONKEY may be one of them :P OK I don't know that it's true, but it seems like it would. That or the thought of it being made from something in your butt was more than enough to discourage me :7

Link to comment
  • Admin

Having your vagina smell like DONKEY may be one of them :P OK I don't know that it's true, but it seems like it would. That or the thought of it being made from something in your butt was more than enough to discourage me :7

Gross! :wacko: This is why I tend to stay away from these threads. I should learn my lesson, but curiosity killed the....you know what. :P

Carolyn Marie

Link to comment
  • 1 month later...
  • 4 weeks later...
Guest AiAmAngel

Dr. Bowers told me mine will self lubricate.

I wasn't aware that Marci does a colon section procedure.

I know she uses some mucosa from urethra, but the amount of secretions there seem to be far to little. It may technically qualify as lubrication, but seems like it would hardly enough for dialating or intercourse.

If Marci is doing something revolutionary there, and you are able to dialate and have intercourse with just your natural lubrication please be sure to let us know. Even if it is a colon section this would be cool as I haven't heard any first hand result positive or negative about that procedure.

Marci does NOT do colon segment SRS. You are under-estimating the donor tissues ability to adapt to it's new location and function. We DO get some natural lubrication. Not as much as other women, but we do have some. In addition some of us get more than others. You also seem to forget that many natal women need extra lube as well.

Colon segment SRS may be self-lubricating, but that surgery has other downsides that make penile inversion a better choice IMO.

Studies done by Masters and Johnson dating all the way back to the 70s note the capability of the neo-vagina to be adequately lubricating and to even outdo some non-transsexual women's self-lubrication. Its all about diligent and careful postoperative care- the kind that takes several years.

As for colon surgery, I definitely do NOT recommend it, unless you find unusual, foul odors leaking out of you to be appealing. Avoid the colon surgery and simply wait it out for a couple of years, you'll have less to worry about than you think.

Link to comment

Could you provide a specific quote or link on that stating that the penile inversion technique is sufficiently self lubricating, even on procedures done all the way back to the 70s?

Marci's office says "Most patients are not able to have natural lubrication. You will need to use a synthetic lubricant for intercourse or dilation" in a recent email.

Of course there is that post orgasmic "lube" if one wants to call it that, but that isn't exactly useful since it isn't present till after...

Link to comment
Guest AiAmAngel

Could you provide a specific quote or link on that stating that the penile inversion technique is sufficiently self lubricating, even on procedures done all the way back to the 70s?

Marci's office says "Most patients are not able to have natural lubrication. You will need to use a synthetic lubricant for intercourse or dilation" in a recent email.

Of course there is that post orgasmic "lube" if one wants to call it that, but that isn't exactly useful since it isn't present till after...

I *believe* this one is Masters and Johnson 1961 titled Human Sexual Response around page 261? I don't have a way to access any published material like that online, so I can't fact check. If you find anything additional on it, please let me know in a PM.

That said, this applies almost explicitly after periods of *years*, like 3 to 4. The majority consensus seems to be that you'll need to use lubrication until you feel like you just don't need it, which could be quite a while and warrant the statement that synthetic lubrication will be needed, especially when talking about *dialation* (which shouldn't be quite so urgent years from your surgery date).

Link to comment

Ok Nova, I don't really know. I'm a CD'er and my knowledge of transition is a bit limited. There are a bunch of responses here that seem to say "sorta, maybe". So my thought for you is - It probably does not matter. If you stroll through your local pharmacy or supermarket, you will find a shelf-full of 'intimate lubricants". 95% of these are purchased by straight cis-couples. Its common for cis-women to begin to "need" lube as menopause begins. No shame in that. As a straight guy (closet CD'er) I stumbled on these products later in life at a point where my partner was beginning that change. What I found was, they transformed the whole experience (in a very positive way) and I wished I'd been smart enough to use them 30 years sooner. They are great, trust me. So, I'd say, don't worry, buy/use a lube. You'll love it and you won't be different than millions of cis-women.

Hugs,

Kay

xx

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   10 Members, 0 Anonymous, 80 Guests (See full list)

    • Vidanjali
    • Birdie
    • SamC
    • Desert Fox
    • VickySGV
    • Abigail Genevieve
    • evy-emaciated
    • Ivy
    • AmandaJoy
    • MaryEllen
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.8k
    • Total Posts
      770.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,105
    • Most Online
      8,356

    evy-emaciated
    Newest Member
    evy-emaciated
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. austin_4
      austin_4
      (17 years old)
    2. Britany_Relia
      Britany_Relia
      (39 years old)
    3. Emily S
      Emily S
      (67 years old)
    4. Hoof Arted
      Hoof Arted
      (22 years old)
    5. n3eeko
      n3eeko
  • Posts

    • Vidanjali
      That's awesome, Davie. Keep the faith!
    • Adrianna Danielle
      Yes,I hate that     Also finding out I might be father of a 24 year young lady.I had an one night stand with a woman off base when I was in the army.Called this afternoon and said I am possibly the father of her now 24 year old daughter.Told her I will agree with a paternity test that will be done.
    • Ivy
      Yeah.  I like Nebula, that was where I watched it.   I posted the YouTube cause I figured more people could see it.
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      We agree on most of this... and the church/state thing is kind of a tangent anyways. Oops. LOL   I think it has long been established that all different kinds of groups have access to public funds. In my opinion, either everybody has access or nobody does. I would prefer "nobody."   Relying on public funds gives the government the power to take it away, and puts that power in the hands of whatever group controls the government at the moment... the news article that is the topic of this thread shows a clear example of that happening.  Organizations trust government at their peril.
    • DonkeySocks
      Fantastic news! Thank you for updating us.
    • Davie
      More info on Abigail Thorne here: https://go.nebula.tv/philosophytube and, Dracula's ex-girlfriend, on Philosophy tube.   "The reason why Nebula is so cheap for what it is, is because there's no upper hierarchical group looking yo skim off the top. Imagine how much cheaper EVERYTHING could be if it was like that for every other service or product; if the money went straight to workers, not up a chain of command until it reached someone who did exactly "jack" to produce what's being sold.
    • Ivy
    • Ivy
      I'm aware that the young US ended up fighting a war with these people, and that phrase was not meant to address Church & state.  But somebody was willing to include it at the time.   I am also aware that your family arrangements would not go over well with most christian nationalists.  But that is kinda where I'm coming from on this.  I believe you and others of us with an unconventional lifestyle should be free to live as we desire - as long as we are not hurting anyone else.  And by "hurting" I don't mean only their feelings.   Using christianity to justify oppression is just wrong.  As is forced conversion, or forced conversion therapy.   Regarding public funds, LGBTQetc people have as much right to them as straight-cis folks.  I'm not arguing that queer people have more rights, just equal rights.
    • Davie
      Even better news:  It turns out for my sister it was cardio not stroke. She’s put on new blood thinner and sent home. False alarm! Yay.
    • JenniferB
      Things have changed since I've been on HRT for about 15 years. The consequence is I am not so concerned about how I present all the time.  I wear t-shirts a lot. I am pragmatic in how I shop. No, I don't want to look male, but will buy some male clothing because it fits. I am tall and built like a football linebacker, so buying women's clothes that fit can be difficult. For one I have no problem buying men's sneakers if they can pass as unisex. I wear size 12-13 women's shoes. And that can be hard to find. And, I don't like wearing slacks without pockets. I use pockets for work.    I've learned to be pragmatic. I dress up when I want to go out in public, and not so much at work. I do have a favorite blouse that accentuates the girls. And one blue striped blouse where I wear a cami top.
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      https://www.patheos.com/blogs/danthropology/2016/05/secularists-please-stop-quoting-the-treaty-of-tripoli/   ^^^ an interesting piece about the treaty, written by an atheist.   I totally understand why the Christian nationalist stuff makes people uncomfortable. For me, it is uncomfortable in a different way, as modern Christian nationalism is not nearly as "generic" as the views of the Founders.  Its specifically Evangelical.  I'm in a plural marriage, so definitely not approved of.    I believe the intent of the Founders was to uhold generic Christian ideas... "in God we trust" and "there's a God who created the world and He wrote ten commandments for us" sort of stuff.  Nothing beyond that, nothing specific enough to use against folks.
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      Free?!?!  That's insane.  I can understand perhaps mistaking somebody's well equipped garage as a business, but demanding free work is ridiculous.   My GF once remarked that while few things in life are free, butt-kickings are an exception. She offers those free-of-charge, to any who ask. A little charity helps the world go round 🤣
    • Ivy
      I had a CDL when I was working for the city.  But I let it go when I retired.  I couldn't justify paying so much just to drive myself around.
    • Ivy
      While I'm sure the "Founders" had the 30 years war, etc. on their minds, they didn't write the constitution as considering only Christian sects. The early colonists (I used the word) did mostly come from areas of "christian culture" but it's hard to reconcile some of their actions with what Christ himself taught.   Christians have a right to their beliefs, but there are a lot of American citizens that do not consider themselves "christian."  I have seen writings where the US was specifically said not to be a "Christian Nation". "The 1797 Treaty of Tripoli that sought to secure America from attacks by the so-called Barbary pirates who were Muslim made a point to say that the United States "is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion.""    It shouldn't be difficult to understand why the "Christian Nationalist" movement makes some of us uncomfortable.  
    • EasyE
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...