Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Male criminals who become women behind bars


Guest Nicole9

Recommended Posts

Guest Nicole9

http://www.news.com.au/breaking-news/call-me-michelle-the-killers-who-become-women-behind-bars/story-e6frfkp9-1226615750377

Hi all,

ok so my local rag has a bit of a hang up with the trans issue and they seen to drag the issue to the top of the pile on a monthly basis. However this one struck me, as these individuals are unable to work (hence unable to earn money) should the state pay for their SRS over a non offending member of the state? Personally yes they should be tilted to health care but when it is better/not equal too than of any other citizen then there is a problem. What do you guys think?

Link to comment
  • Replies 92
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • MaryEllen

    9

  • Carolyn Marie

    4

  • Kyla666

    4

  • Drea

    3

  • Forum Moderator

"When a person feels trapped in a male body, they can be angry, nasty and aggressive and once they achieve their gender transformation, they experience relief with their new identity".

I find the comment above quite interesting, and having experienced gender dysphoria I can relate, I was a much angier person before treatment, I did not like parts of myself before coming to grips with the underlying condition. I was'nt violent myself, but I can see how some folks might be driven over the edge with this condition, it can really mess with your mind. Having GD and being born male, really sux at times.....
Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

I have to agree with Cynthia. I was often a nasty male. Even though i've had to stop E and my T has come back i am so much happier at least being myself. Somehow i'm just calmer and more accepting. It has been awful to loose the additional changes from the E but maybe i'll be able to go back on. In the mean time if people can be helped how does it matter whether they are in hell in jail or the outside world. We all need help sometimes regardless.

Hugs,

Charlie

Link to comment
Guest sophia.gentry58

I think the problem lies in the misconception people have about MTF/FTM and the ultimate desire for SRS. The public's ignorance of the gender dysphoria and even the mounting evidence for the genetic predisposition for the dysphoria, causes the public to believe that a person simply chooses to receive a sex reassignment for some nafarious reason for which they (John Q Public) have no desire to have paid for from the the public coffers. The answer resides in educatioin, education, and more education.

Sophia

Link to comment
  • Admin

Medical costs for SRS, based only on time in actual hospital and surgical care areas are close if not less than time spent in care for self inflicted harm, and from harm caused by other violent trauma. It can possibly be said they are higher for a ward of the state, but the higher costs are there just because the person is in custody.

I know what I paid for my SRS, I have also seen the bills I might have had to pay, but for insurance, for a family member in a year where they had 5 hospitalizations for self harm / suicide attempts. (Their attempts were not related to GD.) My costs were 60% of one single hospitalization for their care.

Link to comment
Guest Cloudygirl27

I would have to disagree with this. Criminals should not be getting these things done for basicly free at the tax payers expensive while the non-criminals have to scrimp and save to get SRS.

-
Alyssa

Link to comment
Guest MissErika

This is a touchy issue, while I believe that imprisoned people should be able to get ther medical needs met, I feel that the stateshould not pay fo srs.

The VA won't even do that, and their helping veterans of our military.

Link to comment
Guest cynthash

HRT? Yes. SRS? No. I have a lot of BS to go through in life, and no way is someone that didn't meet the requirements for being a 'clean' member of this(admittedly self-destructive) society going to get what I have no access to. It's called 'fair'.

On the other hand, pre or nonop inmates should be kept away from their non-trans counterparts. Too often, prison is a terrible hell for a trans person, above and beyond any pretense of 'justice'. Hurt others, get incarcerated; but not at the expense of your humanity.

Like others have said: education, education, education.

Link to comment
Guest Gypsyfeenix

I would have to disagree with this. Criminals should not be getting these things done for basicly free at the tax payers expensive while the non-criminals have to scrimp and save to get SRS.

-

Alyssa

Completely agree here.

Why should someone who has committed a crime, broken the rules of polite society as it were, be given chances that others who play by the rules must sacrifice for?

If it were my tax dollars, there is no way in he!! that I would want my money paying for someone in prison to get anything other than punishment. You are there for a reason - you broke the law. Why should you get benefits that law abiding citizens have little or no access to?

Link to comment

Sigh. I think it depends. Is the person in for life or a limited term of years? Are they stable without it, or dangerously suicidal? How do the long term costs play out? If the person is in for a long time, and severely depressed with suicidal episodes over the dyphoria, it may well be more cost effective (as well as more humane) for the state to pay for the SRS, as the inmate after recovery will be a lower-maintenance inmate as far as need for monitoring, acute treatment after suicide attempts, etc.

Cost can't be the major deciding factor, though, and neither can "they're a criminal so they deserve it."Our criminal justice system is structured in a way that can land people in prison very easily for very little wrongdoing--there are far more drug addicts than murderers behiind bars, kwim?

Having done something wrong and being found guilty in a court of law do not necessarily have anything to do with each other (though, granted, they usually do).

Basic humane treatment for people who have no choices beyond what their given may occasionally mean they get a surgery they couldn't have gotten on the outside without insurance/money. At least if you're not incarcerated you have a theoretical chance of finding a way to save up and get it. An inmate simply doesn't.

Link to comment
Guest Gypsyfeenix
If the person is in for a long time, and severely depressed with suicidal episodes over the dyphoria, it may well be more cost effective (as well as more humane) for the state to pay for the SRS

While I respect your point of view, there are many people on the outside who didn't commit a crime that would better benefit from this assistance AND become productive, taxpaying members of society once freed of the burden of dysphoria.

Link to comment
Guest Megan_Lynn

No offense to any one from Canada but your country already pays for SRS/GRS for its citizens.

With it being so hard for the average trans person to stay employed after coming out and getting a job just for being trans. Many will do what it takes just to survive. This does not mean they are criminals at all but just very desperate and were never given the chances needed to make it. Many are kids that had been tossed out of there homes by there parents and had to live on the streets. Now I do not feel anyone that is a murder should be given SRS/GRS at all as they took a anoughter persons live and get what they deserve. But there are many people in jail for very simple things that should not even be there. Now yes I do feel the people who are able to stay clean and are unable to afford SRS/GRS should be helped first before anyone in jail. But this still does not mean anyone in jail should never be able to get that same help. This is not a black and white thing at all there are many variables to conceder.

Someone on SSI/SSD ( social security) will never ever be able to get SRS/GRS unless someone else pays for it for them. As they are not aloud to have any assents worth over 3k at any time or they will #1 have to sign it over to the government or sell it off and pay back government for the benefits already given #2 loose there SSI/SSD benefits. these people definatly should be given the SRS/GRS paid for by our government first as I also believe any and all military vets should get preferred excepts as well when it comes to this. Anyone who serves understands what it takes and all there rights you give up when your in the service protecting others rights. No civilian will ever truly understand unless they have served.

These are my opinions take them or leave them your choice.

Link to comment
If the person is in for a long time, and severely depressed with suicidal episodes over the dyphoria, it may well be more cost effective (as well as more humane) for the state to pay for the SRS

While I respect your point of view, there are many people on the outside who didn't commit a crime that would better benefit from this assistance AND become productive, taxpaying members of society once freed of the burden of dysphoria.

See my last paragraph above.

It's not that I don't think people not incarcerated should be denied healthcare (I think health care is a universal right the U.S. needs to get on board with). It's just a different issue and confounding them doesn't help determine the specific issue.

Link to comment
Guest Robin Winter

No offense to any one from Canada but your country already pays for SRS/GRS for its citizens.

Not all of Canada. Our health care is handled provincially, and only maybe 3 provinces pay for it, and the numbers per year are extremely limited.

Link to comment
Guest Gypsyfeenix

No offense to any one from Canada but your country already pays for SRS/GRS for its citizens.

Actually, no, the country does not

.

Some provinces do, some do not as health care falls to a provincial level. I know this because I worked in provincial government for almost ten years in Ontario.

It bothers me when people make blanket statements like this with the cast of derision in their words, as if Canadian transfolk have it "easier" than the rest of the world. They do not. My wife does NOT have it easier, and her SRS would NOT be covered. Trust me, if is was, we'd already be done with it.

Link to comment
Guest Gypsyfeenix
If the person is in for a long time, and severely depressed with suicidal episodes over the dyphoria, it may well be more cost effective (as well as more humane) for the state to pay for the SRS

While I respect your point of view, there are many people on the outside who didn't commit a crime that would better benefit from this assistance AND become productive, taxpaying members of society once freed of the burden of dysphoria.

See my last paragraph above.

It's not that I don't think people not incarcerated should be denied healthcare (I think health care is a universal right the U.S. needs to get on board with). It's just a different issue and confounding them doesn't help determine the specific issue.

I agree...healthcare SHOULD be universal.

My problem is more with people who, like you see on this site, are at a dangerous place with absolutely NO options, and those who have done harm to others are afforded something they really have no right to. In jail, you have the right to food, shelter and clothing - not SRS/HRT. My heart does not cry for someone who is dysphoric and also a person who has committed crimes against someone like you or me. I highly doubt that if someone killed one of your family members, and then wanted SRS, you'd be okay with it. I wouldn't.

Again, let me say that I do respect your opinion on this - I think we will have to agree to disagree, though. Nothing will make it okay in my mind that some scuzzbag in the pokey is getting more consideration than someone like you who ALSO wants SRS or HRT but can't afford it.

Link to comment
Guest Bellexia

Many blanket statements from both sides being thrown around here. Not all people in prison are violent offenders. Some rules they broke were quite arbitrary. Drug laws for instance. If it were truly a polite society they would not be there, but instead be getting help. That said, I am on the fence here. I think they should get it, only if I can get it. The meds yes, they should be getting because someone made a valid point. Who here pre transition wasn't angry? Were some of us even violent? Yes.

Link to comment
Guest Gypsyfeenix

Many blanket statements from both sides being thrown around here. Not all people in prison are violent offenders. Some rules they broke were quite arbitrary. Drug laws for instance. If it were truly a polite society they would not be there, but instead be getting help. That said, I am on the fence here. I think they should get it, only if I can get it. The meds yes, they should be getting because someone made a valid point. Who here pre transition wasn't angry? Were some of us even violent? Yes.

I never said that all offenders were violent offenders anywhere in my posts. I USED one as an example, but I never said all.

Laws are not arbitrary. That's why they are laws. If laws need to be changed, that's another forum topic.

The difference between the people here that were "violent", as you say, and those in jail is the difference of self-control and knowing right from wrong.

I maintain that if someone is in prison, they are there for a reason - not an arbitrary ruling. I'm not saying mistakes aren't made by the justice system - hell, that happens all the time, but again that would be another forum topic.

If someone is in prison then they do not deserve the luxury of having the culmination of their highest hopes and dreams fulfilled when others on the outside, living the best that they can do not. There is no fairness in that. You broke the law, you were tried by a jury of your peers and you were found guilty of your crimes. HEY! Let's reward you with the expensive SRS/HRT that you couldn't get on the outside!

Nope. Not fair, not cool. I see too many amazing and wonderful people who are stuck without those luxuries because of money, plain and simple. People here, in this forum who cannot afford to eat and pay rent at the same time as getting HRT, let alone SRS, and yet those incarcerated get to??

Link to comment
Guest Bellexia

Yeah some laws are arbitrary. That's why it's easier to get meds on the inside than outside. Bam broken argument already. If I can break a law, go to jail, get free meds and possibly free srs then some laws do not work.

Link to comment
Guest Gypsyfeenix

Yeah some laws are arbitrary. That's why it's easier to get meds on the inside than outside. Bam broken argument already. If I can break a law, go to jail, get free meds and possibly free srs then some laws do not work.

Yeah, honestly, you are not making sense.

When you refer to "laws being arbitrary", I don't think you know what that means.

The phrase itself is an oxymoron. Laws are NOT arbitrary. Policies? Yes. Guidelines? Yup. Laws? no.

What I think you mean, if I'm following the bouncing ball of you "BAM" logic is that you are trying to say that people PURPOSELY break the law to go to jail, and therefore they have easier access to the drugs/treatments in question.

That's not the definition of "Arbitrary laws". You are describing "finding a loophole and exploiting it to your own devices, regardless of the situation it puts you in". Not as pretty a phrase, but more accurate.

Have a nice evening.

Link to comment
Guest Megan_Lynn

No offense to any one from Canada but your country already pays for SRS/GRS for its citizens.

Actually, no, the country does not

.

Some provinces do, some do not as health care falls to a provincial level. I know this because I worked in provincial government for almost ten years in Ontario.

It bothers me when people make blanket statements like this with the cast of derision in their words, as if Canadian transfolk have it "easier" than the rest of the world. They do not. My wife does NOT have it easier, and her SRS would NOT be covered. Trust me, if is was, we'd already be done with it.

Yes I was wrong to say the entire country of Canada covered SRS/GRS but every trans person I ever spoke to from your country told me this.. So I did some research and found this nice piece of info. it shows what providences cover SRS/GRS and what ones do not.

http://www.xtra.ca/BinaryContent/stories/77/06/7706/7706-SRS/212_SRS.swf

http://www.xtra.ca/public/National/Sex_reassignment_surgery_in_Canada_whats_covered_and_where-7706.aspx

As for for my comment being mocking( cast of derision) no it was not and I really do not like being told my tone was something it was not. This is why texting and anything wrote gets taken out of text as its so darn impersonal. You can not hear nor see the persons true intent by the voice inflection nor face expressions.

As for do I feel trans people in Canada have it better your darn skippy I do and here is why.

#1 Gay marriage. This alone allows any and all citizens of Canada to marry each other. Trans people in the states have at times had marriages annulled as once they transition they are now considered a same sex marriage and or if single and a trans woman tries to marry a man they are deny-ed as the laws will say but you were born a man( granted this does not always happen)..

#2 while yes not every providence covers SRS/GRS the ones that do have the highest average population so the vast majority are technically covered. All that would be needed is to move to a providence that does cover it and spend some waiting time. #3 while yes not every providence covers SRS/GRS am pretty sure they all at least cover HRT( I may be wrong)

#3 lets look at this in numbers the entire population of Canada is 33,476,688 this is less then the state of California at 38,041,430 and the entire United States population at 313,919,040 Now lets look at the population of Ontario 12,851,821 , Quebec 7,903,001 , British Columbia 4,400,057 , Saskatchewan 1,033,381 this comes to a combined total of 26,188,260 or 76-77 percent of the entire countries population has coverage for SRS/GRS. This alone makes it 76-77 percent better for all trans people in Canada then in the states. The states have 313,919,040 people that are not covered by government SRS/GRs while only 7,288,428 people in Canada are without this coverage. So basically the United States has a 43 times greater chance a person is denied coverage. Factoring in that there is a average of the same amount of trans people per capita in Canada as in The United States. ( ex 1-200 1-1000 ect)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Canadian_provinces_and_territories_by_population

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_and_territories_by_population

So no sarcasm no mocking these are facts..

If any of the states started covering SRS/GRS you can darn well bet not just me but many other trans people would be moving just to be able to get it. As its ten to twenty times cheaper to move then afford the 20k plus for SRS here in the states.

Link to comment
Guest Bellexia

Yeah some laws are arbitrary. That's why it's easier to get meds on the inside than outside. Bam broken argument already. If I can break a law, go to jail, get free meds and possibly free srs then some laws do not work.

Yeah, honestly, you are not making sense.

When you refer to "laws being arbitrary", I don't think you know what that means.

The phrase itself is an oxymoron. Laws are NOT arbitrary. Policies? Yes. Guidelines? Yup. Laws? no.

What I think you mean, if I'm following the bouncing ball of you "BAM" logic is that you are trying to say that people PURPOSELY break the law to go to jail, and therefore they have easier access to the drugs/treatments in question.

That's not the definition of "Arbitrary laws". You are describing "finding a loophole and exploiting it to your own devices, regardless of the situation it puts you in". Not as pretty a phrase, but more accurate.

Have a nice evening.

Quite hostile but ok. So many people today are just so hostile for no reason other than to win an argument. Congrats I guess. That said.

I cannot go into what I believe are arbitrary laws on this forum because I do not want to be banned. However while I did misuse that term I do believe that certain laws have no place while others are in place/not in place. There is already precedence in getting surgery. Maybe not in every state but there is. http://www.advocate.com/politics/transgender/2012/09/12/ruling-trans-inmates-surgery-gets-bipartisan-rebuke If the link is not allowed, then it is the Michelle Kosilek case.

So while I would not personally commit a crime to get it, the laws are there that allow such loopholes. Laws policy whatever. In the end if you break them you break the law and pay the consequences. So it's a moot point to argue the definition when laws go by many different terms, morals, sin, code, rules etc.

Oh and I won't wish you a nice day, not to be rude but I don't want to be condescending like that. I personally find the pretending to be nice like that very rude. Something I have noticed a lot here :/

Link to comment
Guest Gypsyfeenix

No offense to any one from Canada but your country already pays for SRS/GRS for its citizens.

Actually, no, the country does not

.

Some provinces do, some do not as health care falls to a provincial level. I know this because I worked in provincial government for almost ten years in Ontario.

It bothers me when people make blanket statements like this with the cast of derision in their words, as if Canadian transfolk have it "easier" than the rest of the world. They do not. My wife does NOT have it easier, and her SRS would NOT be covered. Trust me, if is was, we'd already be done with it.

Yes I was wrong to say the entire country of Canada covered SRS/GRS but every trans person I ever spoke to from your country told me this.. So I did some research and found this nice piece of info. it shows what providences cover SRS/GRS and what ones do not.

http://www.xtra.ca/BinaryContent/stories/77/06/7706/7706-SRS/212_SRS.swf

As for for my comment being mocking( cast of derision) no it was not and I really do not like being told my tone was something it was not. This is why texting and anything wrote gets taken out of text as its so darn impersonal. You can not hear nor see the persons true intent by the voice inflection nor face expressions.

As for do I feel trans people in Canada have it better your darn skippy I do and here is why.

#1 Gay marriage. This alone allows any and all citizens of Canada to marry each other. Trans people in the states have at times had marriages annulled as once they transition they are now considered a same sex marriage and or if single and a trans woman tries to marry a man they are deny-ed as the laws will say but you were born a man( granted this does not always happen)..

#2 while yes not every providence covers SRS/GRS the ones that do have the highest average population so the vast majority are technically covered. All that would be needed is to move to a providence that does cover it and spend some waiting time. #3 while yes not every providence covers SRS/GRS am pretty sure they all at least cover HRT( I may be wrong)

Right, so everything that you just posted educated you to the facts instead of hearsay. Wonderful.

As far as the rest of it, Same Sex marriage has nothing to do with anything that this topic is about. You did sound sarcastic when you posted it. I can tell you that picking up and moving to another province is just as costly for us to do as it would be for YOU to do it. Moving to another province means cross country moving expenses based on the ideal that you MAY have a job, a place to live and resources to tap into. I find it hard to believe that in a country where you can buy your HRT in Walmart, you would say something like that. Of course, I realize that you are probably stung by my comments about the "cast of derision" seeing as you quoted it, but frankly, if I hadn't brought it up, would you have honestly gone looking for the truth?

We have had a glut of same sex couples coming to Canada so they can be married - not for the publicity, but because they want to announce their commitment to each other. Still not sure how this is relevant to the conversation.

As far as the rest of it goes, please do not assume that you need to educate me about my country. I know very well what goes on here. I live here, and I pay taxes. I vote on these issues and get ticked off when they do or don't get passed in legislation.

lets look at this in numbers the entire population of Canada is 33,476,688 this is less then the state of California at 38,041,430 and the entire United States population at 313,919,040 Now lets look at the population of Ontario 12,851,821 , Quebec 7,903,001 , British Columbia 4,400,057 , Saskatchewan 1,033,381 this comes to a combined total of 26,188,260 or 76-77 percent of the entire countries population has coverage for SRS/GRS. This alone makes it 76-77 percent better for all trans people in Canada then in the states. The states have 313,919,040 people that are not covered by government SRS/GRs while only 7,288,428 people in Canada are without this coverage. So basically the United States has a 43 times greater chance a person is denied coverage. Factoring in that there is a average of the same amount of trans people per capita in Canada as in The United States. ( ex 1-200 1-1000 ect)

Are you honestly trying to say that because of RATIO, our transfolk have it easier than americans?

I am offended that you would say something like that. It catty and to minimize someone else's pain based on population is not acceptable. I'm done having this petty conversation. I am shocked and disappointed that you would belittle the pain of others this way....

Link to comment
  • Root Admin

Okay folks. Calm down. I won't say this again.

MaryEllen

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   6 Members, 0 Anonymous, 82 Guests (See full list)

    • VickySGV
    • Mmindy
    • April Marie
    • Vidanjali
    • awkward-yet-sweet
    • Carolyn Marie
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.8k
    • Total Posts
      770.7k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,128
    • Most Online
      8,356

    Alisa Anne
    Newest Member
    Alisa Anne
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. cigsandsaints
      cigsandsaints
      (30 years old)
    2. cygnusKP
      cygnusKP
      (47 years old)
    3. Georgina
      Georgina
      (46 years old)
    4. MaK30
      MaK30
      (31 years old)
    5. Mandymike
      Mandymike
      (54 years old)
  • Posts

    • Vidanjali
      I appreciate this so much and it's one of the reasons why this community feels like home - a rare treasure among the world wide web. 
    • VickySGV
      As far as things being lost on the Web, accidents happen, Just here alone, I have 20,825 posts showing in my number count, but probably only 19K of them are still actually here to view.  There was a change to a new server a number of years ago, and a segment of the data base they were in became locked and could not be transferred to the new drive in the servers we use now.  Why or how that segment of the data base became locked has not been figured out in the time since but at least we know what happened and it was not intentional or aimed at a single element of behavior here.  Data accidents happen with not one single person really responsible for them or for that matter even the computer itself.  Frustrating as all get out when it happens, but it does happen.  Some other electronics I work on as a hobby had their similar problems here a couple days ago because of the Solar Flares, and power outages or dips in voltage can make electronic life miserable.
    • Carolyn Marie
      This is very true, Jani.  The original owner of this site, Laura, and her chief assistants, developed our community rules more than 15 years ago.  They have been modified many times, to take into account changing tastes, mores, technical issues and legal issues.  Sites such as TikTok and X didn't exist then.  Our naughty word filter, as just one example, has been modified many, many times.   On this site, as on most private sites, in order to become a member one must agree to the T's & C's and abide by, in our case, the "Community Rules."  If you seriously violate those rules your membership can be terminated.  So, yes, freedom of speech here is restricted.  Some sites are lax about enforcement, but that has never been the case here.  We guard the safety of members, and your emotional comfort, zealously.  We aren't perfect and sometimes let things get out of hand, or we go too far with restrictions, but those instances are uncommon (IMO).   Every site has different standards.  Luckily, for every interest there are numerous sites and it's usually easy to find one that fits your needs and temperament.  When it comes to the Internet, one size does not fit all.   Thanks for your question, @Ladypcnj.   Carolyn Marie
    • Ladypcnj
      Thanks Jani and Vidanjali, it helps me understand more. 
    • Vidanjali
      If I take time to type something up which I find personally important or impactful, I will first type it on a Word document or on the notes app on my phone and save it before sharing it online if the intention of the writing was to be shared in that way. Indeed, it is extremely frustrating for that sort of work to vanish when it was an emotional experience to have recounted and written it. But if it does happen, my advice would be to try to focus on having had the personal catharsis of transforming the thoughts into words. Even if the writing has vanished, your intention was acted out. You cannot control the results, whether it disappeared or not. So we can try our best to focus on gratitude for having been able to express what was expressed in the way it was expressed, rather than disappointment over it not bearing the fruit we expected it to. From a higher point of view, all things of this world are non-permanent. So when something like that happens, at best we can view it as an opportunity to practice mitigating grief over non-permanence of all things. All this is easily said - I acknowledge it is challenging. But without challenge, we do not grow.   As far as freedom of speech is concerned, my view is that implicit in freedom of speech is duty in exercising that freedom responsibly. That means applying ethics to speech. One may ask, "whose ethics?" which is a valid question. The answer is, your ethics. If you wish to participate in a community with a specific code of rules or ethics, it is up to you to use your art and skill to express yourself within that framework. Of course in certain contexts it becomes imperative to speak up, breaking the rules - blowing whistles as it were. But that likewise should be done skillfully as much as possible. If one feels unduly constrained within a community ethical framework, one may also exercise their freedom to not participate in that community. It is a balance, like anything else in life. There is no ethical framework which is ideal because this is not an ideal world. So, tldr; do your best and make good decisions.
    • Jani
      As a private platform the owner can limit what is said on this space.   I'm sure someone with more authority and/or insight into this issue will chime in. Jani   “A few narrow categories of speech are not protected from government restrictions. The main such categories are incitement, defamation, fraud, obscenity, child pornography, fighting words, and threats. As the Supreme Court held in Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969)   The Freedom of Speech is one of the most essential tenants of American democracy, yet that right is not absolute. The First Amendment prohibits States from passing laws that “abridge the Freedom of Speech.” Thus, because Platforms are private businesses, individuals cannot use the First Amendment to pursue recourse against censorship on a private platform.”
    • Ivy
      I've heard of this being done.  It seems like a good idea, I mean the gas is already there.  I don't see why it couldn't be done on a larger scale.  The technology already exists.  I expect the problem would be coordinating it all, and who does that.  We're all so determined to protect our own turf, myself included.
    • Willow
      Good morning   my body and my mind kept waking me up saying hey aren’t you supposed to be getting up now since about 4am. I finally got up at 8:20 to get ready for my 10am shift.  I guess your wake up system gets into a habit and doesn’t like change.off tomorrow, then work Memorial day.    We got rain and a bit of thunder last night. Nothing too bad, unlike the poor people in the Midwest. They are really getting hammered with tornadoes this spring.  I suppose we’ll get ours later on.  It’s supposed to be a bad hurricane season and we haven’t had a really bad one in quite a few years.  The worst I’ve seen was a Cat 3 when the eye went right over us.     I stayed and it wasn’t as bad as I thought it might be but a 5? Now that’s another story.  I really don’t know how these condos will hold up to a bad hurricane.  Yes there is bracing throughout but how well was any of it installed?  Only the tradesmen plumbing electricians finish craftsmen spoke English the rest were all Hispanic and different emigrants worked together on different parts of the buildings.  One group did the framing and sheathing another different crew the roof, another the windows and so on.  Each building is 4 stories 18 units.  On the bottom we have four units with double walls but the top two are 5 each and no double walls.    @Mirrabooka I didn’t see many Reds, Roos or grasshoppers when I was in Australia.  I was mostly in Tasmania where they are mostly Wallabies.  My wife got to hold a young Tazzy Devil and a Koala Bear and I’ve held a wombat.  An emu got the best of my wife stealing all the food she had.   time to get ready for my day   Willow      
    • Birdie
    • Mirrabooka
      I yam wot I yam! Yeah!
    • Ladypcnj
      As we know online rules are usually created by a team of people, basically the guideline rules are to keep everything running smoothly, and everyone is treated equally, and most importantly the code of conduct to make sure no rules are broken. My concern is, what happens when the online community rules (in general speaking) can have an impact on the freedom of speech? Perhaps it might had been artificial intelligence, that took down a post I made on the internet, somewhere else. I know I haven't broken any rules, I was sharing a true story experience I had about online safety, so it doesn't happen to anyone else.. then the post was taken down. I felt to frustrate the time and energy I've spent typing out my experience what happened to me, and then poof it was gone  lol  What can I do about this? lol
    • Mirrabooka
      @Heather Shay you keep opening these cans of worms!!! 😄   I'm not a musician; I've barely strummed a guitar ever, but I LOVE music.    As far as influential voices go, I invite you to consider these homegrown guys, who continue to give me earworms. I hope that you listen to and can appreciate them:   Jimmy Barnes   Daryl Braithwaite   Very best: John Farnham  
    • Lydia_R
      I've listened to this song an excessive amount of times.  I always play this when I power up a new music studio which is basically what I have going on today.
    • Lydia_R
      I tend to think of most energy politics from the demand side.  It's boring to think of just the "usefulness" of food, clothing and shelter, but outside of things like this that are so basic, we are very wasteful in the pursuit of things that are not necessary.   I tend to go through phases in life every few years where I just become meditative.  You know, it's a fine thing trying to capture this methane in the landfill, but the NET gain from it must be pretty small.  There must be a massive amount of propane that is just burned in the refining of oil.  At least that is what I understand from what I've read and processed from information on the internet.  I've been thinking about how gas tanks in cars have become pressurized over the last few decades.  It probably has something to do with ethanol, right?  I had this crazy idea last year that ethanol might be made from corn cobs.  They have to do something with them.   The problem with addressing things on the demand side is the old "buy American" failure of sorts.  I think the truth is more complicated than simply calling it a failure.  The idea of a world factory with parts produced in a central location making manufacturing more practical seems reasonable.  Reducing demand for energy is a fine idea, but is there some similar logistical problem with it?  My feeling is that it would probably work with some coordination.  We did survive without all this industrialization before.  I think the most exciting part is using mountain bikes instead of horses.  @awkward-yet-sweetand I got into a thread that exposed that idea.  Oh my, I'm laughing again.  It's such a cool idea!!  Bikes are wonderful as long as they are stored indoors.
    • Vidanjali
      Thanks, @Davie. I signed up. I've been a Miami Heat fan for years which already makes me love D & all the Wade family. But beyond athleticism, they are such good and inspiring people doing good and having a positive effect on culture. Bless them and their ventures.   Here's Zaya's instagram account if you want to see some of her gorgeous modeling. You do not need an instagram account to view. https://www.instagram.com/zayawade/  
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...