Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Male criminals who become women behind bars


Guest Nicole9

Recommended Posts

Guest Gypsyfeenix

Okay folks. Calm down. I won't say this again.

MaryEllen

No worries, ME...I'm done.

It's a touchy subject on the best of days, and I for one am finished.

Link to comment
  • Replies 92
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • MaryEllen

    9

  • Carolyn Marie

    4

  • Kyla666

    4

  • Drea

    3

I've read how this issue has raised a visceral anger in the public mind. I know how I was before I began HRT and began transition. I experienced a lot of anger over the years. When my doctor asked how I was feeling taking estrogen. It took all of two second to answer his question. A great calm had decended over me. The anger was no longer there and I experienced joy, something that my life lacked much of the time pre-HRT and pre-transition. I took much of that anger out on my pillow at night. I've been pretty kind to my pillow this past year.

My experience says life isn't fair and some people would seriously benefit by treatment. Kathryn

Link to comment
Guest Megan_Lynn

lets look at this in numbers the entire population of Canada is 33,476,688 this is less then the state of California at 38,041,430 and the entire United States population at 313,919,040 Now lets look at the population of Ontario 12,851,821 , Quebec 7,903,001 , British Columbia 4,400,057 , Saskatchewan 1,033,381 this comes to a combined total of 26,188,260 or 76-77 percent of the entire countries population has coverage for SRS/GRS. This alone makes it 76-77 percent better for all trans people in Canada then in the states. The states have 313,919,040 people that are not covered by government SRS/GRs while only 7,288,428 people in Canada are without this coverage. So basically the United States has a 43 times greater chance a person is denied coverage. Factoring in that there is a average of the same amount of trans people per capita in Canada as in The United States. ( ex 1-200 1-1000 ect)

Are you honestly trying to say that because of RATIO, our transfolk have it easier than americans?

I am offended that you would say something like that. It catty and to minimize someone else's pain based on population is not acceptable. I'm done having this petty conversation. I am shocked and disappointed that you would belittle the pain of others this way....

The numbers were just to show that 76-77 percent of the population of Canada had access to SRS/GRs paid for from the provinces. While zero people in the United states have this. Not sure how this would minimize anyones pain nor was anyone pain even mentioned. I was merely stating how I felt that it was heeps easier for the average Canadian trans person then the average American trans person to access SRS/GRS. And yes Gay marriage effects trans people in so many ways so yes it makes it alot easier for trans people in Canada as well. is anyones suffering any less then anoughter because of were they live well yes and no. Trans people will all suffer at one time or anoughter because of how society likes to see us trans people. But depending on location and laws it can be alot easier to get by at one place then anoughter. From speaking to many trans people over the years from your country and many from my country it seems the opportunities, laws and society in general make it alot better place to be in Canada then in the United States.

As for me I have been on HRT for 4 1/2 years without being able to afford to get SRS/GRS and most likely never will be able. This over time will most likely end up trashing my liver from all the spiro from so may years on it. If one of the states in this country of mine would start offering government paid SRS/GRs there is zero drought that I would not be packing up and moving. Even if this included hitch hiking the entire way with no place to go once I get there as I would do pretty much anything to make my mind and body match. That is while still being a law abiding person. I will most likely be dead and gone before my country wakes up and starts funding for SRS/GRS.

I laughed at the HRT at Walmart.. Yes my country loves to put a pharmacy in any building it can. I have to pay out of pocket for my HRt and cause I use patches its very expensive for me. Averages around 140 a month . My endo wants me on alot higher dose then I am on now but I just could not aford it.

Link to comment
Guest Nicole9

Ok everyone just take a breath.

This is an Australian articular here the general population gets some health care coverage (not 100% sure what the government will cover but pity sure it ain't all costs associated with transitioning) But a prisoner has access to full health cover. Kinda erked me a bit, not because they are not entitled to cover but the government hasn't universal views on the matter that everyone isn't entitled to the same level of care. (really sorry for you guys in the states/ Canada that's a real raw deal)

Oh well stay out of jail everyone :)

Link to comment
Guest Melissa~

I really don't have a problem with prisons covering SRS. Saying the societal standard is to discriminate on required medical does nothing to address getting society to move forward on medical care. The incarceration at full cost to society -is- societies decision, own it. I for one support halving or more the incarceration rate.

Link to comment
Guest Leah1026

Getting back to the original post ands link...

As I've stated on another site:

People are missing the obvious. The article continues a long media tradition of negatively portraying and vilifying transsexual WOMEN. Transsexual men are, again, ignored, as if they don't exist.

Link to comment
Guest chngnwnd

I have mixed emotions about this, but in the end of the day it is about equality. Non transgender inmates receive medically necessary care. To deny transgender inmates medically necessary care relegates transgender individuals to second class status. The momentum created as a result of court decisions to pay for SRS helps us all.

Bobbi

Link to comment
Guest Robin Winter

I have mixed emotions about this, but in the end of the day it is about equality. Non transgender inmates receive medically necessary care. To deny transgender inmates medically necessary care relegates transgender individuals to second class status. The momentum created as a result of court decisions to pay for SRS helps us all.

Bobbi

That's actually a very good point I hadn't considered.

Link to comment
Guest LizMarie

I have mixed emotions about this, but in the end of the day it is about equality. Non transgender inmates receive medically necessary care. To deny transgender inmates medically necessary care relegates transgender individuals to second class status. The momentum created as a result of court decisions to pay for SRS helps us all.

Bobbi

And this is the crux of the matter. Many trans people who are not criminals feel this is wrong because they are not covered. But that is not the fault of the prison system. It's the fault of insurance companies that try to wiggle around medical procedures that are proven over 70+ years by calling them "experimental" even still. This would be like calling an appendectomy experimental.

Direct your anger at the insurers who use these sorts of loopholes to try to avoid this coverage.

And cost is not an issue. If we accept that 1 in 2500 males is MtF and seeks SRS (not all MtFs seek SRS), and we recognize that SRS is a once in a lifetime event, and that working lifetime is approximately 40 years long, and that the average SRS cost is $25,000 (this is too high but I'm being generous), then the cost per person per year in the overall insurance pool is $0.25 per year or just over $0.02 per month. Add in a 50% profit margin to that and it's basically $0.03 cents per month on your health insurance costs.

Even if you inflated the costs to ten times that (i.e. 1 in 250 males is MtF seeking SRS which is an absurd number), it would still be $0.30 per month per insured person in the pool.

Even greed can't be pointed at as a cause here because the insurance companies wouldn't make oodles of money from this even if it was included and they certainly won't lose money. The only excuses for the insurance companies are either ignorance or bigotry.

And before someone points out that SRS can be optionally bought by individual companies as a rider to the insurance policy, my point is that it should not have to be done that way! An appendectomy is not covered on a rider. SRS ought to be in the base policy and there is almost no excuse for why it is not except bad excuses.

Link to comment

There is a reason prision is call " punishment" and not a "vacation " over the years i have looked at those trans inmates petitioning for this most of these people are, well i think "angery " is a gross understament. many of those who are petitioning and or have recived the op while be hind bars . seem to be murderes and rapist and child molesters doing life long stints in there for THEIR crimes. Many i would wager do not like prision life as a male. i find it also interesting that almost all of them began thier transitions in prision , and i would be willing to bet that most did so to escape the much more violent evrions of male prision. i mean they are obviousely not getting out so what better way to get out than to find your way to a female prision . it isn't like lying about it would be below them. most of them thier crimes are simply appauling and deserve the punishment that is dealt to them . anger is one thing , being angery about ones situation is one thing. putting a shotgun into some one mouth and blowing thier head off is totally something else.violently raping and tourturing some one todeath is something totally different than simply being angery.

and the handfull that are allowed to be moved to female prisions well the case history shows that they continue thier violence. Maddison Hall in this very artical after being moved to a female prision began sexualy assulting his cell mates.....

I feel not one ounce of sympathy for any of their plight . and it is not me being jelous or angery that they may get something that i have to work my arse off for. when some one is sentenced to life in prision their sentence is for the remainder of thier natural life . when one gets cancer developes a heart condition and needs a heart transplant. well i am sorry but that to me marks the coming of the end of thier sentence. we put more money into keeping these murdering raping scumbags happy and healthy while behind bars than we put into schools and education. the health insurance and well being of law abiding peoples .

it is disheartening that good behavior goes with out reward, and being a murder gets you everything it seems, fed clothes access to state of the art exercise wquipment and medical insurance

guess it is just the world we live in

Sakura

Link to comment
Guest Hannah
prision is called " punishment"

Sakura

Prison should not be punishment, in my opinion. The government should not be in the business of punishing people, but instead on keeping society safe. Perhaps fear of punishment helps to keep society safe -- but I still don't like framing it as punishment...

As the issue in general I don't think the problem is so much that inmates get medically necessary treatment, but that regular people on the outside don't.

Link to comment
Guest Cloudygirl27
prision is called " punishment"

Sakura

Prison should not be punishment, in my opinion. The government should not be in the business of punishing people, but instead on keeping society safe. Perhaps fear of punishment helps to keep society safe -- but I still don't like framing it as punishment...

As the issue in general I don't think the problem is so much that inmates get medically necessary treatment, but that regular people on the outside don't.

Are you serious? "Prison should not be a punishment"? It actually took me a few minutes and a glass of water to get my head around that statement. So, lets say that a friend of yours gets hurt or murdered and the offender for the crime is sent to prison. You don't think he or she should be punished for that act? No wonder criminals are not afraid to do the crime because doing the time is basically a vacation with free meals, medical care, etc.

I would have to agree with Sakura. You do the crime, you shouldn't be allowed any privileges besides basic medical needs and a sanitary area.

Link to comment
Guest Sarah Faith
prision is called " punishment"

Sakura

Prison should not be punishment, in my opinion. The government should not be in the business of punishing people, but instead on keeping society safe. Perhaps fear of punishment helps to keep society safe -- but I still don't like framing it as punishment...

As the issue in general I don't think the problem is so much that inmates get medically necessary treatment, but that regular people on the outside don't.

Part of the job of keeping people safe, is having the power to back up the laws that do so. I mean no offense but Prison absolutely should be and must be a punishment. Murderers, Rapists, and others who end or ruin peoples lives truly have no business being happy especially at tax payers expense.

Link to comment

In reading about these inmates it seems quite clear that the male anatomy, testes (testosterone) is the culprit, and in basic removal of them would solve the problem. That would seem necessary to them and deems appropriate to me. But funding a full SRS is going above and beyond that what is necessary. Let them fund anything other than a basic orchidectomy

Link to comment
Guest KarenLyn

I don't believe public funds should be used to pay for SRS for criminals. I wouldn't even be willing to pay for facial hair removal. I would be ok with them being maintained at whatever point they are in their transition if they started before their incarceration. Everything else would have to be put on hold. It's their own fault for breaking the law.

It makes me angry when inmates abuse the system when there are plenty of people who work hard and can barely manage basic health care.

my 2¢

Karen

Link to comment
  • Root Admin

(cough) Kosilek. (cough cough)

Kosilek is a vicious murderer. Convicted of garroting his wife to death. This scumbag should get free SRS??? No way!

MaryEllen

Link to comment
Guest sophia.gentry58

I have mixed emotions about this, but in the end of the day it is about equality. Non transgender inmates receive medically necessary care. To deny transgender inmates medically necessary care relegates transgender individuals to second class status. The momentum created as a result of court decisions to pay for SRS helps us all.

Bobbi

And this is the crux of the matter. Many trans people who are not criminals feel this is wrong because they are not covered. But that is not the fault of the prison system. It's the fault of insurance companies that try to wiggle around medical procedures that are proven over 70+ years by calling them "experimental" even still. This would be like calling an appendectomy experimental.

Direct your anger at the insurers who use these sorts of loopholes to try to avoid this coverage.

And cost is not an issue. If we accept that 1 in 2500 males is MtF and seeks SRS (not all MtFs seek SRS), and we recognize that SRS is a once in a lifetime event, and that working lifetime is approximately 40 years long, and that the average SRS cost is $25,000 (this is too high but I'm being generous), then the cost per person per year in the overall insurance pool is $0.25 per year or just over $0.02 per month. Add in a 50% profit margin to that and it's basically $0.03 cents per month on your health insurance costs.

Even if you inflated the costs to ten times that (i.e. 1 in 250 males is MtF seeking SRS which is an absurd number), it would still be $0.30 per month per insured person in the pool.

Even greed can't be pointed at as a cause here because the insurance companies wouldn't make oodles of money from this even if it was included and they certainly won't lose money. The only excuses for the insurance companies are either ignorance or bigotry.

And before someone points out that SRS can be optionally bought by individual companies as a rider to the insurance policy, my point is that it should not have to be done that way! An appendectomy is not covered on a rider. SRS ought to be in the base policy and there is almost no excuse for why it is not except bad excuses.

Thanks LizMarie

That really puts matters in proper perspective.

Sophia

Link to comment
Guest KimberlyF

To me there is anger that makes someone a loud obnoxious jerk. That anger can be dealt with.

You carve someone up, if it wasn't self-defense or defending another innocent, I don't want to hear about excuses. Sit in this little cage and do not enjoy life.

Link to comment
Guest Jenni_S

(cough) Kosilek. (cough cough)

Kosilek is a vicious murderer. Convicted of garroting his wife to death. This scumbag should get free SRS??? No way!

MaryEllen

Yes indeed, Mary Ellen, and yet there seem to be plenty that support Kosilek getting that surgery. The general opinion seems to be that if this goes forward, it will be that much easier for people to have the costs covered in general, and for their own self, when the time comes.

So really, this case? THIS case?? Why does the "community" choose this one to back, and support? "The ends justify the means" seems to be what is going on here. If I get mine, great, it was all worth it! To those that have felt that way, a few questions to you. Ones that I've asked before, in fact.

Kosilek is a convicted murderer, who has admitted the crime. He is sentenced to life without parole. Cheryl McCaul, the spouse, was found in the back seat of her car, strangled with rope and piano wire, so viciously that her head was nearly severed. This is the person who is now being supported by a significant faction of the transgender community, so that they can get theirs? Is that all that matters? Has this community become so self-centered that it's SRS by any means necessary now, as long as I don't have to pay for it?

Many people say that trans people are all sorts of nasty things. Crazy, nuts, deviant, the list goes on. And the community doesn't like it. And yet, said community will support this person. Yes, they should get their SRS covered by the state, because that'll open all sorts of doors for us! Really? Do you think that'll help that at-large population's opinion, the ones that think the trans are crazy, nuts, deviant and so on? With things like this going on, I don't have to wonder very much why they might think that way.

There are plenty of people who would be far more worthy of community support. People who have had miscarriages of justice done to them, people who can't make ends meet despite doing everything they can, people who would give you their last dollar if it would help you more than them, and, yes, people who haven't murdered their wives.

But what do I know? You might get your way; perhaps the Kosilek case will make it so you never have to pay one cent to have your dream realized. And when you're there, on the table, waiting for the anesthesiologist, I hope you see this.

1c5bf9f703a129e042bfc737da67db87.jpg

Who's that? Oh, that's Cheryl McCaul. The woman who had to die so that Kosilek could make the case for SRS.

Any community that would disregard the murder of a person, to advance their own agenda, is not my community.

So I ask, again, since it won't go away, why this case?

Link to comment
  • Admin

I sat on a death penalty case, and was the jury foreperson. Having seen what such a criminal looks like up close and personal, and having seen the results of the kinds of wounds left by that kind of an attack (it was a knife attack, not a garroting, but the type of wound is similar), I have absolutely no sympathy for such a heartless criminal. An attack like that is not a crime of passion, it is thoughtful and deliberate, hate filled and merciless. I would not want my tax dollars, or anyone else's, to pay for GRS.

I don't support the death penalty, but I do not, could not, support that kind of medical treatment for a convicted murderer.

Carolyn Marie

Link to comment
Guest Leah1026

Jennie said:

Kosilek is a convicted murderer, who has admitted the crime. He is sentenced to life without parole. Cheryl McCaul, the spouse, was found in the back seat of her car, strangled with rope and piano wire, so viciously that her head was nearly severed. This is the person who is now being supported by a significant faction of the transgender community, so that they can get theirs?

First, I've already finished transition years ago, so that is a non-factor for me.

Why?

Frankly I'm surprised I have to explain this at all.

I think we all know the pain and misery of gender dysphoria. To deny a person treatment to eleviate said pain and misery is cruel and unusual punishment. It's like telling a cancer patient "Sorry, no chemo or surgery for you". But prisoners with cancer do get treatment and that's okay, hmmmm.

Carolyn Marie said:

I would not want my tax dollars, or anyone else's, to pay for GRS.

Michelle has been fighting the state on this for 20 years. In that time the state has spent millions to deny her treatment. So your are okay with spending multi-millions instead of 40-50k for transitional medical treament? Tell me that's logical.

Last, I think many here are dealing with internalized transphobia. We don't want to be further stigmatized by being associated with Michelle Kosileck. To prove how normal we are we're willing to sacrifice one of our own. Let me make it clear: I despise the crime, but she has a constitutional right, as a ward of the state, to medically necessary care. You deny her that right and you're all helping to deny yourself that same right.

Link to comment
  • Root Admin

I find it appalling many in the transgender community are supporting the right of this murderous scumbag to have SRS funded by the tax payers of Massachusetts. That the mean, nasty state of Massachusetts is not willing to give poor,pitiful, persecuted Michelle Kosilek the surgery that she needs. I cannot get free SRS, Yet some of you bleeding hearts think it's cruel to deny this puke bag her right to get free SRS. Does she have more rights than I do?

I am a transsexual woman. I am ashamed and disgusted that this person identifies as the same.

Take a good look. This is the face of pure evil. A murderous monster. This SOB deserves and has the right to have free SRS but I do not??

Link to comment
Guest KimberlyF

I find it appalling many in the transgender community are supporting the right of this murderous scumbag to have SRS funded by the tax payers of Massachusetts. That the mean, nasty state of Massachusetts is not willing to give poor,pitiful, persecuted Michelle Kosilek the surgery that she needs. I cannot get free SRS, Yet some of you bleeding hearts think it's cruel to deny this puke bag her right to get free SRS. Does she have more rights than I do?

I am a transsexual woman. I am ashamed and disgusted that this person identifies as the same.

Take a good look. This is the face of pure evil. A murderous monster. This SOB deserves and has the right to have free SRS but I do not??

Like.

68FB1E11-C503-4B25-B29A-CAAD11C5380A-378

Link to comment

Kosilek is a convicted murderer, who has admitted the crime. He is sentenced to life without parole. Cheryl McCaul, the spouse, was found in the back seat of her car, strangled with rope and piano wire, so viciously that her head was nearly severed. This is the person who is now being supported by a significant faction of the transgender community, so that they can get theirs? Is that all that matters? Has this community become so self-centered that it's SRS by any means necessary now, as long as I don't have to pay for it?

As I read this I can hear the justification, like when any MTF engages in so action that is predominatly associated with males "But women can be vicious murderers too, that terrible action doesn't mean she is any less a woman"

Many people say that trans people are all sorts of nasty things. Crazy, nuts, deviant, the list goes on. And the community doesn't like it. And yet, said community will support this person.

And the community's recent obcession over restroom just adds to those perceptions and in similar fashion the way it supports those instances where there is some problem with an MTF using a womens restroom or locker room where the trans person in question is doing something pervy (e.g. Colleen Francis). I am all for supporting the medically indicated needs, but the community doesn't promote that, but rather promotes use of womens facilities based solely upon presentation at the moment, intended presentation or self identifcation (regardless of presentation) and in no way is linked to any medically supervised transition.

Community support for these sorts of things is what polarizes the majority of so called trans-phobes into opposing the trans agenda.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   7 Members, 0 Anonymous, 67 Guests (See full list)

    • KathyLauren
    • SamC
    • Birdie
    • VickySGV
    • Ivy
    • Willow
    • MaryEllen
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.8k
    • Total Posts
      770.2k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,103
    • Most Online
      8,356

    BUGFIEND
    Newest Member
    BUGFIEND
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Bobbijean
      Bobbijean
    2. Bryan
      Bryan
      (61 years old)
    3. jlw5ju
      jlw5ju
      (27 years old)
    4. ladykirabellum
      ladykirabellum
      (47 years old)
    5. Lizzie17
      Lizzie17
  • Posts

    • Ashley0616
    • ClaireBloom
      My avatar is from a T-shirt that I am just dying to buy.  Maybe soon....
    • Lydia_R
      I had some guy grab my butt on the ship.  I don't know how "real" it was, but I did not enjoy that at all.  Also did not enjoy the hazing I saw other people going through.  One person can only do so much to stop that when there are 10 people doing it.
    • Lydia_R
      Here is a legible copy (hopefully):    
    • Lydia_R
      I pulled this out of a stack of old military mementos yesterday.  I guess I didn't realize how cool this one was because I did so much of this kind of thing back then.    
    • Lydia_R
      This internet video thing is pretty amazing.  I'd call it Zoom, but there are other platforms out there.  I prefer Zoom over Teams because Zoom puts me and everyone else in the same picture.  I like seeing the whole group in one shot.  Teams of course is about having so many people that you can't get them in the shot, or is it?   Just saying that I have never met any of my counselors in person.  Doctors, of course I have and I am lucky there.  They are 3.5 miles from my house as is the main transgender surgery place in town.  I've been doing virtual visits with the medical doctors lately though.  It feels like once I became steady state, they don't need to interact with me physically that much.  I have enjoyed going into their office in my nice clothing.
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      I guess a lot depends on where you start and where you wanna end up.  For me, doing the "boy form" thing has come with disadvantages.  Smaller skeleton, thinner bones, and skinny/tiny everything.  I'll never be taken seriously.  I guess the advantage is that my way of blending in is just kind of confusing.  "Mommy, is that a boy or a girl?"    One of the biggest arguments for starting transition early in life is I think it gives a person a greater ability to pass.  My two MtF friends started early, and pass really well.  They never got to the larger bone structure, beard, deep voice stuff.  Me being intersex (which is more complicated) and not getting around to "boy form" until my 30's, my body size and features were pretty much set in stone.      You're lucky.  Some folks pay all that and more, even AFTER insurance.  One of my friends faced the choice last year - pay for her final year of college or pay for her meds.  She's taken a year off from college to work and save up money to finish.    My medical expenses have been more injury-related than therapy or medication   The state covered some of it with a fund for crime victims, insurance covered a lot, but there's ended up being a few thousand dollars spent out-of-pocket since 2022 to put me back together again.  I've never found a decent therapist, but my husband has a psych degree among other things, so I figure talking with him is almost as good.  I do have a good doctor, although I have to drive a long way to a big city to see her.  Mostly she takes a basic look at me, and writes another year's prescription.  Since I'm non-op and only using testosterone cream for a localized effect, its pretty simple stuff. 
    • Lydia_R
      I'm a tracker and I've paid for 100% of my transition costs out of pocket.  Counseling was a huge, huge part of my transition and well worth my money.  Not to be uppity about all of this.  I'm just sharing information I have because I have it and it may be useful for others.  Here is my analysis of my spending on transition over the last 2.5 years:   Medical Doctors and Blood Draws: $2,397 Counseling: $3,800 Medications (brand name): $2,702.85 Medications (generic): $485.39 Total: $9,385.24   I picked up on the internet early in transition that transition is a consumer activity.  I tend to agree with that.   This year (Jan - May 18th, 2024), I've spent: Medical Doctors: $102 Medications: $241.52 Total: $343.52   So I'm on a much more sustainable path with it.  I'm pretty happy with where I am with it, although I do still desire surgery and am nervous about how that will all unfold.  But my doctors have me on this steady state thing.  I could seek out other medications, but what I'm doing is good enough.  Oh, I'm missing something....  I did a bunch of electrolysis that didn't appear to have any effect.  I've always enjoyed shaving and I use pink shaving cream now (I've got some lipstick blond in me).  It's good enough.  Not sure if I'll do electro or laser in the future.  The need to shave my body has become less and less.  Before HRT, I was shaving my body weekly or even every 5 days.  Now it is more like 2-3 weeks.  Everyone's body hair is different.  My beard is very coarse and stiff while my body hair has been somewhat minimal and light.  It's nice to have smooth legs and not have to shave as much.   Counseling was $200/session.  I tried one or two counselors before I found one who resonated with where I really was.  When I was prescribed HRT, I didn't fill the prescription until 4 months later.  I had to take some time to decide that I really wanted to take on that lifetime financial commitment.  And of course the possibly negative health consequences too, but I think I was actually thinking more about the finances of it all.  Maybe 51%.   I did a lot of work to revitalize my career before jumping into medical transition.  I started counseling 3 months before I got the best paying job of my life.  The pressure of wanting to transition was so great that I couldn't wait any longer.  She was coming out.  Even though I had very little money, I splurged on some nice dresses and a full length mirror and then started counseling.  Sometimes you just have to move forward and hope for the best.  Other times it is better to wait and do some hard work.  The grace of it all..
    • Ivy
      And when the pressure is released it sucks in heat.  I had a regulator leaking and it was covered with ice.  It's how a heat pump works as well.   Why do they always pick names like this?  It's like the exact opposite of what it really is. I hate politics so much.  But I still have to follow it.
    • Lydia_R
      Wonderful!  This reminds me of a discussion I had with my brother a decade ago.  I said that things expand when they get hotter.  He said, no, they expand when they get colder.  And I had to think about that for a while.  The weird thing is that H20 is special in that when it reaches freezing, it expands.   The pressure makes the cold and then we see the condensation.
    • KatieSC
      I used to have a really good therapist, however, she does not accept health insurance reimbursement fees as they are too low. I had to pay 130 per session. When she decided to jack the rates to 185 per hour, I cut bait. Without a doubt, counseling is very helpful. What concerns me greatly is that we are a vulnerable population. Unfortunately, we can easily be targeted for some pretty high fees. How many of us have been in the situation where our healthcare provider, surgeons, or counselors, have required cash payments? We get jammed as well by the health insurance companies as they often will not pay for items that could be essential to our well-being. It is my contention that our chances of being targeted for violence, death, or harassment, go up when we cannot easily blend in with the female population.    For those of us that are MTF, some of us are blessed with more feminine features, and many of us are not. We get the whammy of a larger skeleton, bigger hands, bigger feet, a beard, a deep voice, and masculine face. It takes a lot for some of us to be able to blend in. My belief is that the better we blend in, the better chance we have of not being targeted. In this, electrolysis, facial feminizing/gender affirming facial surgery, voice/speech therapy with voice feminization/gender affirming voice surgery, and body contouring are all potentially lifesaving. Unfortunately, many of the insurance companies deem the procedures as cosmetic, and yet there is no cosmetic that fixes all of these issues.    If you pay your money, you can get anything you want in this world. The sad reality is that for us, many of these procedures would enhance our lives tremendously, yet we face ongoing battles with our very existence. Yeah, an empathetic therapist helps, but is it just the concept of reasonable empathy at a reasonable cost? When my therapist jacked her rates to 185 per hour, I said enough is enough. Your mileage may vary.
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      I don't think the temperature matters as much.  Think about how gases like CO2 are stored in cylinders, and they are basically the same in summer or winter.  Any gas becomes liquid under enough pressure.  What does matter is the strength of the pressure vessel.  If exposed to excess external heat, pressure increases and can burst a tank or a pipe.  Household propane tanks are often painted white or silver and have safety release valves, because sunlight can heat a tank enough to cause a significant increase in internal pressure, even though the contents remain liquid. 
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      It has been a long week, and I think this weekend is going to be pretty busy.  The high school is having their graduation later today.  Although we don't have any grads in our family this year, my husband is going because he's involved with the school.  And tonight there's the torchlight ceremony for the county cadets who are finishing their program, and the reading of assignments for the new seniors.  One of my stepkids will be a senior this year.  She's talented, and will be assigned a squad leader position.  My husband is really proud of her, and she's well-liked by her peers even though she's very quiet and serious.    I might get to go on a trip to Texas this week.  The storms that hit Houston caused a lot of electrical damage, so no doubt the utilities in that area will be ordering stuff from my husband's company.  When the big hurricane hit Florida in 2022, we made several trips there with badly-needed equipment, and the entire transportation department was involved in the first convoy.  When he travels, I usually want to go along, since 1-on-1 time is kind of rare for us. 
    • Mmindy
    • Lydia_R
      Maybe surface tension?   I was in a political debate yesterday and it got way too focused on social stuff and I just had to steer the conversation back to how natural gas transitions to a liquid under pressure.  One of the people I was debating had a career working in that field and it was a good opportunity to expose stuff like that.  He mentioned that it isn't just pressure, it is temperature too.  So then I mentioned how the lines are running underground and asked how that played a role in it.  He came back saying that natural gas is a liquid under pressure.  I guess I didn't get a straight answer on that, but it did move my thinking one step down the road.  Perhaps I should have been more direct with him and asked him at what temperature and pressure.  Is there a chart?   I feel people would be better off if they paid more attention to the objects in their environment instead of focusing on some of the things that we hear so much of in the news.  People are pretty clueless as to how much trigonometry plays a role in so many things in our society.  Even land surveyors don't really use it anymore because programmers locked it away in a function.  Much like how cascading style sheets (CSS) is a wrapper for math.  I wonder what former president Trump thinks about all of that?  He must have some knowledge of how his buildings are constructed, right?  There certainly is a part of me that thinks he is just putting on a show about all of this.  Perhaps I'm wrong though.  All kinds of people in the world.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...