Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Conservative Pastor Speaks About "The Transgender Question"


Carolyn Marie

Recommended Posts

  • Admin

I debated with myself whether to place this here or in the Religion Forum. I think it will get more attention here. My only comment is that Mr. Moore seems to think its all about the surgery. I wonder if he has ever spoken to a transperson?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/on-faith/wp/2013/08/15/conservative-christianity-and-the-transgender-question/

Carolyn Marie

Link to comment
Guest KimberlyF

He seems to have covered the gauntlet.

"and they can't be eradicated by a change of clothes or chemical tinkering or a surgeon's knife, much less by an arbitrary announcement in the high school gym."

The one line keying on surgery seems to work more for dramatic effect.

"But we believe we can no more surgically alter our gospel than we can surgically alter our gender."

I do like a few comments...

"But this also means that we will love and be patient with those who feel alienated from their created identities."

"All we can do is say what we believe as Christians: that all of us are sinners, and that none of us are freaks."

I'm fine with disagreeing with people who don't preach hate.

Link to comment
  • Admin

In Robert Helnlein's story Glory Road, the Empress of 20 universes goes in regularly for "imprinting" of the entire mental lives of her predecessors in office for the last hundred or so generations to help her make wise current and relevant decisions in regard to her governing her empire. She reportedly gets all the bad the prior emperors / empresses experienced along with the good, etc.

My daydream for this person is that we could invent a machine that could take our experiences and imprint them on people of this type. Give the guy the "wisdom" of 20 or 30 real life TG people's experience. We are nearing the technology level for it. The sooner the better.

Link to comment
  • Admin

.I'm fine with disagreeing with people who don't preach hate.

Amen to that, Kim. I do agree that his comments were more restrained and tolerant than many I've read.

HUGS

Carolyn Marie

Link to comment
Guest alexiaannalise

I really disagree with him its not that we are defying god its the fact we were assigned the wrong gender in the womb i wish ppl would really learn this i deal with this enough with my ex gf that its not right well to me being a female feels right and good and i love who i am actually becoming and its awesome

*kisses*

Alexia Annalise

Link to comment
Guest -guest-

I'm surprised that the concept of a disconnect between the mental (gender identity) and the physical (sex) doesn't come more easily to Christians.

Don't they generally believe that our bodies are only transitory and our souls define who we are?

Link to comment
Guest sophia.gentry58

Carolyn, I got a slightly different take from the article. First, I would have love to have had the capability of responding to Mr. Moore directly. In fact I will attempt to locate his local church address and send him a letter. Secondly, to me, Mr. Moore seemed to be saying that regardless of what attempts we make or how far we go in changing or altering our appearance it is wrong in the eyes of God and therefore a grave sin worthy of hell fire.

I did like however many of the threads as a response to Mr. Moore's short sightedness.

Two (there are more) things are obvious to me with respect to Mr. Moore and many like him (I was one of those people before spending a year in Iraq) one; he is not willing to accept the fact that because the bible that was developed especially during the King James era was seriously bastardized, it brings into question whether Christianity can claim legitimacy in the area of biblical inerrancy. Secondly, and most importantly, 99.999% percent of the world's population incessantly majors on the minor. What I mean by that with regard to this topic is that most of us (including us trans men and women) spend way too much time concentrating on this flesh of ours, very little attention to our minds, and little to no attention on the eternal existence of our true selves, the spirit of our humanity. For those who do not accept the premise that we even have a spirit is perfectly understandable why they wouldn't have a clue about such things, but I find it ironic that Christians in particular but you can throw in the Jews and Muslims as well who each claim to understand all things spiritual and each believing that they have the eternal edict for controlling our lives are so carnal, so superficial that you'd be hard-pressed to gain any insight into true spirituality.

Some hold the view that the body that we all have is a mere shell that allows us to experience life in this plane of existence. Albeit, a magnificent shell to be sure, but a shell nonetheless. There are many others who believe that this shell of ours is a holy temple because of the eternal spirit within, however whether we are mere shells or a holy temple we are beings that are sovereign over our own body, not to destroy but to creatively express life via the body without limitations. Thus, all who have a problem with me transitioning are simply basing their views with a primitive draconian mindset.

Sophia

Link to comment
  • Admin

The gospel can't be surgically altered? Is he forgetting about Constantine's little operations?

The Council Of Nicea did not completely arrive at the common canon of items in the Bible, and even today, the Roman Catholic Bible, the Orthodox Christian Bible and the Protestant church canons are significantly different, and have different doctrines of what can constitute final authority on belief of the users of that Bible. Constantine was the moral equivalent of Dr. Frankenstein as far as the Bible went, since there were countless other documents offered, but unused. A wonderful kettle of stew.

Link to comment
Guest LizMarie

This article is an attempt to dress up bigotry in religious guise and give it excuse for existing. I've seen quite enough of this already, regardless of how politely he formulates his words. There have been very religious formulations for all sorts of bigotry in the past as well.

The "conservative Christian" is a human being who has deliberately decided that science is meaningless to them, even though their entire lives exploit the cumulative power of the scientific revolution all around them. Science repeatedly tells us that what we are, as trans folk, is an inherent biological truth and that his entire premise, that we are created purely and perfectly male and female, is absurdly wrong.

Further, this "God does not make mistakes" perspective is destroyed by the Gospels themselves. Examine John 9:1-3 where a man was blind from birth not because of any sin but solely to become a means of glorifying God. That right there puts to the lie that mistakes must be a sign of sin and that God only creates us perfectly every time. I've often thought about Carolyn or Genee serving with their churches and how their positions and outreach to those in need within the trans community wouldn't even exist in the form that it is today if they were not trans themselves to begin with.

As far as surgical alteration of our genitals goes, Jesus himself simply didn't seem to care. In Matthew 19:12 Jesus himself states: "For there are eunuchs who were born that way, and there are eunuchs who have been made eunuchs by others—and there are those who choose to live like eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. The one who can accept this should accept it."

In short, this author cherry picks his verses to fit his preconceptions, then stamps those preconceived biases as divinely ordained and asserts that this is how it is, science be damned.

Not so long ago the Dalai Lama said "If scientific analysis were conclusively to demonstrate certain claims in Buddhism to be false, then we must accept the findings of science and abandon those claims.” This same ought to be applied to Christianity, and conservative Christianity's refusal to accept this is prima facie evidence that it is, at its heart, an anti-intellectual wish to restore the dark ages. This denial of science is intrinsic to the system of falsehoods perpetuated by "conservative Christianity" to keep its followers in bondage to it. In many respects, conservative Christianity bears the hallmarks of a cult, denying reality itself and using brainwashing techniques to ensure that its followers remain obedient to its interpretation of reality.

Frank Schaeffer, the son of the late Christian apologist Francis Schaeffer, has written extensively about his escape from this mental prison that conservative Christianity constructs. The blog "Permission To Live" is another place where someone who has escaped the mental traps of conservative Christianity has written extensively. I highly recommend reading both Frank Schaeffer's website and the "Permission to Live" blog, if you feel trapped by the inherent contradictions of conservative Christianity and want to find your way past such into a larger and more meaningful world. I have a close friend who grew up in that and she says, in her mid-40s, that she doesn't even understand how she lived and believed as she did when she was younger.

In short, polite formulations do not excuse bigotry, and just because it is polite doesn't mean I will respect it. I will no more respect a bigot towards trans folk than I will respect a bigot towards people of color.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 179 Guests (See full list)

    • VickySGV
    • Carolyn Marie
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.7k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,033
    • Most Online
      8,356

    ArtavikenGenderflui
    Newest Member
    ArtavikenGenderflui
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. afraid of self
      afraid of self
    2. Chaidoesart
      Chaidoesart
      (14 years old)
    3. Faith57
      Faith57
    4. Joyce Ann
      Joyce Ann
      (70 years old)
    5. Kelly21121
      Kelly21121
      (56 years old)
  • Posts

    • Carolyn Marie
      https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2024/04/russian-poetry-competition-bans-transgender-applicants/     Everyone in Russia knows that Putin hates LGBT people, so every segment of society gets on board with the Leader's viewpoint, or they risk his wrath.  Sounds a lot like Florida, doesn't it?   Carolyn Marie
    • RaineOnYourParade
      happy trans birthday! I can't speak personally on the subject, but I hope hormones bring you the changes you're looking for <3 
    • MaeBe
      That’s super healthy, to see that something that becomes common has less effect on you and that you are able to decipher these feelings.   Sadly, this trend tends to only deaden good feelings as we tend not to let bad feelings attenuate the same way.   I have noticed less euphoria, but still feel the dysphorias that I have. Sometimes the good sneaks in and reminds me, but often time it’s just me seeing myself in the mirror and being comfortable about what I see when embracing my realized self. I may not get the same buzz I once did, but I don’t feel incongruous when looking at a more “drab” reflection.    Wishing you strength, you are amazing!
    • KayC
      Congratulations! and Happy Trans Birthday @LittleSam! That is such a BIG milestone.  I can still remember walking out of my clinic with my first HRT presciption.  I was on Cloud-9.  Wishing you all the best in the start of your new Journey!
    • missyjo
      maebe thank you I try to be. I thank God for blessings, try to share them, beg forgiveness for my shortcomings n vow to try to do better...2 priests have said no, God doesn't condemn you just for being trans...but apparently evangelicals do   I shall vtry dear thank you  
    • MaeBe
      Meet him at the being good to others part of Christianity. At the heart of it, there are excellent tenets of the faith. Those that condemn are judging, Jesus would have us be selfless; stone casting and all that. Are you a good person? Are you putting good into the world? If your gender is an issue for God, let God judge. In the mortal realm, let your actions be heard. 
    • missyjo
      and just fi sweeten it..I'm catholic n he hasn't been for years..he's evangelical..whatever that is
    • MaeBe
      Let’s stick to cite-able fact. Most of my posts have been directly in relation to LGBTQ+ rights as it pertains to P2025 and I have drawn direct links between people, their quotes, and their agenda. I have made reference to the cronyism that P2025 would entail as well, by gutting, not cutting, broad swathes of government and replacing it with “conservative warriors” (I can get you the direct quote, but rest assured it’s a quote). All this does is constantly force the cogs to be refitted, not their movement. To say that agencies have directly defied a President is a bit much, the EPA did what Trump told them to do at the direct harm to the environment, the department of agriculture did the same by enacting the administrations forced move to KC which decimated the USDA.      How about Betsy DeVoss for Education? Or Bannon for anything? What about the revolving Chief of Staff position that Trump couldn’t stay filled? Or the Postmaster General, who did much to make the USPS worse?   Let’s not mix politics with racism, sexism, or any other ism. Because Trump made mainly white, male, appointments—many of them not, arguably, people fit for service—or unwilling to commit to term. I can argue this because, again, he’s up for election and will do what he did before (and more of the same, his words).   Please delineate how the selected diversity appointments have negatively affected the US, other than being black, women, or queer? Representation matters and America benefits when its people are inspired and empowered.
    • missyjo
      ok ladies if I've asked this before I'm sorry please delete    ok so I have 2vsiblings..one is overly religious..n preachy n domineering..so he keeps trying to talk with me n I'd like to..but he always falls into this all knowing all wise domineering preachy thing tjaz tells me he's praying for christ to beat Satan for control of my soul..which is doomed to hell bc I'm transgender    I'd like to try to have a civil conversation n try to set him strait n gsin a cooperation n real conversation    any suggestions?
    • missyjo
      abigail darling what about extensions or a wig? be brave n hang in there  to thine own self be true  good luck
    • RaineOnYourParade
      When I first started figuring things out, I got a lot more euphoria. Every time a friend would use he/they pronouns for me, I'd get this bubbly feeling, and seeing myself look masculine made me really happy. Dysphoric state felt more normal, so I guess I noticed the pain it caused me less.   Now, it's more just that my pronouns and such things feel natural, and dysphoria is a lot stronger -- I know what's natural, so experiencing the opposite is more jarring than everything. The problem is, most of my natural experiences are from friends, and I rarely get properly gendered by strangers, much less by my family. I've found myself unable to bind in months due to aches, colds,, and not wanting to risk damage.    It partially makes me want to go back to the beginning of my journey, because at least then I got full euphoria. I'm pretty sure it'll be like this until I medically transition, or at the very least get top surgery (you know all those trans dudes online with tiny chests? Not me, unfortunately). It's a bit depressing, but at least I know that, eventually, there's a way out of this.
    • RaineOnYourParade
      Major mood, right here ^^^    I've listened to Lumineers to a long time (a major portion of it by osmosis via my mom), so that is almost painfully relatable
    • RaineOnYourParade
      As for getting a button-up/formal pants suit, you can try to talk to her more -- Cis women in tuxes have worn tuxes in recent years, after all, (for example, Zendaya) so it can still be a relatively safe topic. For jumpsuits, I'd recommend going with a simple one with a blazer, if you can -- this'll make it look overall more masculine. There's a lot of good brands, but going for one without a lot of extra glitz on it will make it look less feminine under a blazer. I don't know many specific brands though since I usually just get my stuff from chain stores, sorry :<   When it comes to your hair, if you can't cut it, you can look up tutorials on fluffing it up instead. If you can pull it off, it can look a lot shorter and more androgynous instead!
    • RaineOnYourParade
      As far as I'm aware, he wasn't -- he just sometimes wore skirts, which was why it was a question in the first place.   In my opinion, part of that is because of the way press spares attention on issues like that. As a bit of a true crime nut and what I see: Child predator cases' (and cases of a sexual nature in general) press focus on those with an AMAB perpetrator generally, and very rarely are AFAB perpetrators given much press time or even getting tried due to a whole bunch of issues I'm not gonna get into. Because of this, when you see these types of cases and a boy is the victim, it's almost always a queer person who is the one who committed a crime that gets press. Therefore, with the amount of cases seen with this type of perpetrator (and due to the fact "99% of queer people are not sexual criminals" doesn't attract eyes), the human brain can kind of naturally makes an association with it. It's not right, but it's also a fault I think falls partially on the media.   That's all my opinion, though!   This is extra confusing to me, as a feminine man is usually viewed as gay. If someone is refusing the acknowledge the existence of trans people, then gay would be the societal connection that comes after, I think. So, that sorta implies that trans women wouldn't be interested in women in the first place by those assumptions? Of course, trans lesbians exist (most trans women I know like women, actually), but it's a little ridiculous to me that people will deny trans people's existence, call all feminine AMAB people gay, and say that trans people are looking to peep all in the same breath.   Wow, this was a lot longer of a response than I was planning to write--
    • Abigail Genevieve
      For one thing, the practice of putting into office wholly unqualified people simply because of racial, sexual or national characteristics.  It is no accident that Karine is a Haitian immigrant, Black and lesbian.  Kamala Harris is a Black female. Pete Buttigieg is gay.  Often you find that Biden explicitly stated that this is why he hired them, not because of competence, but because they checked so many boxes on his little list.  It makes a mockery of people and is a disservice to the US. 
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...