Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

The Uk Keeps Haters Out


Carolyn Marie

Recommended Posts

  • Admin

Please check out this link to a story in today's CNN.com. http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/europe/05/06...list/index.html

While I have some misgivings about "freedom of speech" issues, I have no sympathy for the hate mongers targeted by the British Home Office. All I can say is, good for the UK, and good for Home Secretary Jacqui Smith.

Carolyn Marie

Link to comment
Guest nova

Good one, Carolyn Marie

Michael Savage...wasn't he the one that was too extreme for Fox news? A botany (or something like that) major from Berkeley CA, who bored Californians to death for years with his radio talk show ranting about rich women who grocery shop in spandex; Guatamalan "leaf blowers", and autistic "brats" who need a good spanking. One of the original "compassionate conservatives".

Link to comment

Ah, Dr. Weiner, batcrap crazy and proud of it.

He said that trans people were 'delusional psychopaths who need to be in the back of the psych ward doped up on medication.' But he acts as a safety valve and a canary in the coal mine. He only says what a lot of people beleive and I think it unwise to drive them underground only to be unpleasantly surprised when they come roaring to the surface.

Link to comment
Guest julia_d

Personally I'm glad this country has started to be honest about keeping these religious nutjobs out.. There are enough home grown ones who should be thrown out into the kinds of societies they want to create.

I would have allowed him to come, but with the condition that no hate motivated crime was possible to commit against him.. and then watch some crazed gay (doped up off the back of the psycho ward) murder him.

I think the USA would do well to follow some of the UK anti-hate laws.. because they see nutjobs like this silenced, imprisoned and in some cases deported or made to find sanctuary elsewhere. These dinosaurs are not welcome in a modern liberal (small "l" because it is probably the least free country in Europe) state..

We have the right to refuse entry.. and I'm glad to see it at last being used to keep these cup cakes and haters of freedom out... personally I would have let him in.. then as soon as he opened his mouth thrown him in jail and let him rot for about 10 years waiting to come to trial.. in an orange jumpsuit.

Link to comment
Guest Sergei

Good for Jacqui Smith. I've always praised England for protecting us, and I still believe that this is the best country in the world to go through gender transition.

Link to comment
Guest Elizabeth K

Scarey people! We know about many of these hateful people, but like cockroaches, when you see one, there are a hundred more still hidding in the walls.

How can anyone profess to believe in GOD and then go about the devil's business? Christian? Islamic? I don't think so - agents of evil... demons.

I really don't believe in the classic HELL - but these people make me wish there was one, one they could go to. The only thing we can do is pray they see the error of their ways. That may seem weak, but if you think on it, it is one of the most powerful prayers there are.

Maybe Home Secretary Jacqui Smith has the right idea - just keep them away if you can. Or lock them in a room together, throw in a couple of knives, wait about an hour... then shoot the survivor.

Lizzy

Link to comment
Guest CharlieRose
I think the USA would do well to follow some of the UK anti-hate laws.. because they see nutjobs like this silenced, imprisoned and in some cases deported or made to find sanctuary elsewhere. These dinosaurs are not welcome in a modern liberal (small "l" because it is probably the least free country in Europe) state..

I dunno, that might kind of go against American philosophy in general. Our first part of the Bill of Rights is free speech. And the first rule about free speech is that even if you don't like it, it doesn't mean you have a right to shut them up. What is it... there's a quote by Voltaire, something like "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." Or maybe it's only falsely attributed to Voltaire. But whatever. It's a good quote.

We're a nation of all kinds of people, even hateful ones. (Heck, 140 years ago it was half our country, lol!) (You know, the confederacy.) Plus, we get accused of being on a moral high horse enough already, this would do nothing good for us. Can you imagine the field day some countries we're currently in high tension with would have if we "banned" some of their citizens?

Link to comment

I increasingly understand why people in this thread feel the way they do. Nonetheless, I am appalled. As a long time listener to the Savage Nation, I can tell you firsthand Savage is not nice. By since when is nice a necessity? Though I don't agree with all of what he spews, Savage reminds us we live in a cruel, pitiless, violent world and there is no possibility of escaping that. Plus he readily pokes holes in the bubbles that pass for liberal thought these days. Savage is the third most popular radio host in America; do you really think banning him is going to make the world a better place? The Germans banned the cup cakes for a while in the 20s, membership exploded. If you think Savage is a problem, it is best to understand he is a symptom, not a cause.

What makes Savage so angry is not only particular policy. It is the liberal/progressive mindset that there are some thoughts which are appropriate and some which are not and THEY have the right to pick which ones. This creed, if it helps us as transfolk in the short term, is massively destructive to the concept of liberty. You cannot force civility, you cannot enforce niceness, you can silence those who you find unpleasant, but you will never quiet their minds and they will win sympathy with those that fear your bullying, which is what you are actually doing. It's not that they wants this, they depend on it for their long term designs, everyone from White Supremacists to libertarians to Communists. Decorum and decency have NO PLACE in the public forum. Only the absolute, fearless pursuit of truth regardless of who it hurts or seems to hurt.

If we, as the trans community, had the power and decided to ban anyone from calling us 'mentally ill, demon possessed social degenerates,' or the like, what would happen? We should expect that our opponents will be driven underground, but the masses will wonder why we fear this position so much we will punish those who express it? We could make our case then and it is a good case, but it will be taken as one-sided propaganda. And they would be right to feel so. I was never an anti-Semite, but any inclination I had in that direction was cured by lurking at Stormfront and watching the posters there showing their utter ignorance and wrongness (not moral, but factual!) Morris Dees would have that site shut down; I say it's the most potent inoculation against White Supremacy there is. Likewise, we would do best by allowing the transphobic bigots to spew, and make fools of themselves, and disgust those whom they might otherwise be able to court. It's just human nature to sympathize with any persecuted group, even neo-cup cakes because no one likes a bully. If we truly have a solid argument, and we do, we can take them in a fair fight and win. And we should, because evil and stupidity scurry from the light like cockroaches.

If you despise Dr, Weiner's arguments so much, the worst thing you can do is muzzle him or mock him. If you mop the floor with his ilk, you will seal the hydra's head, and in Weiner's case particularly, after he's done spitting and cursing, if he doesn't change his opinion totally, he will respect you more. I've seen it happen over the years.

Link to comment
Guest Zenda

Kia Ora,

Freedom of speech is all well and good ....But....

:rolleyes: "A bigot's mind is like the pupil of the eye-the more light one shines upon it-the more it will contract!"

People like Savage are 'mentally challenged' they are not going to change,whilst their ego is being fed-that is America 'allowing' him to broadcast his 'hate speech' over the airways...

Britain is finally coming to it's senses-when will America do the same???

Metta Jendar :)

Link to comment
Kia Ora,

Freedom of speech is all well and good ....But....

:rolleyes: "A bigot's mind is like the pupil of the eye-the more light one shines upon it-the more it will contract!"

People like Savage are 'mentally challenged' they are not going to change,whilst their ego is being fed-that is America 'allowing' him to broadcast his 'hate speech' over the airways...

Britain is finally coming to it's senses-when will America do the same???

Metta Jendar :)

Holmes may be correct with his definition of a bigot, but that would not be Savage. Savage is mean and has a low tolerance for BS, but he has changed his mind, or modified his views several times in my experince.

Furthermore, you best marginallize a fool and a maniac by letting him run his mouth. If the Czar had let Lenin and his run their mouths freely, I seriously doubt there would have ever been a Red Revolution, in spite all the bone-headed mistakes of Kerensky's provisional government. Speaking of which, if you supress even a vile hate monger, not only does their anger and extremism increase, but sympathy with the masses as well, meaning if you do fall from power, your enemies can move against you with even greater public support. This is why Hitler had to incremintally increase his persecution of his enemies, because Germany was a free society before and he needed time to goad people into genocide. Lenin on the other hand hung aritstocracts, police officers and kulaks from every lamppost in every city across the Motherland, to the wild jubulation of the crowd.

Yo CANNOT air out a room by forcing the stink into the corner. Likewise you cannot eliminate hatred by supressing it. I have my own hatreds; maybe my mind would contract like a pupil with good information, but I'll tell you this, telling me not to discuss it and dismissing me out of hand A. only convinces me I'm right even more cause in my experince, terminating the conversation means you have lost and won't admit defeat, and B. It makes me madder than Hell. You can't do any worse than debate me, assuming you're actually right. Otherwise I will destroy you. And that's the way it should be if we are to be free.

Link to comment
Kia Ora,

Freedom of speech is all well and good ....But....

:rolleyes: "A bigot's mind is like the pupil of the eye-the more light one shines upon it-the more it will contract!"

People like Savage are 'mentally challenged' they are not going to change,whilst their ego is being fed-that is America 'allowing' him to broadcast his 'hate speech' over the airways...

Britain is finally coming to it's senses-when will America do the same???

Metta Jendar :)

Jendar, you always want people to think and I admire that in your threads so I would like to make you think about this carefully before you answer - let's say the 'bigot ' in question is not spewing hatred against the transgendered community but agianst the entire practice of Buddahism?

Would you still want him banned, would you applaud if the USA took him off of the air?

Would you feel that Britain has finally come to it's senses?

No, the problem with banning the freedome of speech for anyone is that it leads to the banning for everyone.

Freedom of speech is protected until it is used to insight riote or treason other wise you are free to your opinion wheither I agree or not.

I do not like this jerk but in the words of a great Americam - I do not agree with a word that you say, but I will defend to my death your right to say them.

We awant to be heard and unfortunatlly so does he - he got fans and asponsers - go get some and go on the air with the 'Gentle Midnfulness Hour' and I will listen - I do not listen to Savage - that's how freedom of speech works.

Love ya,

Sally

Link to comment
Guest Zenda

Kia Ora,

In one sense you both are right…From a Buddhist perspective I’m not offended by what others say about me or for that matter Buddhism, after all as far as I’m concerned you have every right to say what you like, I may not agree with what you say but you have every right to say it…But this does not mean that I condone ‘hate speech’ –that can incite hatred that could lead to unrest and violence…And I guess that’s just how Britain feels when it comes to ‘banning’ certain people from entering the country on the bases of what they openly represent…

I guess I will never fully understand the American psyche when it comes to 'freedom of speech'...Remember that Christian counsellor Jacob :rolleyes: remind me, why was he 'banned' was it something he said or represented???

Metta Jendar :)

Link to comment

This site is not an example of a 'public' airway - it is not a government agency, it is privately owned and operated so the owner has certain responsibilities and indeed legal responsibilities over everything that gets posted here and the United States is such a litigious country - we sue Mc Donald's because we are over weight or because our coffee is too hot - if we think you have money and we have a problem you will be sued! And defending anyone's freedom of speech is not a defense in 'civil court'.

The 'American Psyche' is unfathomable to those outside who really believe that we have anything like personal freedom - we don't, a little more than in Singapore, but then our streets aren't that clean or safe. We cling to our freedom of speech and view it as our right to complain and the right to bare arms is the other one - we have given up all others, even the right to vote has been prooven to be a waste of time our last President lost two elections and served both terms - what a joke and we are now buried over our heads in the debts and wars that his administration started and had no clue how to stop - A really high price to pay so that a few executive buddies of the Vice-President to get rich and some even pardoned.

We are a country on the verge of collapse, we have already lasted longer than any other Democracy in History but we are not doing so well now because we have always counted on war boosting the economy and this depression is going on during a war - they've run out of ideas - how do we fix the real problem - uncontrolled capitalism can not work - someone will have to own it all and will not care who he has to crush to get it.

No total freedom is Anarchy and no freedom is totalitarianism and we are somewhere in between with our elected (sometimes) royalty and their total lack of understanding what the working poor really need.

I'll get off of my soapbox, because no one with any power will ever listen to me - I can't get them any money, political friends or power so I don't exist.

Love ya,

Sally

Link to comment
  • Who's Online   8 Members, 0 Anonymous, 191 Guests (See full list)

    • MaeBe
    • missyjo
    • Ashley0616
    • Evelyn J
    • MaybeRob
    • RaineOnYourParade
    • Betty K
    • Abigail Genevieve
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.7k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,033
    • Most Online
      8,356

    ArtavikenGenderflui
    Newest Member
    ArtavikenGenderflui
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. afraid of self
      afraid of self
    2. Chaidoesart
      Chaidoesart
      (14 years old)
    3. Faith57
      Faith57
    4. Joyce Ann
      Joyce Ann
      (70 years old)
    5. Kelly21121
      Kelly21121
      (56 years old)
  • Posts

    • missyjo
      abigail darling what about extensions or a wig? be brave n hang in there  to thine own self be true  good luck
    • RaineOnYourParade
      When I first started figuring things out, I got a lot more euphoria. Every time a friend would use he/they pronouns for me, I'd get this bubbly feeling, and seeing myself look masculine made me really happy. Dysphoric state felt more normal, so I guess I noticed the pain it caused me less.   Now, it's more just that my pronouns and such things feel natural, and dysphoria is a lot stronger -- I know what's natural, so experiencing the opposite is more jarring than everything. The problem is, most of my natural experiences are from friends, and I rarely get properly gendered by strangers, much less by my family. I've found myself unable to bind in months due to aches, colds,, and not wanting to risk damage.    It partially makes me want to go back to the beginning of my journey, because at least then I got full euphoria. I'm pretty sure it'll be like this until I medically transition, or at the very least get top surgery (you know all those trans dudes online with tiny chests? Not me, unfortunately). It's a bit depressing, but at least I know that, eventually, there's a way out of this.
    • RaineOnYourParade
      Major mood, right here ^^^    I've listened to Lumineers to a long time (a major portion of it by osmosis via my mom), so that is almost painfully relatable
    • RaineOnYourParade
      As for getting a button-up/formal pants suit, you can try to talk to her more -- Cis women in tuxes have worn tuxes in recent years, after all, (for example, Zendaya) so it can still be a relatively safe topic. For jumpsuits, I'd recommend going with a simple one with a blazer, if you can -- this'll make it look overall more masculine. There's a lot of good brands, but going for one without a lot of extra glitz on it will make it look less feminine under a blazer. I don't know many specific brands though since I usually just get my stuff from chain stores, sorry :<   When it comes to your hair, if you can't cut it, you can look up tutorials on fluffing it up instead. If you can pull it off, it can look a lot shorter and more androgynous instead!
    • RaineOnYourParade
      As far as I'm aware, he wasn't -- he just sometimes wore skirts, which was why it was a question in the first place.   In my opinion, part of that is because of the way press spares attention on issues like that. As a bit of a true crime nut and what I see: Child predator cases' (and cases of a sexual nature in general) press focus on those with an AMAB perpetrator generally, and very rarely are AFAB perpetrators given much press time or even getting tried due to a whole bunch of issues I'm not gonna get into. Because of this, when you see these types of cases and a boy is the victim, it's almost always a queer person who is the one who committed a crime that gets press. Therefore, with the amount of cases seen with this type of perpetrator (and due to the fact "99% of queer people are not sexual criminals" doesn't attract eyes), the human brain can kind of naturally makes an association with it. It's not right, but it's also a fault I think falls partially on the media.   That's all my opinion, though!   This is extra confusing to me, as a feminine man is usually viewed as gay. If someone is refusing the acknowledge the existence of trans people, then gay would be the societal connection that comes after, I think. So, that sorta implies that trans women wouldn't be interested in women in the first place by those assumptions? Of course, trans lesbians exist (most trans women I know like women, actually), but it's a little ridiculous to me that people will deny trans people's existence, call all feminine AMAB people gay, and say that trans people are looking to peep all in the same breath.   Wow, this was a lot longer of a response than I was planning to write--
    • Abigail Genevieve
      For one thing, the practice of putting into office wholly unqualified people simply because of racial, sexual or national characteristics.  It is no accident that Karine is a Haitian immigrant, Black and lesbian.  Kamala Harris is a Black female. Pete Buttigieg is gay.  Often you find that Biden explicitly stated that this is why he hired them, not because of competence, but because they checked so many boxes on his little list.  It makes a mockery of people and is a disservice to the US. 
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I am not sure why people are in favor of unaccountable agencies with bloated budgets and wasteful spending. 
    • Abigail Genevieve
      What about it?
    • SydneyAngel
      Hey girl  I had a problem like you happen to me also. In my first year of estrogen I had a period where my level were good then they got really bad where my testosterone spike high.  I felt like you with all that disforia coming hard. Our bodies need time to adjust. The process is a real pain in the beginning. It levels out eventually and you don't even think about it. Hang in there hugs 
    • Ivy
      Biden's woke agenda?
    • KatieSC
      I wonder if there will be law enforcement procedural shows coming this fall. I can imagine Law and Order: Genital Crimes Unit, or perhaps, FBI: Domestic Genitalia. Then again, maybe they will dedicate a CSI program about the dedicated members of the Oklahoma State Police Genital Screening Unit. Good to know that those Oklahomans have their priorities squared away.
    • KatieSC
      Protections? Well, when they mandate that some who is transgender can get facial and genital electrolysis paid as it is essential to affirming care, or when they mandate and pay for facial feminization surgery, speech therapy/voice affirmation surgery, I will believe that the order is effective. One of biggest hurdles for many transgender individuals is the cost of care. I remember when my one insurance company tried to say that my speech therapy and voice surgery were "cosmetic". I remember when they blocked paying for my facial surgery. I remember the fight I had to get electrolysis. These procedures could save someone's life if the procedures help the individual successfully transition, and are no longer misgendered. 
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I don't think it should be.  Nor do I see Project 2025 as pushing Christian nationalism.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      The agencies are supposed to work for him.  The problem, as conservatives found out in Trump 1, was they will ignore the president and do their own thing.  The agencies are supposed to be under his control.   Congress delegated some of its law making authority to the agencies, which is another problem.   The bloated federal government needs to be trimmed.  Dept Education is worthless - test scores have dropped since it was instituted in the Carter administration consistently, and it is currently implementing Biden's woke agenda more than doing anything else.
    • FinnyFinsterHH
      I hope to eventually wear a suit for dance but don't know what exactly to look for. I feel like jumpsuit is safe option but I have been interested in wearing button up and formal pants. Is there a certain brand i should look for or sites I should look at for tips? My mom is not exactly keen on me wearing too masc clothing like suits just yet but is okay with jumpsuits. Also is there hair styling tips availible, my hair looks like image below. I might be able to get shorter haircut like pixie but am not sure yet.  
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...