Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

The scientific definition of biological sex


Dana Michelle

Recommended Posts

I've seen people make claims that scientifically, transition does not actually change someone's sex, and that transgender women will always be biological males and transgender men always biological females. I think most of these people are probably assuming instead of researching the science. Does anyone know what the scientific interpretation really is? Is there even a scientifically correct answer? When a biology teacher was discussing the categorization of organisms into kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus, species, she said there is no right or wrong way to categorize. Could it be the same for the definition of biological sex?

Link to comment
35 minutes ago, MaryMary said:

But if you use the following language : sex = genitals and reproductive organs and gender = the social construct, psychological aspect. Then, no, transition do not change your sex. But, it can certainly have an effect on how well you sexual functions will work... lol

I am asking about the sex of the body not the gender of the mind. One thing I am wondering is if the definition of biological sex is exclusively based on genitals or if it includes secondary sex characteristics. If sex is determined by genitals and if transition does not change sex, does that mean after vaginoplasty or phalloplasty, transgender women's vaginas are still technically penises, and transgender men's penises are still technically vaginas?

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

I think that biologists would be the first to admit that the classification of sex is very superficial.  A field biologist studying squirrels or foxes or whatever is going to look for visible genitalia.  It is exactly the same as a doctor attending the birth of a human baby: "Congratulations, Mrs. Smith.  It's a boy!"  Same thing: it is a very superficial classification based on what they can see at a glance.

 

Anything more rigorous than that is going to be very specific.  They will say that they are studying chromosomes, or hormone levels, or social interactions.  None of which are the kind of thing that you get from a quick glance.

Link to comment
  • 2 weeks later...

In high school biology, a student was doing a presentation on Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome. He said the encyclopedia said people with AIS are men because they have a Y chromosome. The teacher discussed things a bit during the presentation and did not correct the student. At another time the teacher said all fetuses start out female because they have female characteristics in the early weeks of pregnancy. However, the Y chromosome still exists at this time, so if chromosomes are the definition, doesn't that still technically make XY fetuses male, even before sexual differentiation? I've heard many, many times that fetuses start out female, leading me to believe that someone with female characteristics but a Y chromosome does not necessarily mean they are technically male.


Long ago I've also read things that made it sound like gonads were the definition of sex. This definition would imply those with AIS are technically male since they have testicles. In any case, I think people who claim that is "basic biology" that transwomen are male and transmen are female should cite scientific sources to back up their claims. I haven't been able to find scientific sources to answer the question, but Wikipedia says, "Anisogamy, or the size differences of gametes (sex cells), is the defining feature of the two sexes. By definition, males have small, mobile gametes (sperm); females have large and generally immobile gametes (ova or eggs)."  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_and_gender_distinction. The rest of the section then describes ordinary dictionary definitions rather than scientific definitions.  Using gametes as the definition of sex does not explain how to categorize those who don't produce gametes.

 

Link to comment

Classification is messy and is based on groupings by majority of similar indicators, they typically do not account for all variation.  Sex is no different.  There are species that have little to no sexual dimorphism (differences between sexual groups) and the rest that do have a wide range of levels of variance between groups.  Even with a single sexually dimorphic species, there is typical a wide variety of expression.  Where most people fall down is limiting the grouping to only 2 classifications (male/female).  This is a result of limited scientific knowledge in the past and has become so entrenched in societies around the world, it's hard to get people to update their knowledge.  In species like ours, where there is a lot indicators that allow for grouping into 2 groups, this is based on average indicators based on 2 overwhelming majorities.  In reality there are likely many smaller populations that should have a classification as well, but we run into the problem of where do you draw the line at refining those populations. Do you add intersex and transgender as 2 additional classifications? Or do you further breakdown those groups and add more classifications? What about individuals that are born missing some of the key characteristics used do define any of the groups?  There are people born without gonads, a vulva, a penis, a uterus, etc.  There are people born with many different combinations of chromosomes.  This is why I prefer the sliding scales of gender or sexual attraction (not perfect as they leave out the ability to not even be on the scale), with a large majority of individuals containing most of the characteristics of male/female or hetero/homo  to develop the poles and having the degrees of variation represented in between the poles.

 

So classification of any populations is arbitrary and messy, someone(s) has to select which criteria result in the classification into one of the groups that they decided exist based on their observed data and then convince the majority of people that this is the best system.  For sex, I have seen several different models of classification employed, none are right, none are wrong, it all depends on your data set and the selected sorting criteria. Where people go wrong is in using those classifications for anything other than scientific study or medically relevant purposes.  There is no good argument for policy governing rights to be driven or guided by these classifications, sex, race, gender, etc.  The group we all belong to is homo sapien and all homo sapiens should have the same unalienable rights.

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

This is very good descriptive narrative on this difficult subject. You can see why we as children (without the assistance of our parents or some scholar specializing in gender and sexuality) had no chance to figure things out for ourselves. Even at my age, I’m trying to figure out exactly where I fit into this spectrum although it is clearer now than it’s ever been.

 

3 hours ago, SaraAW said:

There is no good argument for policy governing rights to be driven or guided by these classifications, sex, race, gender, etc.  The group we all belong to is homo sapien and all homo sapiens should have the same unalienable rights.

I agree. In a perfect world, you would have to hope this would be the case. For centuries, money, power, and politics have corrupted the system at its core with these ever-increasing classifications to ‘divide and conquer’ it’s citizenry. We’ve seen it used in the past as it is being used today and likely our future.

 

Susan R?

 

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 97 Guests (See full list)

    • Betty K
    • awkward-yet-sweet
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      769.2k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,051
    • Most Online
      8,356

    Luna29
    Newest Member
    Luna29
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. ciara
      ciara
    2. Jamieleann
      Jamieleann
      (62 years old)
    3. Lukey19252
      Lukey19252
      (22 years old)
    4. Maye
      Maye
      (66 years old)
    5. Spirefreedom
      Spirefreedom
      (21 years old)
  • Posts

    • awkward-yet-sweet
      Wow, Birdie, I hope you get better soon.  At least the nurses figured out that you're not their standard patient.  Hopefully they treat you right.     I wish my husband would replace our stoves.  Of course we use propane, being way out of town, but they're old.  They are supposed to use a battery igniter, but one hasn't worked in years.  There's actually a hole sawed in the bottom plate of the oven where I stick a match.  And the other one had some sort of valve problem, and couldn't get the parts.  I was hoping for a new stove, but I got to watch in awe and dismay as my husband made a "something" with a piece cut from a roll of bulk automotive gasket material.  It works, no leaks.  But I swear we don't replace anything here until it is absolutely dead.  With my luck, that will be another 20 years on those stoves.      I don't complain much, but I wish I had some nicer kitchen things.  Nobody understands that if I'm serving dinner for 36 people, cooking on sheetmetal plates or using stuff from a 1980s junkyard is a bit....suboptimal.  When I mention it, I get lengthy apocalyptic tales of the deprived life in Argentina or Mexico or "In Soviet Union, stove cooks you..."  Thanks, GF.  Or maybe I'm just too spoiled?
    • KayC
      I do the best I can to 'Pass' and I think I have become better at feminizing my appearance ... But, I have also come to realize that no matter how much I feel I pass, it's more up to the individual I interact with than with my efforts and appearance. If they are self-aware humans they will see me as I truly am ... and then I will receive a compliment, or a 'Ma'am', or just a friendly smile.  That's all I really need.
    • MaybeRob
      In my case, at almost 9 months, most changes have been very subtle. I was 60 when I started, and overweight. Also, I am not very observant when it comes to changes. In the last 3 months I have been on T blockers and breast growth have definitely started having suffered irregular "ouchies", but at the same time I have been slowly losing fat, so Bust measurements have not changed. What has changed in the density, I can feel a difference. Face wise the skin feels softer, and my lashes seem to be more visible. Head hair regrowth is a maybe- maybe not situation.  I do have to select men's clothing carefully to camouflage the change in breast shape. I guess I'm still at the not passable as a female stage especially with no makeup. I'm also over 6 foot and well over 100kgs which I guess is problematic to start with!   Hope this helps somewhat   Kate .
    • EasyE
      I started feminizing HRT about 6-7 weeks ago. I began with what I called the beginner's patch. I immediately found myself wanting to level up to the next dose and did that this week (yay!). So far, I am enjoying the ride.   I've read everything I can find on this topic. For the HRT vets on here, what is reasonable to expect in terms of physical changes for someone starting in their 50s? I know "your mileage may vary." I guess I am curious if I stay on my current trajectory for six months, a year, multiple years, how pronounced will the physical changes be? Will I reach a point where it is totally obvious or will I land in a "middle zone" somewhere in which I could pass either way?   Thanks! Like I said I am enjoying the ride so far and always curious to know others' experiences. Not sure anyone else in my life will be excited about these moves I am making, but I have been over that in many places on here already so need to rehash... Love and blessings to all!   Easy
    • April Marie
      Sending prayers and love!
    • Birdie
      Being admitted into the hospital after a long ER visit. I started passing lots of blood and they are keeping me for observation.    Nurse came in to see about a condom catheter, that of course doesn't work on me. 🤣   She said, "I guess we will use incontinence supplies on you."  
    • Ivy
      Yeah.  I think this is what it is about.  Since they are not transgender, nobody else could possibly be either.  I'm not sure that a cisgender person can understand being transgender.  But that hardly means that a transgender person's experience is not real - just because it is not theirs. Why is a transgendered person's experience not valid, while a cisgendered person's is?  Why should it be the cisgendered person that decides? Nobody is forcing a cis person to transition.  What I do for myself is my own business.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      @maebe   It sounds exciting.  I hope all goes well.   Abby
    • Adrianna Danielle
      Decided to head for Lowes after work early and bought a new stove.Was in stock and put it back of my truck.Luckily a neighbor of mine whom does appliance repair did come to remove the connection and convert the stove to natural gas in the new one.Was set up for propane.Happy with it and the scrap metal guy came to pick up my old one.He was happy to get it,said he needed one more to make it a load in his trailer full of junk appliances
    • Maddee
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I've been thinking it is a matter of belief.  They simply do not believe someone can validly be transgender and should not be allowed to practice their beliefs, but should be forced to practice their belief, that is, that there is no such thing as transgender and it is all mental illness/sin/hormonal imbalance. 
    • KatieSC
      I am really kind of sick of everybody who is not transgender deciding on what we need and do not need in the way of procedures. They act like all of this is play acting, and we can just apply cosmetics to our entire body. It might be refreshing if someone asked us directly what services we need in order to transition. I could say more as I am frustrated, but I do not want to violate the TOS.
    • Emily Chen
      Thanks a lot for letting me know! Unfortunately, I'm not available during this time period. Have a great meeting!
    • missyjo
      April good it looks like you've been successful with it. I'm glad  sorry bitchy mood not related to you or here be well dear
    • Ivy
      I discovered her "Whipping Girl" when my egg first cracked.  It helped me understand some things.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...