Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Trump is putting a neon lit target on our backs.


Erikka

Recommended Posts

20 hours ago, The Viv Element said:

you make people feel unsafe in their own country & on these forums

 

Not singling out Viv by any means, but from a more general perspective, ALL of us need to take a deep breath and try to stay away from first person 'criticisms'. Attack is too strong a word. 

 

Trump is an ass, on that we can all pretty much agree. Just read his Twitter feeds. But I like to think that, as a result, he'll be the architect of his own downfall. I won't allow myself to become emotional about such a politically charged discussion, and if I wasn't crazy busy today, I'd elaborate why. I'd rather use my energy for more constructive efforts that might bring about change. I think that in one of your unrelated previous posts, Viv, you mentioned something to the effect that 'once you react, they can see that. Then they gotcha and it helps to feed their egos'. Well said. I think it applies here, today.

 

I guess that what I'm saying is that Transgender Pulse should be a safe place to express our ideas, opinions, etc without fearing hostile reactions. Suzanne1 should have the same ability  to speak her mind without fear of intense, first person criticism. IMHO

Link to comment

What prompted the vitriolic thread is the attack on transgender people by the president, an attack that not only hits at transgender folk but to all LGBTQ. It is NOT that the transgender community is seeking more rights than any other group, it is that ALL minorities are under attack from this president, a message that is very clear, if you are not white and straight, there is no place for you here. A message that to his more fervent followers sends a message that those not within "The Club" are inferior, less than human, a pestilence to be eradicated, a drain of resources that should only be given to those who think like trump. It is not about superior rights...it is about equal rights. Equal=the same, no preferential treatment of any segment of this nation.

In Genesis God gives man dominion over the world...but the definition of dominion is stewardship NOT domination. Those are two very different words with very different meanings. The trans community does not seek to dominate over any other group, just as Black Lives Matter is not any higher status than all lives matter. Equality, dignity, the right to exist and breathe the same air, as put forth by the U.S. Constitution.. the right to pursue life, liberty and justice.

When the president, the person who is to lead and unite the country, openly and loudly, discriminates against women, persons of color, the LGBTQ community, the media, and any group that he dislikes,  those of his followers who share his discriminatory and hateful sentiments, feel free to not only verbally attack but also physically attack the very groups the president has issues with. 

We are at a level of disunity that exceeds the chasm of the hawks and doves of the 60's. A president should be the instrument of unity. What we have is president who encourages a dialogue of disunity and his followers will listen and I fear will act. 

I live in California. A state that I feel is a safer place for people like me...but that like the wind can change in a moment.

Link to comment
58 minutes ago, Patti Anne said:

 

Not singling out Viv by any means, but from a more general perspective, ALL of us need to take a deep breath and try to stay away from first person 'criticisms'. Attack is too strong a word. 

 

Trump is an ass, on that we can all pretty much agree. Just read his Twitter feeds. But I like to think that, as a result, he'll be the architect of his own downfall. I won't allow myself to become emotional about such a politically charged discussion, and if I wasn't crazy busy today, I'd elaborate why. I'd rather use my energy for more constructive efforts that might bring about change. I think that in one of your unrelated previous posts, Viv, you mentioned something to the effect that 'once you react, they can see that. Then they gotcha and it helps to feed their egos'. Well said. I think it applies here, today.

 

I guess that what I'm saying is that Transgender Pulse should be a safe place to express our ideas, opinions, etc without fearing hostile reactions. Suzanne1 should have the same ability  to speak her mind without fear of intense, first person criticism. IMHO

Nobody needs to attack anybody or call them names either. The president is obviously a danger to himself, because of his lack of understandings. Reasons why discussion is so important. We all should have the ability to reach the same page and move on. "The president" had to observe interior of official bunker. Why? So curious... His dietary consumption is also well documented, as well as his affairs. I guess he just likes publicly eating his own feet and shouting his "stable genius" as far as ears and eyes can see. "Witness me! Shiny and Chrome" - Mad Max

I'm happy he's so talkative on twitter, otherwise I wouldn't be able to have quotes to warrant my conclusions and solutions. Best part is we also have video footage, and voice recordings for the kids to remember. And they will... Too bad he doesn't read very much. I heard he loves them pictures, especially if he's in them. So much data. Love them charts and graphs at least I understand their importance.

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

No personal attacks please, everyone gets a chance here,

 

Thanks

Link to comment
22 hours ago, Suzanne1 said:

Well, I voted for Mr. Trump when he ran for the Presidency in 2016, and I will vote for President Trump in the 2020 election.  I voted for him initially because I believed that he would restore the USA to its former greatness.  I will vote for him again in order to both preserve & continue the gains this country has made during his first term in office.  As far as being a hateful person, I disagree.  I am a supporter of President Trump; personally, I like him & admire his style.  If he wins the 2020 election, my family & I look forward to another invitation to his inauguration.

 

 

Another of the many reasons I have & will vote for Donald Trump for President of the United States.  Between the appointments to the US Supreme Court and other federal courts, I believe our Constitutional Republic will be protected from those who wish to destroy it for at least another generation.

 

 

Hopefully, not another Franklin Roosevelt.  My spouse's family & untold others, especially those living in rural areas, suffered greatly under that Roosevelt's reign as President of the USA.

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

By the way, what precipitated this vitriolic thread?  Was it that AP-story in the News Sub-forum about the "Trump Administration Revokes Transgender Health Protection" removing privileged/protected status for TG's???  Yeah, I read that-----I just figured I'd be able to get by w/ the same equal rights as everyone else in the country.  I mean, why do TG's need to be a protected (privileged?) class???  I really don't get it-----I'm pretty certain most folks on this TG-Pulse Forum would agree that being TG is not a mental illness, at least in & of itself.  Certainly, I don't think that our TG/TS status qualifies us as being physically disabled.  Just what is it that warrants our inclusion as a protected group/class, entitled to special considerations/privileges?   With increasing frequency, I'm thinking that an awfully large majority of our TG-population just isn't satisfied with equal rights, we seem to be in a constant quest for superior rights.

 

Just my 2-cents worth, and as I've often stated that doesn't buy much entertainment or patronage, these days.

why do TG's need to be a protected (privileged?)  

 

WHY? Because:

https://www.hrc.org/blog/hrc-releases-annual-report-on-epidemic-of-anti-transgender-violence-2019

https://time.com/5601227/two-black-trans-women-murders-in-dallas-anti-trans-violence/

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/27/us/transgender-women-deaths.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_people_killed_for_being_transgender

 

In the same way that WOMEN FOUGHT FOR THE RIGHT TO VOTE

In the same way that POC FOUGHT FOR THE RIGHT TO LIVE (AND CONTINUE TO DO SO)

affirmative action

immigrants

asians

latinx

the need for LGBTQ

naacp

 

Are these enough examples of why minorities need protection from violence? How many more people need to be raped and killed to warrant protect-for the HUMAN right to walk the street without being attacked for just existing? I. I can't write anymore or it's gonna be vitriolic.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment

Here, here, very well said, @Patti Anne and @Erikka!  Personal attacks are counter-productive, just like the riots and looting we're seeing.  I have mostly tuned out this administration and the news because it brings way too much negativity into my life.  At least until issues come up that affect me and "my kind" directly such as this attack on transgender health care.  That doesn't mean I don't care about the injuries to other groups, it just means I can only care so much before my own emotional health is threatened.  Yes, I'm limited but I don't just sit on the sidelines in ignorance or defiance.

 

I hope my comments on this thread are seen as factually based and not a criticism of anyone's else's thoughts or feelings.  I try really hard not to take or make politics personal.  My concern is always on the well-being of all Americans.

 

On that note, one thing I would like to add to my earlier comments is that this administration and republicans in general are always talking about "protecting capitalism".  Folks, capitalism is doing just FINE, it's the people who need some help now.

 

Despite the controversies and our current shortcomings, I think we are living in the greatest age in the history of the world.  I certainly don't see any time in humanity's past that I would want to go back to.  At the moment, things seem more complicated than ever, but that's just a sign of growth.

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

Hi everyone,

I believe trump did this almost entirely for political reasons. With all the trouble he's having over race issues and protests, his pathetic response to the pandemic, and the economy, there has been a little softening in support from the right wing evangelicals. With all the distractions right now, the only two groups that will really take big notice of this are the LGBTQ community and the right wing evangelicals. I don't think trump really cares all that much about the LGBTQ community either way. But he desperately needs the right wing evangelicals coming to the poles in droves this November. That is also why he did that horrible photo opp with the Bible in front of that church. Unlike the photo opp fiasco, attacks on the LGBTQ community will not be controversial with the right wing evangelicals. Anything he does to us, the evangelicals will applaud and support. As things go worse for trump, he may target us again. We're marginalized and a relatively safe target for trump right now.?

 

Hopefully we will have a new President this January. Let's just hang on to that hope!?

 

Lots of love,

Timber Wolf ?

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Cyndee said:

No personal attacks please, everyone gets a chance here,

 

Thanks

I agree!

Link to comment
  • Admin

OK, I have reviewed the entire Topic here, and by my count almost everyone has had two shots at comment here and no one has changed anyone's mind and is taking out of it what they went in with.  I am going to cut off commenting for at least 24 hours to let the dust settle. 

Link to comment
  • VickySGV locked this topic
  • Root Admin

Should this topic be reopened, I would request that every one read and heed rule #6 of the community rules.

 

The following behavior is strictly forbidden everywhere on the site: flame wars, trolling, deliberately provoking arguments, intentionally insulting others or yourself. . . you get the idea.

Link to comment
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 217 Guests (See full list)

    • MaeBe
    • SamC
    • Ivy
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,029
    • Most Online
      8,356

    Selkimur
    Newest Member
    Selkimur
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Anyatimenow
      Anyatimenow
      (23 years old)
    2. Aria00
      Aria00
    3. Ava B.
      Ava B.
      (24 years old)
    4. Claire Heshi
      Claire Heshi
    5. CrystalMatthews0426
      CrystalMatthews0426
      (41 years old)
  • Posts

    • Ivy
      Got a new Granddaughter this morning.  Mother and child (and father) are doing fine. This makes 7 granddaughters and one grandson.  I have 2 sons and 6 daughters myself.  And then I  switched teams.  I think this stuff runs in the family. Another hard day for the patriarchy.
    • Ivy
      Like @MaeBe pointed out, Trump won't do these things personally.  I doubt that he actually gives a rat's a$$ himself.  But he is the foot in the door for the others.   I don't really see this.  Personally, I am all in favor of "traditional" families.  I raised my own kids this way and it can work fine.  But I think we need to allow for other variations as well.   One thing working against this now is how hard it is for a single breadwinner to support a family.  Many people (I know some) would prefer "traditional" if they could actually afford it.  Like I mentioned, we raised our family with this model, but we were always right at the poverty level.   I was a "conservative evangelical" for most of my life, actually.  So I do understand this.  Admittedly, I no longer consider myself one. I have family members still in this camp.  Some tolerate me, one actually rejects me.  I assure you the rejection is on her side, not mine.  But, I understand she believes what she is doing is right - 'sa pity though. I mean no insult toward anyone on this forum.  You're free to disagree with me.  Many people do.   This is a pretty complex one.  Socialism takes many forms, many of which we accept without even realizing it.  "Classism" does exist, for what it's worth.  Always has, probably always will.  But I don't feel like that is a subject for this forum.   As for the election, it's shaping up to be another one of those "hold your nose" deals.
    • Ivy
      Just some exerts regarding subjects of interest to me.
    • Ivy
      Yeah.  In my early teens I trained myself out of a few things that I now wish I hadn't.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I was thinking in particular of BLM, who years ago had a 'What We Believe' section that sounded like they were at war with the nuclear family.   I tried to find it. Nope.  Of interest https://www.politifact.com/article/2020/aug/28/ask-politifact-does-black-lives-matter-aim-destroy/   My time is limited and I will try to answer as I can.
    • Ivy
      Well, I suppose it is possible that they don't actually plan on doing what they say.  I'm not too sure I want to take that chance.  But I kinda expect to find out.  Yet, perhaps you're right and it's all just talk.  And anyway, my state GOP is giving me enough to worry about anyway. I remember a time when being "woke" just meant you were paying attention.  Now it means you are the antichrist. I just don't want the government "protecting" me from my personal "delusions."
    • MaeBe
      1.  I think there are some legitimate concern.   2. Thoroughly discussing this will consume many threads.   3. I disagree partially with @MaeBe but there is partial agreement.   4. The context includes what is happening in society that the authors are observing.  It is not an isolated document.   The observation is through a certain lens, because people do things differently doesn't mean they're doing it wrong. Honestly, a lot of the conservative rhetoric is morphing desires of people to be treated with respect and social equity to be tantamount to the absolution of the family, heterosexuality, etc. Also, being quiet and trying to blend in doesn't change anything. Show me a social change that benefits a minority or marginalized group that didn't need to be loud.   5. Trump, if elected, is as likely to spend his energies going after political opponents as he is to implementing something like this.   Trump will appoint people to do this, like Roger Severino (who was appointed before, who has a record of anti-LGBTQ+ actions), he need not do anything beyond this. His people are ready to push this agenda forward. While the conservative right rails about bureaucracy, they intend to weaponize it. There is no question. They don't want to simplify government, they simply want to fire everyone and bring in conservative "warriors" (their rhetoric). Does America survive 4 year cycles of purge/cronyism?   6. I reject critical theory, which is based on Marxism.  Marxism has never worked and never will.  Critical theory has problems which would need time to go into, which I do not have.   OK, but this seems like every other time CRT comes up with conservatives...completely out of the blue. I think it's reference is mostly just to spark outrage from the base. Definitely food thought for a different thread, though.   7. There are groups who have declared war on the nuclear family as problematically patriarchal, and a lot of other terms. They are easy to find on the internet.  This document is reacting to that (see #4 above).   What is the war on the nuclear family? I searched online and couldn't find much other than reasons why people aren't getting married as much or having kids (that wasn't a propaganda from Heritage or opinions pieces from the right that paint with really broad strokes). Easy things to see: the upward mobility and agency of women, the massive cost of rearing children, general negative attitudes about the future, male insecurity, etc. None of this equates to a war on the nuclear family, but I guess if you look at it as "men should be breadwinners and women must get married for financial support and extend the male family line (and to promote "National Greatness") I could see the decline of marriage as a sign of the collapse of a titled system and, if I was a beneficiary of that system or believe that to NOT be tilted, be aggrieved.   8.  Much of this would have to be legislated, and this is a policy documented.  Implementation would  be most likely different, but that does not mean criticism is unwarranted.   "It might be different if you just give it a chance", unlike all the other legislation that's out there targeting LGBTQ+ from the right, these are going to be different? First it will be trans rights, then it will be gay marriage, and then what? Women's suffrage?   I get it, we may have different compasses, but it's not hard to see that there's no place for queer people in the conservative worldview. There seems to be a consistent insistence that "America was and is no longer Great", as if the 1950s were the pinnacle of society, completely ignoring how great America still is and can continue to be--without having to regress society to the low standards of its patriarchal yesteryears.    
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      Cadillac parts are pretty expensive, so repairing them costs more.  But they don't seem to break down more than other makes.  Lots of Lincoln models use Ford cars as a base, so you can get parts that aren't much more expensive.    My family has had good luck with "Panther platform" cars.  Ford Crown Victoria, Mercury Marquis, Lincoln Towncar or Continental.  4.6 V8 and 5.0 V8.  Reasonable fuel economy, and fairly durable.  Our county sheriff's office was running Chargers and SUV's for a while, but has gone back to older Crown Victorias for ease of maintenance.  GF rebuilds them here.  But they are getting more scarce, since the newest ones were made in 2011.    1992-1997 years were different than the later years.  1998-2001 they did some changes, and apparently the best years are 2003 to 2011.  Check Craigslist, and also government auctions.  GF has gotten a lot of them at auction, and they can be had in rough-but-running shape for around $1,000.  Ones in great shape can be found in the $5,000+ range.  Good for 200,000 miles without significant rebuilding.  Go through engine and transmission and electrical systems, and they go half a million.    Some Chrysler models are OK.  The 300 mostly has the same engines as the Charger and Challenger, so parts availability is pretty good.  But they tend to get timing issues.  The older Chrysler Sebring convertibles were pretty reliable, sometimes going 200,000 miles without tons of problems, although after that they were pretty much worn out. 
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I think I have read everything the Southern Baptists have to say on transgender, and it helped convince me they are dead wrong on these issues.  They can be nice people.  I would never join an SBC church.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      You come across as a thoughtful, sweet, interesting and pleasant person.    There are parts of this country, and more so the world, where evangelicals experience a great deal of finger wagging.
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      It has been an interesting experience being in a marriage in a Christian faith community, yet being intersex/trans.  I stay pretty quiet, and most have kind of accepted that I'm just the strange, harmless exception.  "Oh, that's just Jen.  Jen is...different."  I define success as being a person most folks just overlook. 
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      Well, I live in an area with a lot of Southern Baptists, Evangelicals, etc...  We've experienced our share of finger-wagging, as the "standard interpretation" of Scripture in the USA is that the Bible only approves of "one man, one woman" marriage.  My faith community is mostly accepted here, but that has taken time and effort.  It can be tough at times to continue to engage with culture and the broader population, and avoid the temptation to huddle up behind walls like a cult.    Tolerance only goes so far.  At one point, my husband was asked to run for sheriff.  He declined, partly because an elected official with four wives would have a REALLY tough time.  (Of course, making way less than his current salary wasn't an option either). 
    • Abigail Genevieve
      My bone structure is far more female than male.  I can't throw like a guy, which has been observed by guys numerous times, and moving like a woman is more natural.  It just is.  I'm not going out of my way to act in a fem. way, as you say, but I am letting go of some of the 'I am not going to move like that because I am a guy' stuff I have defensively developed.  The other breaks through anyway - there were numerous looks from people at work when I would use gestures that are forbidden to men, or say something spontaneously no guy would ever say.   At one point, maybe a year or more ago, I said it was unfair for people to think they were dealing with a man when they were actually dealing with a woman.    Girl here.  'What is a woman' is a topic for another day.
    • Willow
      Mom, I’m home!  What’s for lunch?   Leftover pizza .   ok.    Not exactly our conversation but there is truth in the answer.     @KymmieLsorry you are sick. Feel better soon.   Girl mode, boy mode no mode, not us. Nothing functional for either of us.   anyone here have or had a 10 year old (plus or minus) Caddy, Lincoln or Chrysler?  How was it?  Lots of repairs?  Comfortable seats? Anything positive or negative about it?  I need to replace my 2004 Ford Explorer Eddie Bauer, it’s eating $100 dollar bills and needs a couple of thousand dollars worth of work and that doesn’t even fix the check engine code.  Obviously, it isn’t worth putting that kind of money into a 20 year old car with a 174 thousand miles.   Willow
    • Ashley0616
      Oversized pink shirt, pink and black sports bra
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...