Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Being Considerate to our Non-Binary Friends with Language


Recommended Posts

  • Forum Moderator

So I wanted to take a moment to talk about including our non-binary members. I'd like to remind all my friends here at TransGenderPulse that not everyone identifies in the neat little boxes we call "male" and "female, "boys" and "girls," or even "men" and "women." For some of us, nature had other plans.

 

One of my favorite people in the world is intersex and genderfluid. They like to be identified as "he" or "she" depending on how they're presenting on that particular day. That's OK. I try my best to accommodate them. Sometimes I screw up and need to be corrected. That's OK because we're friends.

 

One of my oldest friends is bigender. They like to be referred to as "he" or "she" depending on how they're presenting that particular day. Fortunately for my slow brain, they tend to go all-out when they're presenting feminine so that's an easy switch for me to make.

 

I've got more friends, some I've made here and some out into the world who don't identify with either gender. They prefer to be addressed as they/them or just friend. I like friend the best. We're all friends here, right? I'd like us to stay friends and keep our circle growing. It's always good to have more friends.

 

Language is a powerful tool. It shapes our perception of the world. It lets us communicate our ideas. It helps us preserve knowledge for future generations. Like most tools, it can be used to help or harm. I'd like all my transgender friends to stop and think about how it feels to be mis-gendered. I want you to remember how deep the words cut when somebody calls you "sir" or "ma'am" when that's not who you are. Your cheeks heat and you get that lump in your throat. Your inner self screams at the world that it isn't who you are, but you choke on it. It has to roll off your back. You mustn't make a scene.

 

Now stop and think about what words like, "ladies" and "bros" do to all of us who don't fit into those neat little boxes. Sure, I like being referred to as a woman. I am a woman. We have members that like being referred to as men. That's OK, they're men. There are more choices than those two little boxes though. I think it's our duty when posting publicly to be as inclusive as we can. We're all friends here. Calling our fellow travelers friend instead of "ladies" or "my dudes" isn't really a hardship, is it?

 

Sometimes, we can say things in the moment that we don't mean. We can say things without thinking. I think we can be better. Isn't that what being your true self is about in the end? Being the absolute best version of yourself that you can be?

 

Hugs!

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

Thank you for this Jackie.  We can say things in the moment but its important to self correct.  Its important to be the best version of ourselves and recognize that others are doing so as well.

 

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Jackie C. said:

Fortunately for my slow brain, they tend to go all-out when they're presenting feminine so that's an easy switch for me to make.

 

My only issue is this part. It's unfortunate to have a slow brain. But you aren't slow brained. It's still a learning experience that still need work to reinforce the habit.

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

Fair enough, but being too hard on myself is something my therapist and I are working on. I had a much more difficult time with the lovely non-binary person who helped me get legal support with TLDEF. Admittedly, I've never met them in person, but I'm still kicking myself for slipping up with their pronouns during our correspondence.

 

Hugs!

Link to comment

Thank you Jackie. We are the first ones who should make the effort to gender correctly our friends. If we who understand what that means and how it hurts don't make the effort, how can we ask cis people to make the same effort?

 

I know I need to pay more attention myself.

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Jackie C. said:

Fair enough, but being too hard on myself is something my therapist and I are working on. I had a much more difficult time with the lovely non-binary person who helped me get legal support with TLDEF. Admittedly, I've never met them in person, but I'm still kicking myself for slipping up with their pronouns during our correspondence.

 

Hugs!

But at least you recognize and try to correct the mistake. One small step for everybody, can be one giant leap for human kind. You have all my ? s

Link to comment

Thank you for posting this, @Jackie C.. I strive to use everyone's preferred name and pronouns whenever I can and I ask if I'm unsure. I also make a concerted effort to use gender-neutral language whenever possible. I do hope that people let me know if I make a mistake and that I never intend to use the wrong pronouns or language. But language is indeed a funny thing. Words in many languages have a gender assigned to them, so a binary way of linguistic thinking is ingrained into our brains just as much as the social and cultural aspects of gender are. I agree that simply having awareness of and being sensitive to these issues are the first steps towards creating a more inclusive world for everyone across all gender identities and expressions.

 

Love,

~Audrey.

Link to comment
  • 4 months later...

I’m in danger of making a rod for my own back. I’ve thought about where I sit on the non binary ‘scale’ and, it’s shifting at the moment. 
 

Now, I might want to place myself at a point where I would like neutral pronouns. At the same time, there are some people who know that I’m transitioning to non binary. (Is that terminology correct? Can you transition from amab to neutrois, or is transitioning purely like..... mtf?). Anyway, if somebody turned round to me and said ‘I think you’re now more female than male, then I’d be tempted to tell them to use she/her if they wished. 
equally, I’d be somewhat concerned that I’d like overstepped my target. I don’t want to present as female, at the moment, I think, but that could be denial or something. 
 

I’ll wrap this up with..... I just do not know what pronouns or gender to use with myself at the moment and I’m having difficulty deciding what others should call me. 
 

 

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator
2 hours ago, PixieOfTheHills said:

I’ll wrap this up with..... I just do not know what pronouns or gender to use with myself at the moment and I’m having difficulty deciding what others should call me. 

 

Let us know and we will do our best. We will screw up from time to time. I try my best, but gender neutral pronouns are rough for my calcified brain to process for some reason. Nobody's perfect. What matters is that they try.

 

For now though, let's just call you friend. OK?

 

Hugs!

Link to comment
  • Admin

Thanks for this topic, Jackie.  It's very important.  As long as I've been here, and as many times as I interact with community members IRL, I am still often confused and I find using pronouns like "they/them" awkward.  It's just that folks from my generation aren't used to it, and it takes us time to make the adjustment.  But like you said, we need to try our best, and I think that goes a long way.  What more people from the cis-world, right?  I've always tried to cut cis-folk a lot of slack, as long as they aren't misgendering and using the wrong pronouns in a hurtful way.  For me, as long as they make an effort, its all good.

 

Carolyn Marie

Link to comment

It goes further with me.....

 

 because I’m now so aware that I shouldn’t use the wrong pronouns etc, it spills over into even talking about people in general. Eg. Yesterday I was posting about somebody I know and I was worried about referring to ‘her’, because as far as I know...... that’s what....... they...... are. It’s like I’m now scared to use her/she/him/his at all about....... anybody!!!

 

 If I ever get told off about using the wrong pronouns, I’m going to feel so bad...... hence my extreme caution. 
 

on a slightly parallel vein, my name & ‘sometimes dead’ name. I am known to nearly everybody by my given name. But I’ve chosen an androgynous name I use with the few select people who know I’m non binary. Now, Is this a bad thing to do? I ask myself. It’s being deceitful, perhaps? I don’t know. I’ll speak to my therapist about it, who knows my dead name and chosen name, the latter of which she uses. 

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

It's a good topic to raise Jackie, and some of the points here have raised just how complicated it is, even for us who are better placed to understand.

 

My current view is really to worry little if the person adressing us is being natural and not deliberately negative. For one thing, unless someone is obviously who they feel or know they are then the uninitiated cannot really be chastised for getting it wrong. When I read here on the forum I myself often find it difficult to ascertain correct gender and pronouns so I am certain the general population will, and probably always will, get it wrong.

 

I raise this point, bearing in mind that I read in the news this week about the fallout from a railway employee anouncing with ' ladies and gentlemen' : https://uk.news.yahoo.com/railway-firm-apologises-non-binary-093229536.html

 

My own view, even though speaking as someone who is ~ non binary -> mtf is that this is just political correctness gone mad. I know others will have a different view but I am not looking for discussion of this, just giving an example of how extreme things may get if everyone would want their different ways with recourse to litigation etc if they didn't get their way. There are many views on any situation and I think the danger for everyone is for people to take or give offence on a whim, no matter how slighted they feel.

 

If, or more probably when, I get it wrong please accept my apologies as I am only human.

 

Tracy

Link to comment

I totally agree Tracey. The thing is, I find, that the media gets involved and in order to turn news into entertainment, they blow everything up sensationally to the point where people are led to a negative view of something, which results in bad publicity. There’sa certain morning TV presenter  here in the uk who relishes doing this. 

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator
1 hour ago, PixieOfTheHills said:

There’sa certain morning TV presenter  here in the uk who relishes doing this. 

 

Yeah, we have those in the US too. They're looking for clicks/views and outrage drives up their ratings. It's like reality TV: You find a batch of the CRAZIEST SOBs you can dredge up and use them to represent your show because that'll get the audience tuning back in.

 

If the crazy happens to reinforce the world-view of your audience, that gets them coming back and there's a whole layer of "turn the serfs against each other" baked in. It's just a mess. Things were ever so much saner in the days before the 24-hour news cycle. Now it's all "fill time" and "rile-up the base!"

 

Hugs!

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   6 Members, 0 Anonymous, 163 Guests (See full list)

    • Carolyn Marie
    • Abigail Genevieve
    • RaineOnYourParade
    • MaeBe
    • Ivy
    • awkward-yet-sweet
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,029
    • Most Online
      8,356

    Selkimur
    Newest Member
    Selkimur
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Anyatimenow
      Anyatimenow
      (23 years old)
    2. Aria00
      Aria00
    3. Ava B.
      Ava B.
      (24 years old)
    4. Claire Heshi
      Claire Heshi
    5. CrystalMatthews0426
      CrystalMatthews0426
      (41 years old)
  • Posts

    • MaeBe
      1.  I think there are some legitimate concern.   2. Thoroughly discussing this will consume many threads.   3. I disagree partially with @MaeBe but there is partial agreement.   4. The context includes what is happening in society that the authors are observing.  It is not an isolated document.   The observation is through a certain lens, because people do things differently doesn't mean they're doing it wrong. Honestly, a lot of the conservative rhetoric is morphing desires of people to be treated with respect and social equity to be tantamount to the absolution of the family, heterosexuality, etc. Also, being quiet and trying to blend in doesn't change anything. Show me a social change that benefits a minority or marginalized group that didn't need to be loud.   5. Trump, if elected, is as likely to spend his energies going after political opponents as he is to implementing something like this.   Trump will appoint people to do this, like Roger Severino (who was appointed before, who has a record of anti-LGBTQ+ actions), he need not do anything beyond this. His people are ready to push this agenda forward. While the conservative right rails about bureaucracy, they intend to weaponize it. There is no question. They don't want to simplify government, they simply want to fire everyone and bring in conservative "warriors" (their rhetoric). Does America survive 4 year cycles of purge/cronyism?   6. I reject critical theory, which is based on Marxism.  Marxism has never worked and never will.  Critical theory has problems which would need time to go into, which I do not have.   OK, but this seems like every other time CRT comes up with conservatives...completely out of the blue. I think it's reference is mostly just to spark outrage from the base. Definitely food thought for a different thread, though.   7. There are groups who have declared war on the nuclear family as problematically patriarchal, and a lot of other terms. They are easy to find on the internet.  This document is reacting to that (see #4 above).   What is the war on the nuclear family? I searched online and couldn't find much other than reasons why people aren't getting married as much or having kids (that wasn't a propaganda from Heritage or opinions pieces from the right that paint with really broad strokes). Easy things to see: the upward mobility and agency of women, the massive cost of rearing children, general negative attitudes about the future, male insecurity, etc. None of this equates to a war on the nuclear family, but I guess if you look at it as "men should be breadwinners and women must get married for financial support and extend the male family line (and to promote "National Greatness") I could see the decline of marriage as a sign of the collapse of a titled system and, if I was a beneficiary of that system or believe that to NOT be tilted, be aggrieved.   8.  Much of this would have to be legislated, and this is a policy documented.  Implementation would  be most likely different, but that does not mean criticism is unwarranted.   "It might be different if you just give it a chance", unlike all the other legislation that's out there targeting LGBTQ+ from the right, these are going to be different? First it will be trans rights, then it will be gay marriage, and then what? Women's suffrage?   I get it, we may have different compasses, but it's not hard to see that there's no place for queer people in the conservative worldview. There seems to be a consistent insistence that "America was and is no longer Great", as if the 1950s were the pinnacle of society, completely ignoring how great America still is and can continue to be--without having to regress society to the low standards of its patriarchal yesteryears.    
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      Cadillac parts are pretty expensive, so repairing them costs more.  But they don't seem to break down more than other makes.  Lots of Lincoln models use Ford cars as a base, so you can get parts that aren't much more expensive.    My family has had good luck with "Panther platform" cars.  Ford Crown Victoria, Mercury Marquis, Lincoln Towncar or Continental.  4.6 V8 and 5.0 V8.  Reasonable fuel economy, and fairly durable.  Our county sheriff's office was running Chargers and SUV's for a while, but has gone back to older Crown Victorias for ease of maintenance.  GF rebuilds them here.  But they are getting more scarce, since the newest ones were made in 2011.    1992-1997 years were different than the later years.  1998-2001 they did some changes, and apparently the best years are 2003 to 2011.  Check Craigslist, and also government auctions.  GF has gotten a lot of them at auction, and they can be had in rough-but-running shape for around $1,000.  Ones in great shape can be found in the $5,000+ range.  Good for 200,000 miles without significant rebuilding.  Go through engine and transmission and electrical systems, and they go half a million.    Some Chrysler models are OK.  The 300 mostly has the same engines as the Charger and Challenger, so parts availability is pretty good.  But they tend to get timing issues.  The older Chrysler Sebring convertibles were pretty reliable, sometimes going 200,000 miles without tons of problems, although after that they were pretty much worn out. 
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I think I have read everything the Southern Baptists have to say on transgender, and it helped convince me they are dead wrong on these issues.  They can be nice people.  I would never join an SBC church.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      You come across as a thoughtful, sweet, interesting and pleasant person.    There are parts of this country, and more so the world, where evangelicals experience a great deal of finger wagging.
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      It has been an interesting experience being in a marriage in a Christian faith community, yet being intersex/trans.  I stay pretty quiet, and most have kind of accepted that I'm just the strange, harmless exception.  "Oh, that's just Jen.  Jen is...different."  I define success as being a person most folks just overlook. 
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      Well, I live in an area with a lot of Southern Baptists, Evangelicals, etc...  We've experienced our share of finger-wagging, as the "standard interpretation" of Scripture in the USA is that the Bible only approves of "one man, one woman" marriage.  My faith community is mostly accepted here, but that has taken time and effort.  It can be tough at times to continue to engage with culture and the broader population, and avoid the temptation to huddle up behind walls like a cult.    Tolerance only goes so far.  At one point, my husband was asked to run for sheriff.  He declined, partly because an elected official with four wives would have a REALLY tough time.  (Of course, making way less than his current salary wasn't an option either). 
    • Abigail Genevieve
      My bone structure is far more female than male.  I can't throw like a guy, which has been observed by guys numerous times, and moving like a woman is more natural.  It just is.  I'm not going out of my way to act in a fem. way, as you say, but I am letting go of some of the 'I am not going to move like that because I am a guy' stuff I have defensively developed.  The other breaks through anyway - there were numerous looks from people at work when I would use gestures that are forbidden to men, or say something spontaneously no guy would ever say.   At one point, maybe a year or more ago, I said it was unfair for people to think they were dealing with a man when they were actually dealing with a woman.    Girl here.  'What is a woman' is a topic for another day.
    • Willow
      Mom, I’m home!  What’s for lunch?   Leftover pizza .   ok.    Not exactly our conversation but there is truth in the answer.     @KymmieLsorry you are sick. Feel better soon.   Girl mode, boy mode no mode, not us. Nothing functional for either of us.   anyone here have or had a 10 year old (plus or minus) Caddy, Lincoln or Chrysler?  How was it?  Lots of repairs?  Comfortable seats? Anything positive or negative about it?  I need to replace my 2004 Ford Explorer Eddie Bauer, it’s eating $100 dollar bills and needs a couple of thousand dollars worth of work and that doesn’t even fix the check engine code.  Obviously, it isn’t worth putting that kind of money into a 20 year old car with a 174 thousand miles.   Willow
    • Ashley0616
      Oversized pink shirt, pink and black sports bra
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I think you mean the worst possible interpretation of 2025 situation.  Keep in mind that there are those who will distort and downright lie about anything coming from conservatives - I have seen it time and time again.  It's one of the reasons I want to read the thing slowly and carefully.  They want you to be very, very afraid. 
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Here is where the expectation is that the stereotypical evangelical comes in finger wagging, disapproving and condemning.    Not gonna do that.   You have to work these things out.  Transgender issues put a whole different spin on everything and God understands what we are going through. I have enough trouble over here.  :)
    • Ivy
      You do you. You seem to be in a safe place if we end up with a 2025 situation.  But a lot of us are not.
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      Well, my marriage is different.  I'm actually part of a multi-partner marriage.  Like you see in the Book of Genesis.  My husband has four wives...and me.  I was kind of an accident, as our community sets the "reasonable maximum" at four wives, but that's a long story.  Plural marriage is approved in my faith community, with the exception of spiritual leaders, as described in 1 Timothy 3.  We believe that anything that isn't specifically prohibited is permitted.    The purpose of marriage is for people to work together, demonstrate the love of God, and to have children.  My faith believes in exponential reproduction - big families with lots of kids, both as a blessing and with the intention of using the size of our population for political ends.  Being intersex/trans and unable to bear children, I wouldn't have been a good candidate to be somebody's only spouse (the majority of our community tends toward traditional couple marriage).  Since my husband has other partners, I don't have to worry about the childbearing aspect, and I help out with raising our family's kids.  I'm a "bonus parent."    I'm not 100% open about my intersex/trans nature, although my community's leaders are aware of me.  Being transgender isn't condemned, but it is seen as a health problem derived from an imperfect, fallen world and an environment polluted with chemicals.  Since I'm married, I have a safe place to be, and I can live how I need to live.    I firmly believe the advice given in 1 Corinthians 7.  We don't totally own our bodies.  God gets a say, as I believe He created us to be male or female, not something outside the binary.  I don't think that transition without discussion with partners is OK....again, we don't totally own ourselves.  When I started to figure myself out, that was actually the main thing on my mind - will my partners accept me?  How will my position in the family change?  Since my partners don't really have a problem with the mild version of transition that I wanted to do, it has all been good. 
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      Indeed.  While it seems like the majority of LGBTQ+ folks vote for Democrat candidates, not everybody drinks the Kool-Aid.  I'm a registered Independent, since I vote for individuals rather than party.  One of my trans friends is very pro-Trump - wears her MAGA hat and everything.  I find it interesting to see the reactions she gets... folks aren't always as tolerant as they claim to be.  Even on this forum, you get some real flak from Democrat voters....many will insist that the California way is the only way.    In my opinion, "Project 2025" isn't the real problem.  Check out UN "Agenda 2030."   
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      While Biden may be more friendly to trans folks, I'm not a single-issue voter.  I just can't choose a Democrat candidate, as I believe their actions will destroy my community and way of life.  Biden just announced that he wants to significantly increase capital gains taxes.  Maybe he intends to "tax the rich" but that is going to affect everything from land sales to grocery prices to the cost of electricity and even folks' retirement savings, as most companies make a large amount of their profits through investing in the market.  It is absolute lunacy to think that increased cost or reduced profits won't be passed on to the rest of us.  Things are going to get way worse at this rate.    Mostly, I vote in elections for state and local issues, as the national government is about as pleasant as a Porta-Potty in July.  So, either I'll do a write-in vote for president, or I'll check the box for Trump.  Anything but Biden.     
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...